De: Andrew Robinson
Enviado: terça-feira, 2 de junho de 2020 01:45
Para: Antonio Scuri; r...@gnu.org
Cc: IUP discussion list.
Assunto: Re: [Iup-users] IUP License Questions
>I see only one download for IUP, not many. The GPL license appears to say that
>ALL code linked with GPL source
De: Andrew Robinson
Enviado: terça-feira, 2 de junho de 2020 01:45
Para: Antonio Scuri; r...@gnu.org
Cc: IUP discussion list.
Assunto: Re: [Iup-users] IUP License Questions
>I see only one download for IUP, not many.
Those who use the IUP librar
On 2020-06-02 11:15, Andrew Robinson wrote:
> I see only one download for IUP, not many. The GPL license appears to say that
> ALL code linked with GPL source (that would mean all the GPL static
> libraries), must also be disclosed under a GPL license. By providing GPL
> static libraries in a singl
I see only one download for IUP, not many. The GPL license appears to say that
ALL code linked with GPL source (that would mean all the GPL static
libraries), must also be disclosed under a GPL license. By providing GPL
static libraries in a single IUP package instead of having the users download
i
If we put everything together in a single library, then no, it is not
legal. But we don't.
That's exactly why we split in several libraries. Each secondary library
can have its own license if necessary. The documentation of each library
reflects this.
BTW the documentation cleary displays "
I'm still not seeing direct links to the great many copyright licenses that I
had no idea existed until a few days ago. It is not reasonable to expect users
of IUP to comb through each and every source file to search for any licensing
that was not mentioned at the outset in the documentation. At a
t scrub each "src" subdirectory in the IUP source code?
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Antonio Scuri
> *Sent:* Monday, June 1, 2020 12:48 PM
> *To:* Moore, Tysen
> *Cc:* arobinso...@cox.net; IUP discussion list.
> *Subject:* Re: [Iup-users] IUP L
ntonio Scuri
Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 12:48 PM
To: Moore, Tysen
Cc: arobinso...@cox.net; IUP discussion list.
Subject: Re: [Iup-users] IUP License Questions
Just added a few more references for the license of the third party
libraries. It is on SVN for now.
But no, they are documented o
Just added a few more references for the license of the third party
libraries. It is on SVN for now.
But no, they are documented only at their respective IUP library page.
BTW if you red the COPYRIGHT files, then you actually red their licenses
too. Unfortunately legality text is confusing.
That was my difficulty as well. I can't seem to find the third party licenses
in the documentation (https://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/iup/). I have also
checked the various "COPYRIGHT" and "README" files and can't find anything
either. It would be useful to have the "Overview" documentation tha
"Each of IM, CD or IUP libraries that use third party libraries that have a
license term different than IUP, has a separate page in the documentation"
Where in the documentation? I can easily find the IUP license in the
documentation, but not any third party licenses. All the licenses should be i
G'day,
A couple of comments about including/excluding libraries,
that superficially look good, but may require more effort
to realise:
1. The Good:
IUP's top-level Makefile has an "EXCLUDE_TARGETS=..."
feature, so that subtargets can be switched in/out from the
command line.
There's relatively
Each of IM, CD or IUP libraries that use third party libraries that have
a license term different than IUP, has a separate page in the
documentation. If you use those libraries you should check their
documentation. In their documentation there should be a note about the
license terms, and usually
I can't seem to find it so can you give a link to the online IUP documentation
where it lists all the third party functions and their licenses?
Best Regards,
Andres
On 2020-05-29 at 8:36 AM, Antonio Scuri wrote:
Yes, in the IUP, CD and IM documentation we include the license terms of all
thi
It might be useful for other users if the documentation clearly listed these
libraries and their licenses as potential license problems below the statement,
"IUP is free software, can be used for public and commercial applications.". A
simple listing would make it easier for users to know of po
Yes, in the IUP, CD and IM documentation we include the license terms of
all third party libraries.
Best,
Scuri
Em sex, 29 de mai de 2020 12:33, Andrew Robinson
escreveu:
> Ola,
>
> "*When using LGPL you can if the library is in an external module, for
> instance in a DLL. And you must inclu
Ola,
"When using LGPL you can if the library is in an external module, for instance
in a DLL. And you must include its license text in the distribution"
Does PUC-RIO have a copy of all the licenses required for their independently
licensed features in the distribution or IUP/IM/CD website, or d
Hi,
1. Are there other IUP dependencies that require this library?
No, all these libraries are independent features. You can simply ignore
them. You must link with the specific library to use it, and then be
dependent of its license requirements.
2. There is no way this code can be used with a
We are using the IUP framework to create a commercial application. The
decision to use this framework rested upon the statement; "IUP is free
software, can be used for public and commercial applications". Unfortunately,
our license compliance team has flagged some issues within IUP. It would
19 matches
Mail list logo
