If the all name is still around then it is ok, it's just sometimes in
the past changes where made that would not support earlier ways of
doing thing which lead to plugins no longer working. If it's more an
alias that is created than I am up for it.
I like Daniel's idea of event(), couldn't make
Stop supporting IE or even just IE6 would be very unprofessional, it's
not a question of balls, it's a question of professionalism. Not
supporting IE doesn't damage IE in any way, it's the end user that get
all the problems.
Some company keep using IE6 not always because their employees can't
Isn't the google stuff more than good enough tho :)
After if it is mostly for personal use, do your own patches before
submitting them, then I dont see what stop you jQuery is open-source
after all :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
element.bind('click', someFunction, this); - This way allow backward
compatibility.
Your way, renaming the functions the most uses in plug-in, will mean
an aweful lot of developers will have to go through their code and
update it. And to be honest I don't see how anything else could
describe
Fixed by just wrapping the image tag in some div and playing with the
div instead.
However IE8 seems to have issues still renderinf fading transition
properly, the images can sometimes have few pixels jerky before fading
and it fade faster than firefox for some reason. Otherwise it works.
Thanks
The only one that could give us proper number (well more accurate
ones) is Microsoft itself as they must be able to track how many
download of each version they had and how many version of windows have
been send out. Even that wouldn't be that accurate due to cracked
copies around the world.
I
Or well something like that. Basically i wrote a little plugin that
load and switching between images, everything works perfectly apart
from the fading transition not working under IE.
I think it might have something to do with the way IE handle new
images loaded in an image tag but I am unsure
)
matched.push( cur );
cur = cur[dir];
n++;
}
return matched;
};
to allow the limit on parents as parent and parents use the same .dir
function.
(unfortunately I am still crap some my code is probably wrong :( )
On Apr 9, 12:37 pm, Gilles gil...@netxtra.net wrote
Firefox error console report:
$(document).ready is not a function, so there is a conflict somewhere,
it is probably mootools taking over the $
Maybe this page would help: http://docs.jquery.com/Core/jQuery.noConflict
Have you tried call your jquery and then underneath call all the
jquery
Don't klnow what happen there, got submitted when I was not done,
excuse the broken fingers. The code is obviously not write...
On Apr 9, 12:37 pm, Gilles gil...@netxtra.net wrote:
I would prefer Mike 2nd approach, not sure the this.each is required
if it does the job without it, it's just
Also you might want to add:
script src=jquery-1.3.2.js type=text/javascript/script
before all the other script tags, so you actually load JQuery before
trying to use it :)
On Apr 3, 5:46 pm, David Zhou da...@nodnod.net wrote:
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 8:42 AM, Dev ajoymahat...@gmail.com wrote:
unless you packed it in jquery-fadeout.js ofc :)
On Apr 4, 3:36 pm, Gilles gil...@netxtra.net wrote:
Also you might want to add:
script src=jquery-1.3.2.js type=text/javascript/script
before all the other script tags, so you actually load JQuery before
trying to use it :)
On Apr 3, 5:46
Nice work guys, looking good so far :)
I tried your page on FF 3.0.1 however I get $.browser.version =
1.9.0.6. at the bottom right of the page.
Didn't wanted to disrupt the thread, but want to point that out just
in case.
On Apr 1, 11:10 am, Mark Gibson jollyt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
It would be good to see DOM speed results compare to other libraries
and see which libraries comes the closest to it. But I would never
expect any library to match it on all tests. But then again that
TaskSpeed test only take into consideration few basics tests and not
the overall performance of
I meant signed petition lol, 637 now and the last one from you!
The number of download would be hard as I don't think you can download
it, did the download form process but apparantly I am unsuitable for
IE6 lol
On Apr 2, 11:34 am, DBJDBJ dbj...@gmail.com wrote:
@Gilles , 392 vote already
library | ms
DOM *499*
Dojo 1.3.0 2327
plugd-a (Dojo) 2455
Dojo 1.2.3 2922
jQuery 1.3.2 3170
MooTools 1.2.1 5876
jQuery 1.2.6 *7049*
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Gilles gil...@netxtra.net wrote:
It would
lol nice, 392 vote already!
On Apr 1, 7:43 pm, Ryura yoyobo...@gmail.com wrote:
Show the quoted text at the bottom ;)
On Apr 1, 2:15 pm, David Zhou da...@nodnod.net wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Ryura yoyobo...@gmail.com wrote:
This is not great, its absolutely terrible. IE6
If the style are appended to the head it works just fine.
Here I am not sure I get why the div is created nor why the span
variable is declared (probably snippet of code and it is use somewhere
else i assumed)
body
p id=testThis test should have border and padding!/p
script
Bonjour!
Stupid question, but you have made sure to wrap your code inside $
(function(){ /* your code */ }); yes?
As otherwise JQuery might have trouble locating what you need if it
isn't.
Also could you provide the HTML source as rendered by the browser, it
makes copy/pasting/testing easier :)
');
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Gilles wrote:
Bonjour!
Stupid question, but you have made sure to wrap your code inside $
(function(){ /* your code */ }); yes?
As otherwise JQuery might have trouble locating what you need if it
isn't.
Also could you provide the HTML source
for
event delegation type tasks)
Using $(this+' .quantite') WILL NOT WORK when /this/ is a document node.
You have to use $(this).find(' .quantite'); or
$(this).children('.quantite'); should work to.
~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire)
Gilles wrote:
Ah zut, I forgot the , and I
Might want to try something like this instead:
$(.gallery img).each(function()
{
$('#bild_spel div ul').append('liimg src= '+$(this).attr
('src')+' alt=/li');
});
haven't tested it but I believe it's correct :)
On Mar 30, 11:48 am, smurkas marcus.dalg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I
I don't think this is a bug, if you go ahead and remove an element it
is quite normal to assume that you would want the binding on that
element to be removed as well in order to save ressources. In most
cases a removed element is not going to come back, otherwise it's
easier to just move it out
be wrapped in li)
var img = $(.gallery img);
$(img).each(function() {
$(#bild_spel div ul).append(this);
});
You'll just need to wrap it in your li somewhere else
On Mar 30, 12:17 pm, Gilles gil...@netxtra.net wrote:
Might want to try something like this instead:
$(.gallery img).each
more functionalities.
On Mar 30, 7:53 pm, John Campbell jcampbe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Gilles gil...@netxtra.net wrote:
Also could you explain what $.getScript(scripts[n++],
arguments.callee); actually does? I am not sure of what
arguments.callee refers
$.getScript(scripts[n++],
arguments.callee); actually does? I am not sure of what
arguments.callee refers to.
Thanks for the help and feedback so far guys, it is really
appreciated.
Gilles.
On Mar 29, 12:14 am, Ricardo ricardob...@gmail.com wrote:
You could drop the evaling altogether:
var
)
so it gets picked up as an error by the compiler (because of course you
can't assign a variable to a string constant).
Hope this helps you avoid future problems.
Be well,
Tony
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Gilles gil...@netxtra.net wrote:
Thanks for pointing it out Karl, will go fix
know
why the code variable becomes blank tho. The only silly thing I think
of is maybe the return of eval is ''. My only worry is that if I can
make it not blank I'll just get the error again.
Oh, and only tried on IE7 so far as well for the bug, not IE6 or IE8.
On Mar 27, 5:18 pm, Gilles gil
Hi,
I normally bebug my code myself, cos I believe it helps me improve
myself, but here I just can't figure it out.
basically I am writing a JQuery plugin, that JQuery plugin generate a
bit of code that I then eval later. The code is a casacde of getScript
with some initialization command being
Not sure I see what you mean by JQuery allowing you to not have any
even listener in your HTML document, you can do the same from pure
javascript as well.
After yes JQuery will be heavier on your page, depending on your
project, if you use only 2 event listener going pure javascript would
be
If all your class have the same prefix you could also use CSS3
selectors like class^=color-]
So $('class^=color-]').each(function() {
$(this).removeClass(this.className);
});
Haven't tried it and I am tried, but that should remove all classes
starting with color-foo, not sure if it is
still, that's a heavy work around for something that i assumed would
be stored in memory. If i understand correctly you parse through each
css file, right?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Gilles gil...@netxtra.net wrote:
Try changing to JQuery.each() instead (or $.each, but I believe it's
32 matches
Mail list logo
