Re: [jffnms-users] JFFNMS on linux (Fedora) vs Windows (2000 or 2003)

Jason, JFFNMS is faster in Linux, also, you will not be able to use the Reachability interface (Pings from the NMS server to the hosts) because we use fping. Also syslog and tacacs integration will no be possible. Javier Jason Humes wrote: Hi I was wondering if anyone has any info on th

[jffnms-users] JFFNMS on linux (Fedora) vs Windows (2000 or 2003)

Hi I was wondering if anyone has any info on the differences in running JFFNMS on a Linux (Fedora) system vs. running JFFNMS on a Windows (2000 or 2003) system. Is the performance similar or better on one system over another? Are there any major road blocks to installing this on Windows 2000 or 20

RE: [jffnms-users] Backup of VLAN table

You can get the vlan.dat by tftp'ing to the box and pulling the file from the flash filesystem. I hope that helps. -Original Message- From: Javier Szyszlican [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:45 AM Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] Backup of VLAN ta

[jffnms-users] Debian Installation: Problem with the PDF on the Website

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello guys, the PDF presented on the Website is unviewable by my GNOME PDF Reader. Can you fix this issue, please? thx, thalunil - -- Use PGP to encrypt/sign your eMail. Get my public key at: http://www.kallisti.de/users/thalunil/public_key.asc -BE

Re: [jffnms-users] Backup of VLAN table

Thomas, Do you know a way to get that data from the switch? Javier Thomas Mangin wrote: Javier, This is really a feature request.. Could you consider adding the backup the content of the vlan database of the cisco switches. Without it, you can not restore a failed switch to a working state. Regards

RE: [jffnms-users] Installing on Fedora

Also, when I try and apt-get for the individual php4 packages listed below, they also cant be found. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Jason Humes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 3:39 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [jffnms-users] I

RE: [jffnms-users] Installing on Fedora

Hi When I run 'apt-cache search jffnms' or that apt-cache show command, it cant find jffnms. What apt repost. Should I use? Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2004 7:41 AM To: Jason Humes Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject:

Re: [jffnms-users] 64 bit snmp counters

php supports SNMPv3 with the snmpv3_* functions, check the php site. You will need to create a new poller using those functions. Javier Tjerk Nan wrote: On Jun 14, 2004, at 16:27, Javier Szyszlican wrote: Hi, Support for this is not currently incorporated in JFFNMS, User request for this is minimal

Re: [jffnms-users] Creating my own graph -> doesn't work

Hi, You have to show me more of the output of the poller. The poller is ok, but the rrd backend is imporatant, because its the one that stores the poller value in the RRD Files. Did you added the field in the Interfce Types screen? you have to define the RRDTool DS. Javier Tjerk Nan wrote: Hell

Re: [jffnms-users] 64 bit snmp counters

On Jun 14, 2004, at 16:27, Javier Szyszlican wrote: Hi, Support for this is not currently incorporated in JFFNMS, User request for this is minimal. You can't just put in the OIDs, because the standard PHP snmp functions are snmp v1, the V3 use a different name. But you could create a new poller t

[jffnms-users] Creating my own graph -> doesn't work

Hello, I'm currently trying to create my own graphs. I use snmp_poller to get the # of multicast packets. The poller gives this result: H 9 : I 145 : P 70 : snmp_counter:multicast(.1.3...99): 197186 -> buffer(): 456 (time P:21.51 | 0.85) 15:20:51 : H 9 : I 146 : P 70 : snmp_count

Re: [jffnms-users] Very long interface names under performance gr aphs

Jason, Then you will be ok, edit the engine/discovery/snmp_interfaces.inc.php and change the IfDescr OID to .1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.1 You will have to do the same on engine/pollers/snmp_verify_interface_number.php, chagne the ifDescr OID. Hope that helps. If JFFNMS really help you in you job, it

RE: [jffnms-users] Very long interface names under performance gr aphs

Hi This box running JFFNMS is only going to be used for CATos devices, so what would the proper OID be and where would this script be located? So, once I have the snmp_interfaces script using the new OID to populate the Interface name field, it will show the logical interface name, correct? Thank

Re: [jffnms-users] Interface up/down events, do not display or poll?

Jason, In 0.7.8 to be released in a few weeks, I've added this option. But the problem you are having (repeated 224 times) it because the CatOS interface are named the same. Javier Jason Humes wrote: Hi I was wondering if there is any way to have JFFNMS not poll for the status of interfaces, ie

Re: [jffnms-users] Very long interface names under performance gr aphs

Hi Jason, The only way to do this, is change the OID in the snmp_interfaces discovery script, but that will change it for all the hosts. We need an exception system, that should handle the different Host Types. So you could say, for CatOS, use a different OID for the Interface Names. But we d

[jffnms-users] Interface up/down events, do not display or poll?

Hi I was wondering if there is any way to have JFFNMS not poll for the status of interfaces, ie. The UP/DOWN status of an interface. I ask because my event log is showing many events stating that "Interface short wave fibre gigabit ethernet Protocol up (Message repeated 224 times)". How is jffnms

RE: [jffnms-users] Very long interface names under performance gr aphs

Hi again, Is there anyway to have the titles of the graphs changed to represent the interface or something else, because as it stands now, all the graph titles are the same "multimode fibre fast ethernet". Can I change this manually or have JFFNMS use some other value to auto name these graphs. T

RE: [jffnms-users] Very long interface names under performance gr aphs

You are right, it is a catOS 6500. So there is no way of doing this. Thanks for the reply. :) -Original Message- From: Javier Szyszlican [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:31 AM Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] Very long interface names under per

[jffnms-users] Backup of VLAN table

Javier, This is really a feature request.. Could you consider adding the backup the content of the vlan database of the cisco switches. Without it, you can not restore a failed switch to a working state. Regards, Thomas -- Thomas Mangin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Technical Di

Re: [jffnms-users] Very long interface names under performance graphs

Jason, I think you have a CatOS box, and thouse have a extrange way of showing the interface names, not like an IOS box. We'll need exceptions for those. Javier Jason Humes wrote: Hi I was wondering if there is any way to configure JFFNMS to use the logical port names (ie. F0/1, g3/22, etc) inste

Re: [jffnms-users] To begin

Hi Aldo, No, thats not the right way to do it. Creating interfaces manually is not a good choice. When you are in the Hosts screen, click on 'Manual Discovery' and then add the interfaces you want from the list you will see. Javier Aldo Canepa wrote: Hi, It's the first time i'm using JFFMNS and I

[jffnms-users] 64 bit SNMP counters?

Hello, I'm currently monitoring 1 gigabit interfaces and that goes well. But 10 gig, well, here the 32 bit vs. 64 bit snmp counter problem comes around. see http://home.o2w.net/~nan/10g.png My questions: - what is the status of 64 bit counter support? When will it be ready? - Why can't i just us

[jffnms-users] Very long interface names under performance graphs

Hi I was wondering if there is any way to configure JFFNMS to use the logical port names (ie. F0/1, g3/22, etc) instead of the long name "short wave fibre fast eth(rest is cut off)". Or can I expand the "Group Interface" scroll box so that I can see the whole long name? Thanks Jason D. Humes A

Re: [jffnms-users] 64 bit snmp counters

Hi, Support for this is not currently incorporated in JFFNMS, User request for this is minimal. You can't just put in the OIDs, because the standard PHP snmp functions are snmp v1, the V3 use a different name. But you could create a new poller that uses the new PHP SNMP functions. Javier Tjerk Na

[jffnms-users] 64 bit snmp counters

Hello, I'm currently monitoring 1 gigabit interfaces and that goes well. But 10 gig, well, here the 32 bit vs. 64 bit snmp counter problem comes around. see http://home.o2w.net/~nan/10g.png My questions: - what is the status of 64 bit counter support? When will it be ready? - Why can't i just us

Re: [jffnms-users] Manual discovery router with more then 600 (sub)interfaces

Kees, How much times does it take for the ATM subinterfaces to appear? Do you see any errors in your apache error_log ? Javier Kees Wolters @ wrote: We are a xDSL provider in the Netherlands and we will would like to use JFFNMS to monitor our xDSL aggregation router. JFFNMS "Manual discovery" wo

Re: [jffnms-users] How to totally wipe an old database?

Jason, Sure, just get the DB dump included with the package. And do this: #mysql -ujffnms -pjffnms >DROP DATABASE jffnms; >CREATE DATABASE jffnms; >quit #mysql -ujffnms -pjffnms jffnms < /opt/jffnms/docs/jffnms-0.7.7.mysql Hope that helps. Javier Jason Humes wrote: Hi I've got a JFFNMS box which is

[jffnms-users] How to totally wipe an old database?

Hi I've got a JFFNMS box which is running on Debian and it seems to have lost its marbles for some reason and I would like to totally wipe out all of its gathered data/hosts/etc and start fresh. Is this possible without wiping out the entire OS? Thanks. Jason D. Humes Applied Computer Solution

[jffnms-users] Manual discovery router with more then 600 (sub)interfaces

Title: Message We are a xDSL provider in the Netherlands and we will would like to use JFFNMS to monitor our xDSL aggregation router. JFFNMS "Manual discovery" works fine in general exept for our xDSL aggregation router which has a lot of ATM (sub)interfaces.   After choosing the "Manual dis