Sure, I agree that Andrea's solution is far better.
I'll even update the method I use to works with the instanceof way.
On Sep 21, 7:44 pm, aHeckman aaron.heckm...@gmail.com wrote:
Mickael, I'd use Andrea's solution instead for the same reasons: any
object could have an .is() method.
On Sep
Is there a way to automatically append some parameters in every ajax
call's query string?
ajaxStart event doesn't send ajax options to callback function, so
there is not way to modify the query string.
ajaxSend event doesn't work with GET request, because the query
string is already appended to
Web 2.0 Apps and multi-thousand chidlren dom collections is an issue
(aka: problem) I already am thinking about.
There will be a point in a single page + ajax web apps which will
make this (widely used) ad-hoc app design not-feasible.
And Matt's problem is showing this clearly. Not yet, but
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:49 AM, DBJDBJ dbj...@gmail.com wrote:
if huge ajax result sets do result in generation of huge dom
collections , even direct dom manipulation will show a visible (over 1
sec) delay.
I manage thousands of records for different collections without problems in
internet
Well, the select lists everyone that has access to utilize the ticketing
system for submitting feedback/kudos on them, so everyone needs to be in the
select.
I'll try the suggestions here.
Thanks for all the good advice!
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:49 AM, DBJDBJ dbj...@gmail.com wrote:
Web 2.0
Some make visible on drill down mechanism is going to make UX more
manageable for end-users, I think.
And easier on the browser, especially for mobile platforms.
For example please see 'Expandable Detail Table Rows' ,
Matt has an simple but very usable explanation here:
What happens if you change this (that fails) :
$('p').find('strong ~ strong');
$('div').find('code ~ code');
To this :
$( 'strong ~ strong', document.getElementsByTagName(p) );
$( 'code ~ code', document.getElementsByTagName(div) );
Am I just fishing here ? Very quick one (and on top of my
Hey
I just released a plugin that allows multidimensional animation for
jQuery. This is useful for Bezier Curvers among other things.
Article is here
http://blog.parkerfox.co.uk/2009/09/22/bezier-curves-and-arcs-in-jquery/
Demo is here
http://weepy.github.com/jquery.path/
Code is actually
Hey,
this is brilliant. I've been searching for this for a long time, and wanted
to do it myself but had too huge
time constrains.
I'm definitely going to play with it asap and come back to you, I have
numerous usecases that I want to
try out.
Cheers!
Paul
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 2:04 PM, weepy
recently had a problem here ... on line 3968 of jquery.js
speed: function(speed, easing, fn) {
var opt = typeof speed === object ? speed : {
the trouble is that speed was null rather than undefined and
typeof null is object, resulting in
(opt == null) = true ,
Hi, everyone.
I've recently discovered jQuery and started to use it but I had some
problems with the selector module. Some selectors aren't recognised by
my browser, for example: #id, ancestor descendant and parent child.
I've run the jQuery Test Suite on my browsers: Mozilla Firefox 3.0.14
and
Hello all,
I've got a case with some unexpected behavior related to toggle; I
think it might be the root of the issues behind bugs 4681, 4960, and
5010. Basically, I think that toggle behaves in a way which is
logically correct (arguably), but not what people would expect.
The main point is
Hm, is this not easier to do inside http://processingjs.org/ ?
--DBJ
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
jQuery Development group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To
processingjs is great, but it's a rather heavy weight solution !
On Sep 22, 2:35 pm, DBJDBJ dbj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hm, is this not easier to do insidehttp://processingjs.org/ ?
--DBJ
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
I have created quick and dirty test of adding 50K options to the
single elements.
Then I started it on this desktop and IE8 ... and waited
Then I did not believed what I have seen, and executed the same test
on the WIN7 64 bit + IE8 64bit ( 2 core Intel + 2GB RAM).
The result was almost
My JSON-REST plugin does this by wrapping $.ajax with other method(s).
Just add an object of params to $.rest.data.
http://plugins.jquery.com/project/rest
You can do this by wrapping/replacing the $.ajax method yourself
(function ($) {
var _ajax = $.ajax,
A = $.ajax =
On Sep 22, 2009, at 8:02 AM, DBJDBJ wrote:
What happens if you change this (that fails) :
$('p').find('strong ~ strong');
$('div').find('code ~ code');
To this :
$( 'strong ~ strong', document.getElementsByTagName(p) );
$( 'code ~ code', document.getElementsByTagName(div) );
Am I
It's very possible as the company continues to expand :P.
Now that you mention it, though, I could probably break them out into a
department and then manager menu/submenu which would filter the list out
quite nicely.
Though, of all the things I've used jQuery for, this being the only issue
really
over thinking or over engineering ... Yes that is a *very* big
issue.
BTW: so far John has managed to stay away from over-engineering, it
seems ...
PS: IE is one very good example of over-engineering ..
In my (too) long career I had been few times lucky to communicate with
some very big IT
He's using the unit testing framework, so that part isn't needed
-- dz
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:38 PM, DBJDBJ dbj...@gmail.com wrote:
It is blatantly obvious and therefore difficult to spot ...
I think your test page does things without
$( function () {
...
}) ;
It that matters ?
It is blatantly obvious and therefore difficult to spot ...
I think your test page does things without
$( function () {
...
}) ;
It that matters ?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
jQuery Development
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 8:35 PM, DBJDBJ dbj...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW: so far John has managed to stay away from over-engineering, it
seems ...
a simple exposed API does not mean there is not a lot of engineering behind
as well :-)
( and maniac features detection to solve self-updated
Exactly, David. :)
If it did matter, I suppose all of the tests would be failing.
This isn't user error. Copy one of the failing selectors and paste
into firebug to see for yourself.
--Karl
On Sep 22, 2009, at 3:42 PM, David Zhou wrote:
He's using the unit testing framework, so that part
fadeIn() and fadeOut() cool be much more useful if they'd work
together instead of queueing up against each other. A usecase where
this comes up is a tooltip widget, where a single element is reused to
display the tooltip of various elements (absolutely necessary for a
large number of tooltipped
... after Karl and DZ exchanged understanding , let us try and help
Karl ...
My thinking is this : is this a Sizzle issue ? Or jQuery core does
something ?
By answering this question we will narrow down this exciting bug
chase.
If we observe jQuery.find() (which is Sizzle() ) we can easily see
General Sibling Combinator module: find(element ~ element) (2, 4, 6)
1.$('p').find('code ~ strong').length: 3
2.$('p').find('code ~ code').length, expected: 3 result: 0
3.$('p').find('strong ~ strong').length, expected: 2 result: 0
4.document.querySelectorAll(p code~ strong).length: 3
I'm often running into the same issue, trying to play with the
optional parameters of .stop(), with varying success.
On Sep 22, 11:47 pm, Jörn Zaefferer joern.zaeffe...@googlemail.com
wrote:
fadeIn() and fadeOut() cool be much more useful if they'd work
together instead of queueing up against
Thanks for doing some more legwork on this. It's good to have this
confirmed as a bug. In my initial post, I wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone else might have more luck than I've had
tracking down the report in Trac. If not, should I file this as a bug?
Also, in recent SVN versions the
Hi,
I noticed something odd with the width and height functions when
applied to select elements:
- width() returns the width _minus_ the border
- width(value) sets the width _including_ the border
element.width(element.width()) reduces the width!
See here:
29 matches
Mail list logo
