The answer was of course in the FAQ -
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/LuceneFAQ#head-3558e5121806fb4fce80fc0
22d889484a9248b71
Breaking large documents into manageable chunks isn't ideal. I need to index
e-mail and with attachments which are frequently large. Currently each
message part corr
Chris,
Somebody recently asked me about how Lucene processes queries. Other than
working on required clauses in a BooleanQuery first, and skipping if there are
no matching Docs for them, there are no other query optimization
strategies/tricks, are there?
Otis
- Original Message
From
I have never run into this problem, but I'd be curious to know why your system
takes more than 10 seconds to read the segments? Super-large index on a slow
disk? As for new ctors, I suppose they wouldn't hurt, if there really is a
need for them. But 10 seconds is a long time...
Otis
- O
On 6/10/06, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Other than working on required clauses in a BooleanQuery first, and skipping
if there are no matching Docs for them, there are no other query optimization
strategies/tricks, are there?
I think that's pretty much it, depending on what y
hi peter,
two quick questions
1. could you let me know what kind of response time you were getting with
solr (as well as the size of data and result sizes)
2. i took a really really quick look at DocSetHitCollector and saw the
dreaded
if (bits==null) bits = new BitSe
On 6/10/06, z shalev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. could you let me know what kind of response time you were getting with
solr (as well as the size of data and result sizes)
A can tell you a little bit about ours... on one CNET faceted browsing
implementation using Solr, the number of fa
On 6/9/06, Peter Keegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, my throughput testing shows that the Solr method is at least 50%
faster than mine. I'm seeing a big win with the use of the HashDocSet for
lower hit counts. On my 64-bit platform, a MAX_SIZE value of 10K-20K seems
to provide optimal perf
: Higher level optimizations that do query transformations are left as
: an exercise to the application :-)
Word!
For example, Yonik helped me speed up a fairly hairy query i had a while
back by realizing that the way i was progromatically generating a query,
one deeply nested clause was actuall
: A can tell you a little bit about ours... on one CNET faceted browsing
: implementation using Solr, the number of facets to check per request
: average somewhere between 100 and 200 (the total number of unique
: facets is much larger though). The median request time is 3ms (and I
: don't think
Hello Otis,
I unfortunately don't master enough maven yet to know how to push a library on
maven public repositories.
However i just found this eBook that looks interesting
http://www.mergere.com/m2book_download.jsp
Waiting for a maven guru to release lucene 2.0 on a public repo, i'll
just
hi yonik,
thanks for the thurough reply,,
a few more quick questions...
"the number of facets to check per request
average somewhere between 100 and 200 (the total number of unique
facets is much larger though). "
you mean 100 - 200 different catagories to facet?
i ran
Hy,
Im writing a kind of bulletin-board-software in java (servlet+velocity as
template framework, mysql5 as backend). As the whole database is in INNODB
and this doesn't support Fulltext-Indexes I looked for alternatives and liked
the concept of Lucene. But I got serveral questions:
1. Everybod
On 6/10/06, z shalev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"the number of facets to check per request
average somewhere between 100 and 200 (the total number of unique
facets is much larger though). "
you mean 100 - 200 different catagories to facet?
I was going by memory, but 100 to 200 set inte
On 6/9/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I have an integer field that I've indexed after converting to a string
: using NumberTools.longToString().
: Now I want to sort my results using this field. Everything works when
: treating the field as a string, but is very slow and memor
Hi Dominik,
I think most of your questions are answered in the Lucene FAQ and various
Lucene articles, so I'll be brief.
- Original Message
From: Dominik Bruhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, June 10, 2006 6:58:03 PM
Subject: Lucene as Search in a Bul
It's really just a matter of putting the Jars in the appropriate directory on
the appropriate machine, I think.
Maybe CC-ed people know which dir/machine that is.
The issue is: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-551
Otis
- Original Message
From: Sven Duzont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
16 matches
Mail list logo
