mine was in the GZIP ( i think output ) streams. reading was OK, but an
output stream left a leakage, that eventually ate up all my 256meg
memory. This was fixed in 1.4, but may still be around in 1.3.
Matt Avery wrote:
The only two memory leaks I know of in the JVM are in Swing. The
indeterm
I;m curious if you looked at all to the program size, and not the size
of the GC ? It may be that a 'native' routine leaks independently of the
GC.
BTW, that a yes. JVM calls upon many functions/services/libraries to do
its bidding. Any one of them may request memory ( from the system pool )
,
You (appear to ) have the same problem that I had. The comm.jar should
be placed in the 'ext' directory, rather than the 'lib' directory. ( i
think ). The doc's are exceptionally outdated. I hope this helps.
Alexander Busch wrote:
Hi,having
j2re1.3.1 running I am trying to run an app that requir
I think what you see is that when your wait expires, you will be
scheduled within the next 1/1000 sec ( in reality when the clock tick
happens, the scheduler looks at the expired timers, and reschedules ).
So if your timer expires at the beginning of a clock cycle, you may have
to wait to the next
The downside for sure it that you now interrupt the cpu 1000 times per
second. The overhead in processing the interrupt. ( context save,
registers saved ). The services performed at a clock ( jiffy ) tick (
timeout services, scheduling services ), are now done more frequently.
but with 1 gighz mac
Although this may be true, one can also say that SUN no longer gives
'others' any opportunities to port Java to other linux machines. For
example it costed FreeBSD/JAVA some $3000 in ( their own ) legal costs
to obtain a free license to distribute the java binaries. It also took a
long time to ob
my out of mem error is/was due to the failure of GZIPOutputStream to
release its memory fetched outside of GC.
I used "top" to display the amount of mem used by the active process. If
that grows larger as your GC stays the same, then u have a mem leak
outside of GC.
I then looked at the contents
I think that the http://www.rxtx.org group has what ur looking for. They
dont supply the JAVA api, but rather the native code that is used by the
java api. I think u just have to compile the 'c' sources, get the
official comm jar file, and away u go.
/gat
Jøran Barkhald Sandberg wrote:
> I'm ru
I cannot speak for either compaq || blackdown, but at:
http://www.compaq.com/java/documentation/1.3.1/linux/docs/release_notes.html
u will find a linux/jvm WITH a JIT for the alpha computer. It was built with
Compaq's CCC compiler, as well as their equivalent c++ compiler. And as some
recent dis
Follow-up, the minimization to the scroll-bar did not happen in jdk1.2.2,
just FYI.
/gat
Amol Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> Following is a code which i use to invoke a JDialog on Red Hat 7.0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
I have also encountered the same "symptom", when a file dialog menu was
shown for a second time. The first time presented it it displayed. The
second, and all other times is was created 'minimized' ( i.e. on the task
bar ). This, I think, is a bad interaction between the awt & the motif
used to d
Did u say u herd clicks ?
If u did, then i dont think that is an underrun problem. The kernel, on
underrun, actually keeps on feeding the device with silence.
The problem with that was the the number of bytes processed by the device, can
become larger that the numbers of bytes the pgm actually
I have not seen this in general, at least not in the java/linux's that i have
created ( for alpha platforms though ) . But then I have been running the
java2demo application, which only ran at 22khz/stereo/16bit. maybe i'll get your
demo pgm, if only i can find a legit ( to have ) mp3 file.
/gat
In general what u hear are underrun errors ( where the sound device is not
feed fast enough ).
second generalization is that the linux/sound is not a real-time system - an
active swap can really do ur program, as well as the proper feeding of the
device, "in" . Higher priority tasks can also caus
I think this is just passing the buck. Javac should do its 'optimizations' (
whatever they may be ) irrespective of the fact that a JIT might be there (
or any other accellerator/translator ). Nor is there any guarantee that a
JIT will optimize anything in its translations.
Mo DeJong wrote:
The missing piece in ur analysis is that the blackdown group got a commercial
license to do the port. It is a license that sun did not give/grant to me when
i did the Java port to the Digital Alpha computers running Linux. Without that
license, or pre commitment to grant a license, you are wasting
Exactly when was this suppose to happen ? This post is a year old.
"This agreement enables the Linux community
to develop and distribute media-enhanced applications for the Java 2 platform
for non-commercial use. The Blackdown team will serve as a conduit to bring
these Java Media APIs to the ent
I have done a linux/java 1.2 port to alpha
/gat
Jo Uthus wrote:
> Ilya wrote:
>
> | Is there any work being done on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux on Alpha?
>
> I recently attended a seminar where COMPAQ talked about their ongoing
> Linux-work.
>
> The representative said that JDK1.2 would be ready fo
Has anyone answered ur question ?
Jonah Michaud wrote:
> Hi, does anyone know if there is a port in the works for Alpha (EV56)
> running RedHat 6.0? I saw a message about it from a couple months ago
> and I was wondering if there was any update. I don't see anything about
> it on the JCK page.
Sometime, i think in December 1999, there was suggested, in one of Sun's
news blurbs, that you were going to unveil a different JDK licensing
model.
I am in the hope that thie new model, would allow me to continue porting
the JDK1.2 & JDK1.1.x series on to the alpha/linux.
As you may be aware, tha
Maybe the other regetable thing is that it is written in c++, and not
compiled on Dec Alpha machiines :-{
gat
MARUYAMA Fuyuhiko wrote:
> Hi Renzo and folks!
>
> From: Renzo Pecoraro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Java Decompiler
> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 02:11:51 -0500
>
> > Help!
> > I just acci
How come no current "Alpha Information" on java-linux ???
gat
Stephen Wynne wrote:
5.8.1. Alpha Issues
>
> Alpha processor port information.
>
> Last modified:
>
> $Id: alpha.sgml,v 1.1 1999/12/29 07:53:30 stevemw Exp $
>
> 5.8.1.1. Is there an Alpha Port?
>
> Yes, there have been (
I tried getting voicenet UN-banned. but no luck. This will be the last
time i will try to indirectly write a mail to u
"Wolfgang HOSCHEK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>", though no
fault of our own. :-/
But I thought this info may be of some use.
gat
Tried ur benchmark test on my jdk1.2/jd
Like many things being offered by SUN, it may very well that the Java Platform
Debugging Architecture (JPDA) was never licensed to Blackdown. I would also
suspect ur argument would be more meritorious if it wasn't for the fact the all
platforms have to be compatable ( as far as JCK is concerned )
Jeff Galyan wrote:
> Someone suggested that Sun is trying to "fracture" the Linux Java
> community. How does that make any sense? Do you really think Sun cares
> in the least whose VM you're using? All Sun cares about is that *all*
> implementations of Java conform to the spec - otherwise compati
.com) (209.71.85.41)
by mail12.voicenet.com with SMTP; 10 Dec 1999 08:09:39 -
Sender: gat
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 02:06:40 -0500
From: Uncle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Big-Endian
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.07 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
MI
Any way to get in touch with this guy ? i keep getting Remote host said: 550 This
domain is banned.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gee, fellas,
Its too bad u didn't feel this way when SUN gave u an exclusive license to
do a COMMERCIAL license. I'd invite u to my life-boat, but there just isn't
enough room.
gat
juergen Kreileder wrote:
> AFAIK Sun has all the right to use our code. But todays press release
> is a slap in th
"Sun announced several course corrections today. For one thing, the company will
remove licensing and royalty payments for the desktop version of the software,
Java 2 Standard Edition, beginning Jan. 31."
gee, maybe i'll be back in the alpha/linux porting business again.
gat
Scott Murray wrote:
ERTICAL;
> > users.add( lHost, gbc );
> >
> > gbc.gridheight = 1;
> > gbc.gridwidth = 1;
> > gbc.fill = GridBagConstraints.NONE;
> > users.add( lHostName, gbc );
> > gbc
I have done a port.
gat
Ilya wrote:
> Is there any work being done on porting JDK 1.2 to Linux on Alpha?
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have ported the java 1.2 ( but not 1.2.1, or 1.2.2 ) some time in the
beginning of this (1999 ) year my non-comm license will expire in the
middle of december though, and Sun has refused to renew that license, or
offer any other in its place.
gat
/http://www.voicenet.com/~gatgul/Java.html
Jo
Its interesting to observer that these native calls appear to be 'IP' calls (
sendpacket, accept, attach, etc... ). it would seem that
they could use the java.net classes to do the work. BUT i suspect that these are fake
Are there specs to these native calls ?
gat
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> On
Is the pgm avail on-line ?
gat
Paul Grepps wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying the WeatherServer RMI example out of the "Just Java 2" book
> and I'm getting the following exception.
> I
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
It really presumes u know a lot about how the stack is organized, how
interrupts/signals are processed, and how u can manipulate pages to become
'executable' with the appropriate linkages and such.
It also presumes u know sparc assembler, of which i do not know.
Otherwise for the most part, it do
I'm sorry for this intrusion,
Is there an example ( concrete to some degree ) of how to make this
happen ? ( was it posted ? )
gat
Rob Clark wrote:
> Chris Abbey wrote:
>
>> But is that memory allocated out of the chunk of VM reserved as the
>> HEAP?
>
--
I'm sorry, but u appear to be angry
Calvin Austin wrote:
> Well you have totally missed that point, I was talking about choice of OS
> NT/Solaris/Linux for users, eg
I am aware of what I call "intel centrism". When some one says we ported to NT,
the intel part is always silent. When someone s
I think ur notion is somewhat short sighted:
1) The source -> free,
2) The Jck -> No so free ( exceeding bogus claim that ur not smart enough to run
the tests, but ur smart enough to port it, which porting, u seem to admit it , is
a difficult task )
3) Distribution -> Not so free.
4) so wheres t
Actually:
1) I'm running on a Digital Alpha computer, with separate root partitions of
RedHat 5.x & redhat 6.0
2) Netbeans is pure java, so it can run anywhere ( runs mostly anywhere on
my machine :-) )
3) This appears to be a kernel ( RedHat kernel 2.2.5-22 problem ) Where I
suspect that the user
cho faster that 1.2. BUT jdk 1.2/alpha has sound !
Rich Edwards wrote:
> This message is for Uncle George -
>
> We have been using jdk117_v2 very successfully on the Alpha for some
> time now, and are moving towards the 2.2 kernel, and the complete
> RedHat 6.0 system. Unfortun
I think you will find time is measured in Jiffies, and not millisecons/microseconds,
or nanoseconds. The only RTC clock is setup to nudge every Jiffy ( 1/60 for the
intel, and 1/1000 for alpha ) . Although u think it is better at 1/1000 - but this
represents 1000 interrupts per second every second
For myself, as the lone alpha-linux porter, is that the new model is very different
from the non-commercial lic agreement. With that agreement I can attempt to make
the JAVA JDK work & distribute to any and all folks that are interested -
FOR NO CHARGE of course.
The New Open license appears to cu
What was more interesting about the proj is that they say there is little to do
for any cpu architecture to get it to run. :-
gat
Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote:
> Nelson Minar wrote:
>
> > >When Sun formerly stated that Hotspot would be a commercial product
> > >there was not much competition ar
U just cant wait to bleed. Looks like 6.0 wont be released until may 10
In reality 2.1 appears to be a tiger with a different set of stripes, and
personality. glibc cheating ( oops hacking ) will have to be redone/or
relearned !
gat
Tom McMichael wrote:
> fhave gone unanswered ... some have sai
I think u will be placing your foot in the look&feel pool of muck. It may very
well be legal, and then again not. I dont believe its a licence u'll be
violating, but rather copyright infringement. Does MICROSOFT exclusively own the
graphics used to present the graphical context. In either case, i
Thank you,
But these are bugs in the tests distributed with the non-comm licenses.
If you dont want to repair the source defects, let me know - I will post them in my
release notes
that i distribute with my JDK 1.2 port.
thanks for ur time
gat
Kevin Ryan wrote:
> Thanks for your comments. You s
> On Thu, 11 Mar 1999 00:36:01 -, James D. Carr wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >
> >the class and source files (like I assume a lot of people do). My main
> >problem is a slow and sometimes unstable link to the Internet, so
> >downloading a 24MB file might take several attempts.
>
I think u need to
i Guess ur soul is ok
Christopher Rowan wrote:
> I saw a similar article somewhere else that got on my nerves.
>
> Don't let 'em steal your thunder!
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
My diffs would get u started with the i386 port, it was the i386/easy/first
step port to get my 64 bit port done. if that what u want to do
u can ask me some q's about the src.
gat
David Reeves wrote:
> Ito jdk1.2. The question is it possible to get the current diff's for
> the jdk1.2 or at lea
Gee -static to create a shared .so file ? maybe u wanna look at -shared !
> > libHelloNative.so: HelloNative.c HelloNative.h
> > gcc -c -o libHelloNative.so \
> > -static \
> > -I/usr/java/include \
> > -I/usr/java/include/genunix \
> >
Fonts have changed. From my look jdk1.2 want to really use scaleable
fonts/type1 fonts/truetype fonts. Scaleable fonts from X are the ones with
0-0-0-0 in them ( as this is the criteria used by jdk1.2)
type1&truetype are suppose to be from the OPENWIN directory, which is "" in my
build. There is a
i have a v3 of the non-com java port to the Digital Alpha. Someone gave me the
JavaCC ( jet another compiler compiler ) to try, and it failed to completely write
out one of the tables. ( one of Suns char to byte routines was broken - so much for
the JCK ). any way are u folks still offering some f
Sun does not support me in my attempts to get JAVA/Linux for Digital Alpha.
No Hardware, No telephone/fax/email support, and no Java Compatability Kit.
Nor has SUN attempted to do so with the whole Linux developer community.
Gerald Gutierrez wrote:
> So what exactly did SUN do when they spoke of
I do not think that there is a port, but rather an effort. i do not know
whats going on, but I can help in some regart to the port effort.
gat
Joel Shellman wrote:
> ail bounced. And the fact is I'm rather desparate.
>
> I saw Rob's post regarding Java on the BeOS and it renewed
> my hopes. Is th
I have completed my ( initial ) port of the JAVA JDK 1.2 NON-COMMERCIAL
sources from SUN. I only have 10 megs of ( FREE ISP ) disk space, and
therefor the sources, and the demo pieces cannot be found in the kit.
These pieces can be extracted from SUN's jdk.
The port can be found at:
www.
got the alpha 2.0.36 kernel from redhat 5.2/updates for alpha
still got the problem. Attached is a demo ( client/server) program that
demonstrates the loss of the SIGIO interrupt after a few EAGAIN failures. I do
not know why the loss, but for most of the failures there is a I "have no more
buffe
Are u folks aware that you wont get an EAGAIN/SIGIO sequence if there is no
avail socket buffer space ? on an O_NONBLOCK socketed fd, if u writev too
many characters ( approx 260k worth), u
1) get only a partial write ( ~~60k chars )
2) Try to write the other chars on the next writev() gets you
in reality, select() was universal to all kerns' !. poll() was software
emmalated in the 2.0.xx series. poll() was the orig choice of system call,
but history took a different turn on the linux boxes, where the functi
onality of poll had to be recreated so that most of the linux world would
run on
NETBEANS worked fairly well under ( alpha ) linux .
gat
Glenn Holmer wrote:
> JBuilder, and NetBeans, because they all run (or will soon) on
> Linux. Can anybody give opinions or sources of info that will
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
, I'm honestly not positive whether it took or not, since I
> can't get it up as window manager. However, I don't have the libXm.so
> error anymore (Thank you Uncle George!!). Now I have the following, and
> I'm really not at all sure where to start looking:
>
> %
As i said i dont know ( knew ? ) about DPS. The call that uses DPS has
been edited out ( ie no shared link undefines ) when this font/shared
lib is loaded in. So now i know, so i'll see if its avail.
gat
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Gnu announced in May (http://www.gnu.org/bulletins/bull24.html) tha
Javasoft, sometime in december, did begin to grant non-commercial access
to the 1.2 source. ( I submitted the form for the jdk 117 non-comm
license, but wrote on the form that the request is for the JDK 1.2
sources. )
I got the sources, and have worked on it to get to work on my NEW i386
i guess thats an oops,
motif for linix/alpha can be found at www.metrolink.com, and
not at www.metrowerks.com ( cant imagine why i got confused!)
sorry
gat
tried looking for the non-commercial license, and its terms - have u folks seen
that document? it seems that the "press release" relates to the commercial
aspects of the licensing/openness but not the non-comm's
gat
Jaco Greeff wrote:
> Visited the pages just now... the new pages are up. Wow! (A
with a site name like sun, u cant ask the sun folks in the US for help ?
well, a long time ago, to begin the port, u take the classes from a done
port, and place them in the directories where the build would put them.
I would also protect the classes from erasure while building, and also
making s
isn't a graduate trainee an undergraduate? sorry that this doesn't
answer your question, but your signature seemed interesting.
Karthik Vishwanath wrote:
> | Graduate trainee, |
> |
technically we are to change only the platform dependent code - hands tied
by license. Ur improvement would not fit into that catagory :( . PLEASE
file away at javasoft.
BTW this does not mean that it wont be used, or benefit those here. I have
no problem with this being posted here
gat
Ernst de
is swim motif avail ( free ? )
Eric Bohm wrote:
> I just upgraded to the jdk117_alpha21164a_bin and am having trouble
> with some of the demo programs seg faulting or aborting while using
> SWiM Motif.
>
Yes folks ( I think ) it ready for prime time. There was a binary
version v1, but there was an awt problem that showed up in the ide
"supermojo" ( i have no connection, AND have only a demo model ), and
has been superceeded by the binary files version v2. The classes file is
still version v1.
I H
u have my permission to post all those emails on this list. i'd like to see them
myself. I
think the previous offer was " who would u like to support ( with regard to the linux
porting project takeover ) u or the guy from javaworld ( i think ), i beleive my ans
was
neither. The previous dialog
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1998 11:45:59 -0400
From: Uncle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: None Avail
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: 1 , 2
what would the "deal" be for this utilization of the blackd
what is habanero???
gat
> But found some problems when trying to use habanero on top of it.
actually a 21164a ( the "a" really counts - who wuddya thunkit )
i'm gonny try to see if i can build for all processors with 117, and see
if it all will fit under 10 meg. these processors are ( 21064, 21164,
and 21164a ).
at the moment i am having probs with finding a home. The folks at
blackdown
can anyone give him a hand with the port.
H. Paul Haiduk wrote:
> --
> Can you give me a URL for Uncle George or for
> anyone else involved
> in the Linux port to the Digital Alpha platform?
> It seems that the
> URL: http://www.voicenet.com/~gatgul/JDK/ is now
>
I suppose they are, but i dont know for sure - the folks at voicenet.com dont
tell me when i have reached the 250mb/month xfer quota. Nor do they tell me when
the web site will be (or even if they will be ) reconnected.
There was an offer for putting the my ver of Alpha port on blackdown.org, but
i suppose this has something with the prob that i was having with drawImage of
demo/molecule viewer. At initialization time, a shared seg is created between the
client & X server to communicate the images u wanna draw - BUT it is a fixed size,
which is based upon ur first image. Guessing, from my
ts of other peripheral programs quickly.
gat
BTW the demo's are now a part of the JDK 117 src pkg.
Uncle George wrote:
> its not surprising to me, but there is no demos directory that comes with the
> jdk source from javasoft et al. if its packaged somewhere else, can u tell me?
>
same here, but in reality it was that admin that was a lot faster than
production - ie the paperwork was ready, but the source wasn't - oh well
gat
BTW, i looked at the POSTed on the archives ( it didn't seem to make it on the
list itself for me ) about the JIT from metrowerks. It seems a littl
Bec of the limited space & bandwidth, I was thinking of providing a
redhat rpm for the various alpha platforms ( 21064, 21164, and the
21164a processors ). I'd like to create the rpm, and submit the rpm to
redhat for their inclusion into the jewel set distribution.
Am i violating the bin license,
Bec of the limited space & bandwidth, I was thinking of providing a
redhat rpm for the various alpha platforms ( 21064, 21164, and the
21164a processors ). I'd like to create the rpm, and submit the rpm to
redhat for their inclusion into the jewel set distribution.
Am i violating the bin license,
the moment
gat
Bill Roman wrote:
> Uncle George wrote:
> >
> > it was compiled with egcs 1.1a, and -mcpu=21164a
> >
> >
> > Wes Nakamura wrote:
> >
> > > I've got an XL300, so it should be a 21164 (what's the difference
> > > betw
i was just trying to see some of the probs in doing a "Native" port of the java 116
jdk.
Its one thing to try to get ur task ( java ) done, without having to go to other
software
packages to get it to go also ( like gdb, libdl.so, lesstiff ( a while back ), ld ) .
Since it seems possible ( as it
interesting, considering that 1.2 isn't out yet. U got a mole in the sun
organization?
gat
just ;)
Steve Byrne wrote:
> Right. I've known projects that have done this and won big. Creating objects
> is somewhat expensive because it's a synchronous operation, and synchronized
> operations are s
Ugg, jet another version to ascend to.
cant wait till december, when 1.2 will be out
gat
Ulrich Kortenkamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today (or yesterday) the solaris and windows versions of the jdk 1.1.7
> were released. Is the porting team already porting this?
>
> BTW: Many thanks for your great work
would that be www.voicenet.com/~gatgul/JDK
some others have offered to stash away the stuff before the voicenet
bandwidth police got after me
can someone tell him where its can also be found?
gat
Todd Allen wrote:
> Your web page appears to be inaccessible. Is the Linux-Alpha port of JDK
> stil
Randy Chapman and
Steve Byrne & Uncle George
java.vendor.url= http://java.blackdown.org/java-linux.html
java.version = gat:09/22/98-22:20
java.class.version = 45.3
os.name= Linux
os.version = 2.0.33
os.arch= alpha
VolanoMark version = 1.0
Messages sent
wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 1998, Uncle George wrote:
> >can u tell me where it hurts ?
> >
> >
Canadian pizza, i dont think so . :-))) ( at least not for me. as i
dont think anyone can match the garlic pizza from manville, n.j ( yes the former
asbestos capital ))
gat
James Seigel wrote:
> You guys rockcan we send pizza to you anywherE?
>
i have no access to 1.2, other than the 386 ports that javasoft beta's
out.
RH 4.1 ???, i'm surprised that 116, built on redhat 5.0 would work at
all??? The library call dladdr() wasn't even avail at 4.1 time, which is
now used to figure out where the parentage of the .so library is
anyway - whe
before u all rush to get the JDK 116 port to the redhat 5.0 ALPHA box,
my ISP has sent me this nasty-gram regarding excessive web access usage
( see attached ) . ergo, when my 250 meg transfer limit is reached for
the month, that will be it for the month.
ANYWAY:
the JDK comes in two parts
ur missing the path pointer to alternate shared libs - LD_LIBRARY_PATH
so
try:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib
presuming that /usr/local/lib is where the libXm.so is stashed.
gat
Kerry Boguszewski-Odom wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to get Java running on an AlphaStation 200 runn
-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Sat, 29 Aug 1998 10:59:52 -0400
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rich Edwards)
Organization:
Codonics, Inc.
To:
java-linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Uncle George -
I'm having a pro
I do,
I do have a 116. But like most things the AWT doesn't work like the awt
from 115.
I have also tried the egcs ( alternate cc compiler for the alpha ). with
this compiler I can use byte/short machine instructions which should
speed up things. Interestingly enough though, the egcs compiled jav
interesting the things people do. i myself have not tried what ur doing,
but i suppose it is suppose to work. i'll have a look see. i suspect that
it is mainly a prob trying to find where the root dir to the lib.so are,
there is no libdl function that will do it . ( i suspect ). a hack was
made, a
BTW, yes i'd like one copy, if its being offered?
BUT
I have limited disk space from the ISP ( 10 megs ) for all my web stuff,
the java port is takeing near half. they wont give more than 10 ( unless
u give more $ ) , and they enforce it as u transfer it to the ftp-only (
to me - htt
sorry, not on that list. i tried at one time ( long time ago) , but just
didn't get in.
the porting list is not even advertised! there also doesnt seem to be an
archive list there either.
so who is to know?
so i guess the ans is no.
from ur inquiry, i suppose there is an effort to produce a sta
the jni for the alpha wasn't built ( as it has to bee in assembler ) until v10
of 115. The include files are also with v10. I dont have too much experience
with the JNI, but it does appear to work with 32 bit int/floats, and 64 bit
long/double's/addresses.
should be somewhere in http://www.voicen
i'd be interested in the enhancements to the 'c' debugger to support
threads.
gat
Bernd Kreimeier wrote:
> I got a statement from Vania Joloboff regarding
it is most likely trying to run the "lp" as in ( i tyhink) "/usr/bin/lp"
which doesnt exist there under redhat. u can symbolically link the lp's
together.
Laura L. Evangelista wrote:
> Sir,
>
> I tried to run your sample application "TestPrint" but it
> wouldn't print anything ... The print
did i miss something, OSF, & linuxthreads ? arent they different critters?
gat
Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> There is also OSF's JDK, which is a 1.1.6 JDK with linuxthreads
> support.
>
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
