[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

2007-04-10 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487706 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-584: - That could be improved in a DisjunctionMatcher. With a bit of bookkeeping

Maven artifacts for Lucene.*

2007-04-10 Thread Sami Siren
I have been hoping to put up mechanism for (easier) deployment of m2 artifacts to maven repositories (both Apache snapshot repository and the main maven repository at ibiblio). The most convenient way would be to use maven2 to build the various lucene projects but as the mailing list

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

2007-04-10 Thread Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487789 ] Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-584: - Ah, too bad. :( Last time I benchmarked Lucene searching on Sun's

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

2007-04-10 Thread eks dev
If I remember well, the last time we profiled search with high density OR queries scoring was taking up to 30% of the time. This was a 8Mio collection of short documents fitting comfortably in RAM. So I am sure disabling scoring in some cases could bring us something. I am not all that

Hudson build is back to normal: Lucene-Nightly #53

2007-04-10 Thread hudson
See http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/53/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-794) SpanScorer and SimpleSpanFragmenter for Contrib Highlighter

2007-04-10 Thread Sean O'Connor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487847 ] Sean O'Connor commented on LUCENE-794: -- I was able to apply the spanhighlighter5.patch. I'm inexperienced with

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-855) MemoryCachedRangeFilter to boost performance of Range queries

2007-04-10 Thread Matt Ericson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Ericson updated LUCENE-855: Attachment: TestRangeFilterPerformanceComparison.java Andy thank you for that test I took at

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-855) MemoryCachedRangeFilter to boost performance of Range queries

2007-04-10 Thread Matt Ericson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Ericson updated LUCENE-855: Attachment: FieldCacheRangeFilter.patch Fixed a bug with the BitSets nextSetBit(i) and

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-794) SpanScorer and SimpleSpanFragmenter for Contrib Highlighter

2007-04-10 Thread Mark Miller (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487860 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-794: Sorry Sean, I forgot to mention that the patch is off of the latest Lucene

Re: Why ORScorer delayed init?

2007-04-10 Thread Yonik Seeley
On 4/10/07, Marvin Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In DisjunctionSumScorer, both skipTo() and next() invoke initScorerDocQueue() on the first iteration. However, since all subscorers are added en masse via the constructor instead of individually via an add() method which does not exist for

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

2007-04-10 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487882 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-584: - By fastest cache I meant the L1 cache of the processor. The size is

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

2007-04-10 Thread Paul Elschot
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 17:41, eks dev wrote: If I remember well, the last time we profiled search with high density OR queries scoring was taking up to 30% of the time. This was a 8Mio collection of short documents fitting comfortably in RAM. So I am sure disabling scoring in some cases

Re: Why ORScorer delayed init?

2007-04-10 Thread Paul Elschot
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 20:24, Yonik Seeley wrote: On 4/10/07, Marvin Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In DisjunctionSumScorer, both skipTo() and next() invoke initScorerDocQueue() on the first iteration. However, since all subscorers are added en masse via the constructor instead of

Re: Why ORScorer delayed init?

2007-04-10 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I thought it would avoid accessing the index as much as : possible before actually doing a search, but I did not : verify whether that is important. : In case it is not, any simplification is off course welcome. conceptually: once Query.createWeight(Searcher) is called, the Search has already

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-855) MemoryCachedRangeFilter to boost performance of Range queries

2007-04-10 Thread Andy Liu (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487897 ] Andy Liu commented on LUCENE-855: - Hey Matt, I get this exception when running your newest FCRF with the

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-860) site should call project Lucene Java, not just Lucene

2007-04-10 Thread Doug Cutting (JIRA)
site should call project Lucene Java, not just Lucene - Key: LUCENE-860 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-860 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-860) site should call project Lucene Java, not just Lucene

2007-04-10 Thread Doug Cutting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated LUCENE-860: Attachment: LUCENE-860.patch Here's a patch that replaces Apache Lucene with Apache Lucene Java in

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-860) site should call project Lucene Java, not just Lucene

2007-04-10 Thread Doug Cutting (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Doug Cutting updated LUCENE-860: Lucene Fields: [Patch Available] (was: [New]) site should call project Lucene Java, not just

Failed test: testExpirationTimeDeletionPolicy

2007-04-10 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Just saw this test fail: [junit] Testcase: testExpirationTimeDeletionPolicy(org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy): FAILED [junit] commit point was older than 2.0 seconds but did not get deleted [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: commit point was older than 2.0

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-857) Remove BitSet caching from QueryFilter

2007-04-10 Thread Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Otis Gospodnetic resolved LUCENE-857. - Resolution: Fixed Thanks for the persistence and patience, Hoss. I see the light now!

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-855) MemoryCachedRangeFilter to boost performance of Range queries

2007-04-10 Thread Matt Ericson (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Matt Ericson updated LUCENE-855: Attachment: FieldCacheRangeFilter.patch Lets try this again. I am very sorry to everyone for the

Re: Failed test: testExpirationTimeDeletionPolicy

2007-04-10 Thread Michael McCandless
Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just saw this test fail: [junit] Testcase: testExpirationTimeDeletionPolicy(org.apache.lucene.index.TestDeletionPolicy): FAILED [junit] commit point was older than 2.0 seconds but did not get deleted [junit]

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-730) Restore top level disjunction performance

2007-04-10 Thread Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Otis Gospodnetic updated LUCENE-730: Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New]) Restore top level disjunction

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

2007-04-10 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487940 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-584: - I'm a little behind on following this issue, but if i can attempt to sum up the

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-855) MemoryCachedRangeFilter to boost performance of Range queries

2007-04-10 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-855?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487962 ] Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-855: - On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA) wrote: : I'd love to know what Hoss

Lucene Branding: the TLP, and Lucene Java

2007-04-10 Thread Chris Hostetter
I was motivated to start this thread by LUCENE-860, but it's been in the back of my mind for a while. As the Lucene Top Level Project grows and get's more Sub-Projects, I (personally) have been finding it hard in email/documentation/discussion to clarify when people are refering to the Lucene

[jira] Reopened: (LUCENE-857) Remove BitSet caching from QueryFilter

2007-04-10 Thread Hoss Man (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Hoss Man reopened LUCENE-857: - Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [New]) Actually Otis: for the backwards compatibility to

Re: Lucene Branding: the TLP, and Lucene Java

2007-04-10 Thread Grant Ingersoll
No, you are not the only one... Many a sleepless night spent on it... :-) I usually try to refer to it as Lucene Java, but old habits die hard and often times I just call it Lucene. I think the name has a good brand at this point and is very strongly associated w/ the Java library. I

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-584) Decouple Filter from BitSet

2007-04-10 Thread Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487966 ] Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-584: - Right. I was under the wrong impression that the Matcher also

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-857) Remove BitSet caching from QueryFilter

2007-04-10 Thread Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-857?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Otis Gospodnetic resolved LUCENE-857. - Resolution: Fixed Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available,

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-794) SpanScorer and SimpleSpanFragmenter for Contrib Highlighter

2007-04-10 Thread Sean O'Connor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487981 ] Sean O'Connor commented on LUCENE-794: -- Thanks Mark. I had the trunk from a few days ago (perhaps a week), so