Jasper requires tools.jar to be available to it.
Should I:
1. copy it from my java distrib into lib/ext with the Jetty jars at
build time (is the jar arch independent)
2. try to get it on the JBOSS_CLASSPATH and hope Jetty/Jasper can see
it...
3. find another way - suggestions ?
In short,
1) worked fine for me...
> -Original Message-
> From: Julian Gosnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:05 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
>
>
>
> Jasper requires tools.jar to be ava
e-
> > From: Julian Gosnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 10:05 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
> >
> >
> >
> > Jasper requires tools.jar to be available to it.
> &g
14, 2001 1:02 PM
> To: David Maplesden; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
>
>
> David Maplesden wrote:
>
> > 1) worked fine for me...
>
> Have you tried it on different architectures?
>
> My concern is that
n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JBossDev (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
> No I haven't and I see now what you mean, I didn't read what you put
> carefully enough
Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "David Maplesden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "JBossDev (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:14 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
> No I haven&#
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
> eforge.net Subject:
Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar
>(javac)...
>
> 11/13/2001 05:37 PM
> Please resp
ssage -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:14 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
>
> Maybe I am missing something, but isn't this whole issue about
distributing
> a compiler with JBoss so the user doesn
amen
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 11:51 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
|
|
|Jikes is not a Java program and you have to use a
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> Jikes is not a Java program and you have to use a binary suitable for
> the target platform. I'm not interested in getting into supporting mutiple
> platform binaries.
Well, I guess now is as good a time as any to bring up a problem I have with
the cur
.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 20
IL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 8:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
>
>
> >
> > Maybe I am missing something, but isn't this whole issue about
> distributing
> > a compiler wit
David
> -Original Message-
> From: Ignacio Coloma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
>
>
> I'm preparing a patch (my humble contribution, snif!) for
> r
de David
> Maplesden
> Enviado el: miércoles, 14 de noviembre de 2001 19:38
> Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Asunto: RE: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
>
>
> You might be jumping the gun a bit with this one. tools.jar is
> only needed
> afaik for Jasper i.e. when Jetty (or
yeah sounds good, add it if you can find it, if you can't print a warning
and carry on
> -Original Message-
> From: Ignacio Coloma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 8:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev]
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, David Maplesden wrote:
> You might be jumping the gun a bit with this one. tools.jar is only needed
> afaik for Jasper i.e. when Jetty (or Tomcat) needs to serve jsp pages. Not
> everyone will want this, indeed many people will probably run JBoss without
> a servlet engine,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> 2.4.x is based on the archaic and fragmented build policy from the
> early days of JBoss and its not likely to change(at least by me).
> The build process has been totally reorganized in the main branch for the
> 3.0 release so focus on getting a source
Next week.
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
> On Wed, 14 N
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
> Next week.
Ooh! I can't wait.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Can we automate .deb building with the new build system?
--jason
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
>
> > 2.4.x is based on the archaic and fragmented build policy from the
> > early days of JBoss and its not likely to change(at least by me).
>
yOn Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Jason Dillon wrote:
> Can we automate .deb building with the new build system?
Possibly. The whole point of debian is automation. We have lots of build
daemons setup(for all the architectures we support), that demand this sort of
feature.
I have just checked out the cvs
We are not planning on re-adding tools.jar to the package are we?
Perhaps we could setup an InstallAnywhere installer which could have some
custom tasks to install a tools.jar from the target JDK for those users who
might have trouble doing this by hand.
--jason
On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Adam Hea
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] RH: tools.jar (javac)...
> We are not planning on re-adding tools.jar to the package are we?
>
> Perhaps we could setup an InstallAnywhere installer which could have some
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
