LinkedIn
Fahad Ali Khan ha solicitado añadirte como contacto en LinkedIn:
--
Me gustaría añadirte a mi red profesional en LinkedIn.
Aceptar invitación de Fahad Ali Khan
http://www.linkedin.com/e/u96119-gp7qs7s9-2d
Hi Guyz
I am facing the problem that one of the router M320 is configured with 2
CBs. CB0 Master connected with External Clock for Synchronization and CB1
used to get sync from CB0, as its lock to CB0 (master). But i am seeing
following message under "show chassis synchronization".
show chassis
Dear Guys
I am working NSM3000 Appliance and its default user/pswd is not working. As
per documentation user: admin & paswd: abc123
As per procedure,
Use the following procedure with the guidance from a JTAC engineer
1.Connect a console device to the console port of the NSMXpress
appliance.
Dear All
Is there any way to configure Psuedowire redundancy in Juniper M/J Series
routing platform using Martini.
Like Cisco has it :
http://www.conft.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_4t/wan/configuration/guide/tpseudo.html
/Fahad
___
juniper-nsp mailing list jun
Guys...!
We are looking for good range of CPE (routers) for Home users & SMBs...and
wish if following features are supported.
- FastEthernet port for WAN & LAN
- 802.1Q Trunking support on both FEs
- IPv4 support (IPv6 is optional)
- PPPoE support on FastEthernet main/Sub-interface (
Guys
Im working on testing of Metro Ethernet Solution and want to integrate it
with Juniper M7i - Gig interface. The main implementation that is required
to configure Q-in-Q (Stacked VLAN setup) over Juniper M7i with Gig Interface
to aggregate MPLS VLANs and carry it to other PE.
Scenario is some
Dear All
I am currently evaluating Juniper SDX-300 software along with other Self
Service Portal/Policy/Resource Management toolslike Broadhop, TAZZ
etc...
Can anyone tell me...Juniper SDX-300 can work for other platforms as same as
for Juniper products...like with Cisco systems 65xx, 76xx, 7
Guys.Im trying to configure MLPPP link (over E1) between two Juniper
M10is in my test lab...and want to discover the possible load (CPU and
Memory) that can survive without any service intruption...but i got stuck in
one place...i have M10is with AS PIC installed. The scenario is very
simple..
Harry
The setup i place in my lab is,
CE1 ---(FE-Vlan) PE1 (E1)--PE2 (FE-Vlan)-CE2
And here is my config of PE1same will be on PE2 (some basic config has
been supressed) VPNs are UP over GRE but no communicationeven PING
with 32 or 56 Bytes got failed.
interf
Dear All
Thanks for you support i also want to start another thread which has ben
questioned alot of time but never answered.
Carrying MPLS VPN [L2VPN (Kompella) and L2cct (Martini)] traffic over GRE
Tunnel.
As it has been proposed in Juniper Documentation that MPLS over GRE is
supported, i
One more question related to Multicalss MLPPP. Suppose if my scenario is
something like following,
PE1 = PE2 PE3
||
||
PE4
In this case, PE2 has total three MLPPP bundles, one with each PE1, PE3 and
>
> Dear Josef
>
> Thanks for your valuable information, and yes you got righti was
> checking on interface extensive, which not showing any Q stats...while on
> *sh interface queue, *the packets are actually going to those specific
> queue.
>
> Kindly can you explain this is little bit detail.
implementing these.
Does any one has the practical implmentation experience to implement CoS
over MLPPP, if yes than please share your sample configuration and comments
on this issue.
Thanks and Regards
Fahad Ali Khan
On 4/16/07, Dan Rautio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fahad,
>
> D
Guysim stuck in implementing CoS over MLPPP link (E1s). My scenario is,
CE---PE===(2E1s MLPPP)===PE---CE
My configuration is as under,
chassis {
fpc 0 {
pic 2 {
adaptive-services {
service-package layer-2;
}
}
}
interfaces {
e1
In our current Network Newbridge 3600 are used for Serial
Aggregation.Beforemigration to MPLS,Intercity E1s was terminated on
NB3600 and the NB3600s
were managed via NMS by Newbridge propriety management protocol
CPSS.Aftershifting E1s to MPLS nodes a UNI is created between Juniper
MPLS Node and
NB
implementations than please share
there solutions and comments.
Regards
Fahad Ali Khan
On 2/8/07, Muhammad Teguh Pribadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think Jacob is right; the problem arose because you had used tcc encap.
> You can see my attached files. Hope it useful fo
t; Rgds
> Alex
>
> ----- Original Message -
> *From:* FAHAD ALI KHAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; juniper-nsp
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:24 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [j-nsp] L2circuit martini issue!
>
>
> Alex.Clea
h the same thing as Cisco IP SLA does.
> Cheers
> Alex
>
>
> ----- Original Message -
> *From:* FAHAD ALI KHAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ; juniper-nsp
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 24, 2007 11:42 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [j-nsp] L2ci
d be able to recognise the failure if it is
> DIRECTLY connected to PE-A and fail over the traffic to protect-interface.
> If there is a L2 switch in between then the whole process should
> be transparent to the client and it should not even notice the failover.
> Is my understanding o
l2circuit
hierarchy). So If PE didnt know abt it and put down Primary link's CCC/TCC,
client cannot use secondary Lastmile.
In this case use of every CE-CE link tracking methodologies will fail.?
Regards
Fahad Ali Khan
On 1/24/07, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fa
BFDfeatures.does they can solve the issue.!
Regards
Fahad Ali Khan
On 1/15/07, Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If Your Client routers support it, FREEK (acronym for Frame-Relay
> End-to-End
> Keepalive) may be what You are looking for...
> Cheers
> Alex
&g
gt; wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 02:42:14PM +0500, FAHAD ALI KHAN wrote:
> > I am amaze to see that Juniper didn't support 6to4 & ISATAP tunneling
> > mechanisms
>
> Especially 6to4 is surprising... it a very trivial, stateless
> encapsulation a Tunn
---
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of FAHAD ALI KHAN
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 3:12 PM
> To: juniper-nsp
> Subject: [j-nsp] IPv6 6to4 tunneling support
>
> Guys...!
>
> I am amaze to see that Juniper didn't support 6to4 & I
Guys!
I have got stuck in a issue regarding MPLS L2circuit (Martini). Here is my
scenario,
L2cct (Martini) has been configured between two MPLS Nodes. Client Site A is
connected directly over E1 at MPLS Node (M10i) and Client Site B is
connected to Frame Relay Switch (New Bridge 3600) over E
Guys...!
I am amaze to see that Juniper didn't support 6to4 & ISATAP tunneling
mechanismsas it is supported by number of other vendors like CISCO,
6WIND, Hitachi...etc...a/c to the RFC 3056.
Can anybody tell me why Juniper is lacking behind other vendor in IPv6
deployment!
Regards
Fahad
25 matches
Mail list logo
