Seamless online upgrades have their place too... say you are upgrading
one server at a time in a cluster.
-Yonik
Apache Lucene Eurocon 2010
18-21 May 2010 | Prague
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Earwin Burrfoot ear...@gmail.com wrote:
I like the idea of index conversion tool over silent
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Earwin Burrfoot ear...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 17:17, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
wrote:
Seamless online upgrades have their place too... say you are upgrading
one server at a time in a cluster.
Nothing here that can't be solved
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:22 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
* There is no back compat across major releases (index nor APIs),
but full back compat within branches.
This would match how many other projects work (KS/Lucy, as Marvin
describes above; Apache Tomcat;
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:39 AM, DM Smith dmsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe have the index store the version(s) and use that when constructing a
reader or writer?
That would cause a reindex to change behavior (among other problems).
-Yonik
Apache Lucene Eurocon 2010
18-21 May 2010 | Prague
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Chris Male gento...@gmail.com wrote:
While having fewer boxes means fewer term queries to make against the index,
more documents means more costly calculations to filter out those extraneous
documents.
Filtering out documents (greater selectivity) seems like
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Chris Male gento...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org
On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:06 AM, Chris Male wrote:
For those doing just Cartesian Tier filtering it seems like the new
approach is a win, but for those
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12856984#action_12856984
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2359:
--
Hi Nicolas, I like the idea of reducing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2359?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12857006#action_12857006
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2359:
--
Perhaps I'm misreading the table? I had
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855752#action_12855752
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2386:
--
I think Solr's spellchecker should be OK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12854621#action_12854621
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2380:
--
bq. We could also do shared byte[] blocks
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 9:06 AM, sh...@apache.org wrote:
JIRA-2353: Config incorrectly handles Windows absolute pathnames
The JIRA-2353 part is my fault - Shai asked me the right format for
JIRA linking, and I got it wrong!
Should be LUCENE-2353 of course. need...more...coffee...
-Yonik
For Solr, we can just move the current trunk to a 15 branch.
-Yonik
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Mar 22, 2010, at 8:27 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi all,
the discussion where to do the development after the merge, now gets actual:
Currently
Of you have checkouts of the previous trunks that you don't want to
re-checkout, then use svn switch.
Solr trunk was moved to a 1.5 branch, so for old trunk checkouts, cd
into your directory and do
svn switch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/branches/branch-1.5-dev
For newtrunk
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Mar 23, 2010, at 10:09 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
3. Other nightly build stuff. My cron tabs, etc. I will update them to
point at the new trunk.
OK, I updated my cron tab for the site check out of Lucene.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Michael Busch busch...@gmail.com wrote:
OK I reran the tests sequentially with my LUCENE-2329 patch applied. The
same test failed again:
[junit] Test org.apache.solr.client.solrj.embedded.JettyWebappTest FAILED
Everything else looks good. So it should be
wait, wait... no...
solr-and-some-java-apis-...@lucene.apache.org
-Yonik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm confused... what is the need for a new name? The only place where
there is a conflict is in the top level svn tree...
Agree, no need to re-brand.
What about something general like:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
To the best of my knowledge, it
hasn't been decided that Lucene and Solr merge and become ONE thing
Depends on what the meaning of thing is ;-)
We have merged into one development project. But Lucene and Solr as
separate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12847647#action_12847647
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2335:
--
This is also useful for MultiReader
E, let's strive for slightly better commit messages ;-)
-Yonik
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:48 AM, uschind...@apache.org wrote:
Author: uschindler
Date: Thu Mar 18 11:48:11 2010
New Revision: 924731
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=924731view=rev
Log:
LUCENE-2326: As rmuir seems to
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Michael Busch busch...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, we're in review-and-commit process, not commit-and-review. Changes
have to be
proposed, discussed and ideally attached to jira as patches first.
Correction, just for the sake of avoiding future confusion (i.e. I'm
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
I think it like the 1st option best (lucene moves as subdir to solr's
current trunk SVN path), but I don't feel strongly.
This'd mean one could simply checkout lucene alone and do everything
you can do today.
IRC has been discussed to death at Apache:
http://markmail.org/search/?q=IRC+list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.general
Look for the spikes... like this:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Jake Mannix jake.man...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
If we move lucene under Solr's existing svn path, ie:
/solr/trunk/lucene
Chiming in just a bit here - isn't there any concern that
Due to a tremendous amount of work by our newly merged committer
corps, the get-on-lucene-trunk branch (branches/solr) is ready for
prime-time as the new solr trunk! Lucene and Solr need to move to a
common trunk for a host of reasons, including single patches that can
cover both, shared tags and
I've merged JIRA permissions - let me know if I accidentally left anyone out.
Looking forward to the communities working more closely again!
(go Robert, go! ;-)
-Yonik
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Per the vote on general@ to merge committers,
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 03/14/2010 06:37 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Mar 14, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
This time a +1 without discuss :-)
Yeah, but Uwe, the thread was DISCUSS, not VOTE! :-)
I had a whole spiel about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844700#action_12844700
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2308:
--
For the non-expert user, it's just a label
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844707#action_12844707
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2308:
--
I'm not sure if strict immutability
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844716#action_12844716
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2308:
--
bq. I'm really unsure about this if people
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12844722#action_12844722
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2308:
--
Of course... given that Fieldable
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12841595#action_12841595
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2294:
--
Yay, we'll be able to remove SolrIndexConfig
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
I've never tried to learn a command-line invocation of a test
case for a single test method, I've always just used the IDE
to run individual methods
Right, I've been doing bunches of Solr dev which for me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12836178#action_12836178
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2271:
--
I'm starting to think that handling NaN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12836180#action_12836180
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2271:
--
bq. maybe we should keep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835750#action_12835750
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2271:
--
bq. its not a bug, as its doc'ed to work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835762#action_12835762
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2271:
--
bq. A design bug that function queries score
queries with zero boosts don't work
---
Key: LUCENE-2270
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2270
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.9
Reporter: Yonik
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835203#action_12835203
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2270:
--
The problem is twofold: a query with only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-2270:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2270.patch
Attached patch that normalizes the query norm in Query.weight
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835297#action_12835297
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2270:
--
Another thing to note is that this patch does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835360#action_12835360
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2270:
--
OK, I'll commit this shortly to all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-2270.
--
Resolution: Fixed
committed to trunk and branches 2.9, 3.0
queries with zero boosts don't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12833481#action_12833481
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2262:
--
It doesn't seem like this type of bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12833493#action_12833493
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2262:
--
bq. yonik, that's not what this issue
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Shay Banon kim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com
It really shouldn't be heavily used.
For a sorted search, get() is called once per segment in the index.
There is no synchronization to retrieve per
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Shay Banon kim...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to try and improve concurrency in Lucene in several places,
and thought I would start with FieldCacheImpl. The implementation is heavily
synchronized on both a global map and on creation values for a pretty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12830603#action_12830603
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2252:
--
The thing about stored fields is that it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12828633#action_12828633
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2232:
--
A branch mispredict can be more costly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12828218#action_12828218
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2232:
--
bq. Has it been tried to unroll getVInt
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:24 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Bummer.
So the only viable workarounds are 1) don't use Thread.interrupt (nor,
things like Future.cancel, which in turn use Thread.interrupt) with
NIOFSDir, or 2) we fix NIOFSDir to reopen the channel AND the
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Could we get the Channel (and other necessary classes) implementation from
Apache Harmony
Public JDK methods don't have the low level stuff to implement our
own, so rolling our own or using Harmony would require native
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12802854#action_12802854
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1990:
--
bq. Using aligned ints would save
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12802885#action_12802885
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1990:
--
bq. In the aligned case, and with the right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12802887#action_12802887
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2221:
--
If you only tested 32 bit on the P4, that can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12802887#action_12802887
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on LUCENE-2221 at 1/20/10 4:36 PM
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Dawid Weiss dawid.we...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there anyone with access to an Intel I7-machine? I'd be curious
what the results of this benchmark are, given the new JVM intrinsics
introduced in HotSpot 1.7:
FYI, the AMD Phenom also has the POPCNT instruction.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12802972#action_12802972
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2221:
--
bq. Results from Intel I7 - an improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801856#action_12801856
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2221:
--
bq. I'm sure Yonik has implemented precalced
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801880#action_12801880
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2221:
--
Ah yeah, missed that.
In fact it appears
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801429#action_12801429
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2213:
--
bq. The thing is, if we blindly add the extra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801437#action_12801437
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2198:
--
One random thought is to wonder how much
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801442#action_12801442
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2198:
--
bq. If we start to discuss about such topics
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801457#action_12801457
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2198:
--
bq. Only in the case that having multiple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801182#action_12801182
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2216:
--
Thanks Dawid!
hashCode and equals probably
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-2216:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2216.patch
I haven't tested this patch, but this seems like a simple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801235#action_12801235
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2216:
--
bq. This is only true if there is happens
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801249#action_12801249
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on LUCENE-2216 at 1/16/10 6:34 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2213?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801261#action_12801261
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2213:
--
Instead of masking with 7fff... you can mask
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801266#action_12801266
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2216:
--
bq. my argument is that ideally it should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801270#action_12801270
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2216:
--
bq. For what it's worth, I checked
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2216?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-2216.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1
Committed in trunk. Thanks for bringing this up
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
return (targetSize 3) + (targetSize 9 ? 3 : 6) + targetSize;
For input values of 9 or greater, all that formula does is multiply by 1.125
and add 6. (Values enumerated below my sig.)
The comment appears to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-2197.
--
Resolution: Fixed
committed.
StopFilter should not create a new CharArraySet if the given
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12798040#action_12798040
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2197:
--
Sorry Simon... I think I just got fed up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797692#action_12797692
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2195:
--
Seems that this patch would just slow things
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2195?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797701#action_12797701
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2195:
--
It's not quite the same - no method call
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797740#action_12797740
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2094:
--
I obviously haven't had the chance to keep up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797779#action_12797779
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2197:
--
bq. Yet, according to the javadoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797784#action_12797784
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2197:
--
Comment from LUCENE-2094 the other issue:
bq
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-2197:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-2197.patch
Here's a patch that reverts to the previous behavior of using
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12790360#action_12790360
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2156:
--
ensureOpen() is to help catch coding mistakes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12788925#action_12788925
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2142:
--
+1
FieldCache.getStringIndex should
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
Sorry, right, test passed on trunk, but it's still not valid even on
trunk (I think?). Ie TermEnum.term() is undefined until you've called
next?
You're thinking TermDocs I think - TermEnum.term() is defined
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787514#action_12787514
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2135:
--
bq. A better approach is to don IR-keyed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787586#action_12787586
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1377:
--
There are some downsides for Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787600#action_12787600
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1377:
--
bq. Who is this we of which you speak?
I did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787601#action_12787601
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1377:
--
bq. maybe this just gives another reason
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787626#action_12787626
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2135:
--
bq. Hmm... this actually gets tricky to get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787637#action_12787637
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1377:
--
bq. Anything which isn't Solr-specific should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12787669#action_12787669
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1377:
--
bq. solr users benefit on the next release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12784990#action_12784990
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1483:
--
That's strange... looks like SorterTemplate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783784#action_12783784
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2094:
--
Preserving gaps from stopword removal isn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783796#action_12783796
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2094:
--
Why? What undesirable things happen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783829#action_12783829
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2094:
--
bq. Yes it causes. If you have an old index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2094?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12783829#action_12783829
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on LUCENE-2094 at 11/30/09 8:15 PM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781407#action_12781407
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2075:
--
What about replacing the expensive division
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781633#action_12781633
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2075:
--
bq. For NRQ the overall improvement has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781636#action_12781636
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1458:
--
In general, I think things like unpaired
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781729#action_12781729
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1606:
--
geeze... maybe we should have just stuck
1 - 100 of 1486 matches
Mail list logo
