I have seen, we have the same problem with the next changes entry, 2046 :(
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 12:26
I looked through the 2.9.1 changes and found none that was too new.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781880#action_12781880
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
I would keep it as it is, because we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781885#action_12781885
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
...not only AutomatonQueries can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781887#action_12781887
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
For testing we could add two AtomicIntegers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781911#action_12781911
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
what is UTF-38? :-) I think you mean UTF-32
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781922#action_12781922
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
bq. Uwe, where do you see UTF-38
Patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781924#action_12781924
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
about the cleanupPrefix method: it is only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781938#action_12781938
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1458:
---
...not to talk about TermRangeQueries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781958#action_12781958
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2094:
---
Maybe we put this into UnicodeUtils
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781983#action_12781983
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2094:
---
It would not hurt, the Set is only used
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12782007#action_12782007
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2094:
---
+1 for breaking backwards for these chars
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12782026#action_12782026
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1606 at 11/24/09 5:09 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12782033#action_12782033
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
OK, so doesn't affect NRQ, as it uses
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12782042#action_12782042
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
I think the approach with nextEnum() would
properties to use version 3.1-dev. The nightly svn target was already
changed.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12782056#action_12782056
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
yes.
Automaton Query/Filter (scalable
Here is the rationale for that:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-builds/200911.mbox/%3c4B0C1563.
6050...@apache.org%3e
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u
and I will create the tag (if I get 2 more votes).
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Andi Vajda [mailto:va...@osafoundation.org]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:46 PM
To: java-dev
So who has an account at the moment, I know of Mike and Grant?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:52 PM
Two things:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1769
and setting the version number as stated in the release howto to 3.1-dev
for the future builds (which are not working at the moment because node
down). The svn dir nightly was already changed.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12782112#action_12782112
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
Should we additionally deprecate
and setting the version number as stated in the release howto to 3.1-
dev
for the future builds (which are not working at the moment because node
down).
Done.
Thanks!
The svn dir nightly was already changed.
I'm not following L-1769. Is there an action to take there or not? I
another FileSwitchDirectory as secondary
and so on.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Otis Gospodnetic [mailto:otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:32 PM
To: java-dev
Hi Grant,
We created new keys during the key-signing on ApacheCon and lot's of
committers upgraded to 4096. Mine is new and 4096 bit and also
simonw and
rmuir got new ones (now appearing in KEYS file).
Grant *replaced* his key in the KEYS file, but if Grant signed an
older
release
That is correct behaviour, because the target of copyTo must support all
interfaces implemented (see docs). So you cannot copy a Token to a
TermAttribute (because it would be a loss in information), but the other way
round is possible.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781384#action_12781384
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
Have you tried aut with NRQ, too? If not I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781385#action_12781385
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
bq. think numeric range might do out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2075:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2075.patch
I updated the patch to add overrides. I also had to add one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781410#action_12781410
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
I tested with an 5 mio doc index containing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781410#action_12781410
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2075 at 11/23/09 2:13 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781460#action_12781460
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
Because of random ranges on the whole range
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781594#action_12781594
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
bq. I wonder if your test is getting any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781621#action_12781621
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
I changed my benchmark to better show
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781663#action_12781663
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2086:
---
No problem, you can commit to 3.0 branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781667#action_12781667
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
bq. Perhaps it's just the ratio of seeks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2092:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.1
3.0.1
2.9.2
BooleanQuery.hashCode
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781806#action_12781806
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2086:
---
Just commit it. It is so simple, so if I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2086:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.0.1
2.9.2
When resolving deletes, IW should resolve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781806#action_12781806
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2086 at 11/24/09 7:16 AM
the bugfix at least to 2.9.2 and 3.0.1
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 4:07 PM
To: gene...@lucene.apache.org; java-dev
()==0 for TermAttribute,
posIncr==1,.).
Hope that explains your questions.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
_
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 9:37 AM
To: java-dev
on that!!! If the Tokenizer already added attributes to it, the
Token impl added by the Filter will never be added (because the interfaces
are still available). So Just for keeping Token, do *not* try to cast all
attributes to Token, this will fail (see next mail).
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2088
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.9.1, 2.9, 3.0
Reporter: Uwe Schindler
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 3.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2088:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2088.patch
Here the patch, will commit soon and respawn 3.0.
I will also
If you use it type unsafe without generics, it will break. And we need it
for 2.9.
I was thinking about both variants and thought it would be better to leave
it in. I will merge this now to 2.9, too.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781124#action_12781124
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2088:
---
If you use it type unsafe without generics
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2087:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Remove recursion in NumericRangeTermEnum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2088:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2088-test.patch
This patch shows how you can break.
As Shai said
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781129#action_12781129
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2088:
---
Thinking about it more and reading
http
the interrupt status.
--
Thanks,
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-
To unsubscribe, e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781138#action_12781138
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2089:
---
bq. ha - too much wine last night to laugh
parts of my code and remove lots of unneeded casts
(thanks to generics). :-)
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 4:07 PM
ThreadInterruptedException that extends RuntimeException and
clears the interrupt status.
--
Thanks,
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u
, it cannot be verified.
Should I revert the replacement and add the old and new pub key of Grant
again before I publish the file? See also the code signing docs of Apache,
there you find the hint ...keep all former keys available, even if you get
new keys...
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1606:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1606.patch
Some cleanups and a more consistent endEnum handling. Also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1606:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1606.patch
Again some updates, moved the '*' and '?' constants also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1606:
--
Component/s: (was: contrib/*)
Search
Automaton Query/Filter (scalable
.
--
Thanks,
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
I opened an issue in INFRA to get a Hudson account. I forgot the issue
number and now I cannot find it. It is even not listed under my name. How
can this happen?
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message
Hi Simon,
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
I opened an issue in INFRA to get a Hudson account. I forgot the issue
number and now I cannot find it. It is even not listed under my name.
How
can this happen?
Try to search you maili inbox :)
Doesn't
I am now trying to find it with JIRA Client GUI...
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 3:57 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1991?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1991.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Similarity#score deprecated method - javadoc reference
Issues are missing after JIRA Client 1.4.1 synchronization, too.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 4:04 PM
And Hudson on the Slowlaris Zone is also dead since 7 days...
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2009 4:34 PM
To: java
Affects Versions: 2.9.1, 2.9, 3.0
Reporter: Uwe Schindler
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.1
Attachments: LUCENE-2087.patch
The current FilteredTermEnum in NRQ uses setEnum() which itsself calls next().
This may lead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2087:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2087.patch
I will commit this soon.
Remove recursion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2087:
--
Description:
The current FilteredTermEnum in NRQ uses setEnum() which itsself calls next
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2087:
--
Description:
The current FilteredTermEnum in NRQ uses setEnum() which itsself calls next
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2087.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision: 882977
Remove recursion in NumericRangeTermEnum
Yes since Tuesday.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Simon Willnauer [mailto:simon.willna...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 9:00 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781040#action_12781040
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
bq. BTW the flex branch fixes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12780748#action_12780748
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
I like it, too, some thoughts:
- Maybe
simple, so I think it can be
included in the final artifacts without any further RC.
When we start the vote on Sunday, we could release 3.0 on the date in
CHANGES.txt (2009-11-25).
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12780801#action_12780801
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
bq. Uwe, i looked at the WildcardTermEnum
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12780801#action_12780801
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1606 at 11/20/09 10:45 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12780824#action_12780824
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
The initial seek should really be optimized
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1606:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1606.patch
Hi Robert,
here is my patch. The WildCard and RegExp test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2075:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2075.patch
Updated patch, adds missing @Overrides, we added in 3.0
We also had some (maybe helpful) opinions :-)
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: ysee...@gmail.com [mailto:ysee...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Yonik
Seeley
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779354#action_12779354
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2075 at 11/18/09 9:39 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779399#action_12779399
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2076:
---
Because of that I moved this issue to 3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779465#action_12779465
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2037:
---
I already made a propsal
Hudson says, the lucene node is dead, so builds are stuck since 2 days. Does
anybody knows more?
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/computer/lucene.zones.apache.org%20(So
laris%2010)/
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779506#action_12779506
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2080:
---
+1, commit it to 3.0, too
Its only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779535#action_12779535
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2037:
---
We have a second place (I did not implement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779560#action_12779560
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
Looks good! Can this cache subclass
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2075:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2075.patch
As PriorityQueue is generified since Lucene 3.0, I added
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2075:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-2075.patch)
Share the Term - TermInfo cache across threads
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779639#action_12779639
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2075:
---
Hi Yonik, thaks, that you used my class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779646#action_12779646
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2075 at 11/18/09 8:39 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-2077:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
Works as expected, thanks! I will commit this to trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2077?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2077.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed:
At revision: 881213 (trunk)
At revision: 881216 (3.0)
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12778815#action_12778815
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2073:
---
How about adding a general note into some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2074:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
Committed 3.0 part in revision: 881317
I also committed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2074:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2074.patch
Updated patch for current trunk (merged). It also minimalized
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779023#action_12779023
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2073:
---
bq. Of course, one never knows, I feel like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779043#action_12779043
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2073:
---
Text looks good, maybe we should still add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2076:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
3.1
I see no reason to duplicate this method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12779083#action_12779083
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2073:
---
+1, ok
Document issues involved
901 - 1000 of 2976 matches
Mail list logo
