Bugs item #530627, was opened at 2002-03-16 00:15
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=530627&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Mac (macearl)
Assigned to: Nobody
Hi all,
Is there a status on this VerifierError? And forgive this question if it's
too stupid, but does this pertains to the massive deployment order
discussion that's going on? If so, give me a dunce cap for not connecting
the dots earlier. If not, this bug demands some attention because it kill
User: schaefera
Date: 02/03/15 22:44:57
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/management/j2ee AppClientModule.java
EJB.java EJBModule.java J2EEApplication.java
J2EEManagedObject.java J2EEResource.java
JCAConnectionFactory.jav
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 542
Successful tests: 525
Errors:10
Failures: 7
[time of test: 16 March 2002 5:40 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 532
Successful tests: 514
Errors:11
Failures: 7
[time of test: 16 March 2002 4:43 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 542
Successful tests: 525
Errors:10
Failures: 7
[time of test: 16 March 2002 3:21 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 542
Successful tests: 525
Errors:10
Failures: 7
[time of test: 16 March 2002 2:12 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 542
Successful tests: 523
Errors:10
Failures: 9
[time of test: 16 March 2002 1:28 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.
User: jules_gosnell
Date: 02/03/15 17:16:38
Modified:jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty
JBossWebApplicationContext.java
Log:
fix NPE
Revision ChangesPath
1.33 +27 -24
contrib/jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty/JBossWebApplicationContext.java
User: jules_gosnell
Date: 02/03/15 17:27:28
Modified:jettybuild.xml
Log:
fix deploy dir
Revision ChangesPath
1.46 +2 -2 contrib/jetty/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/
User: jules_gosnell
Date: 02/03/15 17:00:12
Modified:jetty/src/main/org/jboss/jetty JettyService.java
JettyServiceMBean.java
Log:
refactor JettyService:
- bind Jetty more closely to JBoss Service lifecycle
- now that jetty.xml is contained in jboss-servic
User: jules_gosnell
Date: 02/03/15 17:00:12
Modified:jetty/src/resources/jetty-plugin/META-INF jboss-service.xml
Log:
refactor JettyService:
- bind Jetty more closely to JBoss Service lifecycle
- now that jetty.xml is contained in jboss-service.xml setPublishMBeans cannot work
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 542
Successful tests: 522
Errors:11
Failures: 9
[time of test: 16 March 2002 0:37 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.
>
>
>Jason _DID_ remove some ordering code. marc's main deployer, added after
>jboss 3 alpha but in beta, sorted all the "new" files in a scan according
>to the same principles as the subpackages in an, e.g., ear. I think Jason
>was thinking in terms of urls (as in URLScanner) where you list the
I am listening old Beatles' songs today. :-)
Just commited an IIOP version of the bank test. Both IIOP tests
in CVS (helloiiop and bankiiop) have pretty much the same code
as their JRMP counterparts.
It is now very easy to compare JRMP and IIOP speeds.
Best,
Francisco
___
FYI, bug is now fixedboth in 2.4.5 (Branch_2_4 in CVS) and in 3.0.
Regards,
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin
> Holmes
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 4:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: i
Change Notes item #530536, was opened at 2002-03-15 18:07
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=530536&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v2.4.5
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (n
Bugs item #529956, was opened at 2002-03-14 11:52
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=529956&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v2.4 (stable)
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 7
Submitted By: Kevin Holmes (kholmes)
>Assigne
User: patriot1burke
Date: 02/03/15 14:59:42
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins Tag: Branch_2_4
BMPPersistenceManager.java
CMPPersistenceManager.java
Log:
fixed bug 529956 BMP cache zombies. bypass catch on findByPrimaryKey with c
User: patriot1burke
Date: 02/03/15 14:58:54
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins BMPPersistenceManager.java
CMPPersistenceManager.java
Log:
fixed bug 529956 BMP cache zombies. bypass catch on findByPrimaryKey with commit
option B or C.
Revision Ch
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:36:29
Added: src/resources/bankiiop/META-INF ejb-jar.xml jaws.xml
jboss.xml
Log:
Initial version of the bank test for JBoss/IIOP.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jbosstest/src/resources/bankiiop/META-IN
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:36:29
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/bankiiop/test
BankStressTestCase.java
Log:
Initial version of the bank test for JBoss/IIOP.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/bankii
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:36:28
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/bankiiop/ejb AccountBean.java
AccountBeanCMP.java BankBean.java CustomerBean.java
TellerBean.java
Log:
Initial version of the bank test for JBoss/IIOP.
Revisi
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:36:29
Added: src/resources/bankiiop client.policy jndi.properties
Log:
Initial version of the bank test for JBoss/IIOP.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jbosstest/src/resources/bankiiop/client.policy
Index: client.policy
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:36:29
Added: src/main/org/jboss/test/bankiiop/interfaces Account.java
AccountData.java AccountHome.java Bank.java
BankException.java BankHome.java Customer.java
CustomerHome.java C
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:36:28
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Initial version of the bank test for JBoss/IIOP.
Revision ChangesPath
1.93 +34 -2 jbosstest/build.xml
Index: build.xml
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:28:45
jbosstest/src/resources/bankiiop/META-INF - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:28:45
jbosstest/src/resources/bankiiop - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:25:45
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/test/helloiiop/test
HelloTimingStressTestCase.java
Log:
Cleaned up "IOR:..." mess. Now that the container invoker's HomeFactory
class is in jboss-iiop-client.jar we do not need this stuff an
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:27:55
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/bankiiop/ejb - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:27:55
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/bankiiop - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:27:55
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/bankiiop/interfaces - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:27:55
jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/bankiiop/test - New directory
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:19:53
Modified:iiop build.xml
Log:
Placing into jboss-iiop-client.jar the container invoker's HomeFactory
class, which is needed by clients. The HomeFactory is the nested class
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.iiop.server.IIOPContainerInvoker$HomeFactor
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 14:12:24
Modified:iiop/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/iiop/server
IIOPContainerInvoker.java
Log:
Removed all references to class CacheKey, which is not used anymore.
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +3 -9
contrib/
Jason _DID_ remove some ordering code. marc's main deployer, added after
jboss 3 alpha but in beta, sorted all the "new" files in a scan according
to the same principles as the subpackages in an, e.g., ear. I think Jason
was thinking in terms of urls (as in URLScanner) where you list them
explic
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/15 12:26:40
Modified:src/main/test/compliance/query QuerySUITE.java
Added: src/main/test/compliance/query QueryTestCase.java
Removed: src/main/test/compliance/query BasicQueryExpTestCase.java
Log:
More tests, completed basic unit tests Relati
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/15 12:26:41
Modified:src/main/test/compliance/query/support NumberTest.java
NumberTestMBean.java
Added: src/main/test/compliance/query/support BooleanTest.java
BooleanTestMBean.java
Log:
More tests, c
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/15 12:26:40
Modified:src/main/javax/management/relation RelationService.java
RelationServiceMBean.java RelationTypeSupport.java
Role.java RoleList.java RoleUnresolved.java
RoleUnresolvedLi
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/15 12:26:42
Modified:src/main/test/compliance/server MBeanServerTEST.java
Log:
More tests, completed basic unit tests RelationService and Query
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +5 -1 jmx/src/main/test/compliance/server/MBeanServerTEST.java
ryExp.java,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.1 -r1.2
--- InQueryExp.java 22 Feb 2002 16:44:32 - 1.1
+++ InQueryExp.java 15 Mar 2002 20:26:39 - 1.2
@@ -12,9 +12,17 @@
* An In Query Expression.
*
* Returns true only when any of the value
User: ejort
Date: 02/03/15 12:26:40
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/mx/server/registry
BasicMBeanRegistry.java
Log:
More tests, completed basic unit tests RelationService and Query
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +10 -5
jmx/src/main/org/jboss/m
Bugs item #530437, was opened at 2002-03-15 13:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=530437&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Scherpbier (scherpbier)
Hi,
Jason didn't remove the ordering. It wasn't
really there for the resources. I got stung by it
in the alpha, but I didn't understand it then.
Before, there were MBean dependencies of
J2eeDeployer on JarDeployer, RarDeployer, WarDeployer
and ServiceDeployer.
These have now gone, but notice it
Bugs item #530437, was opened at 2002-03-15 19:48
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=530437&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Andrew Scherpbier (scherpbier)
Assig
But don't you think some sort of ordering (like what was there before Jason
removed it) should be implicit?
Datasources specified in .xml files should be deployed before any
EAR/WAR/JAR files, don't you think?
That seems like a common/simple scenario and I don't think a user with that
basic of a
Patches item #530418, was opened at 2002-03-15 10:54
You can respond by visiting:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=530418&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTest
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole (unstable)
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Loren Rosen (lorenros
This also greatly simplifies the code right? Just sort the directory and
you have your ordering.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris
> Harris
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 1:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev
I don't think there was any intention of forcing people to
rename their files. The point is that if you need an
explicit ordering this is the easiest way for the user to
do it. If you don't need ordering then call it anything you
want. So deployment order is something like
all xxxMyName.[j|s|w|e|
> For what its worth I think the best format for something
> like this would be
> a wiki, so that updating it doesn't need to involve cvs
> commits and
> rebuilding the website. Ideal would be a version
> controlled j2ee wiki
> running in jboss/jetty;-) Marc hasn't been thrilled yet
> with this
Hi, has someone realized that applet jars are included in wars and should be
put 'as is' on the web resources dir? (I mean, treated the same as any gif
image or html file)
I'm asking because I use one of these and my app used to work nice until two
days or so. Then I realized that since some time
(My apologies for butting in here)
I think this is a fantastic idea. I've set up a number of Wiki's for
past clients and for my current employer. They really help pull
important stuff out of e-mail and offline documents and put it where
it's accessible to everyone.
There are *numerous* Wiki clo
I really don't know enough about it to comment intelligently. However,
presumably this wiki would be run on one of the jboss.org boxes, so it
would already have jboss + a database running. I really don't know whether
the perl wikis have any security vulnerabilities. It also seems like good
adve
Hi,
On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 06:29, David Jencks wrote:
> I think it would take someone locating or writing a j2ee based wiki that
> works fine on jboss/jetty, demonstrating it somewhere, and getting marc to
> say "that looks good, lets do it"
http://www.webmacro.org/AboutThisSite
Seems to work ra
Relax buddyYou all convinced me I'm wrong which is why I posted the
question in the first place. If you don't like my eloquence, then bleep you
;)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin
> Holmes
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002
Other than the fact that it would be cool, what's the reason for a J2EE
Wiki? This *REALLY* limits you, adds a great deal of resources to the
server, and restricts the environments in which you can run. The
Perl-based Wikis work great, have more features, require less resources,
will run on virtua
Sweet!!!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 10:21 PM
> To: Bill Burke; Trawick, James
> Cc: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net; Jboss-User@Lists.
> Sourceforge. Net
> Subject: RE: [J
The IIOP module should be working. There are no (major) problems known.
Of course, more testing is needed... Right now there is just one iiop
test in the testsuite. More are coming soon.
So far JBoss/IIOP provides basic RMI/IIOP access to EJBs. Transactions
and security aren't there yet.
To b
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 04:32:46
Modified:iiop/src/main/org/jboss/iiop CorbaORBService.java
CorbaORBServiceMBean.java
Log:
Explicitly passing the essential JacORB parameters to the ORB.init()
call. With this change, the iiop module does not need you t
User: reverbel
Date: 02/03/15 04:32:46
Modified:src/etc/conf/default jboss-service.xml
Log:
Explicitly passing the essential JacORB parameters to the ORB.init()
call. With this change, the iiop module does not need you to have a
jacorb.properties file anymore.
Revision Cha
yes,
david pitched it at boston, and i already said that this would be
interesting as part of the jboss professional forums. andreas is working on
these, it weeds out the non professional people with a small fee that makes
sure you are not just cruising by and sending your 'i can't get my bean t
User: cgjung
Date: 02/03/15 02:04:25
Modified:jboss.net/src/main/org/jboss/net/axis/server Constants.java
Added: jboss.net/src/main/org/jboss/net/axis/server
JBossAuthenticationHandler.java
JBossAuthorizationHandler.java
Log:
User: cgjung
Date: 02/03/15 02:04:25
Modified:jboss.net/testsuite/src/etc roles.properties
Log:
security for jboss.net has finally arrived (although the corresponding testcases
still need
to be checked-in).
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -1 contrib/jboss.net
User: cgjung
Date: 02/03/15 02:04:24
Modified:jboss.net/src/etc axis-config.xml
Removed: jboss.net/src/etc auth.conf
Log:
security for jboss.net has finally arrived (although the corresponding testcases
still need
to be checked-in).
Revision ChangesPath
1.4
User: cgjung
Date: 02/03/15 02:04:24
Modified:jboss.net build.xml
Log:
security for jboss.net has finally arrived (although the corresponding testcases
still need
to be checked-in).
Revision ChangesPath
1.17 +11 -1 contrib/jboss.net/build.xml
Index: bu
User: cgjung
Date: 02/03/15 02:04:24
Modified:jboss.net/docs README.html TODO
Log:
security for jboss.net has finally arrived (although the corresponding testcases
still need
to be checked-in).
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +25 -2 contrib/jboss.net/docs/README.
And just to add my final £.02 worth, Burke, you might want to try reading the spec
(EJB 2.0 section 12.1.9 etc) before issuing such confident and eloquent rebuttals as
"fuck em".
regards,
Kevin.
_
View thread online: http://main.jboss.org
67 matches
Mail list logo
