In my opinion, the back-compat tags are not really needed. The checkout
command for test-tag should simply use a revision number to checkout.
Whenever you commit something in the backwards branch, you set the revision
number in common-build.xml and you are done. No need for a extra tag, for me
this
+1
I don't like the tags either.
Michael
On 1/6/10 10:49 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
In my opinion, the back-compat tags are not really needed. The checkout
command for test-tag should simply use a revision number to checkout.
Whenever you commit something in the backwards branch, you set the re
+1
using a svn revision would make things cleaner.
(3 positive german votes :)
simon
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
> +1
>
> I don't like the tags either.
>
> Michael
>
> On 1/6/10 10:49 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>>
>> In my opinion, the back-compat tags are not really ne
I'll open an issue when I am back in Bremen.
I tried a little bit with svn and found out:
- We just give the rev number in common-build in syntax backwards-rev="-r
". By that you can use ant -Dbackwards-rev="" to force test-tag (we
should rename that to "test-backwards" and keep a test-tag wi
Get rid of baclwards tags
-
Key: LUCENE-2193
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2193
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Uwe Schindler
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797081#action_12797081
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2193:
This sounds great! Basically, ra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2193:
--
Summary: Get rid of backwards tags (was: Get rid of baclwards tags)
> Get rid of backwards ta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797095#action_12797095
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2127:
I think you should be able to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797112#action_12797112
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2127:
-
bq. If your "large queue" is a list/arr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797130#action_12797130
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2127:
bq. I was just thinking of an arr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797134#action_12797134
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2127:
-
bq. A fixed array of ScoreDocs should w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797157#action_12797157
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2127:
bq. It's not fixed.
Ahh OK. We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797163#action_12797163
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2127:
-
Another issue w/ this "raw" collector i
Other than what's left of the TokenStream issues, I think we just need a
compression solution - which shouldn't
be difficult.
- Mark
Robert Muir wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1657
>
> i just struckthrough the things that are done.
>
>
>> Mark, Robert: How far are we with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2035?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-2035.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Christopher!
> TokenSources.getTokenStream() does not assign positionI
: I prefer to see "tags" used for what it is, a place to park an actually
: released; it shouldn't be used for testing or its content changed
: dynamically.
I have no opinion about the rest of this thread (changing the back compat
testing to use a specific revision on the previous release branch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-860:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-860-1.patch
updated patch that also includes doc site level changes
> site should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-860:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-860-2.patch
> site should call project "Lucene Java", not just "Lucene"
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-2127:
Attachment: LUCENE-2127.patch
OK, I think this has some legs, assuming I did everything ri
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797490#action_12797490
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2127:
--
The benchmark code has jira table out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797496#action_12797496
]
Jens Muecke commented on LUCENE-1141:
-
Patch doesn't apply any more.
common.compile-t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797499#action_12797499
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2127:
--
There's a bunch of formatting changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12797501#action_12797501
]
Jens Muecke commented on LUCENE-1489:
-
I tried this patch. After applying, following t
23 matches
Mail list logo
