delegation or Event bubbling and you should
find further information.
--
Suni
it with $('a.second') or $('a.third'), you can use .removeClass
to remove an individual class, or addClass to add new ones. Of course you
can also use css styling for any or all of the classes.
--
Suni
- and equally alarming.
Just a heads up.
--
Suni
Excellent, you're really getting there!
FF works perfect, and I notice no lag or delay at all.
IE7 and IE6 work perfect for the header-row,
but the left fixed column has some problems:
- the actual table rows seem to be slightly shorter in height than the
fixed column rows. This causes a
Nice work!
Seems to work prefectly in FF.
Opera and Explorer give a javascript error. Usually (in my own
experience) this is caused by the same error in 95% of the cases: an
extra comma after the last property of an object. This also seems to
be the case here.
Remove the tailing comma from
Something else is wrong with your code.
I copypasted your HTML directly and it works: nothing is shown.
If you manage to pull this off It will be amazing. AFAIK there is no
100% working solution for all A-grade browsers so far.
There are many different hacks and scripts (some rather tedious) but
I've yet to see one that would work in FF,IE6,IE7 and Opera.
I hope you find a way, though I'm rather
This is a common js dilemma in js when accessing methods from other
methods. Where this points depends on where and how it is called.
Try:
function MainPage(){
var that = this;// Add this line
this.init = function(){
$('#sample').click(function(){
// here
You're missing bottom border style:
.css('border-bottom-style', 'solid')
On 12 joulu, 05:02, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen way too many sites that don't properly optimize images
and end up with a 400 KB image trying to download that could easily
be optimized to 20 KB and maintain image quality... figure up the
difference in performance speed
There is a lot to optimize there.
I'm sure most of the overhead comes from the each-loop. There is
propably other stuff to optimize too, but this looks like where you
could benefit the most. Lets quickly go through some problems:
$(.crewSchedule tr[id=' + cur.employee_id + '] . + lbl)
Your
I came across the same problem earlier, when trying to create a global
way of notifying the user about timed out sessions in ajax-calls. It
would be really handy if the global ajax-events would fire before
locals.
I ended up doing modifications to the jQuery core to make this
possible.
This might help a bit (not tested):
jQuery(tr.Grid_Item,tr.Grid_AltItem).each( function() { // Use tr to
skip checking nont-tr-elements
var td_nodes = jQuery(this).find('td'); // Get the td nodes
with a single select and store them in a variable
var Id = td_nodes.eq(2).text();
AFAIK It's not possible this way.
The click event hits the topmost element in the viewport first, and
then starts bubbling up according to the DOM tree structure.
Why not place the element to the front (with a higher z-index)
instead? You could set it's opacity to 0 so it's invisible, but it's
This has nothing to do with .each. You've propably just missed how the
selectors and binding work, or how the ajax works.
What your script does currently:
1) You create a link and append it to #col1
2) You send an ajax-request (Which is asynchronous, meaning that the
script keeps running and
Im sorry to let you know:
I just tested with your exact code (creating 5000 siteSelector span-
elements with PHP) and it still works fine for me, the message gets
appended immediately. Tested with jquery 1.2.1.
I suggest you first try with another completely different computer. It
may sound far
Looks like you found the problem :)
I tested this without spaces, and indeed the browser (FF) goes mad. It
first froze for a minute or so before totally crashing.
It appears that if there are no spaces at all (even inside the divs)
then something goes pretty badly wrong in Gecko.
--
Suni
Just let jQuery create an img-element that points to the php file:
img src=image_script.php?param1=fooparam2=bar /
Also make sure the php script outputs correct response headers
(content-type etc).
--
Suni
if the problem
persists.
--
Suni
I tested your code (FF and IE) with up to 5000 span-elements and could
not reproduce the issue. The message was appended every time
immediately.
There is propable something else in the page distracting the process.
Please note that when you doubleclick the normal click-event gets also
processed
generally should _avoid_ selecting it again with a
selector string (why bother the extra overhead of re-selecting since
you already have the element selected?). You can just pass the object
as a parameter to whatever functions you might need.
What are you trying to accomplish?
--
Suni
Do you have a sample page where this problem shows up? It would make
debugging a lot easier. There must be some other problem at work here.
Using a variable as the parameter should not matter, jQuery doesn't
even know where the value comes from (from a var or hardcoded).
--
Suni
On 22 marras
You can add the !important rule modifier to your css for the hover
class so that it precedes tablesorter's css:
td.hover
{
background-color: #0F0 !important;
}
Hope that helps.
--
Suni
it
}
return false;
}
);
});
This also lets you have several li - elements inside the opening
ul's
Hope that helps.
--
Suni
Wouldn't it be best (bug or no bug) to just bind the event to the
tbody or table element, and check the clicked row from event.target?
This method only needs one event handler binding regardless of the
number of rows (so performance is better), it works even when you add
rows dynamically, and it
Interesting.
I can see the error by clicking the tabs and quickly hovering over
them. All the JS-stuff seems to be ok.
Only error I can see is that your HTML is incorrect, you are missing a
closing /div (the #bodyContainerWide div is nto closed). This causes
the DOM to possibly go wicked even
basically just bind the event handlers to the parent, such as the
tbody or table, check the event.target and act:
$('#myTable tbody').bind('click', function(e)
{
});
It is very likely that the selection can be optimized a lot, but we'd
need to see the structure of the HTML better to give advice...
thing to look at
if you get errors in IE and Opera but not in FF.
HTH
--
Suni
Amazingly simple and elegant, nice work!
This is correct.
In javascript the inner functions have access to the variables of the
outer function. They even retain that direct access after the outer
function has returned, allowing you to create private variables and
methods (through closure).
AJAX calls follow the same-origin policy, and the browser won't allow
an ajax call to another domain for security reasons. The URL for the
ajax call must reside in the same domain as the page it is being
initiated from.
There are ways around this, one of which is using a server proxy (the
url of
Your problem is that within the function you no longer have a
reference to myObj, since this no longer points to it. Try this trick
(works):
var myObj = {
foo : function() {
var that = this;
$(#myLink).click(function(){
that.bar();
});
},
bar : function(){
}
};
Thanks Joel.
The superfish menu is amazing, no wonder nbc picked it up.
I'm starting to use it in an upcoming project and the only questions I
had about it were about reskinning. Now you went and solved all that
before I had the chance to ask.
Thanks!
Why not just use $.get directly? This should work:
$(document).ready(function() {
$('#action_link a').click(function()
{
$.get('e.php',{test :
$(this).text()},function(data)
{
Reproduced here with FF 2 on WinXP.
As soon as I let go of a draggable the error console goes mad.
Excellent work John, 1.2 API much easier to find now.
http://jquery.com/api/ still points to 1.1.2 though with no mention of 1.2.
Update this with a link to 1.2 too?
--
Suni
In the meanwhile it would help tremendously if the documentation and API links
were consistent in where they point to, and the 1.2 api in the wiki was easy to
find.
FYI: The 1.2 API in the wiki is at: http://docs.jquery.com/Core (or by clicking
jQuery Core in the wiki main page at
syys, 22:33, Jean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cant see the site a long long time ago =/
On 9/5/07, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suni schrieb:
Cant reachhttp://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-validation/,
it just gives me a blank page.
I'd love to see all
:
$.parseJSON.safe = true;
You can find the code here:
http://jollytoad.googlepages.com/json.js
Regards
- Mark Gibson-- Suni
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will add the jQuery team more functionalities integrated in the
framework, like working with cookies, hash, json, ajax in next
versions? Sometimes, it's
On 6 syys, 15:50, Karl Swedberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should be able to do that using event.target. Try this:
$('ul').one('click', function(event) {
if ( !$(event.target).is('a') ) {
// your code here
}
});
This is normal bubbling and should be used more :)
But in this
Cant reach http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-validation/,
it just gives me a blank page.
I'd love to see all the comments and documentation, since I'm having
lots of problems using the additional-methods.js (gives javascript-
errors in FF).
-parameter though, so it would have still
required a tweak there to use config.sortList if the list-parameter
was empty.
HTH
--
Suni
Actually it maybe should be as below, in case the function for the
update-event ever changes :)
.bind(reSort,function() {
$this.trigger('update');
var sortList = config.sortList;
$this.trigger('sorton', [sortList]);
})
need
a great showcase site that would group all these polished effects, plugins and
code in one place.
--
Suni
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin Sterling
To: jquery-en
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 7:12 AM
Subject: [jQuery] [UPDATE] jqGalView (yet another image gallery
/js/common.en.js for more information.
--
Suni
PHP code so that it gives a
specific class to the input fields that have an error, and use that to
select them.
If those won't do, I'd suggest you post some sample html to work with.
--
Suni
Gilles (Webunity) wrote:
Given this query:
jQuery('.formError:first', this);
I basically have this question:
How can i find the first input element, before an object?
How about
jQuery('.formError:first', this).prev();
That should do the trick.
--
Suni
understood you correctly you already have i defined and want to reuse
it later to select all inputs within?
so if:
var i = jQuery(#i);
then:
i.find('input');
should do the trick.
--
Suni
irrelevant since I really don't
think the code is to blame here.
What could either cause the server to send clipped responses, or to make the
browser evaluate the response as complete when in fact it might not yet be?
--
Suni
Well id's really should always be unique. But if you really want to do this,
try:
alert($('#001').children('#0011').html());
- Original Message -
From: Mark
To: jquery-en@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 5:22 PM
Subject: [jQuery] Javascript question: Get
the hardcore who
love digging through the source and the forums.
Anyone jQuery users need some help in starting with Ext, I'll gladly offer
some if I can.
--
Suni
can have only
one SSL-host per IP (on port 80 anyway). The server needs to send the
certificate before it gets the information on what particular domain / path was
accessed, and it has no idea on what certificate to send if there are several.
This can lead to undesirable results.
--
Suni
% sure this is your problem, either wrong filename,
directory or missing file altogether.
HTH
--
Suni
oscar esp wrote:
I have followed all steps however I got an error:
Microsoft JScript runtime error: 'style' is null or not an object
My code:
html
head
link href=ext-1.0/resources/css/ext
that some
people in here were (apart from John himself, obviously) part of the strike
team to help with the integration of jQuery and ext.
Thanks in advance.
--
Suni
about this). There just isn't that much documentation.
--
Suni
cosidering jQuery-Ext? Who is primarily responsible for that stuff, is it
Jack, John or should I just post them either here or maybe the dev-list, or
at the Ext-site forums?
--
Suni
, but maybe not wonders. And I know
some stuff is beyond the creators of the library but would rather require
speed optimizations from the browsers etc. And by no means am I saying that
jQuery is doing badly, quite the contrary. The reason I want more is because
its so good :)
--
Suni
58 matches
Mail list logo
