This seems like a grand plan to me.
On 25 March 2015 at 08:12, Andrew Wilkins andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
I'd like to move the replicaset package to github.com/juju/replicaset. For
rationale and preparatory changes, see: http://reviews.vapour.ws/r/1260/
Please debate here. Silence ==
+100, thanks for doing this, Andrew!
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:16 AM, roger peppe roger.pe...@canonical.com
wrote:
This seems like a grand plan to me.
On 25 March 2015 at 08:12, Andrew Wilkins andrew.wilk...@canonical.com
wrote:
I'd like to move the replicaset package to
Ooh, a proper bikeshed!
If this command is still doing the same thing it was when
I first wrote the original hack version, then it's more like
restore-state-servers-and-hope-that-nothing-much-changed-since-we-dumped.
I'm guessing that Eric's issue with restore is that the word implies that
it
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
Hey folks,
I just signed up for a GCE trial, and tested out the provider on master.
Found a couple of issues.
I've filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1436191. I suspect the
same issue would
Reviews from Tuesday, March 24th
nrpe-external-master
Fixes a duplication issue with rsync and increases the amulet test
timeout. +1
https://code.launchpad.net/~paulgear/charms/precise/nrpe-external-master/fix-duplicate-rsync-entries/+merge/250248
Wasn't the original premise that we would experiment with replica set work,
and then the code would end up in upstream mgo?
John
=:-
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
I'd like to move the replicaset package to github.com/juju/replicaset.
For
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:25 PM, Tim Penhey tim.pen...@canonical.com wrote:
I'm seriously not in favour of calling it recover, and not just
because it has a particular meaning in Go.
I'm glad you said so then. :)
Perhaps rebuild or recreate, but recover feels wrong.
Got it. I'm not married
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
Hey folks,
I just signed up for a GCE trial, and tested out the provider on master.
Found a couple of issues.
I've filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1436191. I suspect the
same issue would
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:14 AM, roger peppe roger.pe...@canonical.com wrote:
Ooh, a proper bikeshed!
:)
If this command is still doing the same thing it was when
I first wrote the original hack version, then it's more like
Well, I can provide a few things off the top of my head that should help.
- Canonical is fully committed to Juju as the way we deploy software
internally, the way we deploy Open Stack clouds for our largest clients
- Windows workloads are supported in the current beta version of Juju,
Agreed. Makes a lot of sense to me.
On 26/03/15 00:33, David Cheney wrote:
Do it!
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Nate Finch nate.fi...@canonical.com wrote:
+100, thanks for doing this, Andrew!
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:16 AM, roger peppe roger.pe...@canonical.com
wrote:
This seems
Thanks for your answer! I didn't know Windows and Centos support was coming
so soon, great to know!
The lacking documentation is the biggest issue to me. The charm-helpers
documentation is outdated in a lot of places and that makes it seem as it
isn't being actively maintained anymore. Ofcourse,
Hi
I'm interested in what the future of Juju is. From the small experience
I've had with it, it seems like a product with a lot of potential. It fills
a gap in our project that no other technology can fill. Its biggest
strength is how relations between services are managed. This is something
I'm a core dev on Juju, I can answer some, but not all of these questions.
First off, as far as long term commitment for Juju - Juju is a huge part of
Canonical's long term strategy... right up there with the Ubuntu Phone and
Ubuntu itself. The Juju team has been expanding hugely in the last
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Merlijn Sebrechts
merlijn.sebrec...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for your answer! I didn't know Windows and Centos support was coming
so soon, great to know!
The lacking documentation is the biggest issue to me. The charm-helpers
documentation is outdated in a lot
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:40 PM, John Meinel j...@arbash-meinel.com wrote:
Wasn't the original premise that we would experiment with replica set
work, and then the code would end up in upstream mgo?
I vaguely recall hearing that. Sounds sensible, and something that can
still be done later.
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical
cur...@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
Hey folks,
I just signed up for a GCE trial, and tested out the provider on master.
Found a couple of issues.
I've
nrpe:
This is a rewrite of the trusty nrpe charm, which includes
nrpe-external-master functionality, using the services framework. There
are a few other merge proposals blocked due to the lack of a
nrpe-external-master relation in trusty, so this will be a welcome
addition to the charm
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Eric Snow eric.s...@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilk...@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Curtis Hovey-Canonical
cur...@canonical.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 3:04 AM, Andrew
On 25/03/2015, Rick Harding rick.hard...@canonical.com wrote:
If you're using the github lander make sure the user has made it's org
membership public.
Thanks Rick, that was is. Thought I'd marked the bot's membership of
go-goose at public previously, but had not.
Martin
--
Juju-dev mailing
Do it!
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Nate Finch nate.fi...@canonical.com wrote:
+100, thanks for doing this, Andrew!
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:16 AM, roger peppe roger.pe...@canonical.com
wrote:
This seems like a grand plan to me.
On 25 March 2015 at 08:12, Andrew Wilkins
memcached
This pair of merge requests fixes an issue with the memcached charm and
nrpe-external-master. It’s not a clean solution, pending a rewrite of
the nrpe charm, targeted at trusty, that’s currently going through
review. As this is an important fix, the workaround has now been
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:00 PM, Dimiter Naydenov
dimiter.nayde...@canonical.com wrote:
One thing to bear in mind. It seems the europe-west1-a AZ is
considered deprecated and will be shut down soon (end of this month
I believe).
It will be nice to skip this AZ when trying to place instances.
23 matches
Mail list logo
