On Friday, May 15, 2015 at 3:14:22 AM UTC-4, Viral Shah wrote:
Hi everyone,
Some more details on NumFocus. When we joined NumFocus, Stefan joined
their board. In addition, 5 people represent the Julia project in the
NumFocus Fiscal Sponsorship Agreement - Tim Holy, Steve Johnson, John
Hi everyone,
Some more details on NumFocus. When we joined NumFocus, Stefan joined their
board. In addition, 5 people represent the Julia project in the NumFocus
Fiscal Sponsorship Agreement - Tim Holy, Steve Johnson, John Myles White,
Jeff, and myself. This will be the group that manages the
Any chance Julia Computing is working with any government agencies? I work
for a federal agency and am making a pitch to make Julia available as an
alternative to SAS and Stata. I've been given permission to use Julia for a
current project with the expectation that I put together a business
Here is a related question: Who will own and operate the julialang.org
domain? Would you be willing to transfer it to NumFocus or a similar
nonprofit, community entity?
On Monday, May 11, 2015 at 10:55:00 AM UTC-7, Brian Granger wrote:
Congrats on Julia Computing stuff! We (IPython/Jupyter)
As much as I would like to do so, I also want to have enough funding for
the Julia foundation (NumFocus) in place before transferring over
community resources.
We look at everything closely so that things don't fall through the cracks.
For someone else to do that, we need an organisational
Currently I own the domain, but transferring it to NumFocus would be fine
if they do that (which I can find out).
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Jim Garrison j...@garrison.cc wrote:
Here is a related question: Who will own and operate the julialang.org
domain? Would you be willing to
Hi Viral and Stefan,
Thanks for the replies.
To be clear, I have no opposition to a third party organization (e.g.
Julia Computing) hosting the web site as an in-kind donation to Julia
(the community project). The GNOME website, for instance, is currently
hosted by Canonical, and it has
Yes, it was clear that you were also a cofounder of Julia Computing, what
was not clear, just from your GitHub info, if you were actively working for
JC, or for MIT, or splitting your time between them.
I do hope there’s enough funding so that you’ll be able to work full time
on the language.
On Sunday, May 10, 2015 at 1:33:58 AM UTC+1, Eric Forgy wrote:
If we pay developers to clean up an existing package, it feels weird to
just give the work we paid for away. Any thoughts on how I should think
about this? I probably just need some education and am open to suggestions.
I think
About Julia Computing, is Stefan also going to be working full time for
Julia Computing? As the second largest contributor (and most vocal!), I
think
that would be critical (and would be greatly reassuring to people betting
on Julia...).
His GitHub shows him living in NYC, but that he's an MIT
Yes, that's correct – I'm also a cofounder of Julia Computing.
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Yichao Yu yyc1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Scott Jones scott.paul.jo...@gmail.com
wrote:
About Julia Computing, is Stefan also going to be working full time for
Julia
Am interested in being part of this venture. Every undertaking must be
motivated as optimally beneficient for the world as a whole, therefore the
following proposal might be acceptable to all:
Will do consulting on implementing Julian AI/physics/math in exchange for
donations to charitable
There's one point from the HN thread (and echoed a few other places) that
I'd like to add some thoughts on.
For all those who're getting worried by this, I don't think there's any
inherent problem. After all, this is exactly what Red Hat has been doing
with Linux for years.
One important
Congrats on Julia Computing stuff! We (IPython/Jupyter) are always thinking
about various approaches to making open source sustainable and it is great
to see explorations like this. I wish you the best of success!!!
I wanted to share some thoughts and questions about trademark as it relates
to
I (and several others who I've spoken with in person) hope you're all able
to appropriately balance time spent towards the consulting work vs time
spent towards developing the core language, since those will inevitably not
overlap as often as everyone would like. The progress that the language
I was able to sell Julia recently for a small 2,5 month consultancy
project at a research institute. The main difficulty in convincing the
client was the uncertain long term support for the language, so I'm very
happy to see this Julia Computing LLC up and running.
I agree with Scott that a
I think this is great. Our startup has similar issues. We want to do
innovative work, but that work needs funding, so we also do some
consulting/training to pay the RD bills. It can be a challenge to find the
right balance though, so beware :)
Given the position of Julia Computing, another
I also read this article this
morning:
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/julia-founders-commercialise-language-create-new-startup/articleshow/47211869.cms
I had been a bit concerned, that after Wednesday, Jeff might have to go
find a job out in the real world, and would
Thanks Scott. That makes a lot of sense.
I will work for Julia Computing full time. I think it's unavoidable
that trying to make a living will take at least some time from working
on julia. Even in academia, there are papers, grants, classes, talks,
and so on that take time away. My current guess is that our best bet
is to have an
Well, I spent many years doing nothing but proprietary development... all
trade secrets, etc. even though the language/database system was based on
an ANSI standard language. Now I'm consulting for a small startup, and we
are also trying to balance open source vs. proprietary development.
So
On Saturday, May 9, 2015 at 1:20:15 PM UTC-7, Viral Shah wrote:
You may have questions. Please shoot them here. We will respond back with
a detailed blog post.
Here's something I've been wondering about: juliacomputing.com mentions
security updates as part of the commercial support package.
22 matches
Mail list logo
