Hi all,
I've moved the Jato mailing list to Google Groups:
http://groups.google.com/group/jatovm?hl=en
I did this because SF.net mailing lists are slow, the archives are
crappy, and I got tired of fighting spam through mailman admin
interface. While Google Groups might not be the perfect
As we are doing a call, we must specify all caller-saved registers as
clobbered.
Cc: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu eduard.munte...@linux360.ro
Cc: Arthur HUILLET arthur.huil...@free.fr
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
arch/x86/call.c |5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
arch/x86/emit-code.c| 12
arch/x86/include/arch/instruction.h |1 -
arch/x86/instruction.c |1 -
arch/x86/lir-printer.c |7 ---
test/arch-x86/emit-code-test_32.c
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
arch/x86/emit-code.c|7 ---
arch/x86/include/arch/instruction.h |1 -
arch/x86/instruction.c |1 -
arch/x86/lir-printer.c |7 ---
4 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 16 deletions
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
arch/x86/emit-code.c| 11 ---
arch/x86/include/arch/instruction.h |1 -
arch/x86/instruction.c |1 -
arch/x86/lir-printer.c |7 ---
4 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 20
Now that NO_OPERANDS and SINGLE_OPERAND emitter share the same function
signature we can unify the two.
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
arch/x86/emit-code.c | 19 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/emit-code.c b
Pekka Enberg kirjoitti:
As I mentioned before, I'm seeing deadlocks with GcTortureTest when
-Xgc is enabled. I've been debugging the problem for a bit now and I
think it's a generic problem of entering the GC from within a JIT
trampoline while we're holding cu-mutex. See the below backtrace
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 12:42 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
AFAICT entering GC from a JIT trampoline is irrelevant to this
discussion. We're really looking at a generic problem where one or more
of the threads are already blocked with pthread_mutex_lock() or whatever
and we try to stop the world
Hi!
As I mentioned before, I'm seeing deadlocks with GcTortureTest when
-Xgc is enabled. I've been debugging the problem for a bit now and I
think it's a generic problem of entering the GC from within a JIT
trampoline while we're holding cu-mutex. See the below backtrace for
details (I think
Tomek Grabiec wrote:
The function was setting elem to the init_stack_trace_elem_current()'s
frame which is error prone because after function returns its stack
frame might be overriden by another function calls done from the
caller.
A fix for that is to make init_stack_trace_elem_current()
Tomasz Grabiec wrote:
Dnia 2009-11-17, wto o godzinie 16:39 +0200, Pekka Enberg pisze:
Tomek Grabiec wrote:
The function was setting elem to the init_stack_trace_elem_current()'s
frame which is error prone because after function returns its stack
frame might be overriden by another function
Tomasz Grabiec wrote:
Tomek Grabiec wrote:
The function was setting elem to the init_stack_trace_elem_current()'s
frame which is error prone because after function returns its stack
frame might be overriden by another function calls done from the
caller.
A fix for that is to make
Hi Tomek,
Tomasz Grabiec kirjoitti:
Dnia 2009-11-16, pon o godzinie 12:19 +0200, Pekka Enberg pisze:
Next step is to change gc_safepoint() to look up struct gc_map based on
regs-eip. I was thinking of adding an hash map of GC maps to struct
compilation_unit but we first need to be able
in the future
add ebx, ebx
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
there's a pretty strange change:
@@ -198,11 +229,11 @@ static int __insert_spill_reload_insn(struct
live_interval *interval, struct com
* can't
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:29 +0200, Tomasz Grabiec wrote:
+ if (xmm_count 8) {
+ map-reg = args_map_alloc_xmm(xmm_count++);
+ map-stack_index = -1;
+ } else {
+ map-reg =
Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
arch/x86/insn-selector.brg | 22 --
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/insn-selector.brg b/arch/x86/insn-selector.brg
index c2d06c3..26bcfd5 100644
--- a/arch
On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 11:45 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
struct vm_type_info is introduced to fully describe a java type of a
call argument, return type, field type, etc. Method's and field's type
strings are parsed on initialization and type information is put to
appropriate struct
() function for converting gregset_t
to struct register_state so we can pass register contents to the
gc_safepoint() function.
Cc: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
Cc: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
arch/x86/include/arch/registers_32.h | 52
Add save_registers() and save_signal_registers() to x86-64 as well.
Cc: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu eduard.munte...@linux360.ro
Cc: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
Cc: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
arch/x86/include/arch/registers_64.h
Hi all,
I am proud to announce the release of Jato v0.0.1 buy more RAM-edition!
Jato is a JIT-only virtual machine for Java that can run some simple programs
under GNU/Linux on modern 32-bit x86 CPUs. A port to the x86-64 machine
architecture is currently being developed. Jato depends on GNU
On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 22:41 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
This fixes incorrect lock order reported by helgrind:
OK, so what is the problem? How are you fixing it? The changelog is
really too terse for this kind of critical fix.
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
---
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 10:34 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
ACK!
Acked-by: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
It's better because we don't initialize the same fields over and over.
Perhaps this is premature optimization, but it's just much more
elegant to not do more than we really need.
no
threads are started.
With the above fixes, GcTortureTest passes when gc_start() is called
from object allocator.
Cc: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
vm/gc.c | 76 +-
1 files
On Sat, 2009-09-05 at 13:27 +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
We must not keep the parameters we received in fixed registers because
they can be clobbered by other insn-selector rules that use them (e.g.
method invocation).
Signed-off-by: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu
Cc: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
include/vm/gc.h |3 +++
vm/gc.c |4
vm/jato.c |6 ++
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/vm/gc.h b/include/vm/gc.h
index a9bfae9
This patch adds a -Xgc command line option that enables the
work-in-progress GC infrastructure.
Cc: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
include/vm/gc.h |1 +
vm/gc.c |3 +++
vm/jato.c |6 ++
3 files changed
Cc: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
include/vm/gc.h |3 +++
vm/gc.c |3 +++
vm/jato.c |6 ++
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/vm/gc.h b/include/vm/gc.h
index a9bfae9
This patch introduces a gc_malloc() entry point. It's a simple wrapper
on top of kzalloc() for now.
Cc: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
include/vm/gc.h |2 ++
test/vm/gc-stub.c |6 ++
vm/gc.c |6 ++
vm
Vegard Nossum wrote:
2009/9/5 Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi:
Good point. I wonder why we have methods without code attribute in
classfiles.
Native and abstract methods don't have code. It's all here:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jvms/second_edition/html/ClassFile.doc.html#1546
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 16:14 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
Jato can be compiled with workarounds which make valgrind
work with jato.
To do so, define VALGRIND variable for make:
make jato VALGRIND=y
We can auto-detect whether we're running on valgrind or not:
#include valgrind/valgrind.h
9d6a82a9290f5f75a5018506b4febe31ad8df3e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 21:21:15 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] vm: Flush and disable buffering on SIGABRT
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
include/vm/trace.h |1 +
vm/signal.c| 23
Hi Tomek,
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 16:14 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
Jato can be compiled with workarounds which make valgrind
work with jato.
To do so, define VALGRIND variable for make:
make jato VALGRIND=y
Currently workarounds eliminate class initialization
from signal handler by
Hi Tomek,
On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 20:30 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/insn-selector.brg | 30 --
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/insn-selector.brg
Hi Vegard,
(I'm cc'ing Eduard on the args map question.)
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 23:39 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
@@ -371,7 +371,56 @@ int vm_class_link(struct vm_class *vmc, const
struct cafebabe_class *class)
}
}
- vmc-methods = malloc(sizeof(*vmc-methods) *
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 23:39 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
---
vm/object.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vm/object.c b/vm/object.c
index 1baa966..36e60c1 100644
--- a/vm/object.c
+++
On Sun, 2009-08-23 at 09:06 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
I did write something about this in the changelog of one of the other
patches. It is correct that this is not _exactly_ what a miranda
method is, but it would have been called a miranda method if it was
generated by javac. But we're doing
instructions.
lab:
I tried to write a regression test based on the above description.
Unfortunately this doesn't seem to trigger the bug:
From d642832b008d8622f01e14eb07c197f40458488a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:41:28 +0300
The 'pop_at_insn' argument is not used in insert_copy_slot_insn()
function so remove it to clean up code.
Cc: Arthur HUILLET arthur.huil...@free.fr
Cc: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
jit/spill-reload.c | 13 +
1 files changed
Lets use radix_tree_lookup() and get rid of the nasty loop in
bb_last_insn(). For some reason, this seems to fix the infinite loop
triggered by empty basic blocks.
Cc: Arthur HUILLET arthur.huil...@free.fr
Cc: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
Use insn_is_branch() to determine whether we must insert a spill
instruction before or after the last instruction in a basic block.
Cc: Arthur HUILLET arthur.huil...@free.fr
Cc: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
---
arch/mmix/include/arch
on some
execution paths.
I think the following patch _is_ correct but it breaks make regression
so I think we're silently spilling/reloading empty basic blocks.
Pekka
From 999622798d073ae892c316e6f69fde7697233e4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pekka Enberg penb
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 15:38 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
We need to assign access flags for arrays and primitive classes which
have no corresponding cafebabe_class. Therefore -access_flags field is
introduced for struct vm_class.
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
I'd rather we
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 19:36 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
2009/8/17 Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi:
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 15:38 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
We need to assign access flags for arrays and primitive classes which
have no corresponding cafebabe_class. Therefore -access_flags
From: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
The -end member of struct live_range is not part of the range. Fix up
some range end checks in jit/linear-scan.c which assume -end is part of
the range.
Cc: Arthur HUILLET arthur.huil...@free.fr
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg penb...@cs.helsinki.fi
Hi all,
I've enabled some more GCC warnings now. There's still few more I'd like
to enable at some point:
-Wstack-protector
-Wstrict-aliasing=3
-Wswitch-default
-Wswitch-enum
-Wpacked
-Wshadow
-Wbad-function-cast
Unfortunately all of them make bugs in Jato code visible so
Tomek Grabiec wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
diff --git a/vm/jato.c b/vm/jato.c
index 6d1ac6b..0d32645 100644
--- a/vm/jato.c
+++ b/vm/jato.c
@@ -607,10 +607,32 @@ native_vmclass_isprimitive(struct vm_object *object)
static jint native_vmclass_getmodifiers(struct
Hi Tomek,
It seems that native symbol resolution is busted somehow:
[AWT-EventQueue-2] SIGSEGV at EIP 08055d30 while accessing memory address
002a.
[AWT-EventQueue-2] Registers:
[AWT-EventQueue-2] eax: ebx: ecx: 0001 edx:
[AWT-EventQueue-2] esi:
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 16:13 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
This fixes the performance issue in liveness analysis.
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
Nice! Perf report looks like this now:
# Overhead CommandShared Object Symbol
# ...
Tomek Grabiec wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
---
vm/jato.c |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vm/jato.c b/vm/jato.c
index 4a82048..ea176ca 100644
--- a/vm/jato.c
+++ b/vm/jato.c
@@ -206,6 +206,13 @@ static void
Tomek Grabiec wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/emit-code.c | 17 +++--
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/emit-code.c b/arch/x86/emit-code.c
index 57de052..521c150 100644
--- a/arch/x86/emit-code.c
+++
The series has been applied, thanks!
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core
Hi Tomek,
I skipped this patch because it's causing too many problems. The
regression test didn't compile:
make -C regression/jni
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/penberg/src/jato/regression/jni'
JAVAHjvm_JNITest.h
CXX libjnitest.so
In file included from jvm_JNITest.cpp:1:
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 15:36 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
Liveness analysis can produce intervals with range not ending at a use
position. When splitting such interval after last use position we get
the new interval with non-zero range length and without use positions.
We should not add such
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 12:50 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
We have to make trace_mutex recursive because java.lang.String
initialization might be triggered during compilation of method
containing ldc on String constant.
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
+void init_tracing(void)
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 12:50 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
---
Makefile |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index ede2d0c..c037fb8 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -308,7 +308,6
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 12:50 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
diff --git a/include/vm/class.h b/include/vm/class.h
index 2ed5ffe..b827afc 100644
--- a/include/vm/class.h
+++ b/include/vm/class.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#define _VM_CLASS_H
#include assert.h
+#include pthread.h
#include
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 14:41 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
---
vm/object.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vm/object.c b/vm/object.c
index cb69dca..1a5136a 100644
--- a/vm/object.c
+++ b/vm/object.c
Hi Vegard,
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 18:12 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
All registers that were defined in the basic block were subtracted from the
use set. This is right if the order is define, use, but it's wrong if the
order is use, define. Fix this by checking if the register has already
been
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 18:12 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
All registers that were defined in the basic block were subtracted from the
use set. This is right if the order is define, use, but it's wrong if the
order is use, define. Fix this by checking if the register has already
been
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 12:15 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
On splitting a bb, the successors of the new bb were still pointing at
the original bb. This caused the CFG to be inconsistent and subsequently
also mimic stack spill/restore to do the wrong thing.
This fixes the
Tomek Grabiec wrote:
When method is a JNI method, then we add a pointer to JNI environemnt
as the first argument. If method is also static, we put class's object
refrence as second argument. All those arguments must be treated same
as any other arguments, so they should receive indices 0 and 1
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 17:53 +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 01:52:39PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
Tomek Grabiec wrote:
When method is a JNI method, then we add a pointer to JNI environemnt
as the first argument. If method is also static, we put class's object
The series has been applied, thanks!
--
___
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
On Sun, 2009-07-26 at 13:22 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
Please hold on with merging this one because I noticed that for some
reason Caused by: parts are not printed after this patch, which
seems to be a bug in JIT.
OK, I reverted the commit from master now.
Hi Tomek,
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 13:03 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
@@ -2024,25 +2024,16 @@ static void invoke(struct basic_block *s, struct
tree_node *tree, struct compila
struct insn *call_insn;
void *target;
- if (pthread_mutex_trylock(cu-mutex)) {
- /*
-
applied
--
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 11:38 +0200, Arthur Huillet wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes an actual bug.
Please merge it (unlike the previous one for control flow resolving,
which I intended to mark as RFC).
Control flow resolving works for SubstringTest, but I prefer to send it
once it's
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 01:20 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
2009/7/15 Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu eduard.munte...@linux360.ro:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:53:30AM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
2009/7/15 Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu eduard.munte...@linux360.ro:
This fixes stack frame operations on
On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 21:12 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
verify_no_recursion() checks whether all call sites of given subroutine
all outside its body. It's a requirement for inlining to be possible.
Does this mean we won't be able to inline all subroutines and thus need
support for the 'jsr' and
The series has been applied. Thanks!
--
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM)
The series has been applied. Thanks!
--
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM)
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 07:17 +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
This bug affects arches where sizeof(int) != sizeof(unsigned long). The
key should be unsigned long so it doesn't get truncated.
Signed-off-by: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu eduard.munte...@linux360.ro
---
lib/radix-tree.c |
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 01:22 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
This provides a recursive-descent parser for the grammar of sections,
as given at: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/guide/jar/jar.html
The actual manifest parsing has still to be done.
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum
1-4 applied, thnx!
--
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the
applied
--
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to
On Tue, 2009-07-07 at 22:02 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
---
vm/jato.c |3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vm/jato.c b/vm/jato.c
index 4eb5dbc..a9eb0a7 100644
--- a/vm/jato.c
+++ b/vm/jato.c
@@ -106,7
On Mon, 2009-07-06 at 01:16 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
We cannot overwrite a register which is not saved (ESI) because this
will lead to a corruption in JIT code. The proper solution is
to copy the call arguments.
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
I'm confused. What exactly
both patches applied
--
___
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
applied
--
___
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
applied
--
___
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
applied
--
___
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
applied
--
___
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
applied
--
___
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 08:24 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
2009/7/2 Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com:
fixup_vtable() was using old -method_index field which is no longer valid.
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
Acked-by: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
Sorry about
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 23:53 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
We need to initialize static fields to zero even before the class
initializer runs (since the initializer may refer to static fields).
This still needs a lot of work, but here is a preliminary fix that
initializes a whole pointer
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 22:58 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
We used to simply append the subclass' methods to the end of the
vtable of the superclass.
With this patch, we only append those methods which are not defined in
the superclass; the methods which are defined in the superclass are
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 09:08 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
08:59 penberg_home vegard: cool.
08:59 penberg_home vegard: but doesn't that make debugging too easy?
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
Applied, thanks!
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 00:01 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
Alas, we cannot initialize these classes; the JVM spec. forbids it.
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
---
vm/jato.c |9 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/vm/jato.c
On Mon, 2009-06-29 at 19:41 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
We do not have to load object reference from stack with this instruction:
mov 0(%esp), %reg
Before we select the code for EXPR_INVOKEVIRTUAL code for call arguments
is selected so we know what register was allocated to the argument
On Tue, 2009-06-30 at 16:27 +0200, Arthur Huillet wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:04:33 +0200
Arthur Huillet arthur.huil...@free.fr wrote:
please don't apply right now, I have a test that breaks.
Please apply this patch, it is OK.
The test wasn't. :)
Applied, thanks!
applied, thanks!
--
___
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
On Wed, 2009-07-01 at 10:38 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
@@ -783,6 +783,17 @@ void emit_prolog(struct buffer *buf, unsigned long
nr_locals)
__emit_sub_imm_reg(buf, nr_locals * sizeof(unsigned long),
REG_ESP);
}
+void emit_trace_invoke(struct buffer *buf,
+ const char
applied
--
___
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
Hi Vegard,
Vegard Nossum wrote:
@@ -120,6 +120,14 @@ void *jit_magic_trampoline(struct compilation_unit *cu)
pthread_mutex_unlock(cu-mutex);
+ /* XXX:
+ *
+ * 09:58 penberg but you need to be careful
+ * 09:58 penberg not to allow any threads to run the
Both series have been applied, thanks!
--
___
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
Series applied, thanks!
--
___
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 18:09 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
2009/6/25 Arthur HUILLET arthur.huil...@free.fr:
Signed-off-by: Arthur HUILLET arthur.huil...@free.fr
Acked-by: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
This was a left-over from:
commit fd3c3475e6825e52b8d7045b96fd44bb5ae04c81
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 18:17 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
From 721f6ad6eed965afb940158c25826a4c997cc74b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:14:30 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] vm/classloader: stop searching once we've found the class
If we
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 22:30 +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
2009/6/25 Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com:
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
My mistake :-)
Acked-by: Vegard Nossum vegard.nos...@gmail.com
Applied, thanks!
On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 23:14 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec tgrab...@gmail.com
---
jit/trampoline.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/jit/trampoline.c b/jit/trampoline.c
index 1afcfbd..05f5cc6 100644
--- a/jit/trampoline.c
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
