Like it, This is the kind of articles I love reading and learn from.
Good job Nathan, and please keep on publishing articles like this one.
Subscribed it.
On 06/04/11 01:03, nathanJsweet wrote:
I wouldn't normally try to use this mailing list to shamelessly
promote something, but I'm doing
Good article Peter, just read it. Quite clear explanation, it has
actually given me new ideas to apply to my own projects. Good job.
.
On 01/04/11 07:26, Peter Michaux wrote:
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:58 AM, cihat altuntas
cihat.altun...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you tkink about developing
Hi guys,
I sometimes run into this doubt when I have to use someone else classes
or API. Let's see this example:
/* API or Class: */
var SomeOneElseClass = function (args) {/*...*/};
SomeOneElseClass.prototype = {
doSomething : function () {/*...*/},
doSomethingElse : function ()
is a Vehicle Object so Car should extend Vehicle (extending).
But if Car contains a Vehicle (wrapping), what does it mean ?
Your code will be harder to understand if your architecture is
performance-oriented and not logic-oriented...
Regards.
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 13:27, Fran m...@fran.ie
CoffeeScript, and that's it, forget about
browsers running other script language.
Just for the record, I'd really love to have other alternatives to JS
Fran
On 11/02/11 16:19, Chris Heilmann wrote:
On 11/02/2011 15:18, Adrian Olaru wrote:
Right now, JavaScript is the way to go. My opinion
*/
$(MyClass.prototype).bind({
myevent : function (e, params) {
// e.target: MyClass instance
}
});
On 07/02/11 10:45, MRoderick wrote:
Hi Fran
It would be great if you could share your results here.
I am sure that others would benefit from your findings, and opinions
on why you
Looks great MRoderick, light and much quicker than jQuery... I'm doing
some test with it. Thanks
On 04/02/11 10:03, MRoderick wrote:
Hi Fran
shameless-self-promotion
You could go for completely independent PubSub implementatations as
well, I wrote one:
https://github.com/mroderick/PubSubJS
Hi guys,
I know this is more jQuery related question and perhaps it'd be better
to ask in its forum but I'll drop it in case some jQuery experts in this
group could answer it. Is there any reason why I should be using
$(document).bind/trigger over $('body').bind/trigger (or the other
way
global namespaced object
This probably makes more sense to your app than bouncing events off the dom
anyway.
-Original Message-
From: jsmentors@googlegroups.com [mailto:jsmentors@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Fran
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:07 AM
To: jsmentors
I think you're mistaking Javascript issues for browser issues... The
language is not to blame. Let's put it in this way: Javascript is a
powerful language that requires more protection from the browser point
of view. So it's not the language the one that must be killed but the
browser... or
How come I didn't see this option ?, thanks Matthias, this could help me
to track down the error... I'll check it out.
Thanks
On 24/01/11 12:15, Matthias Reuter wrote:
I was wondering, is there any way I can find out about the latest
error even though this one was caught by a try/catch block,
Hi Gary, I tried that, but it doesn't seem to be fired
window.onerror = function (e) {
alert(e);
}
try {
throw 'Testing;
} catch (e) {}
This doesn't seem to work.
Thanks.
On 24/01/11 12:31, Gary Katsevman wrote:
I believe that the window.onerror event is still fired (correct me if
arguments
object. I think everything is up to you, don't think it's really important.
Fran
On 13/01/11 16:37, Arlo wrote:
I am developing a JS API for my employer and I constantly ask myself
how I should accept params into my methods. So I figured I would ask
the professionals.
Here is my
-code language ?, can
anyone who knows about it spare some thoughts ?
Thanks a lot.
Fran
--
To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list:
http://www.mail-archive.com/jsmentors@jsmentors.com/
To search via a non-Google archive, visit here:
http://www.mail-archive.com
14 matches
Mail list logo
