I have some navigation that works by clicking on one dom element and
animating another. What I want to do now is tie the onmouseout event
to BOTH those dom elements so that if the mouse cursor stays inside
either of them, the navigation panel stays open, but when the mouse
leaves either of them,
Hm, I don't quite exactly understand what you are saying. I simply
load into the div.fake because I do not want any data loaded. But
firebug DOES show an ajax action taking place everytime I click that
element, allowing me complete the ajax request. Thank you for your
post though, I will look into
Klaus,
Thanks for the hint. very useful !
Jacques
On Jul 28, 2:51 am, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jacques Jocelyn wrote:
> > All,
> > Sorry if this question was asked before, but I've been searching but
> > no real answer to this particular topic
>
> > Please consider the following
I agree that a comparison chart would be great. When I started my quest to
find jQuery I remember trying to evaluate prototype, ext, mootools, jQuery
(woohoo!), 10 or so others. I wanted something that would show me the
overlap and the differences, give me an idea of what they all do generally
and
On Jul 29, 2007, at 12:40 AM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
If you look at my demo page again: http://www.whitestonemedia.com/
cluetip_test/cluetip-test.html
you’ll notice that I put up 4 linked images with 4 cluetip images.
Everything works as expected until I mouse over the images one
after anot
Time for some sleep. it's 12:45 am here in Georgia (USA).
I've got church in the morning so it's time for night-night.
Catch you tomorrow and thanks again for the help!
Rick
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Karl Swedberg
Sent: Sunday, July 29,
The js solution I've been using would orient the tip top or bottom first,
where
you're doing it left to right, which is fine.
Also, my current js solution, which is now giving way to your solution :o) ,
would
simply allow the image to run off the display area, forcing the user to move
the
li
Something else I just noticed.
If you look at my demo page again:
http://www.whitestonemedia.com/cluetip_test/cluetip-test.html
you'll notice that I put up 4 linked images with 4 cluetip images.
Everything works as expected until I mouse over the images one after another
rapidly. Once I d
ha! you figured it out before I sent my last note. nice work!
As for positioning it above or below ... I kind of like that idea.
I'll see what I can do. I don't necessarily want that to be the
default if the tip will fit either to the right or to the left. But
if it can't fit on either side
I think we hit upon the problem at the same time. (see my next message)
Rick
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Karl Swedberg
Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2007 12:27 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Re: ClueTip Issue: I can only get the tip
Hi again,
After taking a closer look at your implementation, I noticed that you
set the width of the clueTip to 410, even though the photo width is
600px:
$('a.load-local').cluetip({local:true, arrows:true, sticky: false,
dropShadow: false, width:410});
That is for sure going to mess i
Hi, Karl. thanks for the reply.
I figured out the problem. nothing's broken.
I just had the width of the tip still set to the default 275.
Once I reset the tip width to 600 to match my image, the entire
image began to show up as expected.
The only thing I wish now is that the tip wou
I started to go look for that. I think I will start a regular donation.
What do the donations fund specifically? Whatever's needed most at the
time?
Rick
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Karl Swedberg
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 11:49 PM
To: jqu
Hi Rick,
Here is how the clueTip positioning is supposed to work:
* switches from the right side of the link to the left side, if
there is not enough room between the link and the right edge of the
browser window
* moves up until the whole clueTip is visible, if the link is
too clo
On Jul 28, 2007, at 6:03 PM, Rick Faircloth wrote:
I certainly wouldn't have any objection to paying a
subscription fee, let's say $10 per month, for access to a metadata
site
that is well-maintained, always up-to-date, and can be counted on
to provide
me with the latest and greatest in jQ t
Mitch,
There is a selector test out there that can let you "compare" the other
frameworks along side jquery (http://mootools.net/slickspeed/), but take it
all with a grain of salt. You can do a search in the group for "slickspeed"
and you will find the many debates about selector speeds and pluses
I came across this ticket http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/312 that looks like
it was implemented in 1.1 but when I try to using:
$('li[&z-index=5]').size() or $('li[&zIndex=5]').size() and they both return
zero.
" The changes have been added to SVN (rev 774) so that you can write the
select-by-style
Thank you Ben that is a very good thread.
Seems the major reasons why people pick jQuery as there framework over
Mootools, and others, has to do with the super documentation, the community,
support, the large number of plugins and of course a whole bunch of
technical reasons about its prowess a
Ideally you would have a jQuery selector you could use to identify the
rows/cells that can be selected (by binding onmousedown, onmouseup). Taking
a look at your html, you've got classes on the TDs in your left columns of
rows (.minute, .hour). The TDs in the right column of rows only have ids
(inc
Searching previous posts works really well on google groups. There have
been quite a few discussions about this topic.
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/5d52f35ac4f2cb1c/419f7bbc13d8a385?lnk=gst&q=mootools&rnum=5#419f7bbc13d8a385
-Marshall
Mitchell Waite wrote:
There were a few length discussion that may help you:
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/search?group=jquery-en&q=Mootools&qt_g=Search+this+group
This one I believe was the one that was pretty good.
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-en/browse_thread/thread/5d52f35ac4f2cb1c/c36f9836b6d1e
Can anyone tell me how this compares to jQuery, briefly?
Mitch
What controls the direction a ClueTip shows from the link?
I put a div on a page with an image inside that has a link.
The ClueTip content is a larger image.
Its working fine, except for the fact that the ClueTip always
displays to the right of the link. Shouldn't the orientation be a
Hey Guys,
I am working on a script that requires me to take the highest z-indexed
object and send it to the back and then reset the other elements to their
appropriate zindex.
So, if we have five items with a z-index of 1 - 5 and when five is clicked
on I need the z-index to be set to 1 and the ot
Ok... good deal.
Thanks for sharing your perspective.
I do appreciate all the work you and the rest of
the core team does, as well as the plug-in authors.
Perhaps I'll become proficient enough at some point
to author a plug-in that will be helpful to the community.
I'll help where I can!
(That
First of all, let me say, thank you for putting some effort into a
demo/issue page that is very easy to follow and use. Beautiful.
It looks like it's disappearing because you've set the draggable option
zIndex to -1. Not that I blame you - when that isn't set, the image isn't
clipped during draggi
Kia,
It would be very easy to create a repeating animation, simply call the
same animation again the callback function.
More importantly, I believe that this is a prefect situation for a gif
animation. Doing javascript animations is very hard for the browser
and slows down old computers. Gifs ha
Hi !
Here is a new plugin : jCodeViewer
http://www.jaysalvat.com/jquery/jcodeviewer/
It's a light alternative to Chili and turns div, textareas, pre tags
in a simple codeviewer with basic syntax coloration.
Not as powerfull as Chili or SyntaxHighlighter, but it goes straight
to the point.
Any fe
I need to have a "please wait" animation. I was thinking of making one using
jquery. Is it possible to create inifinte animations using the animate()
function? A plain repeating gif is really booring. I think a javascript
enabled animation would be more cool, don't you? Any ideas are welcome!
Kia
That was it. I wrapped the tables in s and used .load() on the
divs instead of on the tables themselves. Works great. Stupid IE.
On Jul 25, 7:16 pm, "Benjamin Sterling"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh,
> First, I am curious why you are putting the code directly on a like, is
> there a reason fo
Not sure if this was posted last night when I tried to post it...
I'm working on a little feature for one of my projects and I've ran
into a little JavaScript related issue. I know that the Eyecon's "
Interface Draggables" is not a part of jQuery, but I'm hoping someone
here has had the same issu
> If Mike were being paid for his time, would he be less stretched and
> able to work more on the Project/Plugin system?
You'd have to ask Mike, obviously, but at the same time, we'd rather
give people the opportunity to selflessly contribute to the project -
turning it from a true, community-ori
> Just out of curiosity, what is your main concern about a paid subscription
> service? If the subscription were very low-priced and the benefits
> were significant, I don't see how anyone would mind contributing to the
> effort financially.
My primary concern is that it isn't open, nor does it
John, you just mentioned a situation that I was trying to address
with a paid subscription service.
"we've got Mike maintaining the Project/Plugin system, and he's already
stretched pretty thin"
If Mike were being paid for his time, would he be less stretched and
able to work more on the Project
I can respect your desire to maintain an open system for jQuery,
and I can support that, too. I was just looking for a way to
help plug-in developers and the core team afford the time it takes to
maintain
the core and the plug-ins well... testing, tutorials, documentation,
provision of
metadata,
> Random thought, since jQuery is now using the Drupal project module. Have you
> looked into whether or not the new update_status module for Drupal would be
> modifiable to suit your needs? It may be rather Drupal-specific at the
> moment, but it may be modifiable to handle jQuery plugins inste
did u try using
window.onload = setTimeout(function() {
// your fade call here
}, 6000);
-GTG
On 7/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hello, I have a project to do and that is an advertising spot stage
> that appears for 5 seconds before entering the page and then fade ou
Random thought, since jQuery is now using the Drupal project module. Have you
looked into whether or not the new update_status module for Drupal would be
modifiable to suit your needs? It may be rather Drupal-specific at the
moment, but it may be modifiable to handle jQuery plugins instead.
I don't want a pay-for subscription system. I want a completely-open
system that authors can opt in to. Having an essential part of jQuery
being closed off is the antithesis of the project. Money is never the
issue with the project, donating time and experience always is.
Here's what we're doing,
Great article. Those are some wonderful plugins (including Round 1).
~Sean
John, et al...
I think there should definitely be a place for community comment,
but I wouldn't want that to be the final word on whether jQ versions,
plug-in versions, and various browsers and versions work together or not.
Anecdotal evidence has its place, but with only limited authority.
The
Thanks! I had to change .children to .find, but then it worked
great :)
Doug
On Jul 28, 1:51 pm, "Benjamin Sterling"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug,
> This should work, but untested:
>
> if($("div#sidebar2").children(".plugin").size() != 0{
>
> $("div#sidebar2").css('width',160);
> $("div#con
That can be made much simpler:
if ( $("div#sidebar2[div.plugin]").width(160).length )
$("div#content").css("marginRight", 170);
--John
On 7/28/07, Benjamin Sterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doug,
> This should work, but untested:
>
> if($("div#sidebar2").children(".plugin").size() != 0{
>
Sure - I don't think that should be part of the metadata file, though,
since that's an action that the community can perform instead. (e.g. I
tested farbtastic 1.0 with jQuery 1.1.4 in Firefox 2 and it Failed.)
The difference being that the Metadata would say something like:
"Farbtastic 1.0 requi
Doug,
This should work, but untested:
if($("div#sidebar2").children(".plugin").size() != 0{
$("div#sidebar2").css('width',160);
$("div#content")css('marginRight', 170);
}
On 7/28/07, duggoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> How would I turn this pseudocode into jquery?
>
> if div#sidebar2 con
How would I turn this pseudocode into jquery?
if div#sidebar2 contains div.plugin {
div#sidebar2 width = 160px
div#content margin-right = 170px
}
I've been at this for a couple hours and I can't figure it out, so any
help is really appreciated.
Thanks,
Doug
Thanks Rey,
I have the code, just that i was trying to show a demo to one of my friends
to switch her over from prototype.
Anyways, i have quite a few demos locally...
-GTG
On 7/28/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Thank Ganeshji,
>
> I'll contact Stefan to let him know. If you nee
John Resig wrote:
Rick -
We started work on adding metadata to plugins a while back, so that
you could know that sort of information (what version of jQuery is
required, what versions of plugins it depends on).
Possibly it's worth adding a 'last version tested' field (i.e. the
*maximum* kno
Rick -
We started work on adding metadata to plugins a while back, so that
you could know that sort of information (what version of jQuery is
required, what versions of plugins it depends on).
Here's a random sample:
http://dev.jquery.com/browser/trunk/plugins/accordion/META.json
You can dig th
Thanks Mitchell
Not yet
I tried and a lot of variations
$("dd ul li").hover(
function(){
$(this).css({background: "blue" }).SlideOutRight(1000)
},
function(){
$(this).css({background: "" }).SlideinRight(1000)
}); // NOT WORKING
I would like just background sliding and complete the box. (w
On Jul 27, 8:11 pm, "Rick Faircloth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just think we need some kind of automated system to keep everything
> up-to-date
> without breaking anything versus having to manually perform updates to jQ,
> et al.
I've mentioned this before, but I own the domain MyJQuery.com.
Thank Ganeshji,
I'll contact Stefan to let him know. If you need the code, you can get
it from the SVN.
http://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/plugins/
Rey...
Ganeshji Marwaha wrote:
Interface plugin friends, Just in case you guys didn't know, your site
says that you have exceeded your b
Interface plugin friends, Just in case you guys didn't know, your site says
that you have exceeded your bandwidth limit.
-GTG
On Jul 28, 3:33 am, "Glen Lipka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://commadot.com/?p=581
>
> I would love your thoughts on it.
To quote that post:
"First of all, I would only have to test ONE browser, regardless of
whether you used IE, FF, or Safari."
To play devil's advocate for a moment...
T
On Jul 28, 7:54 pm, Stephan Beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can find. The New Topic button is unfortunately not available when
> reading a post (it's only visible from the list-of-posts view).
i lied - it does show up as a normal link in the top/right of the
page. When in the list-of-posts view
On Jul 28, 7:18 pm, "Mitchell Waite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no idea how that happened, but I will be more careful. BTW I try to
> snip out chunks of text but I am not perfect, and so are a lot of other
> people here.
Sorry, i wasn't picking on you about top-posting or non-snipping.
I have no idea how that happened, but I will be more careful. BTW I try to
snip out chunks of text but I am not perfect, and so are a lot of other
people here.
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stephan Beal
Sent: Saturday, July 28,
On Jul 28, 6:52 pm, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand, stating that a plugin gets tested in only one of the
> mayor browsers and that you the author don't care much about other
> browsers doesn't motivate users much to use the plugin!
A very fair point. That goes back to
On Jul 28, 6:49 pm, Stephan Beal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The top post of this thread was from Nicolas Hoizey and is about a
> completely different topic:
>
> From: Nicolas Hoizey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Ken Burns effects using jQuery?
And then suddenly:
'Discussion subject changed to
Stephan Beal wrote:
On Jul 28, 5:55 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My advice to all who are concerned about this is to engage the plugin
authors in some way to motivate them to update their work. If they don't
want to, then consider adopting the plugin and enhancing it. That's
happene
Md Emran Hasan continues his great series of jQuery Essentials with
round 2 of some top plugins.
http://www.phpfour.com/blog/2007/07/28/jquery-essentials-round-2/
Rey...
On Jul 28, 5:59 pm, "Mitchell Waite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I started this thread myself, how is that hijacking?
The top post of this thread was from Nicolas Hoizey and is about a
completely different topic:
From: Nicolas Hoizey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:12:51 +0200
Loc
On Jul 28, 5:55 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My advice to all who are concerned about this is to engage the plugin
> authors in some way to motivate them to update their work. If they don't
> want to, then consider adopting the plugin and enhancing it. That's
> happened on several oc
inVINCable wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am just about ready to throw my darn computer out the window
here :P.
What I am doing is quite simple, I am using the .load() function to
call upon a function, like so:
$("div.vote_against_selected").click(function(){
//first load content
$("div.fake").loa
Hello everyone,
I am just about ready to throw my darn computer out the window
here :P.
What I am doing is quite simple, I am using the .load() function to
call upon a function, like so:
$("div.vote_against_selected").click(function(){
//first load content
$("div.fake").load("/stories/vote/1/"
I hear what you're saying, Rey... and please don't take my comments
as a knock on the core team or plug-in authors. I benefit greatly
from the efforts of all you guys without having to pay a dime!
And I know it takes time to test and time is money!
That's why I said I'd be willing to pay a mont
You could use the Interface Elements plug-in and the effect SlideInRight.
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mario Moura
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 6:41 AM
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Subject: [jQuery] Sliding an image into a box - Little animation
I started this thread myself, how is that hijacking?
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stephan Beal
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 8:17 AM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: Anyway to kill a bunch of queued up mouse events
Hi Stephan,
Perhaps i'm splitting hairs or arguing over semantics here, though. i
I think we're saying the same thing but from two different perspectives.
An expectation that the jQuery team will test every plugin isn't a
reasonable one nor is it reasonable for anyone to expect an independe
I agree completely, Stephan.
A *completely* automated tool would be virtually impossible.
I was really talking about a system that *would* depend on the
plug-in authors verifying their plug-ins functionality with various
jQ versions. After they do, we have a central database that they
log into,
On Jul 28, 5:13 pm, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> plugin authors, a chance to see if anything breaks. And the code is in
> SVN so there's no reason for someone to not be able to test it.
That's a key phrase, "to not BE ABLE to test it." Certainly authors
are able, but we must recogni
On Jul 28, 1:30 am, "Mitchell Waite" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have this small script that shows and hides a button when you mouse over a
Mitchell, please, for the second time, DO NOT HIJACK THREADS!!! This
is at least the 3rd time i've seen you do it in the past few days!
When you have a qu
Vince,
I am pretty sure you can do it. So you are saying you need to rebind the
click event to $("div.storyvoteagainst") and $("div.storyvotefor").
Assuming you have something like this originally and when you use the load
function, you are loading the same structure:
I would do something
Hi Rick,
This is definitely a concern shared by many and believe me that we to
great lengths to ensure that things don't break.
Plugin compatibility is so important yet one of the things that we've
found during the development process is that few plugin authors actually
check for issues whe
On Jul 28, 11:35 am, Christof Donat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > If you want to call a method of a CLASS
> > then yes it will work because 'this' is then no longer tied to a
> > specific OBJECT.
>
> Yes, it is. It is tied to the "class object", which is the constructor
> function object
On Jul 28, 3:06 pm, "Rick Faircloth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need some kind of system where plug-ins are tested and deemed
> compatible with this version or that version of the core and not with
> some other version.
>
> An automated system that checks for compatibility and dependencies.
Hi Folks
I am trying make a little effect.
In my menu/box/container I want a Sliding effect of a image or background
color.
So when mouseover
--> the image complete the box from left to right. One time and stop.
$("dd/ul/li").mouseover( function() {
$($(this).addClass("selected")).animate(
"data" is actually the string returned by the request, so I cannot
access it as a selector - I think that is what you meant. I can't
query against it at all in Firefox. Does anyone have suggestions as to
how I can convert it into something else before trying to use it? I
tried "toString()" on the
Those were some awesome suggestions Wizzud. Thank you for taking the
time to comment. Here is what I changed/implemented:
* Removed the word tutorial. It was a little misleading, and I had
plan on walking through one or two of these examples in a blog post
anyhow. So for now, it is out.
* I cons
"The one thing this does not do for you, though,
is actually test that all your code works with the new version"
Yes, and that's a big concern. As this library grows in popularity,
the number of plug-ins will only increase along with the updates
to the core and that's going to create a constant
Good point, Stephan...
Thanks,
Rick
-Original Message-
From: jquery-en@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stephan Beal
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2007 4:39 AM
To: jQuery (English)
Subject: [jQuery] Re: How does everyone handle the constant updating of
jQuery and plug-
I'm working on a little feature for one of my projects and Iv'e ran
into a little JavaScript related issue. I know that the Eyecon's "
Interface Draggables" is not a part of jQuery, but I'm hoping someone
here has had the same issue. Pretty much when I start to drag an img
element it disappears. I
Hi Gordon,
Have you tried debugbar (www.debugbar.com)?
It's what I use to debug and "profile" code in IE. I haven't met other
better alternative, though.
Regards,
Mike
I want create my own calendar with jQuery, but I have small problem:
My source (for now):
http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
Untitled Document
td {
font-align: right;
padding: 2px;
}
.hour {
font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 13px;
color: #FF;
f
Hey guys,
Sorry I am just really in a rut here. I was told on IRC earlier that
you CANNOT re-load content into a if you have already loaded
content into it outside of the div. For example here:
$("div.storyvotefor").click(function(){
$("div.storyvote").load("/stories/vote/1/" + $stor
There are a few ways to keep yourself up-to-date with jQuery. You can
of course just update the file you already have, which is probably the
easiest way.
On my site, I have a universal script file and have created a 'load
script' function (rather like jQuery's getScript function) so that I
can c
Sorry, but last server is too slow, try this http://sharq.freehost.pl/grid/
;)
Hi Glen
> Betreff: [jQuery] OT: A Big Idea
[...]
> At the end of today was this great brain-storming session.
> I wrote up about one idea at the end. It's totally in
> "idea-land" so take it with salt.
>
> http://commadot.com/?p=581
>
> I would love your thoughts on it.
That's awasome. I sp
Hi Joonas,
I think this is a good change and I've committed it to SVN. Thanks
for your feedback!
http://jqueryjs.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/plugins/form/jquery.form.js
Mike
> I needed access to the form that's being submitted in the
> options.success() function (in order to hide the form after
Hi,
> If you want to call a method of a CLASS
> then yes it will work because 'this' is then no longer tied to a
> specific OBJECT.
Yes, it is. It is tied to the "class object", which is the constructor
function object in JavaScript:
function myWonderfullClass() {
this.countme = ++myWo
getJSON() expects json to be returned.
'No results' is a result in itself, so if you have no results, tell it you
have no results, maybe by returning {results:0} as opposed to {results:3,
data:{}} or whatever.
At the very least return {}, an empty object, because that will at least
indicate t
Ganeshji Marwaha wrote:
klaus, u rock, it works like a charm...
:-)
can i ask u another question? what is the cleanest way to get an empty
jquery object? (a jquery object that doesnt have any elements selected)
I think that would be:
var empty = $([]);
--Klaus
klaus, u rock, it works like a charm...
can i ask u another question? what is the cleanest way to get an empty
jquery object? (a jquery object that doesnt have any elements selected)
-GTG
On 7/28/07, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Ganeshji Marwaha wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wond
Ganeshji Marwaha wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if there is an easy way to see if 1 jquery object is
equal to another jquery object in terms of its contents selected?
Thanks
-GTG
You could try this (untested):
var isEqual = !$("p").not( $("p.foo") ).length;
--Klaus
On Jul 28, 2:53 am, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeffrey, this is exactly what I was thinking... So now does it work or not?
"Jein."
If you want to call a method of an OBJECT, it won't work because you
need a reference to THAT object (which you can encapsulate in a
closure/anonymous
On Jul 28, 3:11 am, "Rick Faircloth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What does everyone do to stay updated with the latest jQuery and plug-ins
> for every website?
Once you have a site working with your copy of jQ, there is no reason
to update it unless you find that it has a new feature you need or
Hi,
I was wondering if there is an easy way to see if 1 jquery object is equal
to another jquery object in terms of its contents selected?
Thanks
-GTG
Neat examples.
If I might make a couple of suggestions...?
Your page subtitle includes the word 'tutorial'. Personally, if I see that
word I expect to be guided through the process of achieving each of the
results in the examples. I would therefore suggest that, instead of having
to go find the
98 matches
Mail list logo
