swapping the keys,
between the two sides).
-dain
/*
* Dain Sundstrom
* Partner
* Core Developers Network
*/
On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 09:30 AM, Klaus Richarz wrote:
Hello,
I have about 15 CMP entity beans. Some of them are connected
Jules Gosnell
David Jencks
James Stracham
Dain Sundstrom
Greg Wilkins
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try
Jules Gosnell
David Jencks
James Stracham
Dain Sundstrom
Greg Wilkins
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
you've never dreamed of, try
I have configuration for all datatypes in the JDK, and I
will be adding metadata support so you can configure your types.
-dain
On Friday, April 4, 2003, at 02:29 PM, Langelage, Frank wrote:
Today I executed my little performance test with current cvs-versions
of 3.2 and HEAD.
The execution
I think the message is remove the read-only tags and you will not get
the errors.
-dain
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 03:03 AM, Andrew May wrote:
My test case fails on 3.0.3 so it's not just a problem with 3.2.0. So
for us that means we can't go live with either :( - unless we can find
What is the name of the test case and are you working on a solution?
-dain
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 04:22 AM, Stephen Coy wrote:
I'll add the testcase to Branch_3_0 as well.
We've never experienced this problem, but have only operated under
3.0.2, 3.0.4 and 3.0.6.
Our application (over
There is also a problem is they are trying to use
java.rmi.MarshalledObject to store serialized objects, because
java.rmi.MarshalledObject does not respect classloaders.
-dain
On Thursday, April 3, 2003, at 12:52 PM, Scott M Stark wrote:
It look like a problem with hibernate using
of Proxy98 junk.
I'm not sure if anyone else uses it. What does JMX use to generate
classes?
-dain
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company gives more support
-instance invocations. For no-transaction we have the standard
EJB flags.
-dain
On Wednesday, April 2, 2003, at 10:18 AM, Stephen Coy wrote:
Ah ha!
It needs those read-only tags in jboss.xml in order to fail.
Previously, I had explicitly specified that getChildren was
read-only. It needs
Ok now it should be faster then is has ever been. I have another idea
on how to make it even better, but it should be super fast right now.
-dain
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 02:08 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
JBoss HEAD is a work in progress. The performance will get worse and
better
Seriously, you guys need to stop falling for the trolls. No normal
person continues to fight so strongly for a product they hate. My
guess is this guy works for a PR firm hired by Sun or BEA, but it could
be any player in the J2EE world.
Just shun him and he will go away.
-dain
On Tuesday
, but the fix should bin in 3.2 rc4.
Until someone can create a test case that reproduces the new bug, I
don't think there is much we can do.
-dain
On Friday, March 28, 2003, at 10:01 AM, Alex Loubyansky wrote:
Hello Andrew,
you are not alone complaining about this. But nobody could produce
JBoss HEAD is a work in progress. The performance will get worse and
better; there will be bugs. You can't make an omelet without breaking
a few eggs. I suggest you use 3.2.
-dain
On Thursday, March 27, 2003, at 09:12 AM, Langelage, Frank wrote:
After the cvs update of JBoss-head yesterday
close to a guaranteed flush is to use NIO. If you
want it to be efficient and reliable you will have to use NIO. I
suggest you take a look at java.nio.MappedByteBuffer.
-dain
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek
he may already have what you need implemented. You
could also contract with Ceki to have him write it for you.
-dain
On Monday, March 24, 2003, at 11:00 AM, costin wrote:
Hi!
Thanks. I was actually looking through an oreilly book about NIO. The
only problem is how will this break the whole
it is safer to put the driver classes in lib as you can have
big problems it they redeploy.
-dain
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and
the chance
I'm dumb. I didn't read that very carefully.
-dain
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 07:33 PM, David Ward wrote:
Isn't that what I said? Driver jar in lib and datasource xml in
deploy.
By it I meant the datasource xml file.
Sorry if I wasn't clear before.
David
Dain Sundstrom escribió
Loads of people do it quite successfully, so yes.
-dain
On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 02:54 PM, David Luis Fernandes de
Araujo wrote:
So, do you think is safe to run jboss on linux in a production
enviorment ?
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 12:27:17 -0500
John M Flinchbaugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
TransactionManager tm = (TransactionManager)
iniCtx.lookup(java:/TransactionManager);
if(tm.getTransaction() != null) {
// got a transaction
}
-dain
On Wednesday, March 19, 2003, at 05:09 PM, Brian Wallis wrote:
I have some utility classes that are used from beans with container
managed
You need to use a transaction. Preloaded data is only available in a
single transaction.
-dain
On Monday, March 17, 2003, at 10:28 AM, Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
hi,
I have following entity bean definition in jbosscmp-jdbc.xml:
entity
ejb-nameUsersBean/ejb-name
read-ahead
strategyon
we
should consider adding a hibernate as a supported front end framework
(like CMP, AOP and JDO).
-dain
/**
* @name Dain Sundstrom
* @titleAuthor CMP on JBoss
* @company The JBoss Group, LLC.
*/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
3.2 supports not null foreign keys, but you will have to ask Alexey how
to set it up.
-dain
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 10:42 AM, Jonathan.O'[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Bernhard,
No, JBoss 3.x does the insert after ejbCreate. 4.0 is reputed to have
(will have) support for INSERT after
I suggest you put this code in a servlet filter so the transaction
aspect won't pollute your servlet code (and you get some reuse, but
that is not the important part).
-dain
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, at 12:43 PM, Craig Berry wrote:
Thanks very much. This is a one-database application, so
Have you tried 3.0.6?
-dain
On Tuesday, March 11, 2003, at 08:32 AM, Mike Lecza wrote:
Can someone confirm that this works for them so at least I know it may
be something that I am doing wrong?
?
Best Regards
?
?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Or you can pick through the test suite for an example... or read the
cmp slides from last year's JBossOne seminar. There are some bugs in
the slides but you will get the idea.
-dain
On Monday, March 10, 2003, at 02:21 PM, Hunter Hillegas wrote:
Truly the best advice is to buy the docs
TransactionServletFilter: on entry start a transaction and on exit
commit it.
-dain
On Thursday, March 6, 2003, at 11:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to use Velocity. I would like my Servlet to simply place my
Local
EJBs inside of the Velocity template's context and then the template
Can you file a bug report on this?
-dain
On Wednesday, March 5, 2003, at 11:20 AM, Mauricio Hiroshi Nagaoka
wrote:
Hello people!
I've been using DynamicQL with CMP Entity Beans in JBoss 3.0.6 and
it's working quite well, except for a little problem. When I've more
than one client running
optimistic locking because you can get drift between commit and
invalidation replication (Alexey wrote this).
Getting all this to work is a chore, but possible. There are guys
using systems like this today in production.
-dain
On Tuesday, March 4, 2003, at 02:36 PM, David Jencks wrote
And what would the correct query be?
-dain
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:37 PM, Curt Johnson wrote:
I've checked the forums, mailing list and for-pay docs, everything
seems to say that this will work.
What I get in the debug statements from the CMP engine is:
2003-02-27 15:11:04,182
ejbSelectSomeStuff(arg1 + %, ...);
}
public abstract Collection ejbSelectSomeStuff(String arg1, ...);
Simple?
-dain
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
One word 'profiler'.
-dain
On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 04:32 PM, Rafal Kedziorski wrote:
hi,
At 09:24 26.02.2003 -0500, David Jencks wrote:
You can find out how to configure this stuff and why it works the way
it
does in the for pay cmp docs or by looking for the numerous less
The EJB spec requires you to have an ejb-ql element, but if the query
is not implemented in ejb-ql, just leave the element empty. It is a
signal when porting the application to another platform that a query is
not portable.
-dain
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 03:05 PM, Frank Morton
DTDs are very sensitive to order. Look at the DTD and make sure your
elements are *in the exact same order* as listed in the DTD.
-dain
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 03:58 PM, Frank Morton wrote:
I would like to run a filter on every jsp with 3.0.6. I thought if I
put the following
the user wanted when he/
she wrote the query.
-dain
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 08:24 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
If you do not care how it is ordered then why bother with the order by
clause? The database is correct , you are not.
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 01:53 PM
of mine.
Jeremy has already changed our sql generator to generate the sql so the
lame database implementations will work.
-dain
On Monday, February 10, 2003, at 02:24 AM, KRALIK Vladimir wrote:
I think, this is another problem. Message say :
ERROR: For SELECT DISTINCT, ORDER BY expressions
by this. You want all of the distinct
entries of x ordered by y. If two x values have the different y
values. I simply don't care which one you choose to order by. Sure
you can get non deterministic results, but there is enough information
to execute the query.
-dain
to wait for 4.0.
-dain
On Friday, February 7, 2003, at 09:03 PM, Rod Macpherson wrote:
PostgreSQL does not allow an aggregated field reference to appear in
the
where clause.
SELECT DISTINCT t0_s.rec_num ... WHERE ... t0_s.rec_num=t1 ...
Guess DISTINCT by itself is considered an aggregate
' Was expecting one
of:
This means that 'firm' is not the literal IN, and 'firm' is not a
know abstract schema name. Did you declare that your firm entity have
an abstract-schema-name of 'firm'? If not do it.
-dain
---
This SF.NET email
EJB-Ql in EJB 2.0 does not allow parameters in the like clause. EJB
2.1 does have this support but 2.1 will not be supported until JBoss
4.0. In the mean time use JBossQL which supports parameters in the
like clause.
-dain
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 05:54 AM, Rupp,Heiko wrote:
Hi
EJB-Ql in EJB 2.0 does not allow parameters in the like clause. EJB
2.1 does have this support but 2.1 will not be supported until JBoss
4.0. In the mean time use JBossQL which supports parameters in the
like clause.
-dain
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, at 05:54 AM, Rupp,Heiko wrote:
Hi
for holding onto local copies of objects and
limiting
unnecessary calls back out to the app server to get new objects.
JDO is simply an interface to a persistence system. In the end it is
all about implementation. We plan on adding support to all of this in
JBoss, and transparently to you.
-dain
the tx commits, but this
only works with commit option A, as B and C always throw out the cache
data when the new transaction starts. We hope to address that with
Optimistic locking in 4.0.
-dain
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored
Hunter,
There is no way to do this with EJB-QL or JBossQL. The problem is we
don't support functions in the SELECT clause. This is planned for 4.0
but that doesn't help you. I think the only way to implement this it
to use a BMP style finder method.
Sorry,
-dain
On Tuesday, January 28
in CMP and a full SQL-99ish query language is on the table.
BTW, EJB-QL doesn't have an UPPER function in the 2.1 spec.
-dain
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 12:51 PM, Hunter Hillegas wrote:
Is that a JBoss restriction or a SQL restriction?
PostgreSQL allows it, but I don't know
This is a bug. Please file a bug report at sourceforge.
MEMBER OF should be generating a sub select or a left join. This is
simmilar to the IS NULL bug we recently fixed.
-dain
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 02:49 AM, Alexey Yudichev wrote:
The query you proposed makes a join using both
OF
c.partners)
You many want to do a SELECT DISTINCT, as it is possible to get
multiple results back from this query.
-dain
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 03:39 AM, Alexey Yudichev wrote:
Jboss 3.0.4.
2 entities: StoreCategory and Partner.
2 relationships between them:
1)
ejb-relation
Postgres can't store millisecond accurate time until 7.0. Before that
it truncates it to a decasecond if I remember.
-dain
On Monday, January 13, 2003, at 05:06 PM, Eric Klimas wrote:
I don't think this is as much a Jboss issue as it might be a Postgres
JDBC driver issue. I experienced
using a query. The difference between performance of
these systems can be reduced with good caching and read-ahead logic,
but most do not code this.
-dain
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld
CMP
properties, and there is an option to ignoreOnInsert
which exactly what I want. However, the feature seems
to have no effect on the deployment XML.
We have no such feature, but I sounds like a good option. File a
feature request, and it may make it into 4.0.
-dain
I haven't had any coffee yet today, so maybe I still a complete dumb
ass, but what is a compound name and a composite name.
-dain
On Friday, January 3, 2003, at 09:09 AM, Michael Huneycutt wrote:
After looking at the JBoss code, it appears that JBoss only supports
Compound Names
to use the same abstract store system
from an even easier interface.
-dain
On Friday, January 3, 2003, at 02:34 PM, Greg Turner wrote:
IMHO, this is a prime example of business data that does not fit the
EJB model. And you shouldn't try and shoe horn it in. Its been my
understanding that doing
On Monday, December 30, 2002, at 02:29 PM, Stefan Arentz wrote:
Huh? Foreign keys are *legacy* database structure?
Any pre existing schema is legacy to me.
-dain
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven
to this,
always
use this generated key.
Yeah that is exactly what I am doing. However, I like to have real
constraints because I also have other clients access the database.
Any you can in 3.2. The thing you can have is a foreign key that maps
to a secondary key.
-dain
Kiuma,
I don't understand your question. Can you restate the question a
different way?
-dain
On Saturday, December 28, 2002, at 08:16 AM, kiuma wrote:
Hello, I was wondering about dates and queries.
If I have a myCalendar created with new GragorianCalendar() and a
where clause like
day = ?1
the spec requirements
and not much else. In JBoss 4.0 we will address legacy database
structure support and mapping to non JDBC data sources.
-dain
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
I've had a lot of Oracle DBAs tell me that DEFERRABLE INITIALLY
DEFERRED does very bad things to Oracle. I don't remember the
details, but it was bad enough that I gave up on some code that
depended on it.
-dain
On Monday, December 30, 2002, at 10:17 AM, Bill Burke wrote:
nice, thanks
Code completion is over rated, but there is a faq somewhere on the net
somewhere that shows how to set it up with vim.
-dain
On Friday, December 13, 2002, at 03:28 PM, Joao Pedro Clemente wrote:
And the two largest ones:-))
jboss and emacs/jdee/xdoclet
jboss and vi
Yep, I would like
. In B, some
beans may be in the cache but invalid and only the valid ones are used
(i.e. ones in the current transaction), and in C only beans in the
current transaction are in the cache.
-dain
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great
CMP checks the cache before executing a findByPrimaryKey query. If it
is not checking the cache first it is a bug. All other queries go
directly to the database, because we don't have an in memory query
engine.
-dain
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 07:55 AM, Sacha Labourey wrote
a servlet tier.
-dain
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 02:23 PM, Jim Crossley wrote:
These are good points, and I appreciate yours and others' prompt
replies. However, the solutions presented so far seem to force me to
complicate my object model to facilitate testing.
I agree that an app
The exact same thing has existed in JBoss for a long time and is called
JUnitEJB... I really think it should be converted to be an MBean
instead, but that is another story.
-dain
On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 05:00 PM, SPam wrote:
Dain, your are right its a good approach to test EJB tier
at a
time (it's in one of the specs), so which spawned thread gets the tx?
-dain
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-user mailing
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 12:08 PM, Dan Christopherson wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Ah, there's the rub! So my blithering about a hypothetical
'asynchronous task' API needs to be amended again: tasks _must_ run in
their own transaction!
Usually this is accomplished with a message queue
thread in a tx at a time (this is a
huge step forward from the days when you could only have a single
thread per tx and it always had to be the same one... old junk).
Anything is possible, but is it worth it, when you can get 95% of the
need from a JMS queue and new transactions?
-dain
you follow my stream of conscience?
-dain
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
JBoss-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https
this.
-dain
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 03:37 AM, Matthew Hixson wrote:
Does JBoss support defining custom functions that map to functions
defined in the database for extending EJB-QL?
Thanks,
-M@
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get
No, it is in the for pay docs... but the list is short. In addition to
the EJB-QL (2.0 spec) standard functions we support LCASE and UCASE.
-dain
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 12:32 PM, Matthew Hixson wrote:
Is there a list online of all of the EJB-QL functions that are already
built
Yes, but your code has to be aware of the abstract schema database
mapping, which is kind of like hand coding security checks into your
code; you can do it but you want to avoid it if you can.
-dain
On Tuesday, December 3, 2002, at 03:48 PM, Glenn Lewis wrote:
Though it can be done without
Not that I am aware of.
-dain
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 01:06 AM, kiuma wrote:
Hello,
is there any possibility to sort a cmr collection without putting the
result in a SortedSet?
regards,
kiuma
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
I think Alex has this working in 4.0, but I don't think it is
documented yet.
-dain
On Tuesday, November 26, 2002, at 01:15 PM, Eric Klimas wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying write entity beans in Jboss 3.0.4 that have a CMR as part of
the primary key. Is this even possible with EJB (I'd hope so
Can you try 4.0?
-dain
On Saturday, November 23, 2002, at 06:34 AM, Stephen Coy wrote:
This change is now in Branch_3_2.
It looks a little like 3.2 has acquired some other baggage though -
our benchmark for 2000 beans is a little slower
than it was under 3.0.4:
23:06:47,044 INFO [STDOUT
. Does anyone want to back port this to 3.2? It is
fairly simple. If not, I'll do it. I don't think I should back port
it to 3.0 as it has not been heavily tested.
-dain
On Friday, November 22, 2002, at 07:26 AM, Stephen Coy wrote:
I'll try to get it done in the next day or so.
On Friday
No, but that has nothing to do with JBoss; table size is a database
issue. The important part that the query's come out correctly.
-dain
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 03:35 PM, snpe wrote:
Hello Dain,
Have You tried big tables ( 100 big record) with postgresql ?
Thanks
Haris Peco
Upgrade and it should work.
-dain
On Thursday, November 21, 2002, at 06:48 PM, Victor Batista wrote:
Hello!
I am using JBoss 3.0.2 with bundled Tomcat 4.0.4.
I am having problems using read-ahead with Dynamic queries. I
configure my dynamic finder with the read-ahead feature, but it simply
. For security I don't
believe that you can get the same benefit by using a proxy process in
front.
-dain
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 12:09 PM, Pavel Kolesnikov wrote:
Hello,
I've configured my security realm on my JBoss 3.0.2 server.
Everything works fine, but now I'd like to separate web
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 03:58 PM, Randy Shoup wrote:
Dain wrote:
There is no reason you have to separate the web container from the
EJB container. The only reason this ever came up in J2EE is the
other vendors charge so much for a CPU license you wanted to maximize
the CMP
Yes. PostgreSQL is one of the few database I personally extensively
tested, so I am very confident it works (at least in the newest
versions).
-dain
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 09:18 PM, Herve Tchepannou wrote:
does PostgreSQL support the EJB-QL LOCATE() function?
--
Herve
Type the doc in whatever you like, generate a postscript file and use
ps2pdf (http://stat.tamu.edu/doc/gs/Ps2pdf.htm).
-dain
On Wednesday, November 20, 2002, at 09:05 PM, David Jencks wrote:
if you do some archaeology on the old, obsolete, free manual you will
find
it uses a build system like
of the
member of. Something like this: Speciality.code in (?1, ?2, ?3, ?4).
3) after you generate the query call a dynamic ql mapped ejbSelect
query. You will have to convert the collection into an Object array
but that is simple with toArray.
Fairly simple?
-dain
On Tuesday, November 19, 2002
filter. I suggest that if you want to test the
quality of our consultants, you hire IBM Global services for a week and
then hire a (single) JBoss consultant for one day, and judge for you
self on which group you got the most benefit from.
-dain
to query across applications.
I also don't know what you mean by standard JDBC functionality.
-dain
Pete Beck wrote:
Would this allow JBossQL be used in an ad-hoc manner? So you could use
it in a very similar way to JDBC, but in the EJB domain rather than the
database domain?
A simple solution
as a select and then flush the entities changed, or
we could just flush the entire cache. When we have database
notifications working we can rely on them for option A.
Anyway, does anyone want to do this?
-dain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What Michael is proposing is adding INSERT, UPDATE
Michael Bartmann wrote:
Dain,
I could help defining the grammar; unfortunately I'm
quite busy this week and on a long sought vacation
next week, so you'll have to be patient with me.
No rush; I won't be able to get to it for a while anyway.
The current grammar for JBossQL is not exactly tiny
That shouldn't be to hard once we add support for sub queries, but
unless it is supported by most of the major vendors (postgres, oracle,
ms, ibm), it wouldn't be worth the work.
-dain
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:53:28PM -0600, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
What
it
incredibly unlikely.
What Michael is proposing is adding INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE
statements to JBossQL. This is a very cool idea and I hope he spends
some time designing a grammar. Once we have a grammar the
implementation should be fairly easy.
-dain
Pete Beck wrote:
Even better would be if Sun
What is an INTERSECTION query? Is it widely supported?
-dain
Marius Kotsbak wrote:
What about adding INTERSECTION-queries (whis is possible in postgresql)?
Or is it possible by some easy workaround now?
On tir, 2002-11-12 at 20:10, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Pete,
To better support complex
Christian,
Thanks for spending the time on this.
-dain
Christian Riege wrote:
Peter,
there are lies, damn lies and benchmarks.
First of all, thanks for the supplied test and sources.
Second, I've run the tests on my machine (1GHz AMD, .5GB RAM, Linux
Kernel 2.4.18, JVM 1.4.0_02). I know
There is a patch that supposedly fixes this, but I have not looked at it
yet.
-dain
Alex Loubyansky wrote:
Hello Michael,
MAL How can I avoid violating NOT NULL constraints on foreign keys that are
MAL mapped to cmr-fields?
there is no way for now.
MAL I know that we're not suppose to set
That is a super cool idea. This could easily fit into the 4.0
architecture. Do you want to work on proposing a grammar for insert,
update, and delete? Once we have a grammar the conversation to sql is
simple, and we can easily throw in cache updating logic.
-dain
Michael Bartmann wrote
at recommends hotels.com as it is easy to change
reservations, and I will be checking them out next time.
Ok, I'm done ranting now.
-dain
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact
Ok maybe, I use a POTA (plain old travel agent).
-dain
Stephen Davidson wrote:
Greetings.
I can't tell you much about hotels.com, other than there head office is
an Ex-Ericson building across the street from where I live, and that
their HR and IT people are next to impossible to get a hold
You spent the time to build and run a test on two platforms, but you
don't have the time to start OptimizeIt and figure out what it killing
the performance of your application... Anyway, I'll get to looking at
this sometime, but I'm a little busy now.
-dain
Luttrell, Peter wrote:
Over
Michael,
The idea for an in memory query engine is interesting, but this requires
that all of you data to fit into memory and actually be in memory. If
you want to write it, that would be cool, but I think there are way more
important things to make CMP fast.
-dain
Michael Bartmann wrote
guess that you are getting 5 queries per loop.
-dain
Gene Ge wrote:
iterator extremely slow problem
Because I found my search was very slow, so I made a simple test:
code:*
..
System.out.println(before
. In future release the readahead will be more flexible.
-dain
Luttrell, Peter wrote:
Changing the readahead strategy should not change the results i've
posted, as i run though the beans once, hense they are loaded.
So back to the questions: Is it acceptable that adding 2 cmrs takes 450
Now I am completely confused. What exactly do you want that you can't
do today?
-dain
Michael Bartmann wrote:
Dain,
I'm a bit confused (especially by your phrase in memory query) and I
don't know if you
misunderstood me (or Pete's original post) or I misunderstand you.
I'll try to make
Well, it should be fast then. Now is when you fire up OptimizeIt and
findout what part of my code is wasting all that time.
-dain
Luttrell, Peter wrote:
No i did not see that email.
I am using commit option A. The first time that I run through all beans, the
main ones as well
The jr.jrFundStatus field is obviously a number and therefore cannot be
compared to a string literal. Either change the field to a String or
change the query.
-dain
Rene Palad wrote:
I've been doing a:
* @jboss:query signature=Collection
findFundStatusReservedByJbCode(java.lang.Integer
It is in the spec. It would be easy to support iterating outside of the
spec, but you would get an inconsistent database on a writeable database.
-dain
Herve Tchepannou wrote:
Is this a requirement of EJB standard or just due to JBoss implementation?
-Original Message-
From: julien
(getSomeOtherField());
}
}
The important difference is the loading of the value object gets all of
the data from the ejb using calls inside of the bean instance and
specifically the calls don't travel over a Remote or Local interface.
This means there is no code interpositioned.
-dain
1 - 100 of 480 matches
Mail list logo
