[GitHub] [solr] epugh commented on pull request #1248: SOLR-10470: setParallelCacheRefreshes should be deprecated in favor of SolrClientBuilder methods

2022-12-31 Thread GitBox
epugh commented on PR #1248: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1248#issuecomment-1368218658 thanks for the comments folks. Running a full test, and waiting for the jenkins main branch to finish, and then will merge this. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.

[GitHub] [solr] epugh commented on pull request #1248: SOLR-10470: setParallelCacheRefreshes should be deprecated in favor of SolrClientBuilder methods

2022-12-30 Thread GitBox
epugh commented on PR #1248: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1248#issuecomment-1367889316 Okay, any angst to me merging this? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the spec

[GitHub] [solr] epugh commented on pull request #1248: SOLR-10470: setParallelCacheRefreshes should be deprecated in favor of SolrClientBuilder methods

2022-12-29 Thread GitBox
epugh commented on PR #1248: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1248#issuecomment-1367286764 I just fixed the lint problem. While it would be good to think about what properties should be settable and which should be system properties, I actually am thinking that is out of scope. I

[GitHub] [solr] epugh commented on pull request #1248: SOLR-10470: setParallelCacheRefreshes should be deprecated in favor of SolrClientBuilder methods

2022-12-29 Thread GitBox
epugh commented on PR #1248: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1248#issuecomment-1367285064 > > left a few minor comments, overall this looks good. > > is updating the `objectList` method on the table? I find this code a bit ugly (bigger change would be to use an array everywhere,

[GitHub] [solr] epugh commented on pull request #1248: SOLR-10470: setParallelCacheRefreshes should be deprecated in favor of SolrClientBuilder methods

2022-12-27 Thread GitBox
epugh commented on PR #1248: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1248#issuecomment-1366267147 I think I've responded to everythign from @dsmiley and @stillalex.. Only change I haven't made is to eliminate this property and replace it with a system variable... That feels like a bit

[GitHub] [solr] epugh commented on pull request #1248: SOLR-10470: setParallelCacheRefreshes should be deprecated in favor of SolrClientBuilder methods

2022-12-27 Thread GitBox
epugh commented on PR #1248: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1248#issuecomment-1366263569 > left a few minor comments, overall this looks good. > > is updating the `objectList` method on the table? I find this code a bit ugly (bigger change would be to use an array everywhere

[GitHub] [solr] epugh commented on pull request #1248: SOLR-10470: setParallelCacheRefreshes should be deprecated in favor of SolrClientBuilder methods

2022-12-23 Thread GitBox
epugh commented on PR #1248: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1248#issuecomment-1364110212 So, `setParallelCacheRefreshes` appears to be a odd setting Does anyone actually change it/use it? Or do we all just use the default of 3? There don't appear to be any tests for it..

[GitHub] [solr] epugh commented on pull request #1248: SOLR-10470: setParallelCacheRefreshes should be deprecated in favor of SolrClientBuilder methods

2022-12-23 Thread GitBox
epugh commented on PR #1248: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1248#issuecomment-1364109540 So...I can't get a clean run of tests on any branch of solr on my laptop -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [solr] epugh commented on pull request #1248: SOLR-10470: setParallelCacheRefreshes should be deprecated in favor of SolrClientBuilder methods

2022-12-23 Thread GitBox
epugh commented on PR #1248: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1248#issuecomment-1363888032 So, with these changes, a lot of tests fail... For example "DistributedExpandComponentTest" -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log