Juergen Kreileder blackdown.de> writes:
> Any help is greatly appreciated. If you want to help, Karl will send
> you the necessary paperwork.
>
> Juergen
>
Oh, well. I've read the 8 pages long Non Disclosure Agreement that
Karl Asha sent me and I'm having doubts.
I like Java and I th
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Any help is greatly appreciated. If you want to help, Karl will send
> you the necessary paperwork.
>
>
> Juergen
>
Ok then, go ahead and send it to me. At least I can look at it.
If my skills would be enough, I'll try to do something with that.
Wiktor Wanda
Wiktor Wandachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it is the high time for JDK-1.4.2 for sparc + Linux.
Yep. The limiting factor is time.
> I work at the Technical University of Lodz, in Computer Science
> department, and I have to support a whole lab of Sun Blade 150
> machines. No Java
Juergen Kreileder writes:
> Elvis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Anyone knows if there is a JDK-1.4.2 version for sparc (Debian pkg) ? I
> > could not find it in any of the mirrors out there (ftp nor http)..
>
> There's no SPARC version of 1.4.2 currently. I'm working on it but I
> can't promise to
Thanks Juergen. There are 6 of us in the state of Virginia, US, crossing
our fingers :-)
Cheers,
Elvis
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> Elvis wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Anyone knows if there is a JDK-1.4.2 version for sparc (Debian pkg) ? I
> > could not find it in any of the mirr
Yeah... That's one idea I have contemplated for a week, but my skills are
limited at the moment with Java+sparc. Worst case scenario I will attempt
it, but I know I will have to bother some people for help :-)
-Elvis
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005, Ingo Krabbe wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 17:11
Elvis wrote:
Hello,
Anyone knows if there is a JDK-1.4.2 version for sparc (Debian pkg) ? I
could not find it in any of the mirrors out there (ftp nor http)..
There's no SPARC version of 1.4.2 currently. I'm working on it but I
can't promise to have it out before Christmas.
Juerge
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 17:11 schrieb Elvis:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone knows if there is a JDK-1.4.2 version for sparc (Debian pkg) ? I
> could not find it in any of the mirrors out there (ftp nor http)..
>
> If not I have to go back to Solaris which I would hate to do :-(*((
>
> -E.
>
>
> ---
Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2005 17:11 schrieb Elvis:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone knows if there is a JDK-1.4.2 version for sparc (Debian pkg) ? I
> could not find it in any of the mirrors out there (ftp nor http)..
>
> If not I have to go back to Solaris which I would hate to do :-(*((
>
> -E.
>
>
> ---
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 08:57:20AM -0500, Amit Kirdatt wrote:
> We have a web application which generates RTFs dynamically (uses jFor). One
> of the RTFs contains the following symbol ? (symbol for section). Now this
> symbol displays correctly if we start our JBoss server from the command
> line,
Nevermind, I found the problem. The cron environment does not have the
LANG=en_US env. var. set. Once I set that in my script everything works like
a charm
Thanks,
Amit
-Original Message-
From: Amit Kirdatt
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 8:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JDK 1.4.2 fo
Sorry, The thread dump soesn't have anything more than this.
Reg
Veda
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Bryant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 7:48 PM
To: Veda N Ponnusamy
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: JDK 1.4.2 hanging on futex
sometimes there is
sometimes there is more information on the deadlock at the bottom of the
thread dump (i think) including what thread was deadlocked with what...
Veda N Ponnusamy wrote:
I'm having problem with SUN jdk 1.4.2. My application deadlocks when its trying to find the file size. When I do a strace -p pi
Hari Om <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I downloaded and installed "j2sdk-1.3.1-02b-FCS-linux-ppc.bin" from
> the penguinppc.org web site and followed the instructions. I was
> able to INSTALL under /usr/local and also changed my PATH
> variable.but later when I test my java version it gives
> f
Thanks.
I ran the Swing app as root and it eventually created the preferences:
11/08/2002 18:42:34 java.util.prefs.FileSystemPreferences$3 run
INFO: Created system preferences directory in /etc/.java/.systemPrefs
11/08/2002 18:42:34 java.util.prefs.FileSystemPreferences$5 run
INFO: Created user
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 11:07:26AM +1000, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote:
>
> I have finally decided to start using JDK 1.4 ( 1.4.1-beta to be exact. ).
> Installed it as root under /usr/local.
>
> When running a Swing app ( under my own account, NOT root ) that was
> originally created with JDK 1.3
>
> My apologies if this post provokes fear and loathing, but does
> anybody subscribed to this list know if anybody is working on a
> blackdown 1.4 release on non-Intel platforms (specifically PPC)?
the blackdown release for ppc, if there will be any :) , will not have jit
enabled. But i thin
Hi,
I second Vincent's request.
I'm using SuSe 7.3 on a Sparc Netra T1 machine. I have a Java
application that uses JDBC and JavaMail. The process sends thousands of
mail messages. Under the current 1.3.0 JVM sparc port (no jit?, no
hotspot?), the process dies with a OutOfMemory exception a
Rick Lutowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone else tried an applet with 1.4.0 Java Plug-in (with
> or without java3d) in Netscape on debian?
Yes (mostly with our 1.4.0 code).
Note that there are some problems with Java2 1.4.0 and J3D 1.2.1_03.
Until J3D 1.2.1_04 is ready you might want
On Thu, 17 Jan 2002, MD. Tauhidul Islam wrote:
> In Redhat Linux 7.0 after installing jdk and setting the path environment,
> when I try to compile java source file then I get the following error:
>
> # javac test.java
> Segmentation fault: core dumped
>
Visit updates.redhat.com or one of
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Jesus M. Salvo Jr. wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I have been using JDK 1.3.1-b24 with JBuilder4 Foundation Edition before with
> RedHat 6.x ( 2.2..x kernel ,XFree86 4.1.0, glibc 2.1.3, etc. , KDE 2.1 )
>
> Ever since I moved to RedHat 7.2 ( RH 2
Sounds great. Blackdown rocks.
-Jim
> Jim Hazen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Back at the end of August it was said that a first Blackdown release
> > (beta) of JDK 1.4 would happen in two weeks. It's been a bit longer
> > than that. Anyone know what's going on? New features (generics,
>
Jim Hazen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Back at the end of August it was said that a first Blackdown release
> (beta) of JDK 1.4 would happen in two weeks. It's been a bit longer
> than that. Anyone know what's going on? New features (generics,
> etc) being crammed into 1.4 before the release?
On 4 Sep 2001, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > Odd. I have very few problems with Mozilla (I am using 0.9.3), and
> > totally love it. It doesn't crash where Netscape *will* crash! I've
> > only had Mozilla crash when I've forgotten to initialise it by
> > running it as root after installation.
>
>
Alex Buell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 30 Aug 2001, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
>
>> I still have problems with Mozilla on Sparc (even without Java), so
>> this might take a couple of days more... (You might be able to use
>> Java in Mozilla before that. There's a new Java integration API
>>
On 30 Aug 2001, Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> I still have problems with Mozilla on Sparc (even without Java), so
> this might take a couple of days more... (You might be able to use
> Java in Mozilla before that. There's a new Java integration API for
> Mozilla: Waterfall. IIRC it will build with
Alex Buell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Jim Hazen wrote:
>
>> I'm currently using Blackdown 1.3.1 and I love it. It runs faster
>> (than the Sun version), works better, doesn't crash. Couldn't want
>> much more in a JVM. I'm looking forward to Blackdown's take on
>> 1.4,
Jim Hazen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The status page for the Blackdown 1.4 port hasn't been updated in a
> while. Is there any new news? Is Blackdown waiting to integrate
> the Sun 1.4 beta 2 source? Are they prohibited from releasing
> "beta" products by Sun?
>
> I'm currently using Black
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Jim Hazen wrote:
> I'm currently using Blackdown 1.3.1 and I love it. It runs faster
> (than the Sun version), works better, doesn't crash. Couldn't want
> much more in a JVM. I'm looking forward to Blackdown's take on 1.4,
> but since their promise on 6/25 that a beta wou
Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 05:39:03PM +0800, Sam (Ying-Hsien Ku) wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I have installed jdk1.2.2 on Mandrake 7.0
>>
>> However,
>> [root@linuxsam jdk1.2.2]# javac
>> Error: can't find libjava.so.
>> [root@linuxsam jdk1.2.2]#
(You might wan
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 05:39:03PM +0800, Sam (Ying-Hsien Ku) wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have installed jdk1.2.2 on Mandrake 7.0
>
> However,
> [root@linuxsam jdk1.2.2]# javac
> Error: can't find libjava.so.
> [root@linuxsam jdk1.2.2]#
>
> I just find the file on /home/sam/jdk1.2.2/jre/lib/i386/libjav
Hi Johan,
Thanks for your quick response.
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Johan Vos wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Marcus Crafter wrote:
>
> > Great work, but I wanted to ask what performance expectations we
> > should have ? Our tests have shown that the Blackdown sparc JDK 1.2.2
> >
>Yes, performance can be increased since:
>1) there is currently no hotspot in sparc jdk 1.3.0
>2) some parts were compiled without optimization in order to bypass a
>compiler problem.
>
>The intention was to go to 1.4 immediately, and to skip improvements on
>1.3.0 or 1.3.1. Unless people really
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Hope all is well.
>
> We've just noticed that the Blackdown JDK 1.3.0 for sparc is available
> and have installed it on our E250 system.
It should be on the mirrors now, indeed.
> Great work, but I wanted to ask wh
On Mon, 21 May 2001, Alexander Popov wrote:
> So my question is: What parts of the glibc can we
> strip down - what does the Blackdown 1.1.8 VM need
> from the standard glibc?
Try this?
nm -g -D -u /usr/local/java/jdk1.2.2/bin/i386/green_threads/java
--
Joi EllisSoftware E
Hi guys,
We are currently trying to create a small linux
distribution (with as small memory footprint as
possible) to run java apps.
So we've compiled a cut-down kernel and we made a
small VM (I've cut a Blackdown JDK1.1.8 to about
3.5MB - all this will stay on a less than 8MB
flash)...
The main
Jerry:
1. JAVA_HOME should be /usr/java/jdk1.3.0_02 instead of
/usr/java/jdk1.3.0_02/jre.
2. When you untar jakarta-tomcat, there is a docs document
that tell you how to install tomcat.
3. The jakarta-tomcat-3.2.1/bin contains a startup.sh file
that calls tomcat.sh. There is a line in tomcat.sh
On Fri, Apr 06, 2001 at 01:18:59PM -0700, Jerry Asher wrote:
> 1. What should JAVA_HOME be set to?
JAVA_HOME isn't required for anything - it had an important role
under JDK1.1, but that's no longer the case. The usual convention
is that it points to the top of your SDK or JRE installation - tha
> "Jesus" == Jesus M Salvo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jesus> I have just read an article on JavaWorld about Merlin and
Jesus> that a beta of JDK 1.4 is to be released this month. Does
Jesus> Blackdown have plans to have their own JDK 1.4 port to
Jesus> Linux i386/sparc/ppc/e
Has anyone answered ur question ?
Jonah Michaud wrote:
> Hi, does anyone know if there is a port in the works for Alpha (EV56)
> running RedHat 6.0? I saw a message about it from a couple months ago
> and I was wondering if there was any update. I don't see anything about
> it on the JCK page.
Hi,
Yes, you're right. Sun has scheduled jdk1.3 for GNU/Linux i386 for
September.
Matthias
Desiree Hilbring wrote:
>
> Hello everybody,
> Am I right, that there is no release for the JDK1.3 for Linux yet?
> I did not find anything at blackdown.
>
> Thanks for any answer
>
> Desiree
>
>
My response to this email is pre-sorting out of the blackdown
licensing. The issue at hand here is not general access to the J2SE
source but specifically cvs access to the blackdown port. I will take
this up directly with Jørn in order to get him setup with the
blackdown porting group.
Thanks,
Henrik Krobath Olesen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having some problems configuring my Java
> programs to use the mm.Mysql jdbc driver. I've
> searched through the mailing list archive but it
> hasn't helped me to overcome my problem. It al
> comes down to the definition of my classpath
> to which I have
I wrote:
> Hi Blackdown guys,
> But still a problem is preventing the RC3 from working
> with some JITs.
I am sorry. Blackdown JDK is not wrong at all.
I guessed wrong.
> But JDK 1.2.2 RC3 raises SIGSEGV after the
> signal handler returns. Therefore the JITs which utilize
> signals for excepti
Hi Rachit,
> how does it compare to the other two java ports at high connections?
> your page i assume wasn't updated after you ran the 4000 connections
> test. just curious.
IBM JDK 1.1.8 on Linux can't get over 500 connections (a bug confirmed
by IBM). Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC3 fails at just ov
It's available on Volano's site at http://www.volano.com/benchmarks.html
Peter
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
> Is there any way I can get a hold of the benchmark software? I'd like to
> try the tya compiler with blackdown's jdk and see how it stacks up.
>
---
Hi Joseph,
> Is there any way I can get a hold of the benchmark software? I'd like to
> try the tya compiler with blackdown's jdk and see how it stacks up.
See the section called "Download" at:
http://www.volano.com/benchmarks.html
John Neffenger
--
Is there any way I can get a hold of the benchmark software? I'd like to
try the tya compiler with blackdown's jdk and see how it stacks up.
John Neffenger wrote:
> I updated the Volano Report to include Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC3 on Red
> Hat 6.1 and Inprise JDK 1.2.2 RC1 on Red Hat 6.0:
>
> Th
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 10:49:47PM -0200, Monoses Ioan wrote:
>
> I've just installed the RC2 built against glibc 2.1.2 and
> it always dumps core because of SIGILL (Illegal instruction).
> This is true for both a 2.2.5 and a 2.2.12 kernel on a RH6.0.
>
Chances are you are run
On 1999-10-28 08:02:50 -0700, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> On 28 Oct, Martin Schröder wrote:
> > On 1999-10-27 12:46:44 -0700, Ruchir Tewari wrote:
> >> Can the blackdown linux jdk be shipped with a product ?
> >
> > The 1.1.x versions can be shipped; of the 1.2.x versions only the
> > jre can be shipp
On 28 Oct, Martin Schröder wrote:
> On 1999-10-27 12:46:44 -0700, Ruchir Tewari wrote:
>> Can the blackdown linux jdk be shipped with a product ?
>
> The 1.1.x versions can be shipped; of the 1.2.x versions only the
> jre can be shipped since the jdk is still beta.
>
> Just read the LICENSE file
On 1999-10-27 12:46:44 -0700, Ruchir Tewari wrote:
> Can the blackdown linux jdk be shipped with a product ?
The 1.1.x versions can be shipped; of the 1.2.x versions only the
jre can be shipped since the jdk is still beta.
Just read the LICENSE files.
Best regards
Martin
--
> Pierre Heroux writes:
Pierre> I am using jdk1.2 Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v2
Pierre> glibc2.1, native threads, nojit)on RedHat 5.2.
Pierre> I compile a C++ code which invoke JavaVM.
Pierre> g++ simple.cpp -I/usr/local/jdk1.2/include -ljava
Pierre> I g
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Pierre Heroux wrote:
> I am using jdk1.2 Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v2
> glibc2.1, native threads, nojit)on RedHat 5.2.
>
> I compile a C++ code which invoke JavaVM.
> g++ simple.cpp -I/usr/local/jdk1.2/include -ljava
>
> I get the following message
>
> /u
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Pierre Heroux wrote:
> I am using jdk1.2 Classic VM (build Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v2
> glibc2.1, native threads, nojit)on RedHat 5.2.
RedHat 5.2 comes with glibc 2.0.7 and not with glibc 2.1.x. Please get
the correct JDK release for your platform.
> I compile a C++ co
Am I correct in saying that its dying due to native threads?
Should he pull a "THREADS_FLAG=green" in his shell to
correct this?
Liguo Song wrote:
>
> Dear Friends,
>
> I am having trouble to make JDK1.2 Pre V2 working on my Red Hat 6.0.
>
> Anytime, I tried to use anything from the package,
O
h boy. More bugs to have to work around. I'll be thrilled
when the serialization of primitive types problem is finally
fixed. Yes, I spent too much time working around that
Doug
At 09:16 AM 8/25/99 -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote:
>What is that status on the JDK 1.3 port? Or is this not even
>goi
If I remember correctly, this means that you have to download the the
version of JDK1.2 for glibc2.0. An alternative is to update your Linix
installation to glibc2.1.
Matthias
Ted Neward wrote:
>
> I'm getting the following error when attempting to run javac from the
> prompt:
>
> /usr/local/j
Just wondering if anyone has noticed a huge difference in Java2D
performance between green and native threads? I switched to green
threads this morning to test something because of the native threads
deadlocking problem when using Swing. The green threads version does't
deadlock, but moving an in
"W. Christopher Everhart" wrote:
> I was having some problems with the pre-release of JDK1.2 being very very slow. I
>tested it with NetBeans, and compared the results to a versino of NetBeans with
>JDK1.1.7v3 and noticed that both were slow, but the newer version was even slower.
>
> It ends
Lance Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I thought I would check here before trying to submit a bug report.
> (If I should have gone the other way someone please let me know.)
>
> I loaded JDK 1.2 pre-v2 onto my Debian 2.1 (slink) system. The first
> attempt at running (applet or applicati
Lance,
Two days ago, I just went through the same problems than you. Your glibc
doesn't match the JKD 1.2pre-v2 you have downloaded. I have tried the glibc
2.1 version on a glibc 2.0 system and encountered exactly your problems.
Maybe you made the same mistake?
Rudy
-Original Message-
>From: Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: 27 Jun 1999 20:12:54 -0700
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I have in my Office an Sparc 5 running Linux.
>> Now I want to use this machine for programming in Java.
>>
>> So I'm looking for JDK 1.2 for that machine.
>> Is there already an beta-version availa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I have in my Office an Sparc 5 running Linux.
> Now I want to use this machine for programming in Java.
>
> So I'm looking for JDK 1.2 for that machine.
> Is there already an beta-version available for sparc-linux.
>
> If there is one, I would a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Things will improve -- they've already started to improve -- but not as
>fast as you'd like. The reality of the Linux revolution is that manning
>the barricades gives you the responsibility to help make things better
>and forfeits you the right to bitch and moan about the
Nick Lawson wrote:
>
> Paul Mclachlan wrote:
>
> > --- Nick Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I thought Swing was slow on Windows... I appreciate that JDK
> > > 1.2.2
> > > is still beta, but i'm having serious performance problems
> > > with my
> > > apps on linux, where I don't with
Paul Mclachlan wrote:
> --- Nick Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I thought Swing was slow on Windows... I appreciate that JDK
> > 1.2.2
> > is still beta, but i'm having serious performance problems
> > with my
> > apps on linux, where I don't with the other os.
>
> No, this is pretty muc
Paul Mclachlan wrote:
> --- Nick Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I thought Swing was slow on Windows... I appreciate that JDK
> > 1.2.2
> > is still beta, but i'm having serious performance problems
> > with my
> > apps on linux, where I don't with the other os.
>
> No, this is pretty muc
--- Nick Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought Swing was slow on Windows... I appreciate that JDK
> 1.2.2
> is still beta, but i'm having serious performance problems
> with my
> apps on linux, where I don't with the other os.
No, this is pretty much what I'd expect. Windows has a lot m
I am also facing the same problem. I guess it's because of improper libc version.
My system has Slackware 2.0.34 with libc5.4.44. But jdk1.2 distributions ported so far
are only for glibc libraries. So,
with libc5 one will get the following errors. (I got them as well).
After that, I tried to ins
> José Luis Gonçalves wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> it is possibel this combination, I try and try, nothing ...
> In a Debian system i have succeed ... not in redhat ...
>
> any help ?
I'm running RH 6 and jdk1.2pre2, aside from some Native threading issues
it works great. Make sure you DL the glibc 2.1
José Luis Gonçalves wrote:
> Hi! it is possibel this combination, I try and try, nothing ...In a
> Debian system i have succeed ... not in redhat ... any help ?
Yep! would you get the jdk 1.2 pre2 for glibc 2.1, if not what are you
waintin' for?, if you do what's exactly the problem?
-
>I am attempting to compile an RMI application with the 1.17 version
>of the Blackdown JDK, and when I do, I get a Segmentation Fault. This
>does not leave any trace of why the fault occured.
I use RMI extensively in JDK 1.1.7, under Redhat 4.2, 5.2, and 6.0,
and haven't run into this. Is it rmic
Actually, no I did install the glibc2.0 version, I made sure of that. However I
found the problem. I noticed that when I accidentally forgot to exit out of
'su' once and ran the 'java -version', it did NOT complain about not finding
sunwjit... So that told me there might be some access problems on
> Hi, I've just untarred the new jdk on my SuSE 6.1
> and I got an error because it seems that I have no libhpi.so on my
> system.
> Should I have one ? Is it possible to run this JDK on SuSE 6.1 ?
> I searched this thread and I didn't find any previous messages regarding
> this
> library.
This
thanks, I have 117_v3 but I'm wondering when 1.2 will be available.
-- dog writes:
>codea wrt:
>> does any one have and indication as to when a version of the jdk 1.2
>> will be available that is compatible with glibc 2.1? Couldn't find
>> the answer in the archive or FAQs.
>
>jdk117_v2 or jdk1
codea wrt:
> does any one have and indication as to when a version of the jdk 1.2
> will be available that is compatible with glibc 2.1? Couldn't find
> the answer in the archive or FAQs.
jdk117_v2 or jdk117_v3.
dog
--
To UNS
#1 -- yes, FAQ 2.6
#2 -- java.sun.com
At 09:02 PM 6/2/99 -0700, Rick Jesse wrote:
> Is there a doc that explains what the different files are in the 1.1.7
>v3 release. That is, a high level description of what is in each of these
>files: i18n_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz
>jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x8
jais,
it seems that you might have a later version of the libstdc file.
look in the /lib directory (or maybe /usr/lib) for the libstdc* files.
you probably have one like libstdc++-lib6.1-1.so.2. if so, do
ln -s libstdc++-lib6.1-1.so.2 libstdc++-lib6.0-1.so.2
tim daly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Tue, 18 May 1999 13:21:37 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi!
>
>i have some problems with Jdk1.1.7b and caldera 2.2 (i use the same jdk
>with redhat 52 without problems) when i launch the java interpreter he
>told me:
>
>
> /usr/jdk117_v1a/bin/../bin/i686/green_threads/java: error in
>
On 15-May-99 Robert Williams wrote:
> What changes did you make? Simplicity + JDK1.2 freezes up
> after a few steps through the tutorial example 1 on my Red Hat 5.2 system.
No changes at all. I have a SuSE 6.1, I installed JDK1.2 and the only change I
did was to edit the Simplicity script to m
What changes did you make? Simplicity + JDK1.2 freezes up
after a few steps through the tutorial example 1 on my Red Hat 5.2 system.
Kontorotsui wrote:
> On 13-May-99 Jeffery S. Norman wrote:
> > Has anyone got JDK 1.2 to work properly with NetBeans x2 or
> > SimplicityRC???
>
> Simplicity doe
On 13-May-99 Jeffery S. Norman wrote:
> Has anyone got JDK 1.2 to work properly with NetBeans x2 or
> SimplicityRC???
Simplicity does work on my system with JDK1.2, I had to change the wrapper
Simplicity script, but works.
---
Andrea "Kontorotsui" Controzzi - MALE Student of Computer Science at
> Has anyone got JDK 1.2 to work properly with NetBeans x2 or
> SimplicityRC???
>
> NetBeans installs properly (SuSE 6.0) and displays the splash screen,
> but then crashes with a SIGSEGV 11.
>
> Thanks for any help.
Hi Jeffery,
In general, version 1.1 of Simplicity for Java has full support f
You might try wget.
Andrew wrote:
>
> > http://www.wisp.net/~kreilede
> >
>
> I don't know about anybody else, but whenever i go to donwload it it seems
> to crash ie. stop before all the file has been recieved ??
>
> why ??? I've tried a number of times ?? Is it available on another site
> pe
Hi,
I also had the same problem. It took me about 7 tries before I got it.
-- Aravind
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 1999 14:44
> To: Aravind Selvaraje
> Cc: Sterling Moses; Java-Linux List
> Subject: RE: JD
> http://www.wisp.net/~kreilede
>
I don't know about anybody else, but whenever i go to donwload it it seems
to crash ie. stop before all the file has been recieved ??
why ??? I've tried a number of times ?? Is it available on another site
perhaps ftp ..( i don't trust netscape for large files
You will find it at
http://www.wisp.net/~kreilede
-- Aravind
> -Original Message-
> From: Sterling Moses [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 12 May 1999 08:26
> To: Java-Linux List
> Subject: JDK 1.1.7v2 Anywhere?
>
>
> I have checked the blackdown site and have not found a c
On Tue, 11 May 1999 17:26:07 -0500, Sterling Moses wrote:
>I have checked the blackdown site and have not found a copy of the JDK
>1.1.7v2. Have I missed it? Does anyone know where this can be found.
>
>I am trying to fix the error "undefined symbol: _dl_symbol_value"
>
>Any help would be appreci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> This is not true on my system!!!
> JDK1.1.7 *without JIT* worked much faster than JDK1.2 with the JIT (any
> chance
> to check if the JIT was actually activated?)
Well. Specify a non-existent JIT (which will make the JDK run in interpreted
mode) an
Kontorotsui wrote:
> > Sadly, it's also a huge memory hog compared to 1.1.7, so on my machine any
> > larger app is much slower on 1.2.
>
> Yes... damn, it is a nightmare!
>
> I get 11 java processes, each one with size 81512 (RSS: 24324).
> How can this happen??
11 threads, not processes -- th
Am Mon, 10 May 1999 schrieb Kontorotsui:
> On 09-May-99 Peter Schuller wrote:
> >> 2) Should it be S slow??
> > I think so. Unless you're on a P-III 500 mhz with 256 megs of RAM... (I'm
> > guessing this has nothing to do with the Linux port, but rather with JDK 1.2
> > in
> > general).
>
> I
On 09-May-99 Peter Schuller wrote:
>> 2) Should it be S slow??
> I think so. Unless you're on a P-III 500 mhz with 256 megs of RAM... (I'm
> guessing this has nothing to do with the Linux port, but rather with JDK 1.2
> in
> general).
I meant... so slow compared to JDK 1.1.7.
I have a K6-II
Peter Schuller wrote:
>
> The JIT is on by default.
>
> If you do some experimenting, you'll notice that JDK 1.2 with JIT enabled is
> *much* faster than JDK 1.1.7+TYA when it comes to loops and stuff like that.
> But when method calls come into the picture, I've found it to be about as
> fast as
Kontorotsui wrote:
>
> I've installed SuSE 6.1 and the JDK 1.2 now works somehow.
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1) Why does it say this:
>
> Font specified in font.properties not found [--zapf
> dingbats-medium-r-normal--*-%d-*-*-p-*-adobe-fontspecific]
>
> The JDK 1.1.7 never complained about missi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> 2) Should it be S slow??
I think so. Unless you're on a P-III 500 mhz with 256 megs of RAM... (I'm
guessing this has nothing to do with the Linux port, but rather with JDK 1.2 in
general).
> The graphics (swing heavily used) is at least
> twic
> "PC" == Piero Campanelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PC> ok..ok this means that it is unstable and it isn't
PC> usableis it? In other words i am really astonished about
PC> fact that under Redhat 6 i haven't any way to develop in Java:
That shouldn't a surprise since RH 6.
Hey,
this is all true. But, they are thinking of releasing a
jdk-1.1.7_v2 that runs with glibc-2.1. So look at this as a temporary
solution. Untill then, you can live without jar files.
Just find a box that can unjar them, and zip them. Use the .zip
files instead...
Hello,
>JDK-1.1.7 test version(?) for glibc-2.1 is available in
>http://www.wisp.net/~kreilede/
thank you ... i am going to download it ...
>But native thread and swing does not work well. I think
>this is not related with jar file. Swing application stops
>responding when file chooser dialog i
JDK-1.1.7 test version(?) for glibc-2.1 is available in
http://www.wisp.net/~kreilede/
But native thread and swing does not work well. I think
this is not related with jar file. Swing application stops
responding when file chooser dialog is open an close.
And there's more case that I have encount
1 - 100 of 296 matches
Mail list logo
