[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857164#action_12857164
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
{quote}
It's for performance.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch reassigned LUCENE-1698:
-
Assignee: (was: Michael Busch)
:)
> Change backwards-compatibility pol
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-2324:
--
Attachment: lucene-2324.patch
The patch removes all *PerThread classes downstream of
I agree with Uwe. We shouldn't use non-final public statics.
Thinking out loud: Could IndexWriter/IndexReader propagate the Version
to the downstream classes (e.g. IndexWriter to Analyzers, IndexReader to
queries) if not previously explicitly set?
E.g. an IndexWriter calls setVersion on an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855377#action_12855377
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1879:
---
{quote}
I'll start by descr
Uwe, thanks for doing all the svn work! Was a smooth transition!
Michael
On 4/6/10 12:27 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
The freeze is over, we merged successfully.
If you had a flex branch checked out:
svn switch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk/lucene
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853751#action_12853751
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
Sorry, Jason, I got sidetracked
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853509#action_12853509
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2329:
---
We could move the if (postingsA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852858#action_12852858
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2329:
---
Thanks! I think we can resolve this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12852625#action_12852625
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2329:
---
Looks great! I like the remova
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-2329:
--
Attachment: lucene-2329-2.patch
This patch:
* Changes DocumentsWriter to trigger the flush
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-2126.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 929340.
> Split up IndexInput and IndexOutput i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2111?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851452#action_12851452
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2111:
---
bq. Flex is generally faster.
Awe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851451#action_12851451
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2126:
---
I'll try to commit tonight to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851142#action_12851142
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
{quote}
The clarify, the apply deletes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12851078#action_12851078
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
{quote}
I'm not sure we need that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850989#action_12850989
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2329:
---
Good catch!
Thanks for the thor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850792#action_12850792
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
{quote}
However, in the apply del
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850766#action_12850766
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
bq. I think for this same reason
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850760#action_12850760
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
Yes, we would need to buffer terms/que
upto trunk rev 928243
The following revision of Michael Busch was left out (I do not know
how this affects flex): 926791 (buschmi, LUCENE-2329: Use parallel
arrays instead of PostingList objects in TermsHash*)
Also I added a noncommit to the Directory.copyTo() method, as the
IndexFileNameFi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850312#action_12850312
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
bq. Not all apps index only 140 chara
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850268#action_12850268
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1879:
---
LUCENE-2324 will be helpful to sup
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850265#action_12850265
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
{quote}
I'm not sure how we'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850262#action_12850262
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
{quote}
But if 1 thread tends to i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12850235#action_12850235
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
The easiest would be if
n 3/26/10 7:16 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
So, should we start thinking about a Modules dir at the same level as
Lucene/Solr where shared, non-core code lives?
For starters, I think spatial and analyzers could go there.
Proposal:
lucene/
solr/
modules/
analyzers
spatial
others (hi
Welcome Shai!
On 3/26/10 8:04 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
I'll start with Parallel Index (thanks Michael B. for introducing it!)
and continue to more exciting things.
Awesome! I'll help where I can. I'm still excited about all the cool
stuff you can do with parallel indexing, time is my only
: Improvement
Components: Index
Reporter: Michael Busch
Assignee: Michael Busch
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.1
The current in-memory posting list format might not be optimal for searching.
VInt decoding performance and the lack of skip lists would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12849899#action_12849899
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
Awesome!
> Per thread Documents
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12849819#action_12849819
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
Hey Jason,
Disregard my patch here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-2324:
--
Attachment: (was: lucene-2324-no-pooling.patch)
> Per thread DocumentsWriters that wr
On 3/23/10 2:12 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
OK I reran the tests sequentially with my LUCENE-2329 patch applied. The
same test failed again:
[junit] Test org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.JettyWebappTest FAILED
Everything else looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-2329.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 926791.
> Use parallel arrays instead of PostingL
l see this problem running the tests sequentially too.
Test org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.JettyWebappTest FAILED
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Michael Busch wrote:
Sorry for the lack of details. Thought I had just not done an obvious step.
Attached is the output from the Solr
On 3/23/10 1:07 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
Maybe, the Solr test TestLBHttpSolrServer failed for me randomly
before this parallelization though, and still does.
In general the jetty tests have caused me some grief.
But its also equally likely i broke it for you somehow...
Michael, can you try runnin
Hi all,
I wanted to commit LUCENE-2329. I just checked out the new combined
trunk https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk and ran "ant
test". After 20 mins the build failed on the unmodified code (see
below). I hadn't applied my patch yet.
What's the status of the combined trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848855#action_12848855
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2329:
---
Cool, will do! Thanks for the review
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848827#action_12848827
]
Michael Busch edited comment on LUCENE-2329 at 3/23/10 6:0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848827#action_12848827
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2329:
---
{quote}
They save the object header
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848782#action_12848782
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2329:
---
{quote}
OK, but, RAM used by TermVec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848748#action_12848748
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2329:
---
{quote}
so it's surprising the sa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848475#action_12848475
]
Michael Busch edited comment on LUCENE-2329 at 3/23/10 12:5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848475#action_12848475
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2329:
---
I did some performance experiments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848226#action_12848226
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
I think sync'ing after eve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848210#action_12848210
]
Michael Busch edited comment on LUCENE-2312 at 3/22/10 5:0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848210#action_12848210
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
bq. So.. what does this mean for allo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848198#action_12848198
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
Hi Brian - good to see you on this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-2329:
--
Attachment: lucene-2329.patch
Removed reset(). All tests still pass.
> Use parallel arr
+1
Michael
On Mar 22, 2010, at 8:55 AM, Michael McCandless > wrote:
+1
Mike
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Ryan McKinley
wrote:
why not just "d...@lucene.apache.org"?
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Grant Ingersoll > wrote:
Shall we merge the dev mailing lists? This should red
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848161#action_12848161
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2329:
---
bq. I think *ParallelPostingsArray.r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-2329:
--
Attachment: lucene-2329.patch
Made the memory tracking changes as described in my previous
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848058#action_12848058
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2329:
---
One change I should make to the patc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-2329:
--
Attachment: lucene-2329.patch
Changes the indexer to use parallel arrays instead of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12847068#action_12847068
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2329:
---
bq. Hmm the challenge is that the trac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12847024#action_12847024
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2329:
---
bq. This issue is just about
Components: Index
Reporter: Michael Busch
Assignee: Michael Busch
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.1
This is Mike's idea that was discussed in LUCENE-2293 and LUCENE-2324.
In order to avoid having very many long-living PostingList objects in
TermsHashPerFie
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-2324:
--
Attachment: lucene-2324-no-pooling.patch
All tests pass but I have to review if with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12846586#action_12846586
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
bq. Michael, Agreed, can you outline
What about tagging and branching? When we cut a Lucene release we also
tag Solr, even though it's not being released?
Michael
On 3/16/10 3:47 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
But it's actually the reverse? Solr depends on Lucene but not vice/versa.
(If instead I proposed making Solr a subdir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12846128#action_12846128
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
I think we all agree that we want to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12846084#action_12846084
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
Shall we not first try to remove
It be very cool to have a searchable archive for the IRC discussions, so +1.
But at the same time can we make sure that the decisions that are made
on IRC are still being described in a jira issue? I don't mean that
people should repeat brainstorming, but if a discussion leads to opening
a Ji
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845978#action_12845978
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
{quote}
think we simply need a wa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845969#action_12845969
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
{quote}
I thought we're moving
On 3/16/10 12:43 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
If my impression should be wrong or if I miss something please ignore
the last paragraph.
I feel exactly like you, Simon. I don't understand the rush. Also,
we're in review-and-commit process, not commit-and-review. Changes have
to be propose
I completely agree with Uwe and Hoss. These questions need to be
addressed first.
I still want to be able to only checkout Lucene code and run the Lucene
build independently from Solr. And Lucene needs to be able to release
without Solr and the branching/tagging needs to support that as Uwe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845745#action_12845745
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
The tricky part is to make sure th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845745#action_12845745
]
Michael Busch edited comment on LUCENE-2312 at 3/16/10 6:5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845731#action_12845731
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
{quote}
Do volatile byte arrays
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845731#action_12845731
]
Michael Busch edited comment on LUCENE-2312 at 3/16/10 6:1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845726#action_12845726
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
{quote}
A quick and easy way to solve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845712#action_12845712
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
{quote} Hmm... what does JMM say a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845703#action_12845703
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
{quote}
Sounds like awesome prog
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845400#action_12845400
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
{quote}
Sounds great - let's t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845398#action_12845398
]
Michael Busch edited comment on LUCENE-2324 at 3/15/10 4:3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845398#action_12845398
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
{quote}
I think we can do even better
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845391#action_12845391
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
I'll reply on LUCENE-2324.
>
Welcome guys! :)
Sounds really like some great progress in such a short time!
Michael
On 3/15/10 8:25 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
The merge of Solr and Lucene dev is well underway... Lucene already
has a bunch of new committers... welcome aboard!
And overnight tons of work was done (and be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845199#action_12845199
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2324:
---
Here is an interesting article a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845190#action_12845190
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
OK I opened LUCENE-2324. We can c
: Improvement
Components: Index
Reporter: Michael Busch
Assignee: Michael Busch
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.1
See LUCENE-2293 for motivation and more details.
I'm copying here Mike's summary he posted on 2293:
Change the approach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845159#action_12845159
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
bq. How about a new issue?
OK, will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845157#action_12845157
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
{quote}
Michael are you also goin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845155#action_12845155
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
Well, we need to keep our transacti
+1
Michael
On 3/14/10 9:53 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should do away with
the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have everyone be committers. Practically
speaking, this would make all existing contrib commi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845048#action_12845048
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
I'm tempted to get rid of the po
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845047#action_12845047
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
{quote}
but does anyone out there w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-2312:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.2)
3.1
> Search on IndexWriter's RA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845032#action_12845032
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
I'll try to tackle this one!
&g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch reassigned LUCENE-2312:
-
Assignee: Michael Busch
> Search on IndexWriter's RA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12845031#action_12845031
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2312:
---
{quote}
Also, we could store the f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12842502#action_12842502
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2302:
---
Hmm maybe this is too much magic? Woul
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841923#action_12841923
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
bq. So about the int[], would that b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841915#action_12841915
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
{quote}
This is a great approach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841745#action_12841745
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
{quote}
Won't this complicate t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841744#action_12841744
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
{quote}
But if each DW maintains its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841617#action_12841617
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
bq. The big advantage is that all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841545#action_12841545
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
{quote}
I thought that when (3) hap
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841407#action_12841407
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
bq. Yes, I think each DW will hav
1 - 100 of 1549 matches
Mail list logo
