Hi,
Nope - I turned on diskcheck after JBoss did that last time ;-)
I'll have a look closer - only seems to be a problem for the jdk13
build - the jdk14 build seems to be working fine...
Chris
=
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.1"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Holger Engels wrote:
> That is local jndi. I am looking up the "coded name" in my local
> jndi-namespace. The coded name is defined as an ejb-ref in my
> application-client.xml. what I get is something, that feels like a proxy
> to the ejb's home. the ejb-ref must be confi
Bugs item #570030, was opened at 2002-06-17 13:36
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=570030&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Howard Lewis Ship (hship)
Assig
We were registering PropertyEditors in two different places via
hard coded statements so I removed this in favor of simply
augmenting the default editor search path with the
org.jboss.util.propertyeditor
package. There is a new org.jboss.test.util.test.PropertyEditorsUnitTestCase
for both the stan
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
You have examples in the tests in CVS and in the forums.
Anyways, this is a thread better suited for the jboss-users list.
pushpendu chakraborty wrote:
>How do I login to jetty web container and eventually
>jboss ejb container thru program?
>I can successfully use security-constraint etc in
>we
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
|Christian Riege
|Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 11:24 AM
|To: JBoss Dev list
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] I can't believe france is out of the world cup
|
|
|hi,
|
|On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 19:46, Bordet, Simo
> Bugs item #571930, was opened at 2002-06-20 22:25> You can respond by visiting: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=571930&group_id=22866> > Category: JBossServer> Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole> Status: Open> Resolution: None> Priority: 5> Submitted By: rick labanca (rickla)>
Bugs item #571930, was opened at 2002-06-20 22:25
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=571930&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: rick labanca (rickla)
Assigned t
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
Is your disk full or something? I had the build to a clean checkout
this morning and I'm not seeing any errors building main. Anyone
else having a problem?
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: <[
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
Bugs item #574238, was opened at 2002-06-26 12:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574238&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Ass
Bugs item #574238, was opened at 2002-06-26 14:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574238&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Ass
Bugs item #574238, was opened at 2002-06-26 14:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574238&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Ass
Bugs item #574252, was opened at 2002-06-26 13:22
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574252&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Deleted
>Resolution: Duplicate
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolf
Bugs item #574238, was opened at 2002-06-26 12:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574238&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Ass
Bugs item #574238, was opened at 2002-06-26 14:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574238&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Ass
Bugs item #574238, was opened at 2002-06-26 14:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574238&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Ass
Bugs item #554535, was opened at 2002-05-10 10:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=554535&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
>Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Niall O'Sullivan (nosullivan)
Bugs item #574238, was opened at 2002-06-26 12:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574238&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Ass
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
Number of tests run: 661
Successful tests: 660
Errors:0
Failures: 1
[time of test: 27 June 2002 12:31 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[j
Bugs item #574238, was opened at 2002-06-26 14:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574238&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Ass
Bugs item #574238, was opened at 2002-06-26 12:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574238&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Ass
How do I login to jetty web container and eventually
jboss ejb container thru program?
I can successfully use security-constraint etc in
web.xml to login to jboss/jetty.But if I want to get
parameter from a servlet and then try to use normal
jaas login mechanism thru servlet what do I need to
do?
Bugs item #572281, was opened at 2002-06-21 15:46
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=572281&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
>Group: v3.1
Status: Open
>Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Colin Li (colinl)
>Assigned to: Dain Sun
Bugs item #559024, was opened at 2002-05-22 01:13
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=559024&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Henk Laracker (hlaracker)
Assi
hi,
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 19:46, Bordet, Simone wrote:
> > so sorry guys (especcialy from turkey), but now it's between
> > us and the
> > German. We talk again after sunday, maybe tuesday, because
> > the party is
> > gonna be long : ) (so i hope)...
>
> At least the referee is italian,
i
Bugs item #559232, was opened at 2002-05-22 10:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=559232&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
>Group: v3.1
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rik de Groot (synotix)
Assigned to: Dain
Bugs item #563132, was opened at 2002-05-31 18:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=563132&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Peter Luttrell (objec)
Bugs item #574238, was opened at 2002-06-26 14:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574238&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Ass
Hi,
> so sorry guys (especcialy from turkey), but now it's between
> us and the
> German. We talk again after sunday, maybe tuesday, because
> the party is
> gonna be long : ) (so i hope)...
At least the referee is italian, although I'd preferred Italy was there instead of
Germany.
Ah well,
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
so sorry guys (especcialy from turkey), but now it's between us and the
German. We talk again after sunday, maybe tuesday, because the party is
gonna be long : ) (so i hope)...
> Richard Kilgore wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 04:01:23PM +0200, Christian Riege wrote:
>>
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> O
Bugs item #556644, was opened at 2002-05-16 01:24
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=556644&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke)
Ass
- Original Message -
From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Viewing mbean operation results
> On 2002.06.27 11:52:24 -0400 Scott M Stark wrote:
> > The point is that you should not have to code prese
Bugs item #574238, was opened at 2002-06-26 12:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574238&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Steve Wolfangel (swolfangel)
Ass
On 2002.06.27 11:52:24 -0400 Scott M Stark wrote:
> The point is that you should not have to code presentation specific
> methods
> in your mbeans.
Agreed. I'd like to take that one back out ASAP.
We are going to be using our html adaptor in the next
> release so any hacking should be done the
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.3.0"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edi
But the order in which events arrive on a given appender as issued
from multi-threaded code is basically non-deterministic. Two events
issued at times t0 and t1 on the same category will show up in the
log file of the associated appender in arbitrary order for sufficiently
small delta-t. That is a
The point is that you should not have to code presentation specific methods
in your mbeans. We are going to be using our html adaptor in the next
release so any hacking should be done there. I'm inclined to use a
mechanism like the java.beans.PropertyEditor that allows one to obtain
a xml fragment
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Sacha Labourey wrote:
> > Yes. But if we need to bootsrap the jndi communication, we can skip this
> > jndi lookup and just send the create invocation to the invoker. How the
> > invokers can be accessed must either be "wellknown" or somehow configured
> > on the client.
>
>
Hi everyone,
I have written a small specification for tacking the logging
separation problem in servlet containers. It is available here:
http://qos.ch/containers/sc.html
Please do not hesitate to forward this email to forums where Container
developers hang around. I've already forwarded it
NOT AT ALL. Now you belong to us, man...
PS:
go to http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user
enter your e-mail
select Edit Options
and so on...
Thursday, June 27, 2002, 3:25:58 PM, you wrote:
AV> __
AV> Do You Yahoo!?
AV> Yahoo! - O
Snip ...
> You mean no url provider, but jndi.properties (=environment)? OK. But I
> can't live with global jndi.properties. I need them on a per *-ref basis,
> because the components I connect are spreaded across several different
> application servers.
>
It would seem that you would still
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Scott M Stark wrote:
> I thought 'presentationString' only applied to model mbeans. How
> can we integrate the presentation metadata into the existing standard
> and dynamic mbeans?
You can't, as neither one defines a way to extend the metadata.
-- Juha
Bugs item #574199, was opened at 2002-06-26 18:23
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574199&group_id=22866
Category: JBossTX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Paul Adams (padams)
>Assigned t
Bugs item #574257, was opened at 2002-06-26 20:28
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574257&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.1
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bruce Schuchardt (bruceschuchardt)
>Assigned to:
The quick easy solution/hack is to add a ListxxxAsString method for these
that returns
"" + Listxxx().toString() + "".
I did this for one of these methods. Should I do it for the others?
How about if you do this in your jmx presentation servlet? Are we using
this yet?
On 2002.06.27 04:07:08
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/
_
Scott,
What does this mean? Log4j appenders will output events in the order
it receives them. Do you have something else in mind?
> There is no guarentee of log message ordering in the standard log4j
> appenders.
>
>
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBo
Bugs item #570030, was opened at 2002-06-17 09:36
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=570030&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCX
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Howard Lewis Ship (hship)
Assigned t
> Yes. But if we need to bootsrap the jndi communication, we can skip this
> jndi lookup and just send the create invocation to the invoker. How the
> invokers can be accessed must either be "wellknown" or somehow configured
> on the client.
yes, the problem is that I am not sure (in fact I am pr
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Sacha Labourey wrote:
> Just a small point: do we agree that independing on the protocol used to
> communicate with JNDI, the proxy needs to be obtained in a specific way
> (like now, through standard TCP) to bootstrap.
Yes. But if we need to bootsrap the jndi communication,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Bill Burke wrote:
> Holger, your ideas are very interesting and thought provoking. Although I
> disagree with a lot of them (read further), I believe that this is a good
> conversion and something very cool will come out of it.
Actually I've already learned from this discus
Bugs item #574501, was opened at 2002-06-27 11:17
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=574501&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Sacha Labourey (slaboure)
Assigned to: Sa
Just a small point: do we agree that independing on the protocol used to
communicate with JNDI, the proxy needs to be obtained in a specific way
(like now, through standard TCP) to bootstrap.
> -Message d'origine-
> De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Bill
> B
Holger, your ideas are very interesting and thought provoking. Although I
disagree with a lot of them (read further), I believe that this is a good
conversion and something very cool will come out of it.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
I thought 'presentationString' only applied to model mbeans. How
can we integrate the presentation metadata into the existing standard
and dynamic mbeans?
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "J
Number of tests run: 646
Successful tests: 644
Errors:1
Failures: 1
[time of test: 27 June 2002 0:48 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[ja
Number of tests run: 808
Successful tests: 737
Errors:46
Failures: 25
[time of test: 27 June 2002 8:18 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Blackdown Java-Linux Te
65 matches
Mail list logo
