Hello Evgeniy,
I made some test before with this ethertype and it works. The Extreme x450 use
both of them 0x8100 for VLAN and 0x88a8 for VMAN so if i do that the VMAN will
become a VLAN.
I see that by default the Juniper router M10 use ethertype 0x8100, but when I
try to use ethertype
I run successfully the following configuration:
evge...@mx480 show configuration interfaces xe-4/1/0
description === Summit X650 test ===;
flexible-vlan-tagging;
encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
unit 100 {
description === Summit X650 test ===;
vlan-tags outer 4092 inner 100;
Thanks Evgeniy,
I will try this configuration.
If I chance the ethertype of the VMAN, this will chance the etherype of all my
VMAN's and the other's Summit won't reach this one. IMHO
Best regards.
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:34:11 +0300
From: evge...@ip.datagroup.ua
To:
Also works fine:
{master}[edit interfaces xe-4/1/0]
evge...@mx480# show
description === Summit X650 test ===;
flexible-vlan-tagging;
encapsulation flexible-ethernet-services;
gigether-options {
ethernet-switch-profile {
tag-protocol-id 0x88a8;
}
}
unit 100 {
description ===
Thanks Evgeniy,
Maybe there is something I am doing wrong.
Best regards.
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:47:16 +0300
From: evge...@ip.datagroup.ua
To: onamru...@hotmail.com
CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re[2]: [j-nsp] Logical Interfaces 802.1ad
Also works fine:
{master}[edit
Hello Onam,
try to change ethertype from Summit side:
configure vman ethertype 0x8100
best regards,
--
Evgeniy Aikashev
network engineer
JSC DATAGROUP
Monday, October 19, 2009, 3:30:51 AM, Onam wrote:
Hi experts,
I want to make logical interfaces on a physical interface ge-0/2/0 of a
Dear All,
I'm configuring Juniper RPM and it works. But i have problem to implement RPM
for Logical Router. I've an alternative solution by creating VRF in the main
router and put one interface in the logical router as the member. But i don't
like it. And Google doesn't help me this time ;)
Hi,
I am facing L2VPN Martini tunnel issue. In my environment Martini tunnel
shows UP but CEs are not able to communicate end-to-end. I have configured
all PE and P router on logical routers and CE are configured on physical
routers. Following is connectivity
CE1 == PE1 == P == PE2 == CE2
Hi all,
does Juniper support an FPC and E - FPC at the same time within a M20?.
Attached the ouput of show chassis fpc detail command and note that
versions of I/O Manager ASIC information are different.
Slot 0 information:
State Online
Logical slot 0
Temperature 26 degrees C / 78 degrees
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, iber-x wrote:
does Juniper support an FPC and E - FPC at the same time within a M20?.
Attached the ouput of show chassis fpc detail command and note that versions
of I/O Manager ASIC information are different.
Yes, it works at least for us, but please note that the old
Hello,
yes thats perfectly possible.
But take care, beginning with JunOS 9.2 (iirc) the old FPC is no longer
supported AND will not work, only E-FPC will work.
Regards,
Jonas
On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 13:02, iber-x wrote:
Hi all,
does Juniper support an FPC and E - FPC at the same time within
Harry Reynolds wrote:
For draft rosen I would suggest gre rather than mpls p-2-mp. Not sure
that latter is even supported.
There are a few other interop notes, but depends on if you plan
rosen6 or rosen7.
In either case, you need to have a lo0.x with the same ip as the main
instance lo0 in
Experts,
I was wondering if anyone had any good or bad experiences with the EX8200
platform. Specifically how well it works as a core/ agg box running BGP / OSPF
. This box would aggregate all customer L2 switches with .1q trunks to it. It
would route all customer Vlans and act as the
Pekka Savola escribió:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, iber-x wrote:
does Juniper support an FPC and E - FPC at the same time within a
M20?. Attached the ouput of show chassis fpc detail command and note
that versions of I/O Manager ASIC information are different.
Yes, it works at least for us, but
Correct, assuming that ios version supports bgp based inet-mdt.
In the new mode when there are no RTs attached the p-group is used to import
inet-mdt into the correct vrf, ala cisco. This means all PEs should uses the
same p-group for a given mvpn, a restriction that JUNOS had avoided.
Also,
Hello Experts,
In the diagram topology I am working with the VMAN tag 50. I made some test
with a CISCO router and it works.
I check the jumbo-frame at the summit side and is enable to all ports.
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:47:16 +0300
From: evge...@ip.datagroup.ua
To: onamru...@hotmail.com
col111-w11e30f71c3646030a1b690a1...@phx.gbl
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 192.168.38.60/30
---
|=A0=A0=A0=A0 |
Can anyone confirm if MPLS-CCC on a EX-4200s is compatable with EoMPLS (or
similar) on a Cisco 7600/RSP720? I can find references in the archives to
the M40s working but I know the features are quite limited on the EX
switches Just looking for port to port so nothing too complicated.
Thanks
Hello all.
Some of you may have hit this bug - for those that haven't,
here it is:
JUNOS 9.3R2.8 is affected by a severe bug that locks up
the PFE when a policer configured with the 'logical-
interface-policer' feature is applied to a logical unit.
We discovered it because we were trying to
19 matches
Mail list logo
