I was just thinking how cool it would be to generically associate xml
with a method declaration.
Back story:
I am working on unit test cases for JBossCMP using JUnitEJB and it would
be really useful to mark a test method with a tx attribute. Now this
test code is not an EJB or an XMBean, so
-existent element previously.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 8:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Where is the empty datasource-mapping element
> coming from?
&
Can you be more specific about this change? It may cause problems with
my metadata code. I'll fix any problems in the cmp metadata code, but I
need to know what you changed.
-dain
Scott M Stark wrote:
> There was a change in behvior in the xml element value parser layer such
> that element
I was thinking about more options not an advantage.
-dain
David Jencks wrote:
> It also only supports serializable tx isolation, probably meaning that tx
> are in fact serialized.
>
> What would the advantage over hsqldb be?
>
> david jencks
>
> On 2002.05.16 10:51
David Good posted a mapping for JBossCMP about an hour ago. I looked at
their site about a month ago and it looks promising. I think the is a
new db (not hypersonic based). It is embedable, but it is GPL. I don't
think we can embed a GPL application. Anyone?
-dain
Scott M Stark wrote:
>
ation, but
that is for another day.
-dain
Jason Dillon wrote:
> Sure, if you have time.
>
> --jason
>
>
> Quoting Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>>I added commands to the main build file to copy all of the DTD from
>>server and jmx mod
I added commands to the main build file to copy all of the DTD from
server and jmx modules to a new dtd directory in the distribution.
Should I copy DTDs from other modules?
--
x
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect, JBossCMP
JBoss Group, LLC
x
erRef.java:241)
> at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:152)
> at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:148)
> at
> sun.rmi.transpor
for
> JBoss or aren't essential)
> - made it available for JBoss 3.1 release
>
> Andy
>
Good plan, KISS.
--
x
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect, JBossCMP
JBoss Group, LLC
x
___
more than one table, etc.)
It will give me and anyone else interested a kick in the butt to get
these features.
-dain
--
x
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect, JBossCMP
JBoss Group, LLC
x
__
In org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.metadata.JDBCQueryMetaDataFactory I
have a method (convertToJavaClass) that does the name to array class
conversion. Here is the core:
int arraySize = 0;
while(name.endsWith("[]")) {
name = name.substring(0, name.length()-2);
arraySize++;
}
try {
Stephen Coy wrote:
> I'm willing to tackle this. Do you have any idea what shape you would
> like?
Not sure what that means.
> Particular areas to cover?
To start the I'd just like to see the CMP 1.1 tests running under
JBossCMP and JAWS in the unit test suite. Then it would be cool to h
JAWS or JBossCMP? JBossCMP must have a transaction.
-dain
Bill Burke wrote:
> Why are we storing a dirty entity when the method call is not called within
> the context of a transaction (NOT_SUPPORTED, NEVER, etc...)? Seems kind of
> bizarre.
>
> Bill
>
>
> _
Yep the main test only use JAWS. I think david was looking at getting
these tests to use JAWS and JBossCMP, but I think he got to busy. Do
you want to try to get them running under JAWS and JBossCMP?
-dain
Stephen Coy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> By looking for usage of jaws.xml files, I think I've un
I totally agree with this. One of the ideas I have been kicking around
is developing some production tools, which would automate the steps you
describe. Part of this is david's code to merge the xml files during
deployment; once they are merged and defaults unrolled, we write the
complete fi
Frank Morton wrote:
> I'm also converting my beans to 2.0, so don't expect to
> be using JAWS. I could use a sample jbosscmp-jdbc.xml
> that you know is right as a sample.
Don't have one, other then the ones in the testsuite. I'm still working
on the updated docs, and haven't gotten to the sam
are of that?
>
> marcf
>
> |-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dain
> |Sundstrom
> |Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:29 PM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] IIOP barfs on linux
> |
> |
>
Are you using the newest version of 1.3.1 from SUN? If not, you need to
upgrade. If you are using 1.4, just ignore me.
Also I thought the jacob.properties was just a warning.
-dain
marc fleury wrote:
> he...
>
> did rm on the old stuff
> then a CLEAN CO
> then build (builds fine btw)
> the
he build system to release them under build/output/jboss-*/etc/dtd
> or something.
>
> --jason
>
>
> Quoting Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>>Yes I know they are in the jar. I mean we should include a copy in
>>loose form. It is very useful
I had the same problem with JDK 1.3. If you upgrade to the newest
release of 1.3.1 it goes away.
-dain
Filip Hanik wrote:
> is there anything specific we need to know about building the sources. I
> went through the documentation, but it says that everything should build
> fine.
>
> D:\Devel
tadata/jboss_3_0.dtd
> org/jboss/metadata/jaws_2_4.dtd
>
>
> Scott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
> xxxx
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dain Sundstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
Can we include the DTDs for a release in the binary download?
I keep geting messages asking for the location of the DTDs.
-dain
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Is JDBC 3.0 a JDK 1.4 only feature? Is there going to be an optional
pack for 1.3 users? If not, that really sucks. If you want the new
drivers, you have to upgrade to a x.0 version VM. Sounds like a M$ move.
BTW, I searched google and couldn't find any info either way.
-dain
David Jencks
We can't compile against 1.2.2 either. I tried it last week.
-dain
marc fleury wrote:
> yes
>
> marcf
>
> |-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
> |Burke
> |Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 11:54 PM
> |To: Jboss-Dev
> |Subject: [JB
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/19 08:27:15
Modified:src/etc/conf/default Tag: Branch_3_0
standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Log:
Changed oracle max-alias-length to 30.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No revision
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/19 08:25:08
Modified:src/etc/conf/default standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Log:
Changed oracle max-alias-length to 30.
Revision ChangesPath
1.25 +4 -4 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Index: standardjbosscmp-jdbc.x
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/18 12:55:52
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/metadata Tag: Branch_3_0
jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0.dtd
Log:
Added missing other element to declared-sql.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
No
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/18 12:51:53
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/metadata jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0.dtd
Log:
Added missing other element to declared-sql.
Revision ChangesPath
1.16 +8 -1 jboss/src/resources/org/jboss/metadata/jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0.dtd
Index: j
David Jencks wrote:
> cvs update -j HEAD
If you do this:
cvs update -kk -j HEAD
The merge will work better, because it kills keyword expansion. Note,
don't do this on a binary file, as binary files need -kb and -kk turns
-kb off.
-dain
___
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/18 12:40:07
Modified:varia/src/main/org/jboss/varia/autonumber Tag: Branch_3_0
AutoNumberEJB2.java
Log:
Fixed bug [ 543253 ] AutoNumberEJB2 ejbCreate init problem.
Revision ChangesPath
No revision
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/18 12:22:37
Modified:src/etc/conf/default standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Log:
Fixed bug [ 543255 ] SOLID DB and CONSTRAINT
Solid DB doesn't use constraint name.
Revision ChangesPath
1.24 +2 -2 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/standardjbos
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/18 12:31:15
Modified:src/etc/conf/default Tag: Branch_3_0
standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Log:
Fixed bug [ 543255 ] SOLID DB and CONSTRAINT
Solid DB doesn't use constraint name.
Revision ChangesPath
No
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/18 12:38:12
Modified:varia/src/main/org/jboss/varia/autonumber
AutoNumberEJB2.java
Log:
Fixed bug [ 543253 ] AutoNumberEJB2 ejbCreate init problem
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +2 -1
contrib/varia/src/main/org/j
Over the last couple of weeks I have looked at getting JBoss running on
the Zaurus. The problem with the Zaurus is it ships with Personal Java,
which is basically JDK 1.2 minus a whole bunch of stuff, and JBoss no
longer builds with JDK 1.2.
Anyway, we run on Blackdown, and Blackdown should r
We should create an optional services directory in the download that
could contain Castor, Tyrex, maybe Tomcat (then we get rid of the
multiple download packages).
-dain
David Jencks wrote:
> On 2002.04.17 12:11:35 -0400 Dain Sundstrom wrote:
>
>>Is there a reason why we s
I just fixed this on my windows box by installing the latest version of
the JDK 1.3.1_03.
-dain
Vesco Claudio wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If I remember well, this is a problem with rmic but I have encontered this
> problem in WindowsNT sun jdk 1.3.
>
> You have said that you are in linux and linux are
Here is the strategy I follow in JBossCMP:
Low-level non recoverable exceptions (SQLException, IOException...) are
wrapped in an EJBException. (Not RemoteException or ServerException as
is required by the spec).
When catching an Exception, first check for EJBException, and just
rethrow. (avo
dding an optional element to jbosscmp-jdbc.xml would certainly
>>> resolve my problem in a platform independent way.
>>>
>>> BTW. I don't think that using:
>>> myschema.mytable
>>> will work in the current implementation anyway, because the ta
Are we going to release Jetty and Tomcat integrated packages, or does
the package already contain an integrated stack?
Did we branch or just tag? I don't really understand CVS branches (I
have a book on it, just haven't read it yet). Do I need to check fixes
into the branch and head?
-dain
From theserverside.com:
ObjectWeb has released a test suite for JMS features under LGPL. This
suite tests JMS features; its code base is pure JMS without dependency
from any vendor and provides a simple framework to be used by any JMS
providers.
http://www.objectweb.org/joram/tests
I don't
uld have to support Yet Another
> Feature. IMHO it's the same to write:
>
> myschema
> mytable
>
> than
>
> myschema.mytable
>
> Do other environments support this? This should be a common problem. As
> far as I remember Delphi left you alone on this one.
>
me, not a qualified tablename. I would expect that
> most RDBMS products, open or closed source, use this convention of "."
> delimiting tokens in table and column names.
>
> Cheers
>
>
>>From: Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: 2002/04/15 Mo
JL@esial wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using JBoss 3.0.0beta2(200204150942) on Win2k SP2.
> The function tableExists in this class makes the following jdbc call:
> rs = dmd.getTables(con.getCatalog(), null, tableName, null);
>
> I am using DB2 as dbms, and this piece of code will not work if
> tab
- 1.12
+++ JDBCCMP1xFieldBridge.java 15 Apr 2002 03:25:49 - 1.13
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
* One for each entity bean cmp field.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.12 $
+ * @version $Revisi
]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.1 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.2 $
*/
public class Catalog {
- private final Map entityBridges = new HashMap();
+ private final Map entityByAbstractSchemaName = new HashMap();
+ private final Map entityB
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/14 19:43:00
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCDeclaredSQLQuery.java
Log:
Fixed declared-sql.
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +12 -34
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/JDBCDeclaredSQLQu
translate just a few elements of the tree.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.2 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.3 $
*/
public class BasicVisitor implements JBossQLParserVisitor {
public Object visit(Si
JBossQL into SQL.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.5 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.6 $
*/
public class JDBCEJBQLCompiler extends BasicVisitor {
@@ -305,7 +306,7 @@
}
// verify that parameter is the same typ
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/14 10:35:31
Modified:src/etc/conf/default standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Log:
Added mappings for LCase and UCase functions.
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +65 -1 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Index: standardjbosscmp
;
/**
* This abstract syntax node represents a LCase function.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
* @version $Revision: 1.1 $
*/
public class ASTLCase extends SimpleNode {
public ASTLCase(int id) {
;
@@ -84,7 +86,7 @@
* Compiles EJB-QL and JBossQL into SQL.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.4 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.5 $
*/
public class JDBCEJBQLCompiler extends BasicVisitor {
@@ -1027,6 +1029,36 @@
revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -r1.11 -r1.12
--- JDBCTypeMappingMetaData.java 27 Feb 2002 00:05:41 - 1.11
+++ JDBCTypeMappingMetaData.java 14 Apr 2002 17:28:56 - 1.12
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain S
-r1.2
--- BasicVisitor.java 26 Feb 2002 23:16:40 - 1.1
+++ BasicVisitor.java 14 Apr 2002 17:28:55 - 1.2
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
* extensions translate just a few elements of the tree.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revis
Feb 2002 23:16:40 - 1.1
+++ JBossQLParser.jjt 14 Apr 2002 16:26:24 - 1.2
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
* This class parses JBossQL into an abstract syntax tree.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.1 $
+ * @version $Revis
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/14 08:53:03
Modified:src/etc/conf/default standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Log:
Added Oracle9i type mapping.
Revision ChangesPath
1.22 +138 -7jboss/src/etc/conf/default/standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Index: standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
=
I think the problem is that Bill's view of read-only is that the method
does not change any state information (more of a pure-functional
method), and when I am talking about read-only I mean read only fields.
I could notify the container/ interceptor which methods are read-only.
The problem wi
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/13 19:26:39
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCQueryManager.java
Log:
Forgot to set the method variable...
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +2 -2
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/JDBC
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/13 18:56:10
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCQueryManager.java
Log:
Fixed complaint (bug) [ 541870 ] Exception Cleanup (findByPrimaryKey).
Now reports method name and parameter type.
Revision Changes
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/13 18:12:16
Modified:src/etc/conf/default standardjboss.xml
Log:
Added new EntityCreationInterceptor.
Revision ChangesPath
1.37 +12 -1 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/standardjboss.xml
Index: standardjboss.xml
=
borini
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Daniel OConnor
-* @author Bill Burke
+* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Bill Burke
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Andreas Schaefer
-* @version $Revision: 1.76 $
+* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/13 18:11:05
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/resource/connectionmanager
CachedConnectionInterceptor.java
Log:
Added postCreateEntity pass through method.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +10 -0
jbosscx/src/main/org/jboss
tion class.
*
-* @see
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Rickard Öberg
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Marc Fleury
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Andreas Schaefer
-* @version $Revision: 1.39 $
+* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dai
rd Öberg
- * @version $Revision: 1.13 $
+ * @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
+ * @version $Revision: 1.14 $
*/
-public interface EntityPersistenceManager
- extends ContainerPlugin//, StatisticsProvider
+public interface EntityPersistenceManager extends
PostCreate. The ejbCreate
* method is passed over the invokeHome chain, and ejbPostCreate is
* passed over the invoke chain.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
* @version $Revision: 1.1 $
*/
public class EntityCreationInterceptor extends A
invocation for the ejbCreate and a regular
> invocation for the ejbPostCreate?
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 4:52 PM
>>To: JBoss-dev; marc fleury; Bill Burke
>>Subject: IN
I have found another way to get the INSERTING AN ALREADY EXISTING BEAN
bug to appear. The following code you would add to LineItem (in an
Order-LineItem relationship):
public String ejbCreate(Long id, Order order) {
setId(id);
return null;
}
public void ejbPostCreate
]";>Dain Sundstrom
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Rickard Öberg
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Justin Forder
- * @version $Revision: 1.12 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.13 $
*/
public class JDBCStopCommand {
@@ -116,7 +116,9 @@
org.jboss.ejb.Container;
+import org.jboss.ejb.EjbModule;
import org.jboss.ejb.EntityContainer;
import org.jboss.ejb.EntityPersistenceStore;
import org.jboss.ejb.EntityEnterpriseContext;
@@ -60,7 +61,7 @@
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/12 18:40:31
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb EjbModule.java
Log:
Moved static application data map to an instance variable to in EjbModule.
Should reduce memory leak.
Revision ChangesPath
1.18 +27 -1 jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/
21:36:27 - 1.10
+++ SQLUtil.java 13 Apr 2002 01:26:58 - 1.11
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
* SQLUtil helps with building sql statements.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.10 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.11 $
*/
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> */
>package org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.bridge;
>
> +import java.lang.ref.WeakReference;
>import java.lang.reflect.Method;
>import javax.sql.DataSource;
>import java.sql.PreparedStatement;
> @@ -56,7 +57,7 @@
>
LUtil.java
Index: SQLUtil.java
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/jboss/jboss/src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc/SQLUtil.java,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -r1.9 -r1.10
--- SQLUtil.java 12 Apr 20
r1.11
> --- JDBCRelationInterceptor.java27 Dec 2001 17:32:25 - 1.10
> +++ JDBCRelationInterceptor.java12 Apr 2002 19:30:44 - 1.11
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> * relationship. This interceptor also manages the relation table data.
> *
> * @aut
action.Status;
+import javax.transaction.Transaction;
+import javax.transaction.TransactionManager;
import org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.bridge.JDBCCMRFieldBridge;
import org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.bridge.JDBCEntityBridge;
@@ -29,7 +32,7 @@
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/12 11:09:07
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCStartCommand.java
Log:
Fixed bug identified in patch [ 533736 ] CMP 2 no start tx.
The problem was with attempting to start a transaction if one already
exist
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
* One for each role that entity has.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.28 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.29 $
*/
public class JDBCCMRFieldBridge implements JDBCFie
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/11 09:39:20
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCRemoveEntityCommand.java
Log:
Fixed bug [ 536502 ] CMR Cascade Delete Fails.
This was due to createing the wrong pk class when loading a foreign key.
Revis
--- JDBCAbstractCMPFieldBridge.java 26 Feb 2002 23:28:55 - 1.12
+++ JDBCAbstractCMPFieldBridge.java 11 Apr 2002 16:39:21 - 1.13
@@ -40,13 +40,19 @@
* One for each entity bean cmp field.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain S
You may be coding VB, but I'll go get a job at McDonald's (maybe in
Redmond... did you see Fight Club).
-dain
Eric Kaplan wrote:
> guys. jboss is a central piece of our infrastructure, and we would like to
> keep recommending it to customers. it might be prudent not to piss all over
> sun in
15 Jan 2002 22:18:36 - 1.8
+++ JDBCDeleteRelationsCommand.java 10 Apr 2002 15:18:43 - 1.9
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
* Deletes relations from a relation table.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.8 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.9 $
*/
public cla
1.17
diff -u -r1.16 -r1.17
--- JDBCEntityMetaData.java 1 Feb 2002 01:39:30 - 1.16
+++ JDBCEntityMetaData.java 10 Apr 2002 15:18:45 - 1.17
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
* @author Sebastien Alborini
* @autho
@@
* One for each role that entity has.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.26 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.27 $
*/
public class JDBCCMRFieldBridge implements JDBCFieldBridge, CMRFie
File size or memory foot print.
marc fleury wrote:
>
> ___
> Jboss-development mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>
___
Jboss-development ma
Tom,
The commit option code actually Bill's. I don't know if Bill will be
able to look at this before the friday release, so Tom can you submit a
patch?
-dain
tom yeh wrote:
>>you can save a lot of loading time if you
>>could check to see if the data stored in the
>>EntityContext is still i
javax.ejb.FinderException;
import javax.ejb.RemoveException;
+import javax.transaction.Status;
import javax.transaction.Synchronization;
import javax.transaction.SystemException;
import javax.transaction.Transaction;
@@ -59,7 +60,7 @@
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain S
file's ejb-relation elements.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.15 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.16 $
*/
public final class JDBCRelationshipRoleMetaData {
/**
@@ -305,7 +305,11 @@
Stri
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/09 13:41:24
Modified:src/main/org/jboss/ejb/plugins/cmp/jdbc
JDBCStartCommand.java
Log:
Fixed bug [ 530437 ] Intra-Bean Many to Many auto-gen broken.
Revision ChangesPath
1.23 +5 -3
jboss/src/main/org/jboss/
+16,7 @@
* value object property.
*
* @author mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]";>Dain Sundstrom
- * @version $Revision: 1.5 $
+ * @version $Revision: 1.6 $
*/
public final class JDBCValuePropertyMetaData {
private final String propertyName;
@@ -64
I agree, but the problem is that there is very little we can reuse. We
have to throw out all cached data, because we currently have no way to
verify if it is still in sync with the database.
-dain
marc fleury wrote:
> |Is this implies that there is no Option B in jboss 2.4.4 at all
> |because
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/09 08:43:27
Modified:src/etc/conf/default standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
Log:
Fixed bug [ 541507 ] Wrong PostgreSQL function mapping for locate.
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +2 -2 jboss/src/etc/conf/default/standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml
In
User: dsundstrom
Date: 02/04/09 08:31:53
Modified:src/resources/org/jboss/metadata jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0.dtd
Log:
time-out should have been read-time-out. Other minor changes.
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +11 -10jboss/src/resources/org/jboss/metadata/jbosscmp-jdbc_3_0
ctional
> method calls.
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
>>Of Dain Sundstrom
>>Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 10:16 AM
>>To: Bill Burke
>>Cc:
I agree. Commit option B assumes that you can "synchronize the
instance¡¦s state from the persistent storage at the beginning of the
next transaction." We simply don't have any method to to that in 2.4.4
or the current 3.0 code, other then reload all the data. The optimistic
locking code that I
If you didn't pop for the $3k, or you spend 2 days with us the JavaOne
slides are on line.
The EJB 2.1 slides are interesting
http://servlet.java.sun.com/javaone/resources/content/sf2002/conf/sessions/pdfs/1653.pdf
The define web services only for stateless-session beans. I think this
is bec
Lutris has announced that they are no longer selling app servers. My
favorite quote in the email from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I encourage anyone looking for an open source J2EE application server to
get JBOSS.
We rock.
-dain
___
Jboss-development mail
of testing, benchmarking and
production evaluation.
Does anyone else find the first claim completely unethical?
I think everyone should go to theserverside and tell BEA what they
really think.
-dain
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
> BEA has announced that JRockit 3.1 JVM will be free. We should ge
BEA has announced that JRockit 3.1 JVM will be free. We should get a
copy to test on.
They did not say that all future versions will be free, and they
definitely did not say that it would be open source.
Also they have a very weird license system. You need an account, and
they claim you need
Francisco Reverbel wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>
>>Any reason why Proxy.newProxyInstance() adds Serializable & Replacable
>>to proxy instances? I am guessing there is a reason, but it is not
>>documented anywhere.
>>
>
> This proxy compiler is (was?) used to generate
In JBossCMP I only ready each column once left-to-right. If I remember
correctly, the JAWS read ahead code reads the pk columns twice. It
should be easy to fix.
-dain
Scott M Stark wrote:
> There are 3 bugs/patches related to the MSSQL driver requirement that
> the result set columns be rea
Marc,
I was talking about this last week. The problem with this suggestion is
it does not address other ports such as http, http-jmx management. My
ideas was to have a port config file that listed each named port for a
server, and then each mbean that used a port would look in this file (or
301 - 400 of 1053 matches
Mail list logo
