rpose. [0]
Thanks,
dalibor topic
[0] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/jigsaw-dev
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic
Consulting Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 , Mobile: +491737185961
, Video: dalibor.to...@oracle.com
Oracle Global Services Germany GmbH
Hauptverwalt
y with previous versions, (ii) the frequency of
breaking changes increases over time, (iii) 2.54% of their clients
are impacted, and (iv) systems with higher frequency of breaking
changes are larger, more popular, and more active"
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic |
On 16.01.2018 14:08, jeffrey kutcher wrote> Is there official
documentation explaining the method resolution process somewhere?
I'd suggest taking a look at the Java Language specification and JVM
specification for details.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com>
topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergerich
s,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergeri
This is perhaps why there were only 36 applications in our
sample."
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deuts
ng
in the door frame and shouting 'hey, everyone, did you all just hear
what was said in the other room?' each time someone says something in
either room, regardless of how important it is to either separate set of
conversations.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com>
Thanks, Martin - I've passed your feedback on to the team publishing the
builds.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 13.01.2017 19:04, Martin Buchholz wrote:
I tried to look at build 151 "Summary of changes" and went to
http://download.java.net/java/jdk9/changes/jdk-9+151.html
but th
On 27.09.2016 13:01, dalibor topic wrote:
On 27.09.2016 12:03, Andrew Dinn wrote:
Yes we could use braces instead of a
belt, but why do we /need/ braces when we can already wear a belt?
I don't think that it's an either one or another proposition,
Although the developing fashio
and
http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1641&context=theses
for an example of research on the benefits of using suspenders to reduce
lower back pain in police officers, that often need to carry heavy duty
belts.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic
he answered this specific question by providing two
counter examples:
1. "no security manager at runtime", and
2. "no equivalent at compile time"
when A (i.e. being able to constrain access control using a security
manager) can not be true.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<
the use of the term "open" in
the context of a software development community name typically does not
determine the architecture (or any other properties or qualities) of
software produced by such communities, aside from the aforementioned choice.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://
As Mandy said, jdeps can't do that. There are other tools that perform
bytecode engineering, optimization and shrinking that could assist you
in determining a useful subset of all your application's classes to feed
into jdeps for further analysis.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 08.09.
they
don't turn out to be very likely in practice. [0] [1]
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0] "Comet May Kill All Earth Life Says Scientist," The San Francisco
Call (San Francisco, CA), February 8, 1910, Page 1, Image 1, col. 2.
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85066387/1910-02-
system design works hard behind
the scenes to support that approach, please see
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jigsaw/spec/sotms/#compatibility--migration
.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +49173718
On 01.08.2016 16:04, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On 08/01/2016 05:40 AM, dalibor topic wrote:
Is it safe to assume that all such involuntarily headache inducing
Slings and Stones are also kept under lock in non-public classes?
Of course not, no more than it is safe to assume that such will be
,
which is also useful as well as intuitive.
How do I make a single class non-public in a third party component?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | K
On 29.07.2016 16:55, David M. Lloyd wrote:
On 07/29/2016 09:20 AM, dalibor topic wrote:
Is it safe to assume that all potentially headache inducing Guns and
Bullets are always kept under lock in non-public classes?
Of course, that's why we had non-public classes in the first place.
under lock in non-public classes?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwalt
rs of such builds (like different binary formats, or builds with some
option turned on or off, or whatever else people tend find a temporary
need for).
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
OR
x27;t make any sense.
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0] For example, some kind of "open source way", applying to binaries
not actually being published under an open source license.
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +49173718596
a feature" is a resounding yes,
then it may make sense for the mainstream builds.
If not, then probably not.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co.
s, it's important to understand that an average
application consisting of 106 components -- of which 6.8% are
known bad -- could contain numerous unique vulnerabilities" [0]
Relevant background reading:
https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2013-A9-Using_Components_with_Known_Vulnerabiliti
ch trade offs, in particular over the maintenance life
cycle of a software system.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Ha
mwiki.php/JustForFun/ApocalypseDayPlanner?from=Main.ApocalypseDayPlanner
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFatVn1hP3o&feature=youtu.be
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschla
ware.
It even touches briefly on the utility of modules in JDK 9.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deuts
faults" in
https://buildsecurityin.us-cert.gov/articles/knowledge/principles/failing-securely
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe
Done: https://twitter.com/iotsakp/status/757546517519622145
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 25.07.2016 12:05, dalibor topic wrote:
On 25.07.2016 07:36, Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
I wasn't suggesting that it was a JDK bug - but that LWJGL might be a
good
test subject.
I'll try to re
On 25.07.2016 07:36, Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
I wasn't suggesting that it was a JDK bug - but that LWJGL might be a good
test subject.
I'll try to reach out to someone involved in that project and see if
they are interested in joining the fun [0].
cheers,
dalibor topic
development of the programming language and associated development tools
[2].
In short, let's not argue about absolute statements one way or the other
if we can avoid it.
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0]
https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!msg/boring-crypto/48qa1kWignU/o8GGp2K1DAAJ
[1] https://twi
)assessment are important, such as
jdeps, or -XX:+CheckEndorsedAndExtDirs, ... as is empathy.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22
On 15.07.2016 15:39, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
On 15.07.2016 14:55, dalibor topic wrote:
[...]
And if adopting the more correct practices requires them to make a huge
breaking change? Maybe even getting rid of base principles?
Commitment bias to accumulated technical debt is completely
their ability to migrate to new
JDK (update) releases as they start testing against JDK 9 and discover
one or more issues with their code.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACL
ffect code migrating to JDK 9.
I maintain a list of things to consider at
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Adoption/JDK+9+Outreach and would
welcome suggestions for improving and expanding that list over on the
adoption-discuss mailing list.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://w
On 14.07.2016 14:31, Robert Muir wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 8:22 AM, dalibor topic wrote:
I'd suggest moving on [1] to a maintained version of that dependency, such
as 2.6.x currently seems to be.
I'm not complaining about the issue: I'm simply trying to put things
2.6.x currently seems to be.
While that doesn't necessarily mean it won't break in the same or a
different fashion in the future, at least you would have a chance to fix
such issues or to have someone else fix them for you. ;)
cheers,
dalibor topic
[1] https://logging.apache.org/l
On 14.07.2016 11:57, Andrew Dinn wrote:
On 14/07/16 10:44, dalibor topic wrote:
I believe that this was discussed before at
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jpms-spec-observers/2015-September/000122.html
Thank you for the link, Dalibor. It does indeed appear that the
possibility of
much of this API. However, I'll put aside the
appropriateness of such descriptions in order to challenge the assertion
that it 'needs to go away'.
I believe that this was discussed before at
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jpms-spec-observers/2015-September/000122.html
.
Windows goes, please see
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145527 .
As far as the burden of running the Oracle JDK installer goes, keep in
mind that it can be installed silently in a user chosen location, as
described in [3].
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0]
http://www.oracle.com/technetw
'll
reject any cross-posted messages.
- Mark
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptv
On 07.07.2016 18:18, Malachi de Ælfweald wrote:
Right - I was trying to find documentation on the new url format.
Please see http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/220 for details on the new jrt
URI scheme for naming stored modules, classes, and resources .
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<h
Vote: Yes.
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
R
On 12/2/15 5:26 PM, Stephane Epardaud wrote:
> Of course it does not help that I have to do this all outside of my IDE
> as Eclipse doesn't know about Java 9 yet :(
See https://marketplace.eclipse.org/content/java-9-support-beta-neon
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://
Vote: Yes.
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung:
On 30.10.2015 16:29, Vincent Privat wrote:
Hi,
- Is it expected to allow external people to have the possibility to
subscribe to JDK issues?
See http://robilad.livejournal.com/139637.html
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Vote: Yes.
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
R
Vote: Yes.
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
R
implementation are part of
OpenJDK, so you'd have to write your own.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutsc
7u:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2014-January/008242.html .
So I'd tend to agree that separate availability would be a better option at
this point in time of JDK 7u releases.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Vote: Yes.
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
R
Vote: Yes.
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
R
Vote: Yes.
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
R
Vote: Yes.
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
R
53 matches
Mail list logo
