View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20040914021806Lbuild.44
BUILD COMPLETE - build.44Date of build: 09/14/2004 02:18:06Time to build: 10 minutes 52 secondsLast changed: 09/14/2004 02:13:06Last log entry: Backported JBossCache1.1
Please check it out.
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848104#3848104
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3848104
---
This SF.Net email
Last q: yes. Replication and eviction are orthogonal.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848103#3848103
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3848103
---
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040914004451
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:80: exec returned: 1Date of build: 09/14/2004 00:44:51Time to build: 8 minutes 33 secondsLast changed: 09/1
anonymous wrote : You know I created the download module and have not seen any bugs. I
may not have been keeping up on the forums.
Sadly, I don't think that many people have been posting bug reports. I think I found
so many because I started off trying to port the downloads module to a links/bo
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040914001107
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:80: exec returned: 1Date of build: 09/14/2004 00:11:07Time to build: 10 minutes 12 secondsLast changed: 09/
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040913230636Lbuild.147
BUILD COMPLETE - build.147Date of build: 09/13/2004 23:06:36Time to build: 12 minutes 47 secondsLast changed: 09/13/2004 22:57:39Last log entry: Include the missing th
Forget about the map and list. Why don't you do a putObject on UnderedCache to see if
it gets replicated correctly?
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848097#3848097
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&m
Bela,
Thanks for the insight. You are correct in that I am not currently using
transactions, but if I were, I would simply have a begin and commit surrounding every
put operation, so I'm not sure I would accrue any tangible benefits.
I will see if I can mock a small test case that consistentl
If this is not a secret and if the website is publicly available, could you add it the
this wiki page:
http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=NukesReferences
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848088#3848088
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.
I just wanted to let you all know that in 2 weeks we will be delivering version Nukes
1.0 with a customised module for a customer. It will be used to track packages(ie
paperwork) that they are working on. It will also contain the data that they collect
and use. I have spent a year developing usi
Wow, I guess two pairs of eyes are better than one.
Thanks for doing the ftp validation was going to get to that but never had the chance.
I got really busy at work.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848086#3848086
Reply to the post :
http://ww
You know I created the download module and have not seen any bugs. I may not have been
keeping up on the forums.
Also can I get recognized on the nukes front page for doing the conversion. I also
want to say the downloads module was not a straight conversion. I took my time and
made many change
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040913194442Lbuild.146
BUILD COMPLETE - build.146Date of build: 09/13/2004 19:44:42Time to build: 14 minutes 56 secondsLast changed: 09/13/2004 19:00:37Last log entry: Include the LogoutServ
Friends,
There is a simple way to generate wsdl and xml files to expose EJBs as Web Services?
Thanks
//***
I have been problem like this:
20:32:21,741 WARN [EjbModule] The Container Invoker session-webservice-invoker (in
jboss.xml or standardjboss.xml) could not be created becau
Just looking for an update. I know you guys are swamped, but what is the current rough
guess for M2?
1 Month?
3 Months?
6 Months?
Thanks!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848083#3848083
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?modu
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040913185202Lbuild.145
BUILD COMPLETE - build.145Date of build: 09/13/2004 18:52:02Time to build: 17 minutes 31 secondsLast changed: 09/13/2004 18:17:21Last log entry: Update the username/pa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040913175030Lbuild.144
BUILD COMPLETE - build.144Date of build: 09/13/2004 17:50:30Time to build: 19 minutes 35 secondsLast changed: 09/13/2004 17:23:02Last log entry: Fix adding indexes in
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040913170424Lbuild.143
BUILD COMPLETE - build.143Date of build: 09/13/2004 17:04:24Time to build: 13 minutes 48 secondsLast changed: 09/13/2004 16:42:57Last log entry: no message
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040913150453Lbuild.142
BUILD COMPLETE - build.142Date of build: 09/13/2004 15:04:53Time to build: 15 minutes 24 secondsLast changed: 09/13/2004 14:57:45Last log entry: Include the org.jboss.
"bwang00" wrote : You will still need jboss-aop to declare your object,
UnOrderedCache, to be aspectized. Otherwise, aop will treat it as a regular object of
which requires Serializable, and furthermore will not breakdown the object graph for
UnOrderedCache.
|
| -Ben
Thanks for your feedba
Bugs item #1027433, was opened at 2004-09-13 21:01
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by lafr
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1027433&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority:
Bugs item #1027433, was opened at 2004-09-13 21:01
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1027433&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: CVS HEAD
Status: Open
Resoluti
hmm - this forum doesn't like me, it snipped 50% of my postinghere are the last
part:
My thoughts on the JBossIDE is to separate concerns:
1. Reverse/Forward Engineering (Code generation)
Based mostly on hibernate/middlegen existing features.
Make it independent of the EJB3 and it will be u
First couple of questions in the first round...
"marshall" wrote :
| Datasource management. (required for the next 3 to be possible..)
|
What does this cover ? Listing the available datasources in a container ? Is JSR 77
sufficient for this ?
EJBQL Execution
Does this require Datasource
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040913134741Lbuild.141
BUILD COMPLETE - build.141Date of build: 09/13/2004 13:47:41Time to build: 17 minutes 55 secondsLast changed: 09/13/2004 13:08:59Last log entry: Fix the description/di
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040913124934Lbuild.140
BUILD COMPLETE - build.140Date of build: 09/13/2004 12:49:34Time to build: 21 minutes 2 secondsLast changed: 09/13/2004 12:31:16Last log entry: Strip any java:/jaas/ p
Bugs item #1027347, was opened at 2004-09-13 19:20
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1027347&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Prior
Bugs item #1019013, was opened at 2004-08-30 14:36
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1019013&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Prior
Bugs item #1019013, was opened at 2004-08-30 04:36
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by vbkrishnan
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1019013&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority
this is the only clean solution today, this needs to be fixed in future releases and
"target" should be able to contain arbitrary payload to allow for extended
load-policies.
cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848048#3848048
Reply
I'm trying to develop a custom LoadBalancePolicy that selects targets based on their
location within the network (for instance servers within the local subnet will
probably be faster, also hopcount might matter). However, for this I need to obtain
the IP address of the different targets. Is ther
Bugs item #1027347, was opened at 2004-09-13 13:20
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1027347&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #1025642, was opened at 2004-09-10 11:07
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1025642&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Pr
Bugs item #1027302, was opened at 2004-09-13 15:34
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1027302&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolutio
Bugs item #1025642, was opened at 2004-09-10 03:07
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by juanmartinez
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1025642&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Pri
So you
#1 do *not* use transactions
#2 use repl sync
#1 disables bundling of modifications, therefore you get more traffic across the wire
(after *each* modification)
#2 is *much* slower than async replication
It would help if you have a small test case, zipped up and including the configuratio
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20040913095308Lbuild.139
BUILD COMPLETE - build.139Date of build: 09/13/2004 09:53:08Time to build: 19 minutes 38 secondsLast changed: 09/13/2004 09:42:57Last log entry: avoid loading addition
I am not explicitly demarcating transactions, and I am using synchronous replication
(though to be fair I tried async, which was not noticeably faster). My full cache XML
is as follows:
jboss:service=Naming
jboss:service=TransactionManager
org.jboss.cache.
It can be taken for a starting point. But it need to be reworked.
Indeed the trick here is to have the parser generate events, not directly output. Thus
it is possible to have several renderers.
The forum use this architecture :
Message -> Parser stack -> Renderer
Renderers are mainly to have
Here is my test Java code:
| import java.io.*;
| import javax.transaction.*;
|
| import org.jboss.cache.*;
|
| public class MultithreadedClient {
|
| private int numOfThreads;
| private int time;
| private int randomNum;
| private TreeCache cache;
|
|
hi,
I'm trying to get the persistence cache working. The problem I am encountering is
the JBossCache seem to be in a endless loop when trying to archive 160k+ instances of
a simple object containing a few attributes. The data size for the 160k+ objects is
about 10mb as CSV, but in the archiv
I think XDoclet does not care whether it is dot or colon. The XDoclet documentation
uses the dot syntax. Do you see problems?
If XDoclet does not care wheter it is a dot or colon, no (haven't tried yet).
Otherwise source code updates would be required. Anyway, it's a good idea to be
consisten
No, you will need create jboss-aop.xml for aopc as well. Idea of aopc is to
pre-generate the byte code so you don't further class loader and jboss-aop.xml during
runtime.
Look into the etc directory, there is an example of jboss-aop.xml for Person.
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jbo
Hi Ben,
I've been looking through the logs. After adding the flag:
-Djava.system.class.loader=org.jboss.aop.standalone.SystemClassLoader
when running my test apps, I can see that when starting the client app, a:
java.io.NotSerializableException: MyClass
is appearing on the server console loggi
There is a offline wiki module in JBoss cvs (I think Scott Stark wrote that).
Alternatively, you could consider looking at radeox.
Joachim
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3847989#3847989
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?modu
You will still need jboss-aop to declare your object, UnOrderedCache, to be
aspectized. Otherwise, aop will treat it as a regular object of which requires
Serializable, and furthermore will not breakdown the object graph for UnOrderedCache.
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/in
Ran,
If you are willing to provide your test code, I will be happy to take a look at the
problem you mentioned.
Thanks,
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3847986#3847986
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=pos
48 matches
Mail list logo
