On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 03:54, Alan Kent wrote:
> He asked "what is security". He went on to talk about
> the marines, army, air force, navy, etc - each would have a different
> interpretation of "securing a building" - (invade and kill everyone, put a
> fence around, lock the doors when you leav
> Am I correct in my recollection that both NetBeans and Eclipse were
> not originally projects started in Sun and IBM. I forget where NB
> came from but think Eclipse came out of IBM picking up OTI.
Sun bough NetBeans in 99', from a Java development tool firm in the
Czech Republic. I also think
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 09:17, Casper Bang wrote:
>> Am I correct in my recollection that both NetBeans and Eclipse were
>> not originally projects started in Sun and IBM. I forget where NB
>> came from but think Eclipse came out of IBM picking up OTI.
>
> Sun bough NetBeans in 99', from a Java d
Hi Alan,
There's a lot of material about Lift and it's approach to security,
As a short introduction, read this entry:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2683914/why-would-i-use-scala-lift-over-java-spring/3067319#3067319
Cheers,
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Alan Kent wrote:
> On 16/07/20
On Jul 19, 12:26 am, Lhasadad wrote:
> swing had not come out. Even after Swing came out there was still an
> interest in something that performed better (Swing was not a barn
> burner in the beginning) Also in those days Sun was not all that fast
Swing on JRE 1.1 wasn't too bad. Swing in JRE
Interestingly, www.sun.com/forte is not a direct forward to NetBeans
suggesting it really did compete with NetBeans as a developer tool
around the same time frame. Perhaps one was community and another was
enterprise? (In much the same way we'll soon have JDeveloper and
NetBeans).
/Casper
On 19 J
I remember SWT had come out quite a while after Swing, but the latter
was just so bad I still feel a bit queasy when I hear the phrase "Java
UI".
I too was surprised at the name Helios. Previously releases were all
named after moons of Jupiter ("Calisto", "Europa", and "Ganymede"),
then it was na
JFYI: Somehow you got misinformed. XPERIA update to 2.1 is out
already... with 2.2 expected...
On Jul 16, 8:31 am, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
> Don't be a moto. Buy some HTC device instead. Android wins.
>
> NB: In general, I get the extremely strong impression that so far the
> only acceptable a
I have a series of mirrors above my bed and an array of lasers and
projectors fed via a jail-broken iPad. Around my bed, I hire out of
work actors to re-enact the members of the Java Posse.. but that bit
is a bit creepy so I won't go into any more detail... except to say
that Tiffany Brissette doe
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 15:15, Christian Catchpole
wrote:
> Around my bed, I hire out of
> work actors to re-enact the members of the Java Posse.. but that bit
> is a bit creepy so I won't go into any more detail...
Aha! I guess you have stolen the hat...
--
Martin Wildam
--
You received this
I call it 'woody'
On Jul 19, 11:29 pm, Wildam Martin wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 15:15, Christian Catchpole
>
> wrote:
> > Around my bed, I hire out of
> > work actors to re-enact the members of the Java Posse.. but that bit
> > is a bit creepy so I won't go into any more detail...
>
> Aha!
The names dont matter in this case, what matters is the things that they are
trying to convey here.
There is mostly a purpose in the naming conventions, when you talk of a
successful project like Eclipse. Whatever the lobby, there is a clear
pattern in their implementation strategy.
A pattern in n
Someone might want to update the wikipedia page then :P
On Jul 19, 12:26 am, franz wrote:
> JFYI: Somehow you got misinformed. XPERIA update to 2.1 is out
> already... with 2.2 expected...
>
> On Jul 16, 8:31 am, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
>
>
>
> > Don't be a moto. Buy some HTC device instead.
Statements like "JavaFX is still-born..." (without any qualification)
are always problematic... remembers me of Kirill Grouchnikov's recent
blog where he complains that JavaFX's support for designers still
sucks (true), but uses that to conclude, remarkably in the attention-
catching title, that Ja
A simple question for those Scala guru's out there:
It seems actors have been reworked quite some in 2.8. But does this also
mean the syntax has changed ?
Let's say compared to what is described in "Programming in Scala". If I'm
not mistaken the book is based on Scala 2.7.2.
Thanks ! :-)
Jan
-
15 matches
Mail list logo
