>>> Charlie Reiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 29-Mar-01 8:55:48 PM
>>>
>Does anyone know where this thing went? Is it dead?
>Am I missing something obvious?
Errr... yes.
http://www.webgain.com/products/metamata/java_doc.html
Nic Ferrier
I think there might be a problem with environment variable handling.
What is the expected behaviour when an environment variable doesn't
exist?
For example, if I put the following in my run-path:
$CLASSPATH
~/projects/myproj.jar
and CLASSPATH doesn't exist?
The current code seems to throw
>I can imagine a situation where you don't create a
>package based directory structure for your files but it
>should be possible to map the name found in the class
>file to the source files somehow in whatever configuration
>the source files are in. As long as you have the build
>structure i
>>> "Sandip Chitale" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 23-Mar-01 9:27:27 PM
>>>
>The name of the source file (without the directory part)
>is always stored in the .class file whether or not you compile
>the source .java file with -g option.
Didn't know that - thanks.
>Mind you - this gives you only the na
because developers don't tend to
compile without -g. One can always recompile everything with -g after
a release has been made, or compile releases into a seperate
directory.
Does anyone see any merit in this? It's different enough from my
current dependancy system for me to want to see an audience before I
build it.
If enough people are interested though, and think it might work, I'll
develop it and see how it goes.
Nic Ferrier
dancy checking, is available from
here:
http://www.gnu.org/software/java/java-software.html
Nic Ferrier
't we look forward a more symbiotic use of JDE
>and ant as those projects are really complementary.
>(~poor english :) ) ?
I don't like Ant for two reasons:
1. it's hard to reuse project definitions
2. it's not GPLed/LGPLed
If JDE came to rely on Ant I would certainly fork the JDE.
Nic Ferrier
>Your right to do ssuch an enhancement for JDE paul,
>the default directory to place the project is often a problem
>when creating relatively big projects...
>I don't if many other users would agree but i think it would
>be a nice idea to place the project in the first package-directory
:
What
>>> Paul Kinnucan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16-Jan-01 9:08:12 PM >>>
>I've updated the JDE to handle environment variables
>in classpaths and was planning on including relative paths
>as well. Both will be included in the next release.
How are you planning to do relative paths?
Remember I did them
>>> "Max R. Andersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16-Jan-01 9:16:00 PM >>>
>One of the great things about ant is that it let you
>specify both classpath and extdirs. And dependent
>on wether the compiler is javac or jikes it handle
>them transparently.
>1. If it is javac it just uses -cp
>and -
>>> Paul Kinnucan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16-Jan-01 9:08:12 PM >>>
>I've updated the JDE to handle environment variables
>in classpaths and was planning on including relative paths
>as well. Both will be included in the next release.
Cool. So my code was for nothing /8-<
>Now, at Jason's promp
e compiler funcs revert to tradition funcs
that can be called through a pointer (which allows different funcs to
be used).
The relative path macro could be used across the JDE to apply
relative paths wherever they are needed.
Nic Ferrier
12 matches
Mail list logo
