Re: [j-nsp] VRRP for IPv6

2022-01-25 Thread Thomas Bellman via juniper-nsp
On 2022-01-25 22:53, Chris Adams via juniper-nsp wrote: > I wasn't planning to use a virtual link-local address, so I didn't put > one. The JUNOS VRRP for v6 example doesn't include one, although then > the JUNOS documentation for virtual-link-local-address is oddly > confusing: For IPv6, the

Re: [j-nsp] VRRP for IPv6

2022-01-25 Thread Chris Adams via juniper-nsp
Once upon a time, Chris Adams said: > I'm trying to add VRRP for IPv6 to a pair of MX150s (that are already > running VRRP for IPv4). I've switched from VRRPv2 to VRRPv3, and the v4 > VRRP switched over, but both routers think they are master for the v6 > side. Looking at "show vrrp interface"

Re: [j-nsp] VRRP for IPv6

2022-01-25 Thread Chris Adams via juniper-nsp
I wasn't planning to use a virtual link-local address, so I didn't put one. The JUNOS VRRP for v6 example doesn't include one, although then the JUNOS documentation for virtual-link-local-address is oddly confusing:

Re: [j-nsp] VRRP for IPv6

2022-01-25 Thread Chris Adams via juniper-nsp
I do have a loopback filter on input, but it should be clear (and took it off just to double-check - no change). Even if it had been that, it wouldn't have prevented the outbound packets that I'm not seeing. Once upon a time, Rolf Hanßen via juniper-nsp said: > Hello Chris, > > do you have a

Re: [j-nsp] VRRP for IPv6

2022-01-25 Thread Chris Woodfield via juniper-nsp
Echoing Rolf’s comment. The lack of a permit statement in a loopback filter is often the most common “bug” people find in routing protocol configurations. -C > On Jan 25, 2022, at 12:41 PM, Rolf Hanßen via juniper-nsp > wrote: > > Hello Chris, > > do you have a loopback filter applied that

Re: [j-nsp] VRRP for IPv6

2022-01-25 Thread Jonas Frey via juniper-nsp
Looks like you are missing "virtual-link-local-address". -Jonas Am 2022-01-25 20:51, schrieb Chris Adams via juniper-nsp: I'm trying to add VRRP for IPv6 to a pair of MX150s (that are already running VRRP for IPv4). I've switched from VRRPv2 to VRRPv3, and the v4 VRRP switched over, but

Re: [j-nsp] VRRP for IPv6

2022-01-25 Thread Rolf Hanßen via juniper-nsp
Hello Chris, do you have a loopback filter applied that could drop the packets? kind regards Rolf On 25/01/2022 20:51, Chris Adams via juniper-nsp wrote: I'm trying to add VRRP for IPv6 to a pair of MX150s (that are already running VRRP for IPv4). I've switched from VRRPv2 to VRRPv3, and the

[j-nsp] VRRP for IPv6

2022-01-25 Thread Chris Adams via juniper-nsp
I'm trying to add VRRP for IPv6 to a pair of MX150s (that are already running VRRP for IPv4). I've switched from VRRPv2 to VRRPv3, and the v4 VRRP switched over, but both routers think they are master for the v6 side. Looking at "show vrrp interface" on each router, the "Advertisement sent"