Hi,
I see you're running DPC cards, have you considered shifting those
links onto an MPC/Trio Card? (newer chip, more RAM, more horsepower,
yadda yadda yadda =)..) DPC was EOL a while ago, and everything has
been Trio (and now Trio-NG on the new -NG cards coming out now). As
the FIB is pushed
Hi,
The size of the firewall configuration could be concern if you use the box
for subscriber management and have tons of dynamic interface with filters
attached. Otherwise you should be safe to use that knob.
At the moment you have 11.5MB in segment 1, when you enable that know it
will go down
On 22/Jul/15 17:01, Bill Blackford wrote:
I'm referencing my experience from a few years back. Thank you for the
clarification.
Nonetheless, I'd suggest looking into possible software limitations in
current code in mixed environments. The last thing you need is a feature
not working or
On 22/Jul/15 17:30, Jeff Meyers wrote:
yes, we did (at least since yesterday) although we are not really
requiring more ports or bandwidth right now. If I understand that
correctly, I need to upgrade to SCB2 as well?
Hehehehe, where have I heard that before :-)?
IPv4 BGP table havin' us
I'm referencing my experience from a few years back. Thank you for the
clarification.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 22, 2015, at 07:51, Damien DeVille damien.devi...@gmail.com wrote:
You absolutely can mix MPCs and DPCs in the same chassis. When the MPCs
first came out there were
Hi,
thanks for the hint, didn't know about that option. This will certainly
safe us if we are running in to limits. We don't have too many filters,
mostly the basic stuff to protect the RE and a few filters on some vlans
with basic white- and/or blacklisting. So really nothing fance although
On 22/Jul/15 02:59, Chris Kawchuk wrote:
I know that a ton of fixes on BGP convergence time son MX80 is definitely a
reason to be 'moving up'... however as you're on RE-2000s on MX480 may not be
applicable.
I see you're running DPC cards, have you considered shifting those links onto
an
Hi,
The 'route' option on 'memory-enhanced' will give you some time before
upgrade to MPC. Actually you should be okay for quite a long time
considering the size of the table you have at the moment.
https://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos11.4/topics/task/configuration/
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Jerry Jonesmailto:jjo...@danrj.com
Sent: 7/22/2015 8:38 AM
To: Colton Conormailto:colton.co...@gmail.com
Cc: Juniper Listmailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] MX480 Build
The RE-2000 and SCB have been
We would be getting redundant (2) RE-2000's with redundant (2) standard
SCB's.
The configuration would be full BGP tables with 4 providers on 10G ports.
The MS-DCP is a requirement for JFLOW on these older cards right? We would
also use the MS-DCP for IPSec tunnels to Cisco ASAs. Any issues with
I am considering buying a used MX480. It will have the following:
1x MX480-PREMIUM-AC - MX480 Base system with redundant RE-2000, SCB, and AC
power
2x DPCE-R-4XGE-XFP - 4x10GE Enhanced DPC for MX, requires optics sold
separately
1 x Juniper MS-DPC - IP services line card for MX Series
On 22/Jul/15 15:24, Colton Conor wrote:
Besides the chassis size and power consumption anything we should know or
consider deciding between a MX 240, MX480, and MX960? It seems the MX240 is
too small for our needs, so its really the MX480 vs MX960.
You take a bigger on the MX960 with a
On 22/Jul/15 15:24, Colton Conor wrote:
Besides the chassis size and power consumption anything we should know or
consider deciding between a MX 240, MX480, and MX960? It seems the MX240 is
too small for our needs, so its really the MX480 vs MX960.
You take a bigger hit on the MX960 with
The RE-2000 and SCB have been announced EOL for next year.
On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote:
I am considering buying a used MX480. It will have the following:
1x MX480-PREMIUM-AC - MX480 Base system with redundant RE-2000, SCB, and AC
power
2x
You didn't specify which REs you'd get with it. Make sure you are getting a
pair. (Even though the 960 uses three SCBs, you can only use two REs in
that chassis as well.)
The R blades are pretty solid, but you didn't specify any sort of config
requirements.
What will you be using the MSDPC for?
Eventhough the RE-2000 is going into EOL status, it is still faster and has
more memory than the RE's in the MX80 or MX104 right?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Jerry Jones jjo...@danrj.com wrote:
The RE-2000 and SCB have been announced EOL for next year.
On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:24 AM, Colton
Le 22/07/15 15:51, Colton Conor a écrit :
We would be getting redundant (2) RE-2000's with redundant (2) standard
SCB's.
The configuration would be full BGP tables with 4 providers on 10G ports.
The MS-DCP is a requirement for JFLOW on these older cards right? We would
also use the MS-DCP
Hello,
I try to config my SRX650.
I defined my interfaces and zones (TRUST, UNTRUST and DMZ).
I can ping all interfaces of the SRX650 (public @ DMZ, 10.1.5.2 INTERCO, and
public @ UNTRUST)
I can ping outside hosts as 8.8.8.8 for example.
I can ping my INTERCO interface 10.1.5.1
But I
On 23/07/2015, at 1:30 AM, Jeff Meyers jeff.mey...@gmx.net wrote:
yes, we did (at least since yesterday) although we are not really requiring
more ports or bandwidth right now. If I understand that correctly, I need to
upgrade to SCB2 as well?
nope -- no need to go to MPC+SCB2 combo.
You absolutely can mix MPCs and DPCs in the same chassis. When the MPCs
first came out there were compatibility issues, but with modern Junos
versions (11.4 and on) those are history.
- Damien
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Bill Blackford bblackf...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree that this is a
Are you sure you can not mix and match DPC with MPC? I know it was not
recommended back in the day, but from what I have read its fine now. But I
have not seen either of these stated in an official Juniper document. Can
you mix and match or not?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 9:32 AM, Bill Blackford
correct.
On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:53 AM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Eventhough the RE-2000 is going into EOL status, it is still faster and has
more memory than the RE's in the MX80 or MX104 right?
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Jerry Jones jjo...@danrj.com wrote:
The RE-2000
On 22/Jul/15 16:04, Jerry Jones wrote:
MPX support inline flow on Trio. Not as flexible but possible.
You mean MPC?
But the OP is getting DPC's, so he is either relegated to RE-based NDE,
or offload that to the MS-DPC.
Mark.
___
juniper-nsp mailing
I agree that this is a good build for what you've stated. I would definitely
recommend an MS-DPC for off-loading any sampling or crypto.
You mention higher density with the use of MICs in the future. This would
require taking the plunge to MPC and a replacement of your DPCs (you cannot mix
MPX support inline flow on Trio. Not as flexible but possible.
On Jul 22, 2015, at 8:51 AM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote:
We would be getting redundant (2) RE-2000's with redundant (2) standard
SCB's.
The configuration would be full BGP tables with 4 providers on 10G ports.
The
25 matches
Mail list logo
