Re: [j-nsp] Channelised STM-1, into 3 x DS3's.

2010-10-07 Thread Benny Sumitro
Yes it is supported as it is documented in: http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/general/pic-m10i-chan-0c3-stm1-iqe.html http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/general/pic-m10i-chan-0c3-stm1-iqe.htmlBut never

Re: [j-nsp] Class-Of-Service question

2010-09-16 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi Bill, Is your ge-0/0/0.0 is a family inet or family inet6? Benny ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] forwarding-class without scheduler

2010-07-21 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi, Are you doing it on J series or M series? J series platform will discard any unclassified queue (at least, that is what i experienced when i still have j series with junos 8.x installed) while M series will still forward those traffic but without any guarantee of traffic (no transmit rate).

Re: [j-nsp] Hidden iBGP Route if OSPF no-summaries is configured

2010-05-10 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi, If you are using no-summaries command, you basically denied all summary LSA from other regions. Since you need to resolve next-hop reachability in the BGP routes (advertising router), you need to have advertising router reachable from your router. From above output, route 10.200.0.0/16 is

Re: [j-nsp] Link aggregation and RSVP

2010-05-06 Thread Benny Sumitro
Please be aware that if you are using multiple parallel links, in some corner cases, you will create a RSVP error loop messages as seen in our network and documented in PR 485509. Fortunately, there is already a enhancement for this problem in junos 8.5S6. I would suggest using link aggregation

Re: [j-nsp] static load-balancing route in a routing-instance

2010-04-07 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi, Even you are in forwarding instance configuration, you still need set routing-options forwarding-table export load-balance-policy configuration in the global.. Cheers, Benny On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Jens Brenner jjbren...@googlemail.comwrote: Hello, I'm trying to build a

Re: [j-nsp] How to load balance across multiple EBGP exit points when LDP is enabled ?

2010-04-07 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi, Have u try multipath in the BGP configuration? It will ignore point no. 9 (router ID) and 10 (peer ID) in BGP route selection. Assuming both routes have some preference and load balancing is configured in your environment, you will see route with both next-hop (router D and E) installed.

Re: [j-nsp] class-of-service configuration on GE PIC

2009-10-23 Thread Benny Sumitro
What is the error? Could you paste it? I have an aggregate ethernet running and using CoS just fine. Regards, Benny On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Brahim Sagou brahim.sa...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, I am trying to configure aggregate interface (an aggregate of 2 GE interfaces) under

Re: [j-nsp] Load balacing issue - M7i

2009-09-23 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi Tim, You could do load balancing using M7i, but only works on label-1 or label-1+label-2 mpls. So you must get those labels to be different. I have already had this kind of setup in my M10i box with standard CFEB, it should apply the same with M7i. BR, Benny On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:40 PM,

Re: [j-nsp] GRE tunnel interoperability Juniper-Cisco

2009-09-15 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi All, Thanks for the feedback. I want to make sure that there is no configuration problem or interop issue between them. Best regards, Benny On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Georgios Vlachos g.vlac...@kestrel-is.grwrote: Works fine also between SSG series and Cisco enterprise routers...

[j-nsp] GRE tunnel interoperability Juniper-Cisco

2009-09-14 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi List, Has anyone had experience in configuring GRE tunnel between Juniper and Cisco devices? Is there any incompatibility or interoperability problem between them? Thanks, Benny ___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF route is not propagating in VRF

2009-08-20 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi Mustafa, Has you already try domain-vpn-tag 0 in the protocol ospf stanza in the routing-instance? But beware though, you may experience a routing loop if you are not careful. BR, Benny On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Mustafa Golam - mustafa.go...@gmail.comwrote: Hi List, We are

[j-nsp] TCP only drop profiles on M120

2009-06-12 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi list, Does M120 support tcp only for configuring RED profile? I tried to insert tcp protocol but no luck... l...@lab# commit check [edit class-of-service schedulers sch_be_GSM_backbone drop-profile-map loss-priority high protocol tcp protocol] 'protocol tcp' protocol based

Re: [j-nsp] L2VPN interface configuration

2008-12-17 Thread Benny Sumitro
Try extended-vlan-ccc encapsulation for ccc interface that uses 802.1Q tag. On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:37 AM, snort bsd snort...@yahoo.com.au wrote: Hi, all: I am trying to configure an interface with L2VPN and kept getting error: interfaces { fe-0/0/1 { vlan-tagging;

Re: [j-nsp] Policy routing

2008-11-10 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hello, what you are looking is filter-based forwarding which is explained in the techpubs. http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos91/swconfig-policy/configuring-filter-based-forwarding.html#id-10876979 Regards, Benny On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Bit Gossip [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [j-nsp] export policy Junos 9.0

2008-10-23 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi, I once experienced this case too and already open a case with JTAC with no satisfying answer. One thing that a workaround is by creating the export policy not in the peer hierarchy but in the group hierarchy. If you have multiple peer in the group statement and need to have different policy

Re: [j-nsp] FPC high CPU and Interrupts

2008-05-01 Thread Benny Sumitro
or you could use show system processes extensive, it is the same as top in shell minus real time monitoring of the process of course. ~Benny On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Boyd, Benjamin R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've seen it a few times, a process like BGP or sshd will get hung. Have you

Re: [j-nsp] [JUNOS] Equivalent of a shutdown

2008-03-06 Thread Benny Sumitro
I think Juniper has no equivalent command for shut down like in Cisco but I do know that if disable the port the router will not be able to send traffic to that interface and will ignore all command related to that interface although, the remote peer will still see the port up. On Wed, Mar 5,

[j-nsp] Sampling on fxp0

2008-01-28 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi list, One quick question about traffic sampling on JNCIE pg 331. The book states that the requirement is to put a sampling filter on all r5's interfaces which are transit interfaces and fxp or OOB interface but in the next paragraph it states that samping does not fuction for traffic flowing

Re: [j-nsp] STM-4 and Gig LACP Connectivity between Juniper and Ciscogear

2007-11-16 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi, Can you bundle STM-1 using MLPPP? AFAIK bundling STM-4 can only be done by using aggregated sonet and is prop to Juniper. If you succeeded, could you paste the config and share it with me? Thanks, Benny ___ juniper-nsp mailing list

Re: [j-nsp] L2 VPNs configuration

2007-11-11 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi Eugeniu, I think you missed remote side identifier to connect this site to which end site it is connected. L2VPN is point to point so you must define the remote end id. Try this on routing instance in pe2: protocols { l2vpn { encapsulation-type ethernet; site to-pe1 {

Re: [j-nsp] Load Balance b/w two or more LSPs

2007-09-26 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi FJ, The least fill command is for tie breaking in creating a LSP in case of there are more than one link that are eligible for LSP creation. It is not for load balancing of the LSP traffic itself. Regards, Benny On 9/26/07, Farhan Jaffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks All, I have

[j-nsp] XFP and XENPAK

2007-09-13 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi List, Is there any differences between 10GE interface using XFP and XENPAK in Juniper? TIA! Best regards, Benny - Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links. ___

[j-nsp] 2 fixed port M7i aggregated ethernet capability

2007-07-11 Thread Benny Sumitro
Dear List, Does 2 Fixed Ethernet port on M7i box support aggregated ethernet? I'm just curious is it reliable to deploy it if we want to run MPLS IP VPN on them. Thanks, Benny - Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.

Re: [j-nsp] J-Series Hot Swap capability

2007-05-24 Thread Benny Sumitro
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benny Sumitro Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:56 AM To: juniper milist Subject: [j-nsp] J-Series Hot Swap capability Hi list, Is J Series support operational insertion and removal (OIR) of the interface like M series router? Thanks, Benny

[j-nsp] J-Series Hot Swap capability

2007-05-23 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi list, Is J Series support operational insertion and removal (OIR) of the interface like M series router? Thanks, Benny - Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links.

Re: [j-nsp] Vpls-ldp signaling

2007-03-01 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi All, Starting from Junos 7.6, Juniper support LDP based signaling for VPLS (per draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-05). Cheers, Benny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:You can read JNCIS book from Sybex on page 650 as below : Within the JUNOS software, two main varieties of these VPNs exist. To help

Re: [j-nsp] Vpls-ldp signaling

2007-03-01 Thread Benny Sumitro
JUNOS releases do NOT support LDP based signaling for VPLS. Regards, Steven -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benny Sumitro Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 4:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net

Re: [j-nsp] Certified number

2007-01-18 Thread Benny Sumitro
Hi Sabri, Thanks for the info. Cheers, Benny Sabri Berisha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:04:05PM -0800, Benny Sumitro wrote: Hi Benny, Sorry for this non-technical issue and rather a stupid question. I just recently passed my JNCIS-M exam. Can I know my JNCIS number