I use to always put my SQL code in specific files, because I came from ugly
Oracle SQL preprocessor where SQL and code where mixed like hell (JSP files
are the same BTW).
But, today I prefer Named Queries and/or JDBC 4.
I use to declare my ORM mapping and my Depency Injection in a separate XML
As promised, my slides from Agile 2009 are now on SlideShare:
http://tinyurl.com/groovy-testing
Description: Using the Groovy dynamic language for primarily
functional / acceptance / customer / BDD testing with a forward
looking perspective. Also considers polyglot options. The techniques
and
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 01:53, Jess Holleje...@ptc.com wrote:
You don't embed this sort of thing. You use getResourceAsStream() and a
separate file along with MessageFormat or such to perform substitutions
of live data if need be.
Plain and simple.
Yup. Good idea. So you've now maximally
In Wicket, the ordering of containment in the html must map in the
code. IMHO, this would make A/B/.../K testing painful unless you
component it up the wazoo.
On Aug 11, 11:15 am, Joe Nuxoll (Java Posse) jnux...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not sure if this is built directly into Wicket or not... but is
After listening to episode 277, I'm led to conclude I'm thought of by
some as one of the ivory tower guys who just says no to ideas
about changing the Java programming language.
I have a rather different perspective.
In November 2006, Sun published javac and related code under the
familiar
Thanks Joe. I appreciate this response. Any chance we can get a blog
on it to spread around?
On Sep 2, 2009, at 8:44 PM, jddarcy wrote:
After listening to episode 277, I'm led to conclude I'm thought of by
some as one of the ivory tower guys who just says no to ideas
about changing the
Thanks for your response to criticisms of the lack of significant new
features in Java 7. It is very important to know that there is a
ready line of communication between the people who control a language
and those who use it.
Having said that, could you answer this question...
Which of the
As I've communicated to Alex Buckley, I just think the community was
surprised by how few resources Sun would/could put on it. Seems like
this boils down to a conflict of interest between Sun, the JCP and the
people in the trenches. Sun needs to realize how this model appears
from a far and how
All points well taken -- at least by me.
I know what it's like to work as hard as you can towards something and
be shot down by criticism that you're not doing anything or not even trying.
That said, a few points:
* Not all of us are compiler experts -- and javac is fairly large
and
Joe, I think a very (_very_) large problem with The Kitchen Sink
Language, kijaro, and the open sourced JDK is that you fundamentally
can't solve your own problem with it.
There are exceptions, but the vast majority of java programmers I know
of that are interested in developing their own
Funny enough, I just submitted such a poll to java.net since there are
certainly more average developers following it, than there are
tracking the coin mailing-list. Personally I don't think language
design should be a democratic endeavor exactly for the reasons
outlined by Joe and Alex, things
On Sep 3, 5:22 am, Joshua Marinacci jos...@marinacci.org wrote:
Thanks Joe. I appreciate this response. Any chance we can get a blog
on it to spread around?
On Sep 2, 2009, at 8:44 PM, jddarcy wrote:
I've posted a lightly edited copy of my post at
1) Works really well for a while. Hard to not care though.
2) Doesn't do much more than make you look like a trouble maker.
3) The grass is always greener somewhere else. Believe me, it is because of
the manure.
4) Very commendable but hard to pay the bills. Great if you can make it fit
the needs
Hi Guys.
I was there during the Roundup '07 and had a blast.
You may remember me as the pilot.
Unfortunately, I got laid off and now programming again.
We are evailuating web frameworks (ugh) and I know from the podcast
that Dick uses Wicket.
I've noticed that there are a lot of duplication
Is it realistic to use HashSet to determine if a large amount of
string data (2 000 000 strings of length 20) is composed of unique
entry ?
If not, is it realistic, in a more general way, to quicksort this
large amount of string data in memory (not using an extern or file
quicksort) ?
Thank
Casper Bang wrote:
Funny enough, I just submitted such a poll to java.net since there are
certainly more average developers following it, than there are
tracking the coin mailing-list. Personally I don't think language
I'm not in the coin mailing-list, so I trust your numbers. Still,
Have a look at JSF and you will come fleeing back to Wicket. What
Wicked gives you, that other frameworks does not, is the ability to
avoid XML and use your existing HTML and Java skills. Also, it's
really easy to create your own components and obtain reuse that way,
something I have not seen
On Sep 3, 6:37 am, Vince O'Sullivan vjosulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your response to criticisms of the lack of significant new
features in Java 7.
I was more so responding to the implication that Sun is not seeking
input from the broader community (Sun is part of the Java community
do it and find out :) i dont think the hashing of the collections
classes have anything against such high object counts. it might just
be a concern of memory.
on average, do you expect all 2 million strings to be unique? how
often do you expect duplicates?
you could do the processing in
19 matches
Mail list logo
