Re: [julia-users] Re: Dan Luu's critique of Julia: needs commented code, better testing, error handling, and bugs fixed.

2014-12-31 Thread elextr
On Thursday, January 1, 2015 11:44:53 AM UTC+10, Ismael VC wrote: > > I didn't know that fact about the Linux kernel, or how usual it is, I've > just red the git book and it explains it like this: > > http://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Branching-Branching-Workflows > > > > And just under that dia

Re: [julia-users] Re: Dan Luu's critique of Julia: needs commented code, better testing, error handling, and bugs fixed.

2014-12-31 Thread Ismael VC
I didn't know that fact about the Linux kernel, or how usual it is, I've just red the git book and it explains it like this: http://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Branching-Branching-Workflows On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 7:30 PM, wrote: > > > On Thursday, January 1, 2015 9:55:11 AM UTC+10, Ismael VC

[julia-users] Re: Dan Luu's critique of Julia: needs commented code, better testing, error handling, and bugs fixed.

2014-12-31 Thread elextr
On Thursday, January 1, 2015 9:55:11 AM UTC+10, Ismael VC wrote: > > +1 to addering to the git flow, I had also allways expected for the master > branch to be as stable and possible, while development happening in another > branch, not the other way around and sometimes I've had to search for a

[julia-users] Re: Dan Luu's critique of Julia: needs commented code, better testing, error handling, and bugs fixed.

2014-12-31 Thread Ismael VC
+1 to addering to the git flow, I had also allways expected for the master branch to be as stable and possible, while development happening in another branch, not the other way around and sometimes I've had to search for a past working commit in order to build julia, which strikes me as odd, as