Revision: 5398
http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/5398
Author: ma15569
Date: 2017-03-22 19:54:24 + (Wed, 22 Mar 2017)
Log Message:
---
Add check for exactly one selected geometry
Modified Paths:
--
plug-ins/CADExtension/trunk/src/org/openjump/adva
So that in summary
We could add a line:
public static String
LENGTH=I18N.get("org.openjump.core.ui.plugin.edittoolbox.tab.ConstraintsOptionsPanel.Length")
but since we are not sure that in any of language translation
org.openjump.core.ui.plugin.edittoolbox.tab.ConstraintsOptionsPanel.Length
is e
Hi,
Strings which are used alone like "OK" or "Cancel" in the buttons, or as a
title for messages like in "Error: [something happened]" are rather safe as
general string also in Finnish. However, even "Attribute" probably always
translates well into Finnish as "Ominaisuustieto", there is not al
Revision: 5397
http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/5397
Author: ma15569
Date: 2017-03-22 15:11:41 + (Wed, 22 Mar 2017)
Log Message:
---
* Updated Measure Toolbox plugin to ver. 12
- Measure Area tool on drag mode shows correct area/perimeter/length
of re
ok, read it again.
and yes we could do that, but *no* it is very dirty. we should rather copy the
translation for the few generic translations we will add initially from keys
where english or your own language suggests it is _really_ used generically
contextwise.
..ede
On 22.03.2017 15:22, e
yes, but it is "stupid" because
1. we have to add two entries. the one in the language files and the one in the
interface (btw. that's not what interfaces are meant for)
2. we have two mechanisms then, static variables _and_ i18n. this means we
start to mix I18N.getMessage() calls w/ GenericNam
Using com.vividsolutions.jump.workbench.ui.GenericNames we don't need
even to add new ui.Generics.s to language/jump files.
For instance, "Attributes" string could be a new line into GenericsNames:
public static String
ATTRIBUTES=I18N.get("org.openjump.core.ui.plugin.tools.generate.LinearRefer
found it
com.vividsolutions.jump.workbench.ui.GenericNames
is an Interface and uses the translations ui.GenericNames.* i mentioned
previously to Pepe.
i don't feel we should continue this line of coding. it makes sense for a very
limited amount of fixed strings, like menu names, but not for a
Stefan,
what do you mean by class?
com.vividsolutions.jump.workbench.ui.MenuNames
? deals only with menu names.
..ede
On 22.03.2017 15:23, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> Hi Ede,
>
>
>
> we have a class for generic strings already - since the beginning, i think.
>
>
>
> cheers,
>
> stefan
<<< text/html; charset=utf-8: Unrecognized >>>
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot___
Ju
On 22.03.2017 13:04, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
> I will anyhow give a look to "jump" files to find a possible list of "general
> terminology" string list that can be used for the future - and maybe write a
> page on our wiki
that won't hurt.. we have already some strings under ui.GenericNames.*
ui.
>how about after 1.11? ..ede
Yes, thanks.
I will anyhow give a look to "jump" files to find a possible list of
"general terminology" string list that can be used for the future - and
maybe write a page on our wiki
Peppe
2017-03-22 12:36 GMT+01:00 :
> Peppe,
>
> On 22.03.2017 11:59, Giuseppe Ar
Good point Ede!
I was thinging around since a while
Kosmo allows that buttons on ToolboxPlugIn are enabled/disabled depending
to check conditions.
I still don't know if OpenJUMP can do the same.
In my experience Enablecheck do works ToolboxPlugIn. But buttons are still
enabled even if tool doesn'
ic.. thx ede
On 22.03.2017 11:49, Rahkonen Jukka (MML) wrote:
> One tool makes a parallel copy of the line (keeps the length) while the other
> extents it to the limits of the visible map view. Difference is easier to
> notice with short lines, with polygons (linear rings) it is not so clear to
On 22.03.2017 11:53, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
> Draw aux parallel line draws a parallel segment to a selected geometry
> 1a) In the case of a selected linestring the parallel new linestrig length is
> extended to the view
> 2a) In the case of a selected polygon are proportionally longer except first
Peppe,
On 22.03.2017 11:59, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
> Hi Ede,
> I like the new org.openjump.advancedtools.language.I18NPlug
glad you like it. after all we have a working I18N implementation already. no
need for duplicated code.
> I will try to use on all my other plugin.
yeah, a thin wrapper rea
Hi Ede
Draw parallel tool draws a parallel segment to a selected geometry
1) In the case of a selected linestring, the parallel new linestrig
preserve the length of the original
2) In the case of a selected polygon, the parallel linestrings are
proportionally longer except first and last segmen
Hi Ede,
I like the new org.openjump.advancedtools.language.I18NPlug
I will try to use on all my other plugin.
Right a question.
Is it possible to implement the code in the way that it is
related to both plugin and main OJ language files?
For instance (CAD tools) , it checks a language string in
I can add a check to limit draw parallel lines to linestring
Jukka, Ede and Michael, what is your opinion?
2017-03-22 11:51 GMT+01:00 Giuseppe Aruta :
> Hi Ede
>
> Draw parallel tool draws a parallel segment to a selected geometry
> 1) In the case of a selected linestring the parallel new linestr
Hi Ede
Draw parallel tool draws a parallel segment to a selected geometry
1) In the case of a selected linestring the parallel new linestrig preserve
the length of the original
2) In the case of a selected polygon are proportionally longer except
first and last segment of the linestring wher thei
One tool makes a parallel copy of the line (keeps the length) while the other
extents it to the limits of the visible map view. Difference is easier to
notice with short lines, with polygons (linear rings) it is not so clear to see
what happens.
-Jukka-
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä:
hey All,
can someone tell me the difference? they seem to work identically.
..ede
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
___
On 21.03.2017 21:42, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You're right, there are many duplicates (and I must admit I recognize several
> plugins of mine).
>
> Removing all duplicates would be a very big effort.
bad idea. we've got enough on our plates as it is.
> But as a first step, we could ad
On 21.03.2017 20:26, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
> Sorry Ede.
no biggie
> Looking for "source" string, I just noted that in OJ language files we have
> some strings which look like duplicates:
> for instance:
> org.openjump.core.ui.plugin.tools.JoinAttributesSpatiallyPlugIn.source-layer
> org.openjum
24 matches
Mail list logo
