Hi list,
Does anyone know a jabber server that's listening on port 80 that I can test
against? I'm developing an IM client behind an http proxy that will only
deliver and receive data with port 80.
It's possible, as can be seen from the following post on the devzone of
Jabber.org:
aviv - Apr
The
ICQ patch is rather trivial if you look at the code. But I don't want to
imply that it was a trivial effort on Brian's part. In fact, I applaud him
for getting it to work with ICQ.
I
haven't seen yet if Brian was able to integrate the openH323 stack within
SpeakFreely. I should think
At 10:07 AM 4/25/2001 +0800, Leon Kwan wrote:
Sorry that may be I do not make the question clear.
actually, since I found that in jabber.com, it says that the commercial
version of jabber supports multiple server:
Enables Distributed Processing across multiple server farms which in
turn may
That is not a karma problem..
your karma settings are rather high, and would not interfere with a data chunk that
size..
(incidentally, you can turn off karma all together by just setting dec0/dec)
most likely, if you are SURE that you do not have bad XML, and all of your tags are
UTF-8
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 06:58:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There isn't a technical reason why plaintext and LDAP
authentication can't work. We did it for xdb_ldap for Jabber 1.0.
The LDAP library simply must make an ldap_bind() call with the
user's DN and password.
Actually the
Hi!
I have a company internal Jabber server running (version 1.4). It's working
fine except for these messages in the error.log:
20010425T15:02:58: [notice] (update.jabber.org): bouncing
a packet to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/1.6.0.3 from
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Work: Server Connect
And, while I'm at it, here's my second problem that doesn't want to go away:
I have a company internal Jabber server running (version 1.4). Recently, I
broadcasted a message to the users via this:
message to=yourhostname/announce/motd
bodymessage (of the day) that is sent
Hallo Auke,
DJ Adams has covered this in a document that's available here:
http://www.pipetree.com/jabber/update.html
Obviously I need to add this information to the FAQ
(http://docs.jabber.org/general/html/faq.html).
BTW, there is a special list for questions related to administration of
Lemme just translate this marketing stuff to engineering speak:
Enables Distributed Processing across multiple server farms which in
turn may support multiple CPUs.
Jabber.com reworked the server to be pre-emptively multi-threaded
(pthreads). Additionally, some work on JSM was done to
On 26 Apr 01, at 3:04, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 06:58:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There isn't a technical reason why plaintext and LDAP authentication
can't work. We did it for xdb_ldap for Jabber 1.0. The LDAP library
simply must make an ldap_bind() call
just my $0.02 on chat rooms.
I was thinking that it would be also cool to be able to merge rooms. I am
not 100% sure if this has been discussed already (I need to catch up on this
mailing list).
So, the idea would be to have the chat room owners agree to merge the two
chat rooms into one room.
There should be a namespace for the element within the iq, e.g.
iq type='result'service xmlns='jabber:iq:browse' ./iq - is something
returning a result without this? The children of the element are in the same
namespace, so it does not need to be specified again.
An element with a xml
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I'm in the thick of implementing groupchat/conferencing in my client. Thanks to
temas for pointing me to the latest docs so I didn't keep working off of the obsolete
stuff in the JPG!
My current head-scratcher is: the person creating a chat room can set a secret
13 matches
Mail list logo