Some advice:
1) If you think this is a bug with 1.4 alpha itself, it's said in the
blog post announcing it's release to use the bug tracking feature to
report bugs
2) If you think it's an issue with BlockUI, specifying this fact in
the title would help catch the attention of the plugin author,
There's a ticket for this. We'll handle it, probably for 1.3.
--
Ariel Flesler
http://flesler.blogspot.com
On Oct 2, 5:20 pm, Matt Kruse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 2, 11:42 am, Dave Methvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://docs.jquery.com/Traversing/is#expr
If no element fits, or the
http://docs.jquery.com/Traversing/is#expr
If no element fits, or the expression is not valid, then the response
will be 'false'. Note: Only simple expressions are supported. Complex
expressions, such as those containing hierarchy selectors (such as +,
~, and ) will always return 'true'. filter
On Oct 2, 11:42 am, Dave Methvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://docs.jquery.com/Traversing/is#expr
If no element fits, or the expression is not valid, then the response
will be 'false'. Note: Only simple expressions are supported. Complex
expressions, such as those containing hierarchy
Is there a reason, internally, why it would always return
true instead of false?
I agree it's not consistent, I'm not sure about why. Then again it's
outside the domain of documented valid inputs. It would probably be
better to just say the result is undefined for those cases so it could
be
It just doesn't make sense to use a child or sibling selector in a
is() function. is() is dealing with a single element, it's a waste of
resources to go back and look if it's inside something when you should
have done that in the selector.
I think returning true for complex selectores is a
hi Giuliano and thanks for holding on :-)
I understand your point but the infos published on the W3C website seem to
mean that border as a shorthand is retrievable:
http://www.w3schools.com/htmldom/prop_style_border.asp
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:58 PM, Giuliano Marcangelo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alexandre,
this page http://www.quirksmode.org/dom/getstyles.html is probably a better
resource for you to test.
two-thirds of the3 way down the page, is an input area where you can try
out...border...border-widthborder-bottom-width etcand to see the
results...
as you will see, from
ok so basically one can only access the value of a border css property by
explicitating which border it needs . I do think that it's counterintuitive
to have shortcuts in css that are not taken into consideration in
javascript, but then, maybe that's a request for javascript 2.0 :)
Just to be clear, w3schools.com is a training site, not to be confused with
the w3c site (http://www.w3.org/).
Even on the w3schools page you reference, it says only The border property
*sets* all border properties in one declaration. (emphasis mine)
The css spec
i know all this Guiliano, and according to what i've googled about
javascript style.border, it can retrieve the value if that value has been
set before, which is the case here.
in any case, if in the css, you 've set #id{ border: 1px solid #FF;}
then it would only make sense that
Dear Alexandre,
if we take #id{ border: 1px solid #FF;} , border is shorthand
(convenience method) for border-top,border-right,border-bottom,border-left /
width - style - color, all in all twelve combinations.if it would
make sense for $('#id').css('border-color'); return
Olaf Bosch schrieb:
bump ;)
I have updated my Demo. To see Context scroll down to english content.
Jetzt einfach mal auf deutsch, vielleicht findet sich jemand der es mal
übersetzt!?
Ich hab das margin der Box entfernt, und siehe da man sieht jetzt
sogar die CANVAS. leider sind die völlig
Hi all,
What i suppossed its right, the script cane not read the CSS correct.
The Script generate the CANVAS, with the Background from the outer
Container (or transparent)
Look at this Screen:
http://olaf-bosch.de/bugs/jquery/corner/screen.jpg
I have in IE 7
canvas{
margin-top:-16px;
}
and
All those divs are necessary for the type of system I'm building.
Can't talk about it yet, but when we release I can explain why.
Solved the problem by using the in between my selectors.
I adore jQuery and love becoming smarter about jQuery every day from
this list. Amazing resource.
ml
That code is a bit hard to read
I would have written the html to be more semantic, instead of using
lots of div tags.
Still, the exact code if that was in css should be
div div div div.dp_properties - so you can see why it reads a bit
confusing.
I like the idea of defining a tag and
I thought the cascading selectors would have chosen the dp_properties
class that is the first child level of the selected div. . .not the
dp_properties class buried two levels down (but appearing first in the
DOM listing).
jQuery selectors work pretty much the same way they do in CSS.
This
it seems that not the text-method is wrong, but how Opera handles 503-
errors (bad request) The other brwosers return the php echo'd
string in the xmlhttp-object as responseText, but Opera not. Sorry ;-)
On 20 Nov., 13:10, dfd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
I have to strip html-tags from a
Can I just say that I've started using Jquery 1.1.3a with Ext and it's
a HUGE improvement. Most bugs are gone and animations are smooth as
silk - thanks to everyone behind this release!
Chris
Chris,
Post some sample code bud! I'm sure we could all benefit from seeing how
you're incorporating Ext.
Rey
cdomigan wrote:
Can I just say that I've started using Jquery 1.1.3a with Ext and it's
a HUGE improvement. Most bugs are gone and animations are smooth as
silk - thanks to everyone
Thanks for the kind words and testing out jQuery 1.1.3a! Hopefully the last
couple of bugs in 1.1.3a will be resolved soon and 1.1.3 will be out the
door.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 6/5/07, cdomigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I just say that I've started using Jquery 1.1.3a with Ext and it's
a
Brandon Aaron wrote:
Events in the latest SVN are now using addEventListener and
attachEvent. On 5/3/07, Dan G. Switzer, II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This has already been reporting and is filed as a bug. This has to
do w/the how events are attached in the current jQuery code. I
believe this
A bit off topic (apologies for hijacking the topic), but I've noticed
that the jQuery version of the page actually has a greater download
requirement than YUI (and only slightly less that Prototype).
jQuery: 177 KB
YUI: 164 KB
Prototype+Scriptaculous: 178 KB
This could be reduced a little if
Sam,
Don't know where you are getting numbers from but
Core JQuery is ONLY 60kb (uncompressed)
Common plugin such as 'form' 31kb (uncompressed)
Even combined size is nowhere 100kb, size drops once you compress js
--Kush
On May 3, 11:08 am, Kush Murod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sam,
Don't know where you are getting numbers from but
Core JQuery is ONLY 60kb (uncompressed)
Common plugin such as 'form' 31kb (uncompressed)
Even combined size is nowhere 100kb, size drops once you compress js
--Kush
The size I
Suni,
The calendar implementation of Ext (See here
http://www.extjs.com/deploy/ext/examples/menu/menus.html, open first menu,
choose date) is not working properly with jQuery, but is with YUI and
Prototype (you can change the active library from top right). Changing the
calendar months from the
Events in the latest SVN are now using addEventListener and attachEvent.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 5/3/07, Dan G. Switzer, II [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suni,
The calendar implementation of Ext (See here
http://www.extjs.com/deploy/ext/examples/menu/menus.html, open first menu,
choose date) is not
27 matches
Mail list logo
