Yes it is supported as it is documented in:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/general/pic-m10i-chan-0c3-stm1-iqe.html
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/release-independent/junos/topics/reference/general/pic-m10i-chan-0c3-stm1-iqe.htmlBut
never
Hi Bill,
Is your ge-0/0/0.0 is a family inet or family inet6?
Benny
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
Hi,
Are you doing it on J series or M series? J series platform will discard any
unclassified queue (at least, that is what i experienced when i still have j
series with junos 8.x installed) while M series will still forward those
traffic but without any guarantee of traffic (no transmit rate).
Hi,
If you are using no-summaries command, you basically denied all summary LSA
from other regions. Since you need to resolve next-hop reachability in the
BGP routes (advertising router), you need to have advertising router
reachable from your router.
From above output, route 10.200.0.0/16 is
Please be aware that if you are using multiple parallel links, in some
corner cases, you will create a RSVP error loop messages as seen in our
network and documented in PR 485509. Fortunately, there is already a
enhancement for this problem in junos 8.5S6.
I would suggest using link aggregation
Hi,
Even you are in forwarding instance configuration, you still need set
routing-options forwarding-table export load-balance-policy configuration in
the global..
Cheers,
Benny
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Jens Brenner jjbren...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to build a
Hi,
Have u try multipath in the BGP configuration? It will ignore point no. 9
(router ID) and 10 (peer ID) in BGP route selection. Assuming both routes
have some preference and load balancing is configured in your environment,
you will see route with both next-hop (router D and E) installed.
What is the error? Could you paste it? I have an aggregate ethernet running
and using CoS just fine.
Regards,
Benny
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:47 AM, Brahim Sagou brahim.sa...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to configure aggregate interface (an aggregate of 2 GE
interfaces) under
Hi Tim,
You could do load balancing using M7i, but only works on label-1 or
label-1+label-2 mpls. So you must get those labels to be different. I have
already had this kind of setup in my M10i box with standard CFEB, it should
apply the same with M7i.
BR,
Benny
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:40 PM,
Hi All,
Thanks for the feedback. I want to make sure that there is no configuration
problem or interop issue between them.
Best regards,
Benny
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Georgios Vlachos
g.vlac...@kestrel-is.grwrote:
Works fine also between SSG series and Cisco enterprise routers...
Hi List,
Has anyone had experience in configuring GRE tunnel between Juniper and
Cisco devices?
Is there any incompatibility or interoperability problem between them?
Thanks,
Benny
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi Mustafa,
Has you already try domain-vpn-tag 0 in the protocol ospf stanza in the
routing-instance?
But beware though, you may experience a routing loop if you are not careful.
BR,
Benny
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Mustafa Golam - mustafa.go...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi List,
We are
Hi list,
Does M120 support tcp only for configuring RED profile? I tried to insert
tcp protocol but no luck...
l...@lab# commit check
[edit class-of-service schedulers sch_be_GSM_backbone drop-profile-map
loss-priority high protocol tcp protocol]
'protocol tcp'
protocol based
Try extended-vlan-ccc encapsulation for ccc interface that uses 802.1Q tag.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:37 AM, snort bsd snort...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
Hi, all:
I am trying to configure an interface with L2VPN and kept getting error:
interfaces {
fe-0/0/1 {
vlan-tagging;
Hello,
what you are looking is filter-based forwarding which is explained in the
techpubs.
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos91/swconfig-policy/configuring-filter-based-forwarding.html#id-10876979
Regards,
Benny
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Bit Gossip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I once experienced this case too and already open a case with JTAC with no
satisfying answer. One thing that a workaround is by creating the export
policy not in the peer hierarchy but in the group hierarchy. If you have
multiple peer in the group statement and need to have different policy
or you could use show system processes extensive, it is the same as top in
shell minus real time monitoring of the process of course.
~Benny
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:40 AM, Boyd, Benjamin R
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've seen it a few times, a process like BGP or sshd will get hung.
Have you
I think Juniper has no equivalent command for shut down like in Cisco but
I do know that if disable the port the router will not be able to send
traffic to that interface and will ignore all command related to that
interface although, the remote peer will still see the port up.
On Wed, Mar 5,
Hi list,
One quick question about traffic sampling on JNCIE pg 331.
The book states that the requirement is to put a sampling filter on all r5's
interfaces which are transit interfaces and fxp or OOB interface but in the
next paragraph it states that samping does not fuction for traffic flowing
Hi,
Can you bundle STM-1 using MLPPP? AFAIK bundling STM-4 can only be
done by using aggregated sonet and is prop to Juniper.
If you succeeded, could you paste the config and share it with me?
Thanks,
Benny
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
Hi Eugeniu,
I think you missed remote side identifier to connect this site to
which end site it is connected. L2VPN is point to point so you must
define the remote end id.
Try this on routing instance in pe2:
protocols {
l2vpn {
encapsulation-type ethernet;
site to-pe1 {
Hi FJ,
The least fill command is for tie breaking in creating a LSP in case of
there are more than one link that are eligible for LSP creation. It is not
for load balancing of the LSP traffic itself.
Regards,
Benny
On 9/26/07, Farhan Jaffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks All,
I have
Hi List,
Is there any differences between 10GE interface using XFP and XENPAK in Juniper?
TIA!
Best regards,
Benny
-
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links.
___
Dear List,
Does 2 Fixed Ethernet port on M7i box support aggregated ethernet?
I'm just curious is it reliable to deploy it if we want to run MPLS IP VPN on
them.
Thanks,
Benny
-
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benny Sumitro
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 2:56 AM
To: juniper milist
Subject: [j-nsp] J-Series Hot Swap capability
Hi list,
Is J Series support operational insertion and removal (OIR) of the
interface like M series router?
Thanks,
Benny
Hi list,
Is J Series support operational insertion and removal (OIR) of the interface
like M series router?
Thanks,
Benny
-
Yahoo! oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links.
Hi All,
Starting from Junos 7.6, Juniper support LDP based signaling for VPLS (per
draft-ietf-l2vpn-ldp-05).
Cheers,
Benny
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:You can read JNCIS book from Sybex on page 650 as
below :
Within the JUNOS software, two main varieties of these VPNs exist. To
help
JUNOS releases do NOT support LDP based signaling for
VPLS.
Regards,
Steven
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Benny Sumitro
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 4:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Hi Sabri,
Thanks for the info.
Cheers,
Benny
Sabri Berisha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:04:05PM
-0800, Benny Sumitro wrote:
Hi Benny,
Sorry for this non-technical issue and rather a stupid question. I just
recently passed my JNCIS-M exam. Can I know my JNCIS number
29 matches
Mail list logo