On 13.07.2011 22:04, Michaël Michaud wrote:
Le 13/07/2011 21:26, edgar.sol...@web.de a écrit :
ahh ok, good to know. i do not use ant. while you are at it. how about
switching back to _one_ jar. i can't see a valid reason to separate
workbench, all i see are lots of dependencies between the
Dear Michael
OK, when you are happy that there are no more bugs I will release the
new version (and code)
Geoff
On 14/07/2011 4:11 AM, Michaël Michaud wrote:
Hi, Geoffrey
Thanks a lot for all your efforts,
I'll test your improvements soon and let you know.
Michaël
Dear Michael
Thanks
On 14.07.2011 11:47, Geoffrey Roy wrote:
OK, when you are happy that there are no more bugs I will release the new
version (and code)
do you want to host the code on the sf.net svn? we could create an account for
you.
ede
Hi Geoffrey,
OK, when you are happy that there are no more bugs I will release the
new version (and code)
Thanks, it works fine for me now.
Later, I'll send you a language file for vertex plugin, but this is
another jar, so this is just for information.
Thanks for all,
Regards
Michaël
Hi Geoff,
today I will send you the translation of your plugin in Spanish nad some
corrections for Italian too. Before new realize
Giuseppe
--- Gio 14/7/11, Michaël Michaud michael.mich...@free.fr ha scritto:
Da: Michaël Michaud michael.mich...@free.fr
Oggetto: Re: [JPP-Devel] PrinterPlugIn
Hi,
i see only xml files in trunk that seem to organize the nightly build. where
are the ant build files located?
ant build file is in the etc directory.
I've modified it but I've not yet committed,
I think I will switch the code to 1.4.2alpha today, not make an official
release of a patched
On 14.07.2011 13:03, Michaël Michaud wrote:
Hi,
i see only xml files in trunk that seem to organize the nightly build. where
are the ant build files located?
ant build file is in the etc directory.
I've modified it but I've not yet committed,
ok thanks
I think I will switch the code to
Hi Ede,
I've modified it but I've not yet committed,
Done, but will need more check.
we talked about a new version scheme and maybe now it is the time to do so.
How about three number only
major.minor.patch
major is changed when really big changes occur, e.g. backward compatibility
On 14.07.2011 16:57, Michaël Michaud wrote:
Packaging a windows version is a bit of extra work. I don't use the
installer nor the .exe, even if I'm a windows user, but I think this is
useful for a better adoption of OpenJUMP. I would be pleased to study
multiplatform installers like IzPack
Hei Ed Michael,
yes... windows users are lazy and do what they are used to and that's
what I am actually seeing for myself too: if I have the option for an
exe to install, then I download it. (Though rediscovering the Ubuntu
packaging service: the whole packaging on linux is nice too... even
On 14.07.2011 19:48, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
Hei Ed Michael,
yes... windows users are lazy and do what they are used to and that's
what I am actually seeing for myself too: if I have the option for an
exe to install, then I download it. (Though rediscovering the Ubuntu
packaging
Hi Peppe!
I'm right that you develop a angle measure tool? If so, we should work
together. An angle measurement is one point of my TODO for the
AdvancedMeasureTool. My plan was to integrate a third mode (length, area
and angle) for the measure tool. The result should be displayed in same
12 matches
Mail list logo
