OK, in my current local repository the classes are not compiled. I haven't
see problems with the testsuite...
A possible solution is the filtering like in connector module and the
porting to jdk 1.4 of the security code of jboss.
Claudio
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott M Star
Number of tests run: 806
Successful tests: 752
Errors:46
Failures: 8
[time of test: 26 June 2002 7:49 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux Tea
Ok, thanks.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:51 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3
Your opinion is heard but I find it lacking in reason since criticizing
Jetty source code integration based on JDK 1.4 usage is not a Jetty
specific issue. Its also off the mark in that you are not doing the
integration so why bitch about it. The Jetty people are doing a great
job with the integra
Emerson Cargnin - MSA wrote:
> but the rc2 doesn't complains...
That is because rc2 sucked.
> Other question : for this kind of relationship DO I really need to have
> the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file configuration?
Only if you want a custom column mapping.
> After a change in the version of jboss
but the rc2 doesn't complains...
Other question : for this kind of relationship DO I really need to have
the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file configuration?
After a change in the version of jboss (rc3 if i remember) it started to
give me some errors, so I had to put the following tag in one of the
side
Bugs item #573798, was opened at 2002-06-25 20:02
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=573798&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Jonathan Leech (jonathan_leec
The "notify on incomplete deployment" has messed up a lot of tests. I'm
working on fixing them.
david jencks
On 2002.06.25 15:36:54 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Number of tests run: 609
>
>
>
> Successful tests: 559
> Errors:
Number of tests run: 609
Successful tests: 559
Errors:48
Failures: 2
[time of test: 25 June 2002 12:29 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[
Um… never mind. I have lost it…
must eat food.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Jason Dillon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June
25, 2002 12:21 PM
To:
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: MDB and acknowledge-mode
Why is it that the MetaData for a MDB does n
Why is it that the MetaData for a MDB does not parse the acknowledge-mode
tag, but instead uses the TX type to determine what the ack mode should be?
Looks like only client ack and auto ack is possible with this scheme…
Why?
--jason
Bugs item #571930, was opened at 2002-06-20 19:25
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=571930&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: rick labanca (rickla)
Assigned t
There will be three possible implementations: pk generator factory,
special query after statement execute and JDBC 3.0 style result set
operation.
-dain
Justin Casp wrote:
> At least it's on the drawing board, that's all that matters. I figured that
> the idea was ok but the method wouldn't
At least it's on the drawing board, that's all that matters. I figured that
the idea was ok but the method wouldn't be. Any guess as to when it might
appear? How are you planning on implementing this feature?
Justin
> This is definitely a hack (not a pattern), but if it works for you, use
>
> > IMO it would be better to integrate Jetty as binary, so that we
don't
> > have to keep the build systems in syncs in addition to the sources.
> > This will make it much easier to update when Jetty updates too.
>
> This never works nicely as both JBoss and Jetty have frequent
> releases. So y
You have the following in your jbosscmp-jdbc.xml file:
MunicipioEJB
oid
Notice the empty column-name element. This must contain a valid column
name (e.g., municipio_oid).
--
x
Bugs item #573192, was opened at 2002-06-24 11:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=573192&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd)
Assigned
Bugs item #573192, was opened at 2002-06-24 18:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=573192&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Invalid
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd)
Assign
Hi Dain
The problem is that in rc2 and rc1 it worked well...
before I post it as a bug take a look at the ejb.jar.xml,jboss.xml, and
jbosscmp-jdbc.xml
obs: all of them are generated by xdoclet
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> No I haven't seen it before. I assume you have a bad ejb-jar.xml file,
Bugs item #573192, was opened at 2002-06-24 18:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=573192&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd)
Assigned
Bugs item #573192, was opened at 2002-06-24 18:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=573192&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd)
Assigned
Bugs item #571930, was opened at 2002-06-20 22:25
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=571930&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: rick labanca (rickla)
Assigned t
Bugs item #573192, was opened at 2002-06-24 18:12
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=573192&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Christian Riege (lqd)
Assigned
Bugs item #571930, was opened at 2002-06-20 19:25
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=571930&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: rick labanca (rickla)
>Assigned
Bugs item #572227, was opened at 2002-06-21 19:56
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=572227&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Schuchardt (bruceschuchardt)
Jason Dillon wrote:
> There is already 1.4 support in both 3.0 and HEAD. The jboss/connector
> module has some conditionals which build some javax stubs for 1.3 but
> not for 1.4.
OK, I'll have a look.
> IMO it would be better to integrate Jetty as binary, so that we don't
> have to keep the
JBoss-2.4.7 is available from sourceforge:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866
Change notes:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=96593
A JBoss-2.4.7/Tomcat-4.0.4 bundle is also available.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
J
27 matches
Mail list logo
