RE: [JBoss-dev] JMX on the client side?

+1. This all came about because I was thinking about client side caches with server invalidation. Without the JMX kernel it is a pain because we have invent a totally new architecture to handle server to client invocations. If we have the kernel, we quickly prototype this by reusing the

RE: [JBoss-dev] JMX on the client side?

JMX on the client side and JBoss on the client side are two different things, right? AFAIK, MBeanServerFactory.createMBeanServer() doesn't require the service deployer. If it does, that's another thing... Agreed. All I am talking about is an MBean server. If someone wants more

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-636227 ] testsuite generally fails to complete

Bugs item #636227, was opened at 2002-11-10 16:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=636227group_id=22866 Category: JBossTest Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Kimpton (kimptoc) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-636227 ] testsuite generally fails to complete

Bugs item #636227, was opened at 2002-11-10 16:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=636227group_id=22866 Category: JBossTest Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Kimpton (kimptoc) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-636227 ] testsuite generally fails to complete

Bugs item #636227, was opened at 2002-11-10 08:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=636227group_id=22866 Category: JBossTest Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Kimpton (kimptoc) Assigned to:

[JBoss-dev] J2EE Timer Service

Hi Geeks Did anyone started to develop the EJB 2.1 Timer Service ? Otherwise I will have a look into it because I think we could use the Scheduler. Have fun - Andy --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven.

Re: [JBoss-dev] J2EE Timer Service

I have not seen anyone mention this so go ahead. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Andy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 10:18 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev]

Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX on the client side?

No details as yet. I'm just directing the jmx on the client discussion towards a generalization of the notions of the server jmx microkernel. JavaGroups does not assume a multicast enabled network. Look at its architecture and you will see that protocols is abstracted away from messaging such

Re: [JBoss-dev] Files looked on my fs from clean co

I have not seen any issue with permissioning of the checked out files. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Peter Fagerlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 09,

Re: [JBoss-dev] J2EE Timer Service

What about Quartz? Lets integrate instead of invent where we can. --jason snip what do you guys think of a new scheduler? marc f -Original Message- From: Ben Sabrin [mailto:ben;jboss.org] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 3:58 AM To: Marc Fleury Subject: FW: Quartz J2EE Scheduler

[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 10-November-2002

Number of tests run: 991 Successful tests: 986 Errors:5 Failures: 0 [time of test: 10 November 2002 12:48 GMT] [java.version: 1.3.1] [java.vendor: Apple Computer,

[JBoss-dev] Problem compiling 3.2 beta testsuite

Can't get 3.2 testsuite to compile due to the errors below compile-classes-only: [javac] Compiling 932 source files to C:\work\mletpatch\HEAD\jboss3.2beta\testsuite\output\classes [execmodules]

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-636227 ] testsuite generally fails to complete

Bugs item #636227, was opened at 2002-11-10 16:05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=636227group_id=22866 Category: JBossTest Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Chris Kimpton (kimptoc) Assigned to: Adrian

Re: [JBoss-dev] Problem compiling 3.2 beta testsuite

This is fixed. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Juha-P Lindfors [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 10, 2002 1:50 PM Subject: [JBoss-dev] Problem compiling 3.2

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-604085 ] Jetty is not deploying packed wars

Bugs item #604085, was opened at 2002-09-03 18:34 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=604085group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-604085 ] Jetty is not deploying packed wars

Bugs item #604085, was opened at 2002-09-03 18:34 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=604085group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Scott M Stark (starksm) Assigned

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-636418 ] JBossMQ MessageCache changes

Change Notes item #636418, was opened at 2002-11-11 01:00 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=636418group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v4.0 Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Adrian Brock (ejort) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)

Re: [JBoss-dev] J2EE Timer Service

Hi Jason Quartz is something similar than our Scheduler but with the focus on Enterprise-ready timers whereas the Scheduler was only designed to serve as JBoss utility. But the J2EE timer service needs to be incorporated into JBoss like MDB invocation when a message arrives. I will create a

RE: [JBoss-dev] JMX on the client side?

Hiram, I think you missed the point. Of course we could do this with out requiring JMX; anything is possible. The point is if we agree that JMX is always on the client side then entire system is simplified. I guess the disconnect is happening right here. IMO JMX does not always make

Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX on the client side?

Let me give you my example of why I want it. I worked over the trunk invoker so it would do distributed transactions. This requires at least a source of xid's on the calling side, and preferably a TransactionManager. Well, they are already there if the calling side is a jboss instance. If it's

RE: [JBoss-dev] JMX on the client side?

Ok.. i buy into that. I think running a JMX server on the client side should be a piece of cake. The hard part is figuring out how the client-side deployment system going to work. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-537152 ] MAPPING Configuration error for request

Bugs item #537152, was opened at 2002-03-31 02:10 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=537152group_id=22866 Category: CatalinaBundle Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Duplicate Priority: 8 Submitted By: Pravin Pillai

Re: [JBoss-dev] JMX on the client side?

On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 07:13, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Hiram Chirino wrote: Hiram, I think you missed the point. Of course we could do this with out requiring JMX; anything is possible. The point is if we agree that JMX is always on the client side then entire system is simplified. I guess

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://www.lubega.com FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version 1.4.1_01 Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634910 ] arbitrary Exception: iterator of a CMR..

Bugs item #634910, was opened at 2002-11-07 13:03 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634910group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Alexei Yudichev (sflexus) Assigned to: