Oswald Buddenhagen writes:
>>I totally understand as well that spending time setting this
>>up without actually knowing how many people would be willing to get on
>>board might sound like a waste of time (hence my question to other
>>fellow users) :)
>>
> if i'd count the time spent on just
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 09:57:12AM +0100, Nacho Barrientos wrote:
I was initially suggesting Github sponsors as of today AFAIK they don't
take any fee for 1-to-1 sponsorship and they charge in USD, allowing
non-USD-native donors to work around terrible currency conversion rates
by using
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 06:21:51PM +, Sabahattin Gucukoglu wrote:
One-way (possibly stateless) sync, [...]
i'm not sure which of the named behaviors you consider requirements, and
which just happen to be things imapsync does, so here are three ways to
do it *somehow* with isync:
the
On 13 Dec 2021, at 18:27, Simão Afonso wrote:
> On 2021-12-13 18:21:51, Sabahattin Gucukoglu via isync-devel wrote:
>> One-way (possibly stateless) sync, with optional deletion of messages from
>> the source, with optional removal of empty folders. I am aware that this can
>> be implemented
On 2021-12-13 18:21:51, Sabahattin Gucukoglu via isync-devel wrote:
> On 13 Dec 2021, at 17:49, Oswald Buddenhagen
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 02:26:13PM +, Sabahattin Gucukoglu via
> > isync-devel wrote:
> >> Not that I would wish to prejudice the author(s) of imapsync, another
On 13 Dec 2021, at 17:49, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 02:26:13PM +, Sabahattin Gucukoglu via
> isync-devel wrote:
>> Not that I would wish to prejudice the author(s) of imapsync, another paid
>> tool for IMAP migration, but what would it take for mbsync, whose
Hi,
Oswald Buddenhagen writes:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 01:14:37PM +0100, Nacho Barrientos wrote:
>>Nowadays, iSync is an essential part of my computing.
>>
> pedantically, it's better to avoid this capitalization, as it's
> apple's (much younger and now defunct) trademark.
Pedantically, but
On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 02:26:13PM +, Sabahattin Gucukoglu via
isync-devel wrote:
Not that I would wish to prejudice the author(s) of imapsync, another
paid tool for IMAP migration, but what would it take for mbsync, whose
interface and configuration I much prefer, to be usable for one-way
Not that I would wish to prejudice the author(s) of imapsync, another paid tool
for IMAP migration, but what would it take for mbsync, whose interface and
configuration I much prefer, to be usable for one-way syncs in the fashion of
imapsync? And, yes, I’ll pay for it. As patron, not as
Done. I was looking for payment info earlier but haven't gone as far as asking
for it - so thanks for Both! I think this should be added to github or the
webpage.
I'm incredibly grateful for this fantastic piece of software, using it hourly
with a variety of syncs for two accounts.
Best
On Sun, Dec 12, 2021 at 01:14:37PM +0100, Nacho Barrientos wrote:
Nowadays, iSync is an essential part of my computing.
pedantically, it's better to avoid this capitalization, as it's apple's
(much younger and now defunct) trademark.
I couldn't find though any way to donate money on the
Hi all,
Nowadays, iSync is an essential part of my computing. I use it daily to
sync both my personal and my work email. I imagine that the current
maintainers (maintainer?) are lucky to have a day job paying the bills,
however personally I'd be very happy to modestly support the project
12 matches
Mail list logo
