Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done? Gestures

2012-11-26 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Ok, my double tap must have been emulating that most of the time. If I touch the stylus to the bond for about 2 seconds, then tap, it works pretty consistently. I guess that touch-hold is a hover. The Resolver optimization on edit works pretty well. It's a bit confusing when I set it to automat

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done? Gestures

2012-11-26 Thread Robert Hanson
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Otis Rothenberger wrote: > Bob, > > This is neat. > > On a test page using click bond change and click atom change, I can make > it work on my iPad. I have to use a stylus because of model size. > > A bond change using pickcallback seems to require a double tap and

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done? Gestures

2012-11-26 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Bob, This is neat. On a test page using click bond change and click atom change, I can make it work on my iPad. I have to use a stylus because of model size. A bond change using pickcallback seems to require a double tap and an atom change seems to require a single tap. Is that by design? Oti

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done? Gestures

2012-11-26 Thread Robert Hanson
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Paul Pillot < paul.pil...@ac-orleans-tours.fr> wrote: > So many improvements, it's hard to keep pace. > > I've just (re)tried with an iPad and found out that gestures now work : > pinch to zoom, two fingers for a translation. > There is even a support for picking m

[Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done? Gestures

2012-11-26 Thread Paul Pillot
So many improvements, it's hard to keep pace. I've just (re)tried with an iPad and found out that gestures now work : pinch to zoom, two fingers for a translation. There is even a support for picking measurements through double tap. This is fabulous ! Measurements are tricky : it's difficult to

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-26 Thread Robert Hanson
I forgot to implement that thread. Which reminds me, the NAVIGATE command is not implemented. OK, that is fixed, I think. Please check. I think moveto may have similar problems, but I can't check that now. On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Angel Herráez wrote: > move 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2;color bac

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-26 Thread Robert Hanson
don't do any conversions. Just let me fix it. On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Angel Herráez wrote: > With files updated today: > > Yes, "color label" is now working for me. Thanks. > > > > > move 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2;color background black > > > > also worked fine. Maybe you have older files or

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-25 Thread Angel Herráez
With files updated today: Yes, "color label" is now working for me. Thanks. > > move 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2;color background black > > also worked fine. Maybe you have older files or I'm not getting the right > ones to you. Yes, it is working now (no errors) but without the animation effect, just

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Robert Hanson
Good suggestions. A few comments Performance will be the issue, for sure. No WebGL on the iPhone, iPad, or Android tablet, so that won't help there. And there will always be WebGL compromises even if we do get that working. I think you can forget translucent surfaces with WebGL. It's not that

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Robert Hanson
I changed the name from JSmol.zip to jsmol.zip -- both were there, and you were getting the wrong one. Same for Angel, I suspect. Please be sure to use http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol.zip All this was fixed a few days ago. -- Robert M. Hanson Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry Chair,

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Robert Hanson
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Herráez Sánchez Ángel wrote: > > - "color labels" fails with "too much recursion" (I reported a few days > ago) > > definitely fixed a few days ago. at test2.htm: >labels on;color labels blue works fine. > - "move" gives errors - I know it's quite an old

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Oliver Stueker
Thanks Otis, that's great news! Oliver On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Otis Rothenberger wrote: > Oliver, > > They sure do. I'm using both atom and bond pickCallBacks to produce model > kit actions. > > Otis > > -- > Otis Rothenberger > o...@chemagic.com > http://chemagic.com > > > > > On Nov 2

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Otis Rothenberger
Oliver, They sure do. I'm using both atom and bond pickCallBacks to produce model kit actions. Otis -- Otis Rothenberger o...@chemagic.com http://chemagic.com On Nov 24, 2012, at 6:52 PM, Oliver Stueker wrote: > First of all: JSmol is a really GREAT idea and I am still stunned how > good i

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Oliver Stueker
First of all: JSmol is a really GREAT idea and I am still stunned how good it works. One question: do pickCallbacks work with JSmol as well? Up to now I haven't seen a demo with pickCallbacks and right now I don't have time to try myself, but next year I'm going to start a project where I'll prob

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Paul Pillot
The zip file available is apparently an older version (from the 11/13). There might be some caching problem there, preventing from downloading the latest version ? I don't know if it's time to discuss this yet, but I have some comments about JSmol: - speed performance: a colleague of mine repor

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Philip Bays
Yes, I can confirm this now. A fresh start or clearing the cache of safari results in the firefox error on the first load but not subsequently. In addition, I have been focusing on JSmol. However, on test2 page, I find that choosing either the signed or unsigned Jmol applet appears to load t

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Otis Rothenberger
I also get the Firefox error in Safari 6.0.2. It occurs on the first load - not on reload. After several cache clearing tests, the message always appears on the first load after the cache clear - not on reloads. It's almost like a reverse cache problem! Otis -- Otis Rothenberger o...@chemagic.

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Philip Bays
hmmm. On playing some more, the firefox load error showing up in Safari has gone away. Perhaps a cache problem of some kind? On Nov 24, 2012, at 3:01 PM, Philip Bays wrote: > Observations on a Mac using 10.8.2, Safari 6.0.2, Firefox 17.0 > > In both browsers, the two mo items (5th, and 6th i

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Philip Bays
Observations on a Mac using 10.8.2, Safari 6.0.2, Firefox 17.0 In both browsers, the two mo items (5th, and 6th in center column) give an "unrecognized file type error". Firefox has a small popup that says there is a bug in the applet load process at the beginning, but when dismissed, goes on a

Re: [Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Herráez Sánchez Ángel
- "color labels" fails with "too much recursion" (I reported a few days ago) - "move" gives errors - I know it's quite an old command, and I can try to find equivalents using rotate, but they are not so easy and, mostly, it just breaks old scripts and forces editing for alternative solutions

[Jmol-users] JSmol -- Are we done?

2012-11-24 Thread Robert Hanson
I think we are close to saying that that conversion from Java to JavaScript is done. What am I forgetting? http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jsmol/test2.htm -- all links working? -- working on all browsers? -- mouse actions are working? -- all file types loading? Is that everything? Can we say it