Hudson build is back to normal : Lucene-trunk #1158

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2399) Add support for ICU's Normalizer2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2399: Attachment: LUCENE-2399.patch i made this filter final, to avoid a ticket from the policeman. > A

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2399) Add support for ICU's Normalizer2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2399: Attachment: LUCENE-2399.patch This patch is so simple, instead of 3 hairy tokenfilters. I would l

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2399) Add support for ICU's Normalizer2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2399: Assignee: Robert Muir > Add support for ICU's Normalizer2 > - > >

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2399) Add support for ICU's Normalizer2

Add support for ICU's Normalizer2 - Key: LUCENE-2399 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: New Feature Components: contrib/* Affects Versions:

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-2376) java.lang.OutOfMemoryError:Java heap space

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858047#action_12858047 ] Shivender Devarakonda edited comment on LUCENE-2376 at 4/16/10 6:54 PM:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2376) java.lang.OutOfMemoryError:Java heap space

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858047#action_12858047 ] Shivender Devarakonda commented on LUCENE-2376: --- Hi, I reached to the develo

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2398) Improve tests to work easier from IDEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857942#action_12857942 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2398: - Committed an additional fix: 935048, this allow

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2393) Utility to output total term frequency and df from a lucene index

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Tom Burton-West updated LUCENE-2393: Attachment: LUCENE-2393.patch Updated the HighFreqTermsWithTF to use flex API. I don't

RE: Fix to contrib/misc/HighFreqTerms.java

Hi Mike, Thanks for making the fix and changing the display from bytes to utf8. It needs a very minor change: The latest fix converts to utf8 if you give a field argument on the command line but still shows bytes if you don't. Line 89 should parallel line 70 and use term.utf8ToString() instead

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2398) Improve tests to work easier from IDEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2398. - Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 935014. > Improve tests to work easier from IDEs > ---

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2398) Improve tests to work easier from IDEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2398: Fix Version/s: 3.1 Affects Version/s: 3.1 Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (w

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-2398) Improve tests to work easier from IDEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-2398: --- Assignee: Robert Muir > Improve tests to work easier from IDEs > ---

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2398) Improve tests to work easier from IDEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857914#action_12857914 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2398: This is a great cleanup Robert!

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2398) Improve tests to work easier from IDEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857911#action_12857911 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2398: - All tests pass with the latest patch, additiona

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2398) Improve tests to work easier from IDEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2398: Attachment: LUCENE-2398.patch the attached patch refactors the benchmark tests: * logic to run a b

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2287) Unexpected terms are highlighted within nested SpanQuery instances

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857904#action_12857904 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2287: - Hey Michael - there is a lot of reformatting it

Re: Proposal about Version API "relaxation"

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > > It's not a sign that users don't care about it. Lately I think you have > taken the stance, users be damned, Lucene dev should just be geared towards > devs. I'm not a fan of that kind of attitude when it comes to Lucene dev > myself. > > I

Re: Proposal about Version API "relaxation"

On 04/16/2010 12:16 PM, Robert Muir wrote: On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Mark Miller > wrote: I'd be for this plan if I really thought the stable branch would get similar attention to the experimental branch - but I have some doubts about that.

Re: Proposal about Version API "relaxation"

I agree that's a risk... but this being open source, I think it'd balance out? So eg right now I'm looking @ speeding up PhraseQuery (thanks to Robert's prodding ;) ). These changes are all under the hood, so, I would do this on the stable branch. There's no reason not to. There are also good i

Re: Proposal about Version API "relaxation"

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > I'd be for this plan if I really thought the stable branch would get > similar attention to the experimental branch - but I have some doubts about > that. Its a fairly small dev community in comparison to other projects that > do this ... > >

Re: Proposal about Version API "relaxation"

I'd be for this plan if I really thought the stable branch would get similar attention to the experimental branch - but I have some doubts about that. Its a fairly small dev community in comparison to other projects that do this ... Dev on the experimental latest greatest fun branch, or the mo

Re: Proposal about Version API "relaxation"

Getting back to the stable/experimental branches... I think, with separate stable & experimental branches, development would/should be active on both branches. It'd depend on the feature... Eg today we'd have 3.x stable branch and the experimental branch (= trunk). Small features, bug fixes, wo

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2398) Improve tests to work easier from IDEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2398: Attachment: LUCENE-2398.patch Attached is an updated patch, with a new test for MemoryIndex. Inst

[jira] Reopened: (LUCENE-2367) CartesianPolyFilterBuilder has problems around the poles

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Grant Ingersoll reopened LUCENE-2367: - Lucene Fields: (was: [New]) > CartesianPolyFilterBuilder has problems around the poles

Re: Lucene Eclipse project files (Was: Re: Eclipse project files...)

Robert Muir wrote: Do you use Eclipse for development? I do, i generally don't run tests from it though. Ack. I do not understand who is supposed to create the index directory... I do not see it in the build.xml :-/ Believe it or not, there are some oddities about these benchm

Re: Lucene Eclipse project files (Was: Re: Eclipse project files...)

Robert Muir wrote: Do you use Eclipse for development? I do, i generally don't run tests from it though. Ack. I do not understand who is supposed to create the index directory... I do not see it in the build.xml :-/ Believe it or not, there are some oddities about these benchm

Re: Lucene Eclipse project files (Was: Re: Eclipse project files...)

On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Paolo Castagna < castagna.li...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > Do you use Eclipse for development? I do, i generally don't run tests from it though. > > I do not understand who is supposed to create the index directory... > I do not see it in the build.xml :-/ > >

Re: Lucene Eclipse project files (Was: Re: Eclipse project files...)

There are some more problems. i found 2 other base classes like this, additionally the use of lucene.common.dir alltogether is not the best, and some tests that are using it are... not the best. I opened an issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398 On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 8:24 AM,

Re: Lucene Eclipse project files (Was: Re: Eclipse project files...)

Robert Muir wrote: I actually run all the tests from ant... Having Ant as the "authoritative" source of information for the build, tests, packaging is good. But, being able to quickly run some or all the JUnit tests from Eclipse and if there are failures double click to point at the code it's

Re: Lucene Eclipse project files (Was: Re: Eclipse project files...)

Robert Muir wrote: The Collation failure is because its "CollationTestBase" should really be abstract... I'll fix this one and see if theres any others here we can make easier. Good, thanks. :-) Paolo - To unsubscribe, e-mai

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2398) Improve tests to work easier from IDEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857791#action_12857791 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2398: - I checked into this "lucene.common.dir", its on

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2398) Improve tests to work easier from IDEs

Improve tests to work easier from IDEs -- Key: LUCENE-2398 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Test Reporter: Robert Muir Prior

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2398) Improve tests to work easier from IDEs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2398: Attachment: LUCENE-2398.patch attached is a patch that makes CollationTestBase, BaseTestLRU, and

Re: Lucene Eclipse project files (Was: Re: Eclipse project files...)

The Collation failure is because its "CollationTestBase" should really be abstract... I'll fix this one and see if theres any others here we can make easier. On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Robert Muir wrote: > Hi Paolo: > > I actually run all the tests from ant... but I see at least these two

Re: Lucene Eclipse project files (Was: Re: Eclipse project files...)

Hi Paolo: I actually run all the tests from ant... but I see at least these two things: 1. you need to turn on assertions when you run junit (-ea), or some IndexWriter tests will not work, as assertions enables debugging code in them. 2. the ant scripts set a sysprop tempDir for the tests, but i

Lucene Eclipse project files (Was: Re: Eclipse project files...)

Hi Robert, I am now trying to configure all the Lucene contrib sources and tests rather than a minimal configuration (as the first .classpath I shared previously). You can find the .classpath I am using attached to this email. I had problems with the BDB contrib, jars are not there (probably, fo