RE: implementatin of the state-of-art retrieval models for lucene?

2007-02-06 Thread Dalton, Jeffery
Hi Hui, I would love to experiment with your retrieval models. There have been various conversations about BM25 and other functions, but little is publicly available. Cheers, - Jeff > -Original Message- > From: Hui Fang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007

RE: Beyond Lucene 2.0 Index Design

2007-01-12 Thread Dalton, Jeffery
t some of the issues that come up with the > new interface based approach (I often find it takes at least > two implementations to fully flesh out an abstraction like this) > > -Grant > > On Jan 9, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Dalton, Jeffery wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I

RE: Beyond Lucene 2.0 Index Design

2007-01-12 Thread Dalton, Jeffery
? > > > > For example, here are two posting lists: > > > > TermA: X Y > > TermB: Y X > > > > I am not sure how you would return document X or Y for a > search of the > > phrase "TermA Term B". Which should come first? > >

RE: Beyond Lucene 2.0 Index Design

2007-01-12 Thread Dalton, Jeffery
to search on both subject and > content for emails, for example, and sometimes, only wants to > search on subject, this type of tasks, without multiple > fields, how this would be handled. > > I got lost on this, could any one educate? > > Thanks, > > Jian > > On 1

RE: Beyond Lucene 2.0 Index Design

2007-01-09 Thread Dalton, Jeffery
ginal Message- > From: Marvin Humphrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:58 PM > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Beyond Lucene 2.0 Index Design > > > On Jan 9, 2007, at 6:25 AM, Dalton, Jeffery wrote: > > > e. > >

RE: Beyond Lucene 2.0 Index Design

2007-01-09 Thread Dalton, Jeffery
y rank); merging would > become more tricky, since you don't want to exhaust memory > while merging, but I think it is doable. > > "Dalton, Jeffery" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on > 09/01/2007 06:25:33: > > > Hi, > > > > I wanted to s

Beyond Lucene 2.0 Index Design

2007-01-09 Thread Dalton, Jeffery
Hi, I wanted to start some discussion about possible future Lucene file / index formats. This is an extension to the discussion on Flexible Lucene Indexing discussed on the wiki: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/FlexibleIndexing Note: Related sources are listed at the end. I would like

Cannot delete deleteable.new

2006-02-01 Thread Dalton, Jeffery
I have a periodic process that runs as a timer task that periodically optimizes my search index. However, I am having difficulties with this process failing: java.io.IOException: Cannot overwrite: C:\04950_04959\deleteable.new at org.apache.lucene.store.FSDirectory.createOutput(FSDirectory

RE: Optimize segment deletion exception

2006-01-25 Thread Dalton, Jeffery
ows from deleting a file... > > Luc > > > -Original Message- > From: Dalton, Jeffery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: dinsdag 24 januari 2006 21:16 > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Optimize segment deletion exception > > I have a class w

Optimize segment deletion exception

2006-01-24 Thread Dalton, Jeffery
I have a class which uses the Lucene 1.9 (Jan 24th svn version) IndexModifier to write documents, delete documents, etc... Periodically, I have a scheduled task which uses this IndexModifier to optimize the index. I've been tracking down a problem/bug. I can re-produce it pretty consistently runn