Hi,
my 2 cents:
I am not sure why you want to focus on another 1.5.1 version soon. Its
nice to have more releases but buggy releases aren't helpful either
(though I understand that 1.5.1 is supposed to be more stable).
Of course I don't know why we get good download rates, but having stable
b
On 08.01.2012 18:04, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi,
>> don't worry about the plus release i'd say. let me add the maven profiles
>> for releases and generate CORE/PLUS together then.
> OK,
>> currently the files descriptor
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/jump-pilot/files/OpenJUMP/osgeo/osgeo-5.5
Hi,
> don't worry about the plus release i'd say. let me add the maven profiles for
> releases and generate CORE/PLUS together then.
OK,
> currently the files descriptor
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/jump-pilot/files/OpenJUMP/osgeo/osgeo-5.5.files
>
> points to 2597 snapshot which contains
On 08.01.2012 16:57, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
> all things come to pass when their due ;)
"they're" of course damn second language disability ... ede
--
Ridiculously easy VDI. With Citrix VDI-in-a-Box, you don't need a
On 08.01.2012 16:20, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> That's good to see so much activity around OpenJUMP release ;o)
> There has been a small lack of coordination, partly because
> I did not want to miss the osgeo-live-dvd distribution opportunity
> but did not know exactly what the constraints w
Hi,
That's good to see so much activity around OpenJUMP release ;o)
There has been a small lack of coordination, partly because
I did not want to miss the osgeo-live-dvd distribution opportunity
but did not know exactly what the constraints were.
Now we have version 1.5.0 released (based on svn 2
ok.
I just tagged 1.4.2 (based on revision 2388) and 1.5. Though, for 1.5 I
took the last revision 2597 as I didn't know from where the version was
taken (but well.. if there is a problem we can just delete the tag and
create a new one).
gonna have a look at OJs live-dvd documentation next.
st
On 07.01.2012 22:37, Benjamin Gudehus wrote:
> windows7 32bit, java 6, maven 3.0.2
> openjump svn-2594
>
> C:\>mvn package -P core
>
> ...
> [INFO] --- maven-replacer-plugin:1.3.9:replace (default) @ OpenJUMP ---
> [ERROR] Illegal group reference
> [INFO] Replacement run on 0 file.
> [INFO]
> --
windows7 32bit, java 6, maven 3.0.2
openjump svn-2594
C:\>mvn package -P core
...
[INFO] --- maven-replacer-plugin:1.3.9:replace (default) @ OpenJUMP ---
[ERROR] Illegal group reference
[INFO] Replacement run on 0 file.
[INFO]
--
on my windows7 64bit apache-maven-2.0.11, apache-maven-3.0.3 builds are just
fine .. ede
On 07.01.2012 17:39, Benjamin Gudehus wrote:
> The maven build of trunk a few week ago didn't work for me.
>
> I've tried mvn package -P core or something. Need to update to
> a new version and try it again.
On 07.01.2012 19:19, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
>
- ede, do you know how to setup the svn to create a
a 1.5.0 tag and a 1.5.0 branch
(trunk woul become the 1.6 branch ?)
>
> I don't understand this - I did in the past a tag right after the
> release (i.e. before any changes
>>> - ede, do you know how to setup the svn to create a
>>> a 1.5.0 tag and a 1.5.0 branch
>>> (trunk woul become the 1.6 branch ?)
I don't understand this - I did in the past a tag right after the
release (i.e. before any changes for the next version). I did this in
eclipse with subc
Hi
> my priorities are now - osgeo-livedvd updates
> what do you mean by these?
Update of installation script (done), icon (done) and documentation (to
be done)
>
>> - source distribution
>> - plus distribution
>> - exe installer
> i have the feeling that changing everything in trunk for 1.5 and t
The maven build of trunk a few week ago didn't work for me.
I've tried mvn package -P core or something. Need to update to
a new version and try it again.
--Benjamin
2012/1/7
> On 07.01.2012 15:58, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I released 1.5.0 on the main site (only core distribution
On 07.01.2012 15:58, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I released 1.5.0 on the main site (only core distribution)
>
> my priorities are now
> - osgeo-livedvd updates
what do you mean by these?
> - source distribution
> - plus distribution
> - exe installer
i have the feeling that changing every
Hi,
I released 1.5.0 on the main site (only core distribution)
my priorities are now
- osgeo-livedvd updates
- source distribution
- plus distribution
- exe installer
would be happy if you could test, test and test again... (mainly
linux/windows that I did not test at all)
- ede, do you know ho
16 matches
Mail list logo
