El sábado, 26 juli, 2003, a las 18:03 Europe/Madrid, David Sean Taylor
escribió:
On Saturday, July 26, 2003, at 07:49 AM, Jeremy Ford wrote:
I'm +1 to adding a page to the Jetspeed site with links to other
portlets.
This will at least let people know that there are other portlets out
there
ot
>
> I don't want upset people who will be offended by the commercial
> aspect/aspirations here,
> perhaps there is a compromise where I could agree to allow jetspeed usuage
> of the
> *.org domain names above in such a way that I can still persue my
> ideas with
> the other domains?
There doesn't
At 09:25 AM 7/28/2003 -0400, you wrote:
How about portletforge.net ;)
Hey I like that actually ! :)
- -- --- -=[ shuber2 at jahia dot com ]= --- -- -
www.jahia.org : A collaborative source CMS and Portal Server
> Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 8:46 AM
> To: Jetspeed Developers List
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Contributed portlets page
>
>
> Well is it just me or is "Portlet Catalog" not the first term that comes
> to
> mind when thinking about a portlet repository ? Anyway, is thi
e any
result from the discussion should have ASF's buy-in.
-Original Message-
From: Serge Huber2 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2003 8:46 AM
To: Jetspeed Developers List
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Contributed portlets page
Well is it just me or is "Portlet Catalo
or [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 12:04 PM
To: Jetspeed Developers List
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Contributed portlets page
On Saturday, July 26, 2003, at 07:49 AM, Jeremy Ford wrote:
> I'm +1 to adding a page to the Jetspeed site with links to other
> portlets.
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 12:04 PM
To: Jetspeed Developers List
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Contributed portlets page
On Saturday, July 26, 2003, at 07:49 AM, Jeremy Ford wrote:
> I'm +1 to adding a page to the Jetspeed site with links to other
> portlets.
> This w
On Saturday, July 26, 2003, at 07:49 AM, Jeremy Ford wrote:
I'm +1 to adding a page to the Jetspeed site with links to other
portlets.
This will at least let people know that there are other portlets out
there
other than the ones Jetspeed provides.
I like the idea of Jetspeed being self hosted
ot;Mark Orciuch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jetspeed Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 5:53 PM
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Contributed portlets page
> I have mentioned (along with others) the concept of "portlet repository"
or
> &quo
oyd C. J9C534 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 7:03 PM
> To: Jetspeed Developers List
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Contributed portlets page
>
>
> what about setting up a portlet catalog on SourceForge?
>
> > -Original Message-
> >
> Aurelien Pernoud:
>>
>> That's what's done for Httpclient too, a contrib directory that is
>> clearly stated as "not supported" (at least by jetspeed-dev). And
>> that's nice :)
>>
>
> I checked out the HttpClient site and I didn't see anything about
> contributions. Can you send some links?
Su
what about setting up a portlet catalog on SourceForge?
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Orciuch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 6:53 PM
> To: Jetspeed Developers List
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Contributed portlets page
>
>
> I ha
I have mentioned (along with others) the concept of "portlet repository" or
"portlet marketplace" several times on this list. As Scott has already
stated, Apache will not support the infrastructure required to make this
happen. Also, I'm not too crazy about a "public" CVS where everyone is a
commit
> From: Tim Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 8:15 PM
> To: Jetspeed Developers List
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Contributed portlets page
>
> I like the idea, however (or in addition) as time pasts (with Jetspeed 2)
> I think the Jetspeed CVS will be
That's what's done for Httpclient too, a contrib directory that is clearly
stated as "not supported" (at least by jetspeed-dev). And that's nice :)
Tim Reilly a ecrit :
> Of course, having them in CVS would help facilitate better
> collaboration, community bug tracking, fixing, and all the great
> I like the idea, however (or in addition) as time pasts (with Jetspeed
> 2) I think the Jetspeed CVS will be able to be more portlet container
> oriented and select a core set of portlets for the main distribution. I
> imagine it would concentrate on the services to provide to portlets, and
> the
-Original Message-
From: Mark Orciuch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 2:08 PM
To: Jetspeed Developers List
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Contributed portlets page
> When you say "contributed portlets", it makes me think that they are
> contributed to the
> When you say "contributed portlets", it makes me think that they are
> contributed to the Jetspeed CVS.
> Shouldn't the portlet documentation go in the Portlet Catalog?
They are "contributed" but not "committed". Another example would be
WebSurfPortlet.
>
> Or are these portlets that are not i
On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 09:38 AM, Mark Orciuch wrote:
Just wanted to make sure that everyone is OK with this initiative. I
would
like to add a new page to Jetspeed documentation site containing links
to
contributed portlets. There are several portlets out there, including
the
recent To D
19 matches
Mail list logo
