Virus scanning mailet/matcher

2003-06-06 Thread james-subscribe
Hi all! Does anybody have virus scanning mailet/matcher ready for production usage? Actually even it needs changes i would be appreciate for link or for source code. It became very urgent since new virus attack in Europe using holes in M$ Outlook. -- Best regards, james-subscribe

RE: Virus scanning mailet/matcher

2003-06-06 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
giugno 2003 11.45 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Virus scanning mailet/matcher Hi all! Does anybody have virus scanning mailet/matcher ready for production usage? Actually even it needs changes i would be appreciate for link or for source code. It became very urgent since new virus

RE: Virus scanning mailet/matcher

2003-06-06 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
is required. I need a mailet to avoid having an ugly matcher condition string as is currently used. Vincenzo -Original Message- From: Steve Brewin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: venerdi 6 giugno 2003 12.09 To: 'James Users List' Subject: RE: Virus scanning mailet/matcher Vincenzo

Re: Virus scanning mailet/matcher

2003-06-06 Thread Carlos Cortés del Valle
But in fact is something to address, and my plans are to change it from being a matcher that does everything to being a mailet that has 2 special init parms: a headerNamemy [EMAIL PROTECTED]/headerName and a scanAlwaystrue/false/scanAlways. If you could name the header as you want, I think the

RE: Virus scanning mailet/matcher

2003-06-06 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Message- From: Carlos Cortés del Valle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: venerdì 6 giugno 2003 13.17 To: James Users List Subject: Re: Virus scanning mailet/matcher But in fact is something to address, and my plans are to change it from being a matcher that does everything to being a mailet

RE: Virus scanning mailet/matcher

2003-06-06 Thread Steve Brewin
Vincenzo Sounds like you are way ahead of me! -- Steve -Original Message- From: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 June 2003 12:00 To: James Users List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Virus scanning mailet/matcher Steve, you are right

Re[2]: Virus scanning mailet/matcher

2003-06-06 Thread james-subscribe
of the virus infected email adds an SB X-MessageIsInfected: false header to the envelope? SB -- Steve -Original Message- From: Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 June 2003 10:47 To: James Users List; james-subscribe Subject: RE: Virus scanning mailet/matcher

RE: Re[2]: Virus scanning mailet/matcher

2003-06-06 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
Subject: RE: Virus scanning mailet/matcher See http://www.mailet.org/directory.html The antivirus invoker matcher works, and is catching the new W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus in my production system. If you need any help let me know. Vincenzo SB

Re: Re[2]: Virus scanning mailet/matcher

2003-06-06 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
:00 PM Subject: RE: Re[2]: Virus scanning mailet/matcher Ok, but the reason for all this, as said in my message, is to avoid scanning more than once. Look at this example (in my own system): 1) A message is received. 2) The IsInfected matcher looks for the header, doen't find it, then scans

RE: Re[2]: Virus scanning mailet/matcher

2003-06-06 Thread Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
to be scanned. And there could be James administrators not willing to block by extension. Vincenzo -Original Message- From: Hontvari Jozsef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: venerdì 6 giugno 2003 15.11 To: James Users List Subject: Re: Re[2]: Virus scanning mailet/matcher (you can simply

RE: Virus scanning mailet/matcher

2003-06-06 Thread Noel J. Bergman
The point is that this header is written in order to have more flexibility writing config.xml, and to avoid scanning more than once. Mail attributes will fix this issue. You would set a header unless you need to use a header to communicate with another MUA/MTA. --- Noel