[JBoss-dev] [Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Problems with

2005-01-20 Thread nthx
Hint: Docs: 6.3. Preparation Dynamic AOP cannot be used unless the particular joinpoint has been instrumented. You can force intrumentation with the prepare functionality I _think_ that's the problem. Regards, Tomasz View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=vi

[JBoss-dev] [Design of AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: AOPC question on the inner tag

2005-01-20 Thread nthx
As depends on first, all you need is only to compile needed plain _Java_ files - including aspects you want. Put then, every compiled *.class file into your "build" directory and run on that directory. Here snippets from my build.xml: | | | | | |

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time

2004-10-21 Thread nthx
Hello, I have the same problem with the difference that: -JbossCache 1.1 -standalone without anything else (JBossAS..) -adviced all the classes' fields with 'prepare' tag -have two different applications: Forum and Bank -both uses collections but Bank uses map.values() and a map where values con

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time

2004-10-22 Thread nthx
"bwang00" wrote : For setter method, you can't ovelroad it like: | | void setName(String name); | void setName(Object obj); | | This will be fixed in the upcoming 1.2 release in November. In addition, the collection classes api will be enhanced as well. | | -Ben OK, thanks for in

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Standalone remoting without JBossAS vs Pojo architecture

2004-10-22 Thread nthx
Hi everybody! I've read documentation about remoting and wished to remote my plain Pojo object: public static void main.. | Pojo my = new Pojo(17); | | after advice: | Dispatcher.simgleton.registerTarget("/pojo", my); | return my; | As I've expected a client code might

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Declare error

2004-10-27 Thread nthx
"ad-rocha" wrote : Hi, | | Has JBoss AOP a construction like Aspectj "declare error"? | | Thanks, | | Andre Hi Don't ask here for AspectJ like features ;) Authors will answer you: anonymous wrote : "Please use provided solution if you want to have 'declare warning/error' function

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Different handling of XML entities between FINAL and RC1

2004-10-28 Thread nthx
Hi. I've updated JBossAOP to FINAL version and have problem with my XML entities which I access from XML my-aop-file.xml file. Here's the code: | $cd /home/nthx/private/YYY/Project/ | $ls | configurations/ | src/ | build.xml | | | $cat /home/nthx/private/Y

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Different handling of XML entities between FINAL and RC1

2004-10-29 Thread nthx
Hi! No problem. But it's essential for me to have "included" entities. Say you have a product line and some already developed aspects, and want to include A, B, C concerns for configuration 1 of application, and only A and C for 2nd application. The only way, I think is to have two separate X

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Introduction

2004-11-02 Thread nthx
"ad-rocha" wrote : | I have some test cases implemented using JUnit, so these classes (Test1, Test2) | extends TestCase. I've created a new class (MyTestCase) that extends and modify | TestCase default implementation, adding new fields and methods. | | | Compiling with AspectJ I ca

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - How to get 'caller' object in 'call' type of joinpoint?

2004-11-04 Thread nthx
Hi! There is part of documentation saying: anonymous wrote : org.jboss.aop.joinpoint.MethodCalledByMethod | ..This particular class encapsulates a method that is calling another method | so that you can access the caller and callee Well, callee we have with invocation.getTargetObject() (righ

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: How to get 'caller' object in 'call' type of joinpoint?

2004-11-05 Thread nthx
I'd be satisfied with that. That's exactly what I meant. Tomasz View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3854045#3854045 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3854045

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - get* and set* pointcuts vs. set(field) get(field)

2004-11-09 Thread nthx
Hi, In TreeCacheAop doc you state sth like this: "..Whenever there is state change ('set*' interceptors)..All 'get*' operations.. " I wonder if it is a good idea to restrict user of JBossCache to conform to some getters-setters standard. Maybe it would be better to intercept field access (read

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: get* and set* pointcuts vs. set(field) get(field)

2004-11-10 Thread nthx
Ok. This was in TreeCacheAop.java's javadoc.. And what about second question? Regards, Tomasz View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3854586#3854586 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3854586 -

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: how to change the arguments of a method by AOP?

2004-11-11 Thread nthx
Hi It works. You must use "execution" joinpoint instead. It won't work with "call" joinpoint as it doesn't make sense. Even if it works with AspectJ, when I think about "call" type it looks strange to change called method's arguments from caller context. Is there some special reason you can't

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time

2004-11-11 Thread nthx
"bwang00" wrote : For setter method, you can't ovelroad it like: | | void setName(String name); | void setName(Object obj); | | This will be fixed in the upcoming 1.2 release in November. In addition, the collection classes api will be enhanced as well. | | -Ben Sorry, but had to

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time

2004-11-12 Thread nthx
"bwang00" wrote : Can you create a JUnit test case and submit it here or email me ([EMAIL PROTECTED])? I'll take a look. | | Thanks, | | -Ben Ok. Prepared sources and sent to you. When you'll find the_thing, let us know and show where the problem lies. Thanks, Tomasz Nazar View the o

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time

2004-11-15 Thread nthx
Hi! Thanks for tip about "transient log". That was the problem in JbossCache 1.1 I won't check CVS version for now. I'll wait till 2.0. And btw, when will it be? ~end of november? Rgrds, Tomasz View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3855184#3855184

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Does node triggers coordinator methods?

2004-11-15 Thread nthx
Hi! I wonder whether when asking node (invoking 'getChildren()') for some objects, the method is realy executed on coordinator? I suppose it doesn't :( So what I try to achieve is to use my own persistence aspects - not CacheLoader. The scenario is: execute 'getChildren' on slave -> this trigge

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Does node triggers coordinator methods?

2004-11-15 Thread nthx
Yes, I want to write my own persistence layer, but let's say I want to do it with 1.1, because that's last stable version. Maybe I'll repeat problem in other words: 1) I want to cache Root object which may have some children: accessed through 'getChildren()' method. 2) I want to combine cachi

[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Does node triggers coordinator methods?

2004-11-22 Thread nthx
Ok. I got this SharedStoreCacheLoader, but I have little problems with using it. It has strange constructor, so it cannot be plugged directly by using XML conf file. Any help with this, please? Next thing: about shared cache loader. Correct me if my assumptions are wrong: -I want to have share

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Different handling of XML entities between FINAL and RC1

2004-12-14 Thread nthx
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : ... | The include is a bug though and we'll fix as soon as we can. | | Bill Just remind. I haven't found that on JIRA.. or has it been already fixed Regards, Tomasz View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3858572#3858

[JBoss-dev] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: Standalone remoting without JBossAS vs Pojo architecture

2004-12-21 Thread nthx
Hmmm, something wrong happens to the forum or sth.. (bug?) I did NOT post former post here on this forum. I did started topic "Standalone remoting without JBossAS vs Pojo architecture" on other forum. I've been watching the topic. I've just reveived notification, someone answered to notified to

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Pointcut expression for methods that take arrays as argu

2004-07-29 Thread nthx
Hi, there. This is my first post after checking out JBossAOP, and implementing persistance and transaction layer for my POJOs with it. So ... Is it possible to intercept element-of-an-array assignment? I mean: | //I'd like some code here (through Interceptor, of course) | myArray[5] = newEl

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - IllegalAccessException

2004-08-09 Thread nthx
aller(ClassAdvisor.java:1453) | cut | Any ideas about sth wrong here? Thanks.. -- nthx View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3844544#3844544 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: IllegalAccessException

2004-08-09 Thread nthx
nnection (wchich allows one to program threaded apps in non-threaded way :] ) I'll check these tests from CVS... --nthx View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3844563#3844563 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.htm

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: IllegalAccessException

2004-08-09 Thread nthx
adocs' from target 'dist' cause of: | [javadoc] D:\nthx\install\jbossaop\jboss-cvs-04.08.2004 | \AnnotatedPOJO.java:16: illegal character: \64 | [javadoc]@trace public int field; | [javadoc]^ | Then: `$move 'thirdparty/javassist/javassist ..` cause of

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: IllegalAccessException

2004-08-09 Thread nthx
"kabkhan" wrote : I'm investigating a fix. For now, could you try using something else than caller pointcuts? For example: | | | | | http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3844573#3844573 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: IllegalAccessException

2004-08-10 Thread nthx
ogin | > cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jboss co jboss-head | (approx 30 minutes of downloading...) | > cd jboss-head/aop | > build.bat dist | ... | dist: | BUILD FAILED | D:\nthx\install\jbossaop\jboss-head-10.08.2004\jboss-head\aop\build.xml:303: D:\nthx\insta

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: IllegalAccessException

2004-08-10 Thread nthx
ecution of public PreparedStatements.getConnection()) worked fine. After switching to the latest jbossaop: | [aopc] [no comp needed] D:\nthx\E8-workspace\JBossAOPBanking\build\classes\banking\ | aspects\persistance\AccountGatewayTest.class | [aopc] [trying to

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: IllegalAccessException

2004-08-10 Thread nthx
: try to change class and package name of class BankingWithPersistanceDemo... you'll see :) For demo, just.. > ant cu - nthx PS. How to transfer jboss.aop.optimized property to ant task? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: IllegalAccessException

2004-08-11 Thread nthx
"kabkhan" wrote : Weird, I unzipped your file and it compiled fine. Hope I'm not missing something! For what it's worth I'm using jdk 1.4.2 and ant 1.6.1, my output follows: | Hi. I checked other j2sdk versions: j2sdk1.4.1_06 (win) - problem exists 1.4.2_05 (win) - problem doesn't exists

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: IllegalAccessException

2004-08-11 Thread nthx
and everything with calls to private members works correctly. The exact version of jdks, that problem arrises are: | D:\nthx\E8-workspace\JBossError\sent-to-NET\JBossError>java -version | java version "1.4.1-rc" | Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.1-rc

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Annotate class only and crosscut methods within the class

2004-08-16 Thread nthx
Hi all During weekend heavilly developed (what? later :) ) with JBossAOP. Question by the code: package my.demo; | /** @@my.root */ | public class RootClass | { | public RootClass() | { | //constructor here | //... | } | } | | jboss-aop.xml |

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Instrumentor makes _transient_ fields when introducing field

2004-08-16 Thread nthx
Hi, Another separate topic after work at weekend. I need my objects to be serialized. I also need to introduce Identificable implementation to every of them, to give them OID. I did this by introducing IdentificableMixin: | public class IdentificableMixin... | { | private Long oid;

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - java.lang.ClassCastException in Forum_new_$aop

2004-08-19 Thread nthx
Hi. Don't know where to find cause of error: | [java] java.lang.ClassCastException | [java] at org.nthx.pat.demo.Forum.Forum_new_$aop(Unknown Source) | [java] at org.nthx.pat.demo.Driver.main(Unknown Source) | [java] Exception in thread "main" | Decompiled

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: java.lang.ClassCastException in Forum_new_$aop

2004-08-20 Thread nthx
"Bill Burke" wrote : I'm not sure what you're saying with this statement: | | "Modified not to create _transient_ mixin fields. " | | Can you elaborate? Hi Bill, Sorry that you didn't read my erlier post, then you would have known.. http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Instrumentor makes _transient_ fields when introducing f

2004-08-31 Thread nthx
"Bill Burke" wrote : | Sorry for the long delay. I'll look into your ClassCast problems if they still exist with this build. | | Thanks, | | Bill Yes, it still exists - had vacations, so did nothing with that - waiting for feedback.. I've forgiven delay :) t. View the original po

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: introduction class syntax

2004-09-02 Thread nthx
Hello The solution might be to package adviced and non-adviced classes in two different packages, and instead `*` use sth like: `bind ... com.mycompany.aoptized.*`. (unless you have quite complicated package tree) I don't know if syntax that you provide in the introduction is even supported. A

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: java.lang.ClassCastException in Forum_new_$aop

2004-09-10 Thread nthx
Hi After long time I had a fresh look at my code and it happend the exception is _my_ fault. Sorry guys. During "around Forum construction" I've returned object of different class, so that was the cause. Sorry for this, once more.. t. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: On emore AJ vs. JBAOP Querstion. Was Re: JBoss AOP vs. A

2004-09-15 Thread nthx
"rmcdonough" wrote : .I've been doing more reasearch on AOP overall | and more research on AspectJ and JBossAOP. Now I'm not sure that I'll be | phrasing thsi right, but it seems that AspectJ doesn't allow you to apply | advice or introduction on an existing class without explicitly de

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Order of advice/interceptors - Due to: New JBoss AOP Configu

2004-09-20 Thread nthx
Hi, I was thinking about new way of specifying pointcuts, advices within a method's comment (as annotations). How do you want to order advices then? Which will be the first, and so on.. the one which classloader loads first? In 'jboss-aop.xml' it was simple - the same order as definition order.

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - PAT: JBossAOP library for Prevayler

2004-09-20 Thread nthx
Hello readers! Maybe someone would be interested in a library (framework?) I've developed last time with JBossAOP. It's kind of persistance concern which uses Prevayler: object, in-memory database. >From the top of it you code POJOs only, and annotate root of your object graph with >@@pat.root

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Order of advice/interceptors - Due to: New JBoss AOP Con

2004-09-20 Thread nthx
"kabkhan" wrote : I'm currently working on specifying things via annotations :-) | That's why I'm trying to "warn" you before :) t. PS. I don't have idea how to solve it, in a nice manner, yet. When I get some I'll let you know.. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?mod

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Annotate class only and crosscut methods within the clas

2004-09-21 Thread nthx
Yupiii! And once more, I reply to my own post :) So here is the solution with new TYPE_DEF feature: jboss-aop.xml: | | | | | | | | | Interceptor: public class RootInterceptor |implements Interceptor | { | public Object invoke(Invocation invo

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Annotate class only and crosscut methods within the clas

2004-09-22 Thread nthx
Hi And I was going to work today with a thought about posting about this simpler way that I found out yesterday evening... Ehhh :) Tomasz View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3849080#3849080 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?mod

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Order of advice/interceptors - Due to: New JBoss AOP Con

2004-09-22 Thread nthx
Long post .. "Andrzej Krzywda" wrote : Hi! | | You can write an aspect which contains only precedence rules. This aspect you can use as a configuration file of your application: | | public aspect ForumConfiguration { | |declare precedence: Security, Logging, *; | | } |

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - 'within' and 'set' and documentation page

2004-09-23 Thread nthx
Hi guys. I've tried to define pointcut: | | But it doesn't intercepts what I want. It works with 'call' and 'execution' pointcut types. I need that combination.. PS. Maybe there should be separate page on JBossAOP Wiki about "with and withincode". They are quite important in AOP.

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: 'within' and 'set' and documentation page

2004-09-23 Thread nthx
Sorry, it was to hurry. My pointcut doesn't make sense at all. I can have "set(my.*->*)" without using "within". I've tried to use it in another poincut together with "(set(...) OR call(...) OR execution(...)) AND within(my.package)". That's why. Sorry, forget about that. t. View the origina

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - QDox bug: semicolon at the end of class source

2004-09-23 Thread nthx
Hi everyone, public class Pojo | { | | | }; <- because of this semicolon ... | we got exception: | [javac] Compiling 2 source files to /home/nthx/tmp/JBossAOPTests/build/classes | [annotationc] Working directory ignored when same JVM is used. | [annotati

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Arguments of method that called some other method.

2004-09-23 Thread nthx
Hi. Is there any way to get underlined arguments: | public void method(Object _arg1_, String _arg2_) | { | collection.add(arg2); <- join point "call(* $instanceof{java.util.Collection}>add(..))" | | } public Object advice(MethodCalledByMethodInvocation invocation) | { |

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Arguments of method that called some other method.

2004-09-23 Thread nthx
"Bill Burke" wrote : you cannot get arg1 as it is higher in the stack. Sh.. :( Thanks for quick answer. t. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3849321#3849321 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=38

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Arguments of method that called some other method.

2004-09-23 Thread nthx
"kabkhan" wrote : But you could create in interceptor to intercept method(), and store the parameters somewhere, and then access that from your other advice. To make a tunnel you say. Thanks for it. It could be done, but this place of storing.. it smells bad for me. I'll consider both. For now I

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Why lack of 'before' and 'after' advice types is bad..

2004-09-24 Thread nthx
Hi! It's in my mind from some time. Now I share it with you. Imagine situation of say, 3D concern which does sth before invoking core method. It's applied directly on core classes (assuming OO is 2D) Let's suppose someone wants to add 4th dimension concern directly on 3D concern. Its aim would

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Why lack of 'before' and 'after' advice types is bad..

2004-09-24 Thread nthx
Thanks for explanation.. t. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3849438#3849438 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3849438 --- This SF.Net em

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Why lack of 'before' and 'after' advice types is bad..

2004-10-12 Thread nthx
Hi Kevin! I was on short vacations, so forgive delay.. I'm impressed your patience for this topic. I've lost my energy for trying to explain why one needs 'before-after' types of advice. When you get fully functional code for "emulation" of before-after, send it to JBossAOP CVS, so other app d

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Why lack of 'before' and 'after' advice types is bad..

2004-10-13 Thread nthx
Bill, will you agree with me that code duplication is something bad? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851271#3851271 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3851271

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Why lack of 'before' and 'after' advice types is bad..

2004-10-13 Thread nthx
"KevinConner" wrote : Hiya guys. | | ... as it provides the advices that remove the code duplication | With full respect to your code Kevin (I use it): I will send you my custom code for using writting Strings to System.out. Why should we use System.out.println(String) method if we ca

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Why lack of 'before' and 'after' advice types is bad..

2004-10-14 Thread nthx
"KevinConner" wrote : | Think of my solution as the PrintWriter that surrounds the Writer ;-) | E-e :/ It is not correct type of comparition. But thanks for sample. Let's have a closer look at it, by first showing present state of JBossAOP API | public void MyAspect | extend

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Why lack of 'before' and 'after' advice types is bad..

2004-09-27 Thread nthx
Thanks for your time Kevin. Yes it works. I'm impressed. With your solution my 3DAspect looks simple. It's simple to configure it in way that you've provided. And my ExceptionHandlerAspect4D is a simple old JBossAOP aspect, with plain invoke(..). That's enough for me. Ok. But still it is a work

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Why lack of 'before' and 'after' advice types is bad..

2004-09-28 Thread nthx
"KevinConner" wrote : | ...I must admit that if I was faced with an aspect containing 30 advices then I would be wondering whether the design was correct. Is this connected with your pervayler library? If so, we can take this offline. | | Kev | Hello, Oh my, no way! :) It's for my c

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: multiple jboss-aop.xml files?

2004-09-28 Thread nthx
Hi. I'm not an expert about JBossAOP packaging, but this is what I use: | | | | &developer1.ent; | | | On Windows, you must change "/" to "\" I think. You may also use Ant task, to join several XML files into one. Regards, Tomasz View the original post : http://www.j

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: AOP interceptor applied to all JSP/Servlet requests?

2004-10-18 Thread nthx
Hi. My penny to disscussion. I have Struts application and been using Tomcat server. I'd like to use JBossAOP with it. So what I've tried is: precompiled my plain servlets, jsps (in Struts meaning) with jasper/jspc. This way I got sources of my web pages for my application. As I have sources

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: AOP interceptor applied to all JSP/Servlet requests?

2004-10-18 Thread nthx
Hey, thanks for explaining diff between static and dynamic sec model. I will need dynamic one in some application and was wondering whether to use already written JBoss' security aspects. Tomasz View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851733#3851733

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Order of advice/interceptors - Due to: New JBoss AOP Con

2004-10-19 Thread nthx
Hi! I've seen some announcement of 1.0 final release of JBossAOP next week. How did you/are you going to clear things up with advice/aspect/annotations precedence? Tomasz View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851879#3851879 Reply to the post : htt