Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-05 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Karsten Silz wrote: I doubt that 90% of users just use 100 apps - I counted more than 30 on my iPhone that I use at around once a week or more (some I use several times a day) if I'm not on the road. I only gave reference numbers, not realistic figures. You would probably need to survey a c

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-05 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Karsten Silz wrote: Number of apps in the store show what platform developers are interested in which is (now) an important indicator of platform health (that's why everybody and their dog opens an app store). Phones are consumer devices, and to consumers more is betters, so the 140k Apple apps

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-05 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Karsten Silz wrote: On Feb 5, 1:06 am, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: Yes, of course. So little progress in 15 years, I'd say. Gracenote is based on CDDB which started out as a voluntary "CD info submit" service in in 94/95 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ CDDB#History). Looks like nobody (in

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-05 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 5, 2:38 pm, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > Thus, if by knowing > usage statistics you learn that 90% of Android people use only 100 out > of 20.000 apps (just some number at random) and that also 90% of Apple > people use 100 out of 500.000 apps, then it's useless to compare the > store sizes, b

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-05 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 5, 2:22 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote: > Even if you had carefully laid out stats on the app store, it's still > utterly useless. Number of apps in the store show what platform developers are interested in which is (now) an important indicator of platform health (that's why everybody and t

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-05 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 5, 2:22 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote: > If apps available on a platform was an indication of quality, we'd all > be using windows instead of mac os x, which just goes to show how > stupid that argument is. 90+x% of us use Windows. When Windows established that market share in the 90s it

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-05 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 5, 1:06 am, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > Yes, of course. So little progress in 15 years, I'd say. Gracenote is based on CDDB which started out as a voluntary "CD info submit" service in in 94/95 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ CDDB#History). Looks like nobody (including you! ;-) submitted yo

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-05 Thread Wildam Martin
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 14:22, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote: > The question is: How many _quality_ apps are available? Pick > everything you'd like to do with your phone, and check if there's a > quality app for it. Full ACK! And how stable the whole thing is (even after installing 20 apps). -- Mar

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-05 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Reinier Zwitserloot wrote: Even if you had carefully laid out stats on the app store, it's still utterly useless. If apps available on a platform was an indication of quality, we'd all be using windows instead of mac os x, which just goes to show how stupid that argument is. The question is: Ho

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-05 Thread Reinier Zwitserloot
Even if you had carefully laid out stats on the app store, it's still utterly useless. If apps available on a platform was an indication of quality, we'd all be using windows instead of mac os x, which just goes to show how stupid that argument is. The question is: How many _quality_ apps are ava

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-05 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Karsten Silz wrote: On Feb 5, 1:31 am, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: I suppose that the download distribution data for the apps in the store aren't publicly available, do I? No. Apple even doesn't distinguish between apps bought and free apps downloaded. Have I mentioned they are control f

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-05 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 5, 1:31 am, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > I suppose that the download distribution data for the apps in the store > aren't publicly available, do I? No. Apple even doesn't distinguish between apps bought and free apps downloaded. Have I mentioned they are control freaks? -- You received thi

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread RogerV
The punch card era of computing may be the last that leaves any discernible record of the information technology of our era to future archeologist. All the media since then will likely not survive the centuries and this time period will effectively appear as a "dark ages". To think we've not yet i

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 5, 12:28 am, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > >http://www.eurodroid.com/2010/02/power-crazed-apple-demands-developer... > > It's getting ridicolous. I wonder how longer Google Maps will stay on > the iPhone. Yep, that goes too far. Apple - Google relationship seems to have turned from "business"

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 4, 9:39 am, Casper Bang wrote: > When I say "odd reasons" it's not to offend you, but due to personal > experiences. Even my own father (who has an iPhone as recommended by > me) can't quite figure iTunes out and is annoyed at how often it > crashes and really just wants to be able to mount

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Karsten Silz wrote: Most of us probably just have, say ten thousand music tracks max, yet the online music stores have north of five million tracks. Now even if we assume that 80% of them don't sell a single copy per year (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Tail#Criticism), that still leave

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 4, 5:48 am, Robert Casto wrote: > Really, who needs 140,000 apps when 10,000 good ones will do. If you tell Microsoft that Office is bloated and everybody just uses ten percent of the functionality, then Microsoft replies: "Yeah, but everybody uses a different ten percent!" There's some t

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Karsten Silz wrote: Back in 1995 I had better cataloging capabilities of my music (of course, data entry was manual, but no other choice at the time) and frankly I'd have expected much better stuff in 2010!! Can't you edit the song information by hand in iTunes, too? Yes, of course.

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 4, 1:17 am, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > I'd like to have an open system (I'm not saying FLOSS, I'm saying open > to competition), not because I want to copy files by hand, but because > I'd like competition, which means better products. Closed systems compete, too. All online video shops fo

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Casper Bang wrote: And the purity continues: http://www.eurodroid.com/2010/02/power-crazed-apple-demands-developer-axes-mention-of-android-from-iphone-app/ It's getting ridicolous. I wonder how longer Google Maps will stay on the iPhone. -- Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Ma

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread Christian Catchpole
Well, if they don't mention it, maybe it will just go away. On Feb 5, 9:07 am, Casper Bang wrote: > And the purity continues: > > http://www.eurodroid.com/2010/02/power-crazed-apple-demands-developer... > > On Feb 4, 10:25 pm, Peter Becker wrote: > > > > > The days when "soft scrolling" was

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread Casper Bang
And the purity continues: http://www.eurodroid.com/2010/02/power-crazed-apple-demands-developer-axes-mention-of-android-from-iphone-app/ On Feb 4, 10:25 pm, Peter Becker wrote: > The days when "soft scrolling" was an impressive feat. But working with > some guys who started with punch cards

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread Peter Becker
The days when "soft scrolling" was an impressive feat. But working with some guys who started with punch cards and soldering irons I don't try to pull the "been here for long" card anymore :-) One day I might go to Warpstock, though -- after all that is still an annual conference, so OS/2 just

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Christian Catchpole wrote: You think talking MS-DOS TSR's dates you? How about 8 bit Commodore 64, assigning the vertical blanking interrupt to a SID player or similar. Ahhh that bygone youth :-(( -- Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work.

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread Christian Catchpole
You think talking MS-DOS TSR's dates you? How about 8 bit Commodore 64, assigning the vertical blanking interrupt to a SID player or similar. On Feb 4, 4:36 pm, RogerV wrote: > On Jan 30, 9:12 pm, Christian Catchpole > wrote: > > > But as I think about it, I'm taking a new perspective.  We all

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-04 Thread Casper Bang
> I like iTunes so I must have "odd reasons". Who needs an app where > you can buy, organize, search and sync all your media? Real men copy > files by hand. When I say "odd reasons" it's not to offend you, but due to personal experiences. Even my own father (who has an iPhone as recommended by m

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-03 Thread RogerV
On Jan 30, 9:12 pm, Christian Catchpole wrote: > But as I think about it, I'm taking a new perspective. We all think > that "in the future" we will have simpler, cleaner easier to use, > "Minority Report" devices. But until that happens, we all *need* unix > shells and root access to get anythi

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-03 Thread Robert Casto
I read this and the song "Welcome to the Hotel California" popped in my head. So, this is all pushing me to look at a Nexus One. I'm not going T-Mobile. Lousy coverage where I live. I have Verizon and when it comes out in the Spring, I think everyone is going to be taking it seriously. Really, wh

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-03 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Fabrizio Giudici wrote: (rather than e.g. "1st Brandenburgische Konzerte") or whatever. ... of course with a better German than mine... (shame). -- Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalw

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-03 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Karsten Silz wrote: - I like iTunes so I must have "odd reasons". Who needs an app where you can buy, organize, search and sync all your media? Real men copy files by hand. Not so sarcastic comment ;-) I'd like to have an open system (I'm not saying FLOSS, I'm saying open to competition)

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-03 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 2, 4:21 pm, Casper Bang wrote: > More evidence of > dictatorship:http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/02/02/apple-stanza-usb/?utm_source=fee...) The motto of my favorite sitcom "Seinfeld" was "No hugging, no learning". Now this ain't "Seinfeld", so I want to virtually hug all the discussion pa

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-02 Thread Steven Herod
oooh... That puts the Nexus One equal or beyond the 3gs now? On Feb 3, 9:08 am, Casper Bang wrote: > Looks like Google finally decided to flick Apple the finger, > yay:http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/nexus-one-gets-a-software-update-e... > > On Feb 2, 4:21 pm, Casper Bang wrote: > > > > >

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-02 Thread Casper Bang
Looks like Google finally decided to flick Apple the finger, yay: http://www.engadget.com/2010/02/02/nexus-one-gets-a-software-update-enables-multitouch/ On Feb 2, 4:21 pm, Casper Bang wrote: > More evidence of > dictatorship:http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/02/02/apple-stanza-usb/?utm_source=fee.

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-02 Thread Casper Bang
More evidence of dictatorship: http://www.techcrunch.com/2010/02/02/apple-stanza-usb/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+Techcrunch+(TechCrunch) On Feb 1, 11:48 pm, Christian Catchpole wrote: > I came from the era of the Amiga.  An awesomely design personal > computer for th

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Christian Catchpole
I came from the era of the Amiga. An awesomely design personal computer for the time. It could primitively muti-task in 128K of RAM. Why? Because multi-tasking isn't hard if you get your OS and CPU architecture right to start with. I saw the dominance of the PC market, not because it was bette

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Christian Catchpole
I really wasn't trying to go down the path of arguing how evil apple are. It may have sounded like I support their evil ways, but I was just trying to open up the discussion that sometimes you can't have everything. If the platform was as open as we would like, what would the technical side effec

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread JavaSnake
Paul Graham in his essay "Apple's Mistake" (http://www.paulgraham.com/ apple.html) about Apple's app store approval process wrote: "When you look at the famous 1984 ad now, it's easier to imagine Apple as the dictator on the screen than the woman with the hammer. In fact, if you read the dictator's

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Steven Herod
Well, that's not the definition I was implying, the definition I was implying was the dictionary/wikipedia one "A dictator is a ruler (e.g. absolutist or autocratic) who assumes sole and absolute power (sometimes but not always with military control) but, without hereditary ascension such as an ab

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Karsten Silz wrote: Fourthly, no matter how cleverly you install an app on whatever device, in the end it will send data across the Internet for communication which is filtered and monitored for keywords like any other traffic. Finally, think low-tech - from what I read, criminals (who also wan

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 1, 6:05 pm, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > Since we've argued about the extensive meanings of "dictatorship", let's > put the things together. Let's talk, for example, about China. > > Apple's AppStore is subjected to state censorship in China, and as a > result, again for instance, a few applic

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Casper Bang
> My point: Yes, Apple locks you in, but to a certain degree, the other > guys (apps) and content providers do, too.  But since it's not a > dictatorship, you can choose which platform locks you in the least / > the nicest. And my point is, the lock-in on Apple stuff is horrendously pervasive. if

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 1, 5:38 pm, Casper Bang wrote: > > But then you could argue that Apple is the > > most benevolent dictator since they force you to chose from 140,000 > > apps where as Android forces you to chose from just 25,000...  ;-) > > Not true, neither Android not Nokia "forces" you to do anything. >

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 1, 5:34 pm, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > You seem badly affected by Job's Distortion-of-Reality Field! :-) I've > always installed whatever I wanted on my handheld devices (and later > smartphones) since 1998, of course including my own stuff. There might > be an app store by other vendors, bu

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 1, 5:29 pm, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > Karsten Silz wrote: > > > AFAIK, you can't do that with any phone right now.  Flash Player 10.1 > > is supposed to come for anything but the iPhone this year, so you may > > be able to have Flash video in a couple of months.  I don't know what > > Sorry

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Since we've argued about the extensive meanings of "dictatorship", let's put the things together. Let's talk, for example, about China. Apple's AppStore is subjected to state censorship in China, and as a result, again for instance, a few applications about Dalai Lama and Buddhism are not avai

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Casper Bang
> But then you could argue that Apple is the > most benevolent dictator since they force you to chose from 140,000 > apps where as Android forces you to chose from just 25,000...  ;-) Not true, neither Android not Nokia "forces" you to do anything. Android comes with a pre-installed de-facto marke

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Karsten Silz wrote: On Feb 1, 3:49 pm, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: But it depends on the details: being free or not, all the three desktop / server operating systems allow me to install and run what I want (and usually I can choose which o.s. I'll install on my computer); iPhone doesn't.

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Karsten Silz wrote: AFAIK, you can't do that with any phone right now. Flash Player 10.1 is supposed to come for anything but the iPhone this year, so you may be able to have Flash video in a couple of months. I don't know what Sorry, but Jobs just said that there will never be Flash for iP

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 1, 3:33 pm, Casper Bang wrote: > Of course once people have invested significantly (in this case apps, > music etc.) they will find it to pretty hard to leave. Lock-in is different from dictatorship. You can't take native apps from a platform and move them to another one; Adobe Flash/AIR

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 1, 3:49 pm, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > But it depends on the details: being free or not, all the three desktop > / server operating systems allow me to install and run what I want (and > usually I can choose which o.s. I'll install on my computer); iPhone > doesn't. I think most phones don'

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 1, 3:48 pm, Kevin Wright wrote: > I want to be able to write my own Java and Scala apps for the device, and > install them painlessly. > In fact, I want to be able to use it for any content I already own > AND for flash video. AFAIK, you can't do that with any phone right now. Flash Playe

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Casper Bang
Don't think you read what I wrote earlier, and you seem very stuck in the whole dictator semantics. So let me ask you directly, what happens when in a couple of years, you get in bad standing with Apple or something, but now have $3K of content tied to their platform? Technically you may be free to

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 1, 3:48 pm, Kevin Wright wrote: > I want multi-touch > I want a high resolution screen > I want a reasonable battery life > I want compatibility with a wide range of 3rd party peripherals > I want an easy an convenient place to find applications, preferably rated > according to the experien

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread s
The confluence of this technology marketing topic and Fourth- Generation Warfare are essential for deep understanding. Eliminate all the "armed" parts of 4GW, and what's left is what I'm talking about. Culture is everything. Steve Sobczak On Feb 1, 8:12 am, Karsten Silz wrote: > On Feb 1, 12:4

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Karsten Silz wrote: On Feb 1, 3:24 pm, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: Of course, there's the free market. If things were always like today, I wouldn't be worried. But listening to opinions that see the marked divided by iPhone and Android, I'd be worried in perspective. I think that the smar

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Kevin Wright
I want multi-touch I want a high resolution screen I want a reasonable battery life I want compatibility with a wide range of 3rd party peripherals I want an easy an convenient place to find applications, preferably rated according to the experience of others So far, it looks like apple meets all

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 1, 3:24 pm, Fabrizio Giudici wrote: > Of course, there's the free market. If things were always like today, I > wouldn't be worried. But listening to opinions that see the marked > divided by iPhone and Android, I'd be worried in perspective. I think that the smartphone market will mature

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Casper Bang
Of course once people have invested significantly (in this case apps, music etc.) they will find it to pretty hard to leave. Having grown up in southern Denmark, we would occasionally find fleeing people in small boats and made up rafts, who were trying to cross to our side of the Baltic sea. The o

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Viktor Klang
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Fabrizio Giudici < fabrizio.giud...@tidalwave.it> wrote: > Karsten Silz wrote: > > On Feb 1, 12:45 am, Steven Herod > wrote: > > > I think the iPhone is a dictatorship, and most people don't give a > damn about democracy and freedom unless the dictatorship is a

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Karsten Silz wrote: On Feb 1, 12:45 am, Steven Herod wrote: I think the iPhone is a dictatorship, and most people don't give a damn about democracy and freedom unless the dictatorship is affecting them directly. Having grown up in a dictatorship (East Germany), I would define a dictat

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Karsten Silz
On Feb 1, 12:45 am, Steven Herod wrote: > I think the iPhone is a dictatorship, and most people don't give a > damn about democracy and freedom unless the dictatorship is affecting > them directly. Having grown up in a dictatorship (East Germany), I would define a dictatorship as a form of govern

Re: [The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Fabrizio Giudici
Steven Herod wrote: I think the iPhone is a dictatorship, and most people don't give a damn about democracy and freedom unless the dictatorship is affecting them directly. +1. Thanks. -- Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." ja

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-02-01 Thread Casper Bang
> I understand > that Android encourages you to intercept the message flow, so I'm > curious how that works in practice. In practice, Android has a truly unique way of doing this. You don't have an arbitrary number of processes running constantly as per the usual time-slice semantics. Rather, your

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-01-31 Thread Christian Catchpole
I know what Steve Jobs is doing to me, but he has very warm hands. On Feb 1, 9:45 am, Steven Herod wrote: > I think the iPhone is a dictatorship, and most people don't give a > damn about democracy and freedom unless the dictatorship is affecting > them directly. > > Which is why developers pratt

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-01-31 Thread Steven Herod
I think the iPhone is a dictatorship, and most people don't give a damn about democracy and freedom unless the dictatorship is affecting them directly. Which is why developers prattle on about the closed nature of the device and the general public keep rocking along to Miley Cyrus on their iPhones

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-01-31 Thread Christian Catchpole
Cool. Well I hope it works out (or is working out already). I wonder if Android will be able to handle the case transparency like the iPhone can.. http://twitpic.com/10ltrt On Jan 31, 11:04 pm, Chris Adamson wrote: > Christian Catchpole Jan 30 09:12PM -0800:> I > wonder, if there was no App s

[The Java Posse] Re: Apple's purity approach

2010-01-31 Thread Chris Adamson
Christian Catchpole Jan 30 09:12PM -0800: I wonder, if there was no App store, you could install what you want. Would people be throwing their iPhones down in disgust as they grind to a halt, not because anything Apple has done but because people try to use them beyond their ability. Well, isn't